{"id":176430,"date":"2009-07-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-04-26T06:58:08","modified_gmt":"2017-04-26T01:28:08","slug":"n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"N Bharathi Kaliammal W\/O G … vs Principal Secretary Central Silk … on 29 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
N Bharathi Kaliammal W\/O G … vs Principal Secretary Central Silk … on 29 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.L.Manjunath And Malimath<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH comm\" OF KARNATAKA AT sANGALo:\u00a7E.T%\n\nDATED THIS THE 29*\" MY or LSULY, 2os3:9%%  :   \n\nPRESENT \n\nTHE HOWBLE MR..msT1cE s{.*:..\ufb01A#N3u\ufb01A*m. = \"  \n\nAND\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR\u00bb.a3_Usir?\u00a3CEA.'RAV1n.MALiMAT:s:\nwar: APPEAL 1%N_ga.17<~~o2%T%9F'\u00bb--2,gg.;3_(s_ -1351\n\n \n\nBETWEEN :\n\nSmt. N. Bharathi Ka$i'ammai'=_ \nAged abo;I.i_';Z Bouyears" ~\n\nWZGQ. Rav'ichaAnd%ar  **** \n\nR\/at NVre  560 068.  APPELLANT\n\n M  %imsn%.;. satnisn Kumar & Sri T.R.Sridhar\n Ady'eca'tes)\n\n\n\n\" i\ufb01aljjunath 3;,_. Delivered the following-\n\nAND:\n\n1.<\/pre>\n
 The Principal Secretary
\nCentral Silk Board
\n(:58 Complex, BTM Layout,
\nMadiwala,
\nBangalore – 560 068.\n<\/p>\n
2. The Chairman
\nCentral Silk Board
\nMinistry of Textiles,
\n(3558 Complex, BTM Layout
\nMadiwaia, Bangalore —- 560 068.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3. The Central Silk Board,  <\/p>\n
Represented by the Secretary’ _<\/p>\n
Ministry of Textiles,    –.  ‘<\/p>\n
CS8 Complex, BTM layqixt, ~_  V  <\/p>\n
Madlwaia, Bangalore — 553 (3f5f$.;’ _  –.<\/p>\n
     ” ..’.”R.ESPONDENTS<\/p>\n
(By Sri lA\u00e9a:…_isl.vflled under section 4 of the
\nKarnataka High Cqurt Act praying to set aside the order
\npassed  in –v.,Vthe\u00ab w.rit Petition No.2135S\/’2000 dated<\/p>\n
29\/as\/2eo3.tl’;,_ <\/p>\n
Thl\u00e9 ..a””pp\u00e9Va\ufb01l coming on for hearing this day,<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
l|.!D.\u00a7.B.EHI<\/p>\n
The appe\ufb02ant is chaiienging the iegality ahd–::.fth\u00e9.,_’<\/p>\n
correctness of the order passed in Writ  *<\/p>\n
No.3-11355\/2000 dated 29″‘ August, zoos, wh\u00e9r\u00a7i”n7.tn\u00e9”wr:t A’<\/p>\n
Petition \ufb02ied by the appelkant herein {Seen<\/p>\n
confirming the order of punishhje-ht  on the<\/p>\n
disciptinary authority anq whlcht.h.efs.been cotn\ufb01riiheofi by the
\nappehate authority.  h’ V <\/p>\n
2. The faotsiieadihg\ufb02tto’   hereunden.<\/p>\n
The aptoeit\u00e9.-mV1;_’VA3’was.,:hrorkir:g as Assistant Professor
\n(Technicamn xnettgrmte:tt%cen:ran sux Board, Bangaiore.<\/p>\n
On a gzompiairitr-.rrraoe ii\u00e9f her imrnediatesuperior she was<\/p>\n
I-‘i\u00a2_ suspVehd\u00e9?i’ pfeneing voeeartmehtai enquiry. Accordingiy, a<\/p>\n
 served on her 21-5-1998. The nature<\/p>\n
  of oharoes’Eei&~elted against the appe\ufb02ent was that she was<\/p>\n
Z””~..Ve’rrogaht-…’end had exhibited extreme insubordlnation<\/p>\n
47<\/span><\/p>\n
A  ft\u00e9wares her immediate Gf\ufb01cer Smtxtgshame Giridharam<\/p>\n
(V<\/p>\n
Officer the disciplinary authority after hearing the appeliarit<\/p>\n
passed an order on Li-3-1999 imposing punishment of<\/p>\n
reduction in annual increment for a period of one year<\/p>\n
treating the period of suspension as <\/p>\n
Challenging the punishment Imposed on her’**sh:e~_..fl’led\u00aban_:” v. <\/p>\n
appeal before the appellate authprity-.eAA.fiv <\/p>\n
authority dismissed the appeai__ on’<\/p>\n
aggrieved by the same, the  was’  The
\nteamed Single Judge by    noAAanebiguity
\nin the charge andthe  td…h’a5ige’V”been proved,
\ndismissed the ‘”‘.;CIh_atl:en:_iingi\u00e9the Eegality and
\nthe   “passed by the learned Single
