{"id":176368,"date":"2000-07-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2000-07-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000"},"modified":"2016-07-13T01:09:42","modified_gmt":"2016-07-12T19:39:42","slug":"agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000","title":{"rendered":"Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Pholu &amp; Others on 27 July, 2000"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Delhi High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Pholu &amp; Others on 27 July, 2000<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 2000 VIIAD Delhi 1155<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Khan<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: B Khan<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p>Khan, J.<\/p>\n<p>1.     It is all about a wall proposed to be constructed by petitioner on the road  starting  from  G.T. Karnal Road upto New  Azadpur  Railway  Station. Petitioner  claims  it  to be part and parcel of Subzi  Mandi  and  invokes powers to regulate ingress and outguess on it. Respondents say it is public pathway which runs through &#8220;Abadideh&#8221; of their village and on which some of their houses and shops about. According to them petitioner and also the DDA had proposed to construct a wall on this sometime in 1979 also constraining some  of  them to file suit against them which ended up into  a  compromise whereby  parties agreed to raise an Iron girder railing in front  of  shops instead of a brick wall. But ignoring all this, petitioner had renewed  its attempt to reconstruct the wall in place of iron railing which would result in demolition of their shops or blocking access to these.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.   Respondents filed CS No. 583\/79 to stop this along with an application for  ad-interim injunction which was resisted by petitioner  disputing  any compromise  between  the parties in the past and claiming the road  as  its property  which  was dismissed by Trial court declining  grant  of  interim stay. Respondents took appeal against this and Appellate court on consideration of the matter took the view that respondents&#8217; suit would be  rendered infructuous  if  the  interim relief was not granted to  them.  The  court, accordingly,  restrained  petitioner herein from constructing the  wall  in place  of Iron-railing but at the same time left it free to clear  any  encroachment made by respondents on the road.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.   Petitioner  is aggrieved of this order and has filed this revision  to assail it.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.   Petitioner&#8217;s  counsel, Ms. Pinky Anand attacked the impugned order  on the  ground  that it had proceeded on an imaginary compromise  between  the parties.  According to her respondents were trespassers on the  land  which admittedly belonged to petitioner and they were not entitled to any protection  whatever. Nor could they ask for the regulation of movement on  Mandi land  in a particular way. She relied upon AIR 1993 Delhi 359 and AIR  1996 Delhi  351  to urge that a trespasser could not seek injunction  against  a true owner.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.   Mr.  Lonial, on the other hand, traced the history of dispute  between the parties which was resolved by a mutual settlement in earlier revisional proceedings  before  this Court. He submitted that so long  as  respondents claimed  a  right of access on the road, it could not  be  blocked  pending adjudication of the issue.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.   I  have  examined both the orders passed by the courts below  and  the disagreement  between them indicates the boarder line nature of the  matter. It  may be true that Trial Court&#8217;s view declining interim  injunction  also proceeded on a sound reasoning but the other view taken by Appellate  court appears more mature and sound.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.   The  issue  is  not whether the land covered by the  road  belongs  to petitioner  but  whether the road was a public pathway as asserted  by  respondents. So long as it remained to be determined by Trial Court, respondents&#8217;  interest  was required to be protected or else they  would  be  nonsuited. Therefore, even going by the legal propositions pressed in  service by  Ms. Anand, survival of respondents&#8217; suit deserved attention and an  adinterim  injunction to restrain petitioner from raising a wall in place  of iron-railing till the decision in the suit. There can be no two views  that non-grant of such injunction would render respondents&#8217; suit infructuous  as found  by  Appellate court in its order which is affirmed.  However,  Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of suit and to see it though within six  months  from receipt of this order. Revision Petition  is  accordingly dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Pholu &amp; Others on 27 July, 2000 Equivalent citations: 2000 VIIAD Delhi 1155 Author: Khan Bench: B Khan ORDER Khan, J. 1. It is all about a wall proposed to be constructed by petitioner on the road starting from G.T. Karnal Road upto New Azadpur Railway Station. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-176368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Agricultural Produce Market ... vs Pholu &amp; Others on 27 July, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs Pholu &amp; Others on 27 July, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2000-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-12T19:39:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Pholu &amp; Others on 27 July, 2000\",\"datePublished\":\"2000-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-12T19:39:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000\"},\"wordCount\":648,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000\",\"name\":\"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs Pholu &amp; Others on 27 July, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2000-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-12T19:39:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Pholu &amp; Others on 27 July, 2000\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs Pholu &amp; Others on 27 July, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs Pholu &amp; Others on 27 July, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2000-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-12T19:39:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Pholu &amp; Others on 27 July, 2000","datePublished":"2000-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-12T19:39:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000"},"wordCount":648,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000","name":"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs Pholu &amp; Others on 27 July, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2000-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-12T19:39:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-pholu-others-on-27-july-2000#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Agricultural Produce Market &#8230; vs Pholu &amp; Others on 27 July, 2000"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=176368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176368\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=176368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=176368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=176368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}