{"id":176196,"date":"2011-03-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011"},"modified":"2018-06-05T20:25:39","modified_gmt":"2018-06-05T14:55:39","slug":"ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"Ms.Samiksha Agrawal vs Ministry Of External Affairs on 9 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ms.Samiksha Agrawal vs Ministry Of External Affairs on 9 March, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                       at\n                                                New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                               File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000304\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a09,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a09,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Ms.Samiksha\u00a0Agarwal\n           H.No.36,\n           Sukh\u00a0Sagar\u00a0Valley\u00a0Pollipather\n           Jabalpur\u00a0482\u00a0008\n           Madhya\u00a0Pradesh\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0appeared\u00a0late\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0left\u00a0the\u00a0Commission.\n\n           Respondents\n\n           Regional\u00a0Passport\u00a0Office\n           Gangotri\u00a0Complex\n           T.T.Nagar\n           Bhopal\u00a0462\u00a0003\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0P.Roy\u00a0Chaudhuri,\u00a0Advocate\u00a0on\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0CPIO\n\n\n\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner              :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                                Decision\u00a0Notice\n\n\n\n\nAs\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0\n                      In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                       at\n                                               New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                 File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000304\n\n\n                                                    ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.    The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.9.6.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0RPO,\u00a0Bhopal\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      information:\n<\/p>\n<p>      i)        Date\u00a0of\u00a0first\u00a0communication\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0your\u00a0office\u00a0to\u00a0HCI\u00a0London\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0application.<\/p>\n<p>      ii)       Dates\u00a0of\u00a0follow\u00a0up\u00a0communication\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0your\u00a0office\u00a0to\u00a0HCI\u00a0London<\/p>\n<p>      iii)      Photocopies\u00a0of\u00a0all\u00a0communications\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0your\u00a0office\u00a0to\u00a0HCI\u00a0London\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0her \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      application.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0     Smt.\u00a0L.K.Vaghela,\u00a0Passport\u00a0Office\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a08.7.10\u00a0\u00a0as\u00a0follows:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      &#8216;In\u00a0this\u00a0connection,\u00a0you\u00a0are\u00a0hereby\u00a0intimated\u00a0that\u00a0you\u00a0have\u00a0not\u00a0given\u00a0any\u00a0clearance\u00a0to \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      your\u00a0previous\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0(seems\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0scanned\u00a0one)\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0sent\u00a0through\u00a0speed \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      post \u00a0 from \u00a0 Andheri \u00a0 (East) \u00a0 Mumbai \u00a0 Post \u00a0 Office \u00a0 and \u00a0 does \u00a0 not \u00a0 have \u00a0 your \u00a0 signature \u00a0 in \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      original\u00a0 on \u00a0 it. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 envelope \u00a0 in \u00a0 which \u00a0 you \u00a0 sent \u00a0 the \u00a0 above \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 application \u00a0 also \u00a0 have \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      remarks\u00a0as:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                          IF\u00a0UNDELIVERED<\/p>\n<p>                          RTI\u00a0NATION<br \/>\n                          C\u00ad803,\u00a0Ambika\u00a0Tower<br \/>\n                          PUMP\u00a0HOUSE,\u00a0JIJAMATA\u00a0ROAD<br \/>\n                          ANDHERI\u00a0(EAST),\u00a0MUMBAI\u00a0400\u00a0093<\/p>\n<p>      On\u00a0the\u00a0basis\u00a0of\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0above,\u00a0it\u00a0seems\u00a0that\u00a0you\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0residing\u00a0in\u00a0Jabalpur\u00a0(M.P)<\/p>\n<p>      The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0vide\u00a0her\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.27.7.10\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0provided\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0clarifications\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      to\u00a0reply\u00a0dt.29.4.10:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<p>        i)         It\u00a0was\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0your\u00a0office\u00a0on\u00a0my\u00a0behalf\u00a0by\u00a0an\u00a0institute\u00a0named\u00a0&#8216;RTI\u00a0Nation&#8217;\u00a0based\u00a0in\u00a0Mumbai.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       ii)        It\u00a0was\u00a0signed\u00a0by\u00a0me,\u00a0scanned\u00a0by\u00a0me\u00a0and\u00a0emailed\u00a0to\u00a0&#8220;RTI\u00a0Nation&#8221;\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0could\u00a0send\u00a0it \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                  to\u00a0your\u00a0office\u00a0on\u00a0my\u00a0behalf.