\nJudge, the upresent a_pr:’eai:l’s tiled.<\/p>\n
  ..4.~v._ffhe*\u00ab.:leva.rned counsel for the appeilant contends<\/p>\n
“the.vdVisg:ip’iiinvary authority, the appellate authority as<\/p>\n
Lpweil as..the learned Single Judge have failed to consider the<\/p>\n
 “..jije\u00a7fiden’ce”‘let~in by the management. According to him, the<\/p>\n
  Ofhcer as well as the disciplinary authority so also<\/p>\n
5\/<\/p>\n
the appeliate authority including the learned Singie dideot<\/p>\n
censider the evidence let-in by the management….:4’_-1’f’\u00ab\u00abthe”\u00ab <\/p>\n
evidence iet-in by the management had been  t<\/p>\n
the authorities would not have impesed”the’~punisth}’nent’:ent’R<\/p>\n
the appellant as the appeiiant has net <\/p>\n
wrong while discharging her*.._.;d’Vbties not
\nbehaved in an arrogafntA_ manner%  herV””is’m}~riediate
\nsuperiors. on account i ttwtorigketgreejatlon of the
\nevidence and.  management
\nwitnesses the   by demoting
\nher to ei’io”wer;  requests this Court to
\nperuse tithe  to find out whether the<\/p>\n
evidence iet\u00e9’-in  eepreciated by the authorities and<\/p>\n
-‘”~..v\\genet_i”}er;\u00bb_.t:heve_ appueii’ee.tA\u00abhas discharged her duties properiy<\/p>\n
5.  contra, the learned counsei for the<\/p>\n
:’.responden”ts, by producing the original records submits<\/p>\n
 ‘th_Vat~ the aiiegations made against the appeiiant is a case of<\/p>\n
of”\n<\/p>\n
work assigned to her on 17-4-1998 and 22-451998. The
\n. v\\\u00bb0’j(i’L::[f{:’  W”\n<\/p>\n
articles of charge does not contain the work assigned to
\nV\\ <\/p>\n
the appellant by Smt.K:-mama Giridharan, on 17-4+t1e\u00a7_Se.._<\/p>\n
and 224-1993, in order to find out whether’<\/p>\n
instructiehs given by the Deputy Dirxtof of Statietft\ufb01evas ht  <\/p>\n
carried out by the appellant or not. lie’ the e\u00a71tui’:’e_.’aft:-:ti$f-eaf <\/p>\n
charge the detaiis of work assIgh_ed_V by Vth.e”Depet:\u00a7  <\/p>\n
which was refused by the appeIlaht”‘hve$.Vhot tliseiosed.
\nSmt.Kshama Giridharan  been  s.w.1. In<\/p>\n
her examination-in-thief she\ufb01eee. higti\u00e9i\ufb01ut the work<\/p>\n
assigned ivte’Vtthei%viavp;;\u00a7\u00e9}ieht-end tnanner in which the
\nappellant  \u00ab!3eha\\V(ettj In the cross–examination<\/p>\n
it was $u90est*ed te VhverAAt_het”nVSmt.K% ashma Girtdharen had<\/p>\n
Xthe epzpeileht’**te’type certain papers manuaiiy on<\/p>\n
 she has given an answer that she<\/p>\n
  never__”ia”ske_d;’tihetlappellant to type on manual typewriter.<\/p>\n
 hashaise answered in the cross-examination that<\/p>\n
  t-g{p\u00a7n:gt”%rtres not the job entrusted to the appaiant. She has<\/p>\n
W,<\/p>\n
not given any details of the work assigne\u00e9 to the agapehant<\/p>\n
an 17’-‘*’ April and 22″” April, of 1993.<\/p>\n
3. One Sri S\ufb02anjunda Sastry, Statisticiah’;~.:has.:t:;\u00a7\u00e9n’   <\/p>\n
examined as S.W.2. In his cross-eX a’t7’avifs\u00abatiIc>n.1:hag._ha’s_7<\/p>\n
admitted that in his presence, Smt.v4Ex’…AB:\u00a7harath.f..”.K\u00e9iia’rrtr1\u00a7\u00e9’ivht’V<\/p>\n
has not exhibited any arroganc\u00e9s\u00abs.h:ut he. has ‘atso
\nthat she has refused tattje..’_work”\u00a7;,’Vt.:’j__  2?-‘4\u00a51’\u00a7’98 and
\nthis he has Eezarnt from the; sg\ufb01utyjin:$\u00a7\u00a24:qr{statist:cs) and
\nfurther he has Ixaliamn-ya: has
\nrefused to tyif\u00e9s  her job.\n<\/p>\n
 Ramashesh who is
\nworking \u00e9s steheg:fa.Vg:jn\u00a7e;rgtt\u00e9cned to the Oeputy Director<\/p>\n
of statistics”sectao\u00a7n. she has deposed in the cross-<\/p>\n
 ‘exan\ufb01\ufb01atxon that \u00a7h'”1’7″‘ and 22″‘ of April, 1993, that she<\/p>\n
“i1.as__s’.fef\u00a3jse:\u00a25’v'”tt>: ‘\u00a7,*o the work assigned by the Deputy<\/p>\n
Difectsr.  cross-examination she has admitted that<\/p>\n
