{"id":176224,"date":"2009-10-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009"},"modified":"2018-12-25T18:16:35","modified_gmt":"2018-12-25T12:46:35","slug":"ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S M G Rangaraja Urs And Co vs D Hajee S M Suhail S\/O Late Syed … on 1 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S M G Rangaraja Urs And Co vs D Hajee S M Suhail S\/O Late Syed … on 1 October, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
 \n\n-:1:-\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 13? DAY OF OCTOBER 2009\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE V.G.SABI-IAHIT\n\nR.F.A.NO.901[2001\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1. M\/S. M.G.RANGARAJA URS & CO..\nREGISTERED PARTNERSHIP CONCERN.\nHAVING ITS OFFICE AT PARIJATHA\nHOUSE, LALITHMAHAL PALACE ROAD.\nMYSORE.\n\n2. SMT.N.BH_ARATHI URS\nD\/O.LATE DEVARAJ URS.\nPARIJATI-IA. LALITHMAHAL ROAD.\nMYSORE.\n\n3. SR.I.U.RAVISHANKAR.\nS\/O.U.S.NARAYANRAO\n\nMAJOR. R\/O.NO.52, 7TH MAIN.\n\n330 BLOCK, JAYALAKSHMIPURAM\n\nMYSORE. .. APPELLANTS\n\n(BY SR1 GBALAKRISHNA SI-IASTRY, ADV.)\n\nAND:\n\nI. SR1. DHAJEE S.M. SUHAIL.\n\nS\/O. LATE SYED MOHENDEEN SAHEB.\nMAJOR, R\/O.D.NO.1049.\nK.R.HOSPITAL ROAD.\n\nMYSORE.\n\n2. SRI.P.M.B.ARA.DHYA.\nS\/O.S.RUDRAIAH, MAJOR.\n\nD NO.26. VISHWANATHA ROAD,\nMADHAVANAGAR.\n\nBANGALORE. .. RESPONDENTS\n\n[BY SRI T.A.KARUMBAIAH. ADVOCATE.)\n\n\n\n \n\n##1##?!\n\nTHIS R.F.A. IS FILED U\/S. 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL\nPROCEDURE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE\nDT.2\/6\/2001 IN O.S.NO.223\/91, ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.\nCIVIL JUDGE [SR.DN.), MYSORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR\nSPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF THE AGREEMENT, FOR\nPERMANENT INJUNCTION AND FOR MANDATORY INJUNCTION.\n\nTHIS APPEAL BEING RESERVED AND COMING ON FOR\nPRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, COURT\nDELIVERED THE FOLLOVVING:\n\nJ U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
This appeal is filed by the defendants l, 2 and 4 in
\nO.S. No.223\/91 on the \ufb01le of the Principal Civil Judge
\n{Sr.Dn.) Mysore, being aggrieved by the judgment and
\ndecree dated 2\/6\/2001 wherein, the trial Court has
\ndecreed the suit of the plaintiff and directed defendants
\nl to 3 to execute the registered lease deed in respect of
\nShop No.6 located at Urs Complex, ground floor and to
\nhand over the vacant possession of the said shop
\npremises to the plaintiff within 3 months from the date<\/p>\n
of the order by collecting the balance advance of<\/p>\n
Rs.l,50,000\/–, failing which plaintiff is at liberty to<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
-:3:-<\/span><\/p>\n
secure the lease deed and the possession of the suit
\nschedule shop from the defendants 1 to 4, through<\/p>\n
Court by depositing the said amount of Rs. l,50,000\/–.\n<\/p>\n
2. The essential facts of the case leading upto this
\nappeal with reference to the rank of the parties before
\nthe trial court are as follows:\n<\/p>\n
The plaintiff filed O.S.223\/91 on the file of the
\nPrl.CiVil Judge (Sr.Dn.], Mysore, on- 20\/9\/1991,
\nseeking for speci\ufb01c performance of agreement dated
\n17\/3\/1987 and for a direction to the defendants to
\nexecute the registered deed of lease and part with
\npossession of the schedule property in favour of the
\nplaintiff and for perpetual injunction restraining the
\ndefendant or any person claiming under him from
\nhanding over possession of the plaint schedule property<\/p>\n
in favour of any person other than the plaintiff and for<\/p>\n
costs and other incidental reliefs.\n<\/p>\n
3. It is averred in the plaint that defendant had<\/p>\n
entered into a long term lease with the Church of South<\/p>\n
\\3..2><\/p>\n
-: 16 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
third person into the suit property
\nillegally?\n<\/p>\n
2] Whether plaintiff proves that the
\ndefendant had entered into an agreement
\nwith him on 17\/3\/1987 as contended in
\npara No.2 of the plaint’?\n<\/p>\n
3] Whether plaintiff proves that court fee<\/p>\n
paid is proper?\n<\/p>\n
8. On behalf of the plaintiff, plaintiff was examined
\nas P.W.1 and got examined P.W.2, who was present at
\nthe time of execution of the agreement and got marked