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>\n       In\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0reply\u00a0dt.8.7.10,\u00a0she\u00a0provided\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0clarifications:<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       i)         First\u00a0letter\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0your\u00a0office\u00a0through\u00a0speed\u00a0post\u00a0dated\u00a029.4.10\u00a0(at\u00a0Jabalpur\u00a0address)\u00a0was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                  duly\u00a0received\u00a0and\u00a0signed\u00a0by\u00a0me.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       ii)        My\u00a0second\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0sent\u00a0from\u00a0a\u00a0speed\u00a0post\u00a0centre\u00a0in\u00a0Jabalpur<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       iii)       Second\u00a0letter\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0your\u00a0office\u00a0through\u00a0speed\u00a0post\u00a0dated\u00a08.7.10\u00a0(at\u00a0Jabalpur\u00a0address)\u00a0was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                  duly\u00a0received\u00a0and\u00a0signed\u00a0by\u00a0me.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       iv)        I\u00a0am\u00a0enclosing\u00a0an\u00a0attested\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0my\u00a0address\u00a0proof\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0this\u00a0letter.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                  The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 dt.10.9.10 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 stating \u00a0 that \u00a0 no\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0received\u00a0despite\u00a0providing\u00a0clarifications\u00a0as\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO.\u00a0\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       any\u00a0reply,\u00a0she\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.23.11.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>2.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0neither\u00a0the\u00a0clarification\u00a0nor\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       received\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0passport\u00a0office.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0all\u00a0that\u00a0is\u00a0required\u00a0for\u00a0issuance\u00a0of\u00a0passport\u00a0is\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0complete\u00a0certain\u00a0formalities\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0passport\u00a0office\u00a0al\u00a0also\u00a0a\u00a0police\u00a0verification\u00a0report.\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Respondent\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0sure\u00a0whether\u00a0a\u00a0clear\u00a0police\u00a0verification\u00a0report\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       been\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0passport\u00a0office\u00a0or\u00a0not.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0who\u00a0came\u00a0late\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0left\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       submitted\u00a0that\u00a0she\u00a0had\u00a0lost\u00a0her\u00a0passport\u00a0while\u00a0she\u00a0was\u00a0in\u00a0London\u00a0and\u00a0hence\u00a0has\u00a0applied\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0fresh\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       passport.\u00a0She\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0 \u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0an\u00a0earlier\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0she\u00a0was\u00a0informed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       delay\u00a0in\u00a0issuance\u00a0of\u00a0passport\u00a0was\u00a0because\u00a0the\u00a0passport\u00a0office\u00a0is\u00a0awaiting\u00a0the\u00a0High\u00a0Commission\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       India, \u00a0 London&#8217;s \u00a0 response \u00a0 to \u00a0 certain \u00a0 \u00a0 clarifications \u00a0 the \u00a0 passport \u00a0 office \u00a0 had \u00a0 sought \u00a0 from \u00a0 them.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       According \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 instant \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 application \u00a0 she \u00a0 had \u00a0 only \u00a0 sought \u00a0 the \u00a0 copies \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       communication\u00a0between\u00a0the\u00a0passport\u00a0office\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0HCI,\u00a0London\u00a0regarding\u00a0her\u00a0lost\u00a0passport.\u00a0\u00a0She\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       contended\u00a0\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0passport\u00a0office\u00a0is\u00a0deliberately\u00a0not\u00a0providing\u00a0her\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0she\u00a0has\u00a0requested\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       for\u00a0since\u00a0they\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0written\u00a0at\u00a0all\u00a0to\u00a0HCI,\u00a0London.\u00a0\u00a0She\u00a0also\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0a\u00a0clear\u00a0police\u00a0verification\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       report\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0passport\u00a0officer,\u00a0in\u00a0her\u00a0case.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p> 3.       The\u00a0 Commission\u00a0 after\u00a0 hearing\u00a0 the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0sides\u00a0 \u00a0advises\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0visit\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         passport\u00a0 office\u00a0 as\u00a0 suggested\u00a0 by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0complete\u00a0the\u00a0formalities\u00a0 \u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0holds\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         personal\u00a0hearing\u00a0with\u00a0her.