{"id":176605,"date":"2009-05-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009"},"modified":"2017-08-27T09:09:38","modified_gmt":"2017-08-27T03:39:38","slug":"ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Ramagondanahalli &#8230; vs The Agriculture Poduce Marketing &#8230; on 19 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Ramagondanahalli &#8230; vs The Agriculture Poduce Marketing &#8230; on 19 May, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<pre>..3\"..\n\nm THE HIGH \u20ac1(}UR'1' op KARNATAKA, BANGAz;:3;:%;=:. \"'  \n\nDATED THIS ON THE 19TH 1);{;1?'{\u00a7}r\u00ab~ 2sa;a\u00a5L;2{i\u00a7:z3%%A   \n\nBEFORE\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUS'i'\"I\u20ac::::i\u00a72\u00bb A.S.\u00a73f\ufb01PA--\u00a7F~I?i}\u20acg_: H \n\nWP NO M1322  _\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nmama.-\n\nM\/S RAM-AC\u00e9C}I\u00a2;325gN'9\u00a7}1.;\u00a7\u00a3;LI '-M\u00a7mEs:\u00e9W'ARAPPA 3:\u00bb\nsons \" 2 '}.*b.'' 2'\n\n     . V\n\n\"D\" BLOCK; R.M,\"(;'...'1-'\u00bb\ufb01\u00a3},\" QAVANAGERE\nREP BY  PA'RT}'*~TER \" '\nH.SIDDAFi?A\"S,\/C? M-VAH-ESHWARAPPA\n\nAqgzab ABOU*Ef\u00a7\u20ac) YEARS  PETYFIQNER\n\n {B34 si\u00e9j:  :\u00a7:;;.R\u00a7:3I--i}\n\nANE. \n\n \u00bb~.........-um\n\n\" , '*:'_3Q_Iv'\u00a3MI'i''1'EE\n*  'DAYANAGERE\n'BY ITS SECRETARY\n\nTI\"~iE\"A{\"3RICULTU}?E PODUCE MARKETENG\n\nV ' \"i'i-IE DIRECPUR\n\nAGRICULTURAL MARKETING\nNCI9, RAJABHAVAN RQAD\n\nBANGALQRE ... RESPQ\u00a3~5DEN'I'S\n\n(BY SR1: H.K.THIMMEGGWDA}\n\n\u00e9\n\n\n\nTHIS W? FEED FRAYING TO:~\n\nQUASH THE ORDER ::.~'1'.4.:n.a&amp;:; 'E*ASE5\u00a7E1\u00a7   '\n\nRESPONDENT MARKED AS ANN-G Ti? T 3\u00e9}E'a5 '  <\/pre>\n<p>QUASH THE CIRCULAR DT.11j4.~{\u00a78, &#8216;i:3,suEI&gt;T.&#8221;\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7f v &#8216;4_IV&#8217;_.14~ili&#8217;\u00a7 \u00a72, &#8216;=.<br \/>\nMARKED AS ANN~D, To me WP;&#8217;Sf3, FAR AS*PE&#8217;_1&#8217;ITION&#8217;ER is *<\/p>\n<p>CONCERNEI). s<br \/>\nQUASH THE REsc&gt;Lt:TIG;~i?&#8217; D&#8217;i?.2&#8217;&amp;3&#8242;.$\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;i}8v, PASSED BY THE<\/p>\n<p>RE&#8217;E3PQN]I)EN&#8221;I&#8217;S 0? SUBJECT\u00bb NQ15  AS ANNE, To<br \/>\nTHE WP, SO FAR A$&#8217;~}?ETfF\u20ac}E=EE&#8217;R i_S_&#8217;i;_&#8217;:_ON_QEE=ZNED.<\/p>\n<p>THIS PE*rrr1::&gt;::\u00a7.* MV.:::;f\u00a7=r\u00bb\u00a7ii:$i;is .\u00e9\u00a73.&#8217;:r::\u00ab;ARING THIS BAY, THE<br \/>\ncoum DELEEEREB -..I_*&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;&lt;71_&#039;_}_;&#039;.&#039;Z.&#039;*&#039;E)&#039;.t.3_&#039;_.\u00e9&#039;_\u00a7HI_\\;I.,&#039;i..&quot;}: &#8211;<\/p>\n<p> f g\u00a7bEn<br \/>\n   iH.i&#039;\\&#039;*~. T\ufb02i\ufb01ainevgowda standing 123013118621 for the<\/p>\n<p>F\u20ac\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7)f5\u00a7,}{i\u00e9i?iS-.i2\u20ac;k\u00a3i$ \ufb02\u20aci1Zit1\u20ac. The learned counsel is ganted 6<\/p>\n<p> &#039; A week-3  ,t-.23 :i\u00b0:i\u00a7eT&#039;%vaka1at.\n<\/p>\n<p>   If: the instant writ petitimti the petitioners art: cailed in<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;::\u00a7g1,1:\u00b0:e?;&#8217;%i\u00a33I1 the arder dated 04\/11\/2008 whizzh i3 itzapirzgied at<\/p>\n<p>LL &#8221; &#8220;:&#8217;&amp;i1nexL33:*e~{3 t0 the petition. By the said ersziar th-3 r\ufb01spontiems<\/p>\n<p>hava canmiied an\u00e9 forfeited the plat Whiiih was ailmtted hi) fh\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>L<\/p>\n<p>*3<\/p>\n<p>petitienars aliegng vioiatian of terms sf g&#8217;a:r:t;. O11 sizniiar<\/p>\n<p>orders being issued to cttrtain other ailetees, they <\/p>\n<p>this court in WP N0. 