\nExs.P.l to \u00a33.21 and closed his side. Defendants 1 to 3
\ndid not adduce any oral or documentary evidence in
\nrebuttal to the evidence let in by the plaintiff. The 41″
\ndefendant alone has examined himself as D.W.l and<\/p>\n
got marked EX.D.l and closed his side.\n<\/p>\n
9. The learned Civil Judge after hearing the
\ncontentions of the learned counsel appearing for the
\nparties and after appreciating the oral and documentary
\nevidence placed on record by his judgment. dated
\n2\/6\/2001, answered Issue Nos. 1. 2, 5 and additional<\/p>\n
\\_,.)><\/p>\n
-: 17 :~
\nissue No.1 and 2 in the affirmative and Issue Nos.3 and
\n4 in the negative and issue No.6 as per the \ufb01nal order
\nand accordingly, decreed the suit of the plaintiff by
\npassing the following order:–\n<\/p>\n
“Suit of the plaintiff is decreed with<\/p>\n
costs as under:–\n<\/p>\n
Defendants I to 3 are directed to
\nexecute the registered lease deed in respect
\nof shop No.6 located at Urs Complex, ground
\nfloor and to hand over the possession of the
\nsaid shop premises to the plaintiff within 3
\nmonths from the date of this order by
\ncollecting the balance advance of Rs.l.5O
\nlakhs, failing which the plaintiff is at liberty
\nto secure the lease deed and the possession
\nof the suit schedule shop from the
\ndefendants 1 to 4, through court by
\ndepositing the said amount of Rs.l.5O
\nIakhs.”\n<\/p>\n
10. Being aggrieved by the said judgment and
\ndecree passed by the trial Court, decreeing the suit of<\/p>\n
the plaintiff, the defendants 1, 2 and 4 have preferred<\/p>\n
this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
\\;.J><\/p>\n
-: 18 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
11. I have heard the learned counsel appearing
\nfor the appellants and the learned counsel appearing<\/p>\n
for the respondents.\n<\/p>\n
12. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants
\nsubmitted that the defendants have admitted execution
\nof the lease deed in favour of the plaintiff on
\n17\/3\/1987. The plaintiff has not performed his part of
\nthe contract by paying Rs.50,000\/– and therefore there
\nis breach of contract by the plaintiff himself and the<\/p>\n
agreement of sale and therefore, the agreement was<\/p>\n
rescinded due to ef\ufb02ux of time and the plaintiff cannot
\nmaintain the suit as he is not entitled to any of the
\nreliefs as sought for in the suit. The trial Court has not
\nproperty appremated the oral and documentary evidence
\nplaced on record and the trial Court ought to have
\ndismissed the suit of the plaintiff by answering all<\/p>\n
issues in favour of the defendants.\n<\/p>\n
13. Learned counsel for the respondents<\/p>\n
submitted that the trial Court has passed the judgment<\/p>\n
U)<\/p>\n
~: 20 :-\n<\/p>\n
against the defendants is justified or<\/p>\n
calls for interference in this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
3) Whether the judgment. and decree
\npassed by the trial Court decreeing the
\nsuit in favour of the plaintiff is justified<\/p>\n
or calls for interference in this appeal?\n<\/p>\n
4) What order’?\n<\/p>\n
I answer the above points for determination as follows:-\n<\/p>\n
Point No.1: The finding of the trial Court is justified
\nand does not suffer from any error or illegality as to call<\/p>\n
for interference in this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
Point No.2: The \ufb01nding of the trial Court is<\/p>\n
justified and does not call for interference in this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
Point No.3:- The judgment and decree passed by
\nthe trial Court is justified and does not suffer from error<\/p>\n
or illegality as to call for interference in this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
Point No.4:—- As per the final order.\n<\/p>\n
K23′<\/p>\n
-: 21 :-<\/span>
\nIn View of the answers to Point Nos.1 to 3, the
\nappeal is liable to be dismissed for the following<\/p>\n
I’\u20acElSO1′}SI-\n<\/p>\n
Point Nos.1 to 41- All these points are considered
\ntogether since they are interconnected and to avoid<\/p>\n
repetition.\n<\/p>\n
15. Learned counsel appearing for the
\nappellants has taken me through the pleadings of
\nP.Ws.1 and 2 and the contents of the documents
\nExs.P.1 to \u00a33.21 and also the evidence of the 4″!<\/p>\n