\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0allow\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0her\u00a0file\u00a0when\u00a0she\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         comes \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 personal \u00a0 hearing. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 must \u00a0 be \u00a0 provided \u00a0 with \u00a0 attested \u00a0 copies \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         communication\u00a0between\u00a0the\u00a0 \u00a0Passport\u00a0Office\u00a0and\u00a0HCI,\u00a0London,\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0issuance\u00a0of\u00a0 \u00a0new\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         passport\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0entire\u00a0exercise\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0over\u00a0by\u00a09.4.11\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         compliance\u00a0report\u00a0by\u00a016.4.11.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                    \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                            Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Ms.Samiksha\u00a0Agarwal<br \/>\n         H.No.36,<br \/>\n         Sukh\u00a0Sagar\u00a0Valley\u00a0Pollipather<br \/>\n         Jabalpur\u00a0482\u00a0008<br \/>\n         Madhya\u00a0Pradesh<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\u00a0(along\u00a0with\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.27.7.10)<br \/>\n         Regional\u00a0Passport\u00a0Office<br \/>\n         Gangotri\u00a0Complex<br \/>\n         T.T.Nagar<br \/>\n         Bhopal\u00a0462\u00a0003<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0<br \/>\n         Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0External\u00a0Affairs<br \/>\n         O\/o\u00a0JS(CPV),\u00a0CPV\u00a0Division<br \/>\n         Patiala\u00a0House\u00a0Annexe<br \/>\n         Tilak\u00a0Marg<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi\n<\/p>\n<p> 4.   Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Ms.Samiksha Agrawal vs Ministry Of External Affairs on 9 March, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000304 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a09,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a09,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Ms.Samiksha\u00a0Agarwal H.No.36, Sukh\u00a0Sagar\u00a0Valley\u00a0Pollipather Jabalpur\u00a0482\u00a0008 Madhya\u00a0Pradesh The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0appeared\u00a0late\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0left\u00a0the\u00a0Commission. Respondents Regional\u00a0Passport\u00a0Office Gangotri\u00a0Complex T.T.Nagar Bhopal\u00a0462\u00a0003 Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0P.Roy\u00a0Chaudhuri,\u00a0Advocate\u00a0on\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0CPIO Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000304 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.9.6.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0RPO,\u00a0Bhopal\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0 information: i) Date\u00a0of\u00a0first\u00a0communication\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0your\u00a0office\u00a0to\u00a0HCI\u00a0London\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0application. ii) Dates\u00a0of\u00a0follow\u00a0up\u00a0communication\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0your\u00a0office\u00a0to\u00a0HCI\u00a0London [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-176196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ms.Samiksha Agrawal vs Ministry Of External Affairs on 9 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ms.Samiksha Agrawal vs Ministry Of External Affairs on 9 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-05T14:55:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ms.Samiksha Agrawal vs Ministry Of External Affairs on 9 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-05T14:55:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":772,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011\",\"name\":\"Ms.Samiksha Agrawal vs Ministry Of External Affairs on 9 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-05T14:55:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ms.Samiksha Agrawal vs Ministry Of External Affairs on 9 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ms.Samiksha Agrawal vs Ministry Of External Affairs on 9 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ms.Samiksha Agrawal vs Ministry Of External Affairs on 9 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-05T14:55:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ms.Samiksha Agrawal vs Ministry Of External Affairs on 9 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-05T14:55:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011"},"wordCount":772,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011","name":"Ms.Samiksha Agrawal vs Ministry Of External Affairs on 9 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-05T14:55:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-samiksha-agrawal-vs-ministry-of-external-affairs-on-9-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ms.Samiksha Agrawal vs Ministry Of External Affairs on 9 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=176196"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176196\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=176196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=176196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=176196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}