7-*4.___Smt.Bhar\u00a7thi Kaiiammal has refused to type the tatter on<\/p>\n
  that it is not her jab. S.W.4 is one<\/p>\n
5*’<\/p>\n
-12..\n<\/p>\n
the opinion that there is insubordination or arrogant
\nbehaviour at best the appeiiant shouid have been<\/p>\n
censured.\n<\/p>\n
13.. In the resuit, the appgal. is ai_\u00a7dw\u00e9<\u00a7'_';vaii'd  \u00a7:he– _ "<\/p>\n
orders passed by the appellate auvi:Ah'or;'_ty~:aI\u00e9'u. th\u00e9' !\u00a7"aQV:V'_r..e\u00e9i1I.j<\/p>\n
Singie Judge are hereby s\u00e9t'*~..\u00a7sid\u00e9!=. .:e:\u00a7\u00e9&ifingVVV {ha<\/p>\n
appeuant. The ag\ufb01pellant is erxtsV_a',_i4_ie5't\u00a3.:_1_'n_:7of post
\nand punishment imposew\/:%’;;y  authority is<\/p>\n
herebv set aside\u00bb. and th\u00e9.ifaPP\u00a7f\u00a73\\\ufb01ii’v_ i%\u00a7 ‘\u00bbv\u00e9”\ufb01titied to ail<\/p>\n
conseq1;\u00e92″ri’fiVa’lT’  .’ <\/p>\n
Sd\/~
\nJUDGE<\/p>\n
Sd\/4
\nEUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court N Bharathi Kaliammal W\/O G … vs Principal Secretary Central Silk … on 29 July, 2009 Author: K.L.Manjunath And Malimath IN THE HIGH comm” OF KARNATAKA AT sANGALo:\u00a7E.T% DATED THIS THE 29*” MY or LSULY, 2os3:9%% : PRESENT THE HOWBLE MR..msT1cE s{.*:..\ufb01A#N3u\ufb01A*m. = ” AND THE HON’BLE MR\u00bb.a3_Usir?\u00a3CEA.’RAV1n.MALiMAT:s: war: APPEAL 1%N_ga.17<~~o2%T%9F'\u00bb–2,gg.;3_(s_ -1351 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-176430","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nN Bharathi Kaliammal W\/O G ... vs Principal Secretary Central Silk ... on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"N Bharathi Kaliammal W\/O G ... vs Principal Secretary Central Silk ... on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-26T01:28:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"N Bharathi Kaliammal W\\\/O G … vs Principal Secretary Central Silk … on 29 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-26T01:28:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1036,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009\",\"name\":\"N Bharathi Kaliammal W\\\/O G ... vs Principal Secretary Central Silk ... on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-26T01:28:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"N Bharathi Kaliammal W\\\/O G … vs Principal Secretary Central Silk … on 29 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"N Bharathi Kaliammal W\/O G ... vs Principal Secretary Central Silk ... on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"N Bharathi Kaliammal W\/O G ... vs Principal Secretary Central Silk ... on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-26T01:28:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"N Bharathi Kaliammal W\/O G … vs Principal Secretary Central Silk … on 29 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-26T01:28:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009"},"wordCount":1036,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009","name":"N Bharathi Kaliammal W\/O G ... vs Principal Secretary Central Silk ... on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-26T01:28:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-bharathi-kaliammal-wo-g-vs-principal-secretary-central-silk-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"N Bharathi Kaliammal W\/O G … vs Principal Secretary Central Silk … on 29 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176430","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=176430"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176430\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=176430"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=176430"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=176430"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}