defendant D.W.l and EX.D. 1.\n<\/p>\n
16. I have scrutinized the material on record and
\nreappreciated the oral and documentary evidence
\nadduced before the trial Court in the light of the
\ncontentions urged by the learned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n
the parties in this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
17. it is clear from the scrutiny of the material on<\/p>\n
record including the evidence adduced by the parties<\/p>\n
VJ<\/p>\n
-: 24 :-<\/span>
\nhe was ready and willing to pay Rs.1,50,000\/– second
\ninstalment of amount to be paid to the defendants but
\nthe defendants did not receive the said amount and
\nrepresented to the plaintiff that the said amount can be
\npaid at the time of registration of the lease deed and
\npossession would be given to him as per the agreement
\nand therefore, in the absence of any evidence elicited in
\nthe cross–examination of P.W.1 to disbelieve the
\nevidence regarding readiness and willingness to
\nperform the contract and in the absence of any oral
\nand documentary evidence adduced by defendants 1 to
\n3, it is clear that the contention of the plaintiff that he
\nwas ready and willing to perform his part of the contract<\/p>\n
has been proved.\n<\/p>\n
19. The evidence of defendant. No.4, would not be
\nof any help to the defendants l to 3 as it is not open to
\nthe subsequent purchaser to raise any objections
\nregarding readiness and willingness on the part of the
\nplaintiff and performed his part of the contract as per<\/p>\n
the decision of the Horfble Supreme Court reported in<\/p>\n
\\,.)~.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S M G Rangaraja Urs And Co vs D Hajee S M Suhail S\/O Late Syed … on 1 October, 2009 Author: V.G.Sabhahit -:1:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13? DAY OF OCTOBER 2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE V.G.SABI-IAHIT R.F.A.NO.901[2001 BETWEEN: 1. M\/S. M.G.RANGARAJA URS & […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-176224","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S M G Rangaraja Urs And Co vs D Hajee S M Suhail S\/O Late Syed ... on 1 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S M G Rangaraja Urs And Co vs D Hajee S M Suhail S\/O Late Syed ... on 1 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-25T12:46:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S M G Rangaraja Urs And Co vs D Hajee S M Suhail S\\\/O Late Syed … on 1 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-25T12:46:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1255,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S M G Rangaraja Urs And Co vs D Hajee S M Suhail S\\\/O Late Syed ... on 1 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-25T12:46:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S M G Rangaraja Urs And Co vs D Hajee S M Suhail S\\\/O Late Syed … on 1 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S M G Rangaraja Urs And Co vs D Hajee S M Suhail S\/O Late Syed ... on 1 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S M G Rangaraja Urs And Co vs D Hajee S M Suhail S\/O Late Syed ... on 1 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-25T12:46:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S M G Rangaraja Urs And Co vs D Hajee S M Suhail S\/O Late Syed … on 1 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-25T12:46:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009"},"wordCount":1255,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009","name":"M\/S M G Rangaraja Urs And Co vs D Hajee S M Suhail S\/O Late Syed ... on 1 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-25T12:46:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-m-g-rangaraja-urs-and-co-vs-d-hajee-s-m-suhail-so-late-syed-on-1-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S M G Rangaraja Urs And Co vs D Hajee S M Suhail S\/O Late Syed … on 1 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176224","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=176224"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176224\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=176224"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=176224"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=176224"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}