3200\/ 111009 and v.:~m1:11eci:(:d 1i&#8221;:%1:i:t+c}1j\ufb01.VVL&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>court after cunsidering the rival &lt;:01&#039;;t\u00e9f\u00a7ii:ii)&#039;;*15s  <\/p>\n<p>writ p\u00e9titi\ufb01fl, isstaing the fuliowijng difegiiazxs  <\/p>\n<p>hereunder:\n<\/p>\n<p>1) The writ wtitions \ufb01led  .c:eIlor\u00a7}\u00a7:-3c\u00a5\u00b0fVV<\/p>\n<p>2) The impugnertd \u00e9rrsier \u00e9i&#8211;a:tgi:3.&#8217;L_\u00ab?%?\u00a5&#8221;\u00a3*&amp;&#8217;ov\u00a73niber 2008 passed by<br \/>\nfirst respundeiizt c:i&#8217;.&#8217;7r*-7-:s.\u00a3Ic2.r. ciateti&#8212;&#8211;1.l&#8221;&#8216;i April 2008 issued by<br \/>\nsewnd res;-67:&#8217;dez1i;, i$1;z5&#8243;~\u00ab.ffe:soEutio:2 dated 2933 August<br \/>\n2008 pct:-:s&#8217;ed by ih,e%_fi::si&#8217;Tre\u00a3;;;2oncie12t under subject No. 2.5<br \/>\nand the o;;m;~ orde?\u00a7&#8217;d\u00a7:ie._d&#8221; 125&#8242; October 2088 passed by<br \/>\nsecond resin&#8217;-r,&gt;ndenf__ o,r;Eg;&#8230;iizscfar as fherse petitianers are<br \/>\nwzzagivta\u00e9, c7::rev;;il &#8216;}zere;\u00a5.:y set aside:<\/p>\n<p>   remitted back to \ufb01rst respoiident for<\/p>\n<p> fr:a\u00e9\u20acbnsii:?.er:::i&#8217;i:;n*&#8211;. cf the matter cz\ufb01resh cmci ta take<br \/>\n&#8216;k\ufb01pprupfirit-g_  after a\ufb01crding reasanable<br \/>\noppaitunitygafhearing ta these petitiarnerzs and dispase of<br \/>\n_ the $am_fe7 &#8216;tr:  oompliwme of the reieyant provisiuns af<br \/>\n Ai:t and Rules, keeping in view {he waif settle\ufb02<\/p>\n<p> , &#8220;\u00a3&#8217;e.t&#8217;t:.r_  down by this Court mid Apex Court, \ufb01ncluding<\/p>\n<p> =.&#8221;:\u00a7;e &#8220;egrczer passed by the Biwlsion Bench sf this Cami:<br \/>\n_  dated 19&#8243;&#8216; Eeeember 2007&#8242; passed in Writ Appea\u00e9 N0.<br \/>\n&#8221; 115.16 cf 260?&#8217; ( N11&#8242;. Szzrmashekhztzr Vs. The Agziczzitzimti<\/p>\n<p>VT  &#8221; -&#8220;Rroduce Market Cornmittee and ofhers}<\/p>\n<p>3  Those petitioners who maid in}: ebtm\u00e9rz Sanctiorteiri pian,<\/p>\n<p>stash petitioners are yerrnitted to file czpplmcztions seeking<br \/>\nsamztion, cf the pian to take up ctznsiructzkyri as per the<\/p>\n<p>J<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;O<\/p>\n<p>3. Sinc\ufb01 the facts 311 the _p1&#8243;\u20ac:s:\u20ac:r;i. cam art: si\ufb01ziiar to \ufb02&#8221;}fi<\/p>\n<p>facts considered by &#8216;rIt1is court: in the said writ r3e%&#8217;:it.i:)_;:::s:w_jf:i{:h.<\/p>\n<p>were disposed on 06\/02\/2009, this Writ petgz\u00e9ia\ufb01 <\/p>\n<p>disposed in similar terms. Ac:mrd_i.n.g1y, i:31ii;}i_:gi&#8217;1r:ii*~ v\u00e9;r\u00e91e:*&#8221; &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>dated 04\/ 11\/2009 stands quashed.\n<\/p>\n<p>issued in W? N0. 3200\/2009 .s;o1n:es%ce:1%:;\u00a7;\u00a7;t\u00e9\u00a2x*s..xv;hich%vZ&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>was disposed on {)6\/02\/ 2999 w}1Vic1iV:A&#8217;are&#8221;&#8216;r;;:tr\ufb01CtariAA a\ufb01bve shaii<br \/>\nalso bald good in the \u00a7i&#8217;wi\u00e91t3:  conapliance<\/p>\n<p>i111 the same terms.\n<\/p>\n<p>In t\u00e9:I*ii3s&#8221;z3f t1&#8217;1\u00e9[$etition $m,:&#8217;:_f.f.<\/p>\n<p>No order as t0E(:i:a\u00a7\u00a7t&#8217;s.,   A<br \/>\n    sa\/..\n<\/p>\n<p>Iudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court M\/S Ramagondanahalli &#8230; vs The Agriculture Poduce Marketing &#8230; on 19 May, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna ..3&#8243;.. m THE HIGH \u20ac1(}UR&#8217;1&#8242; op KARNATAKA, BANGAz;:3;:%;=:. &#8220;&#8216; DATED THIS ON THE 19TH 1);{;1?'{\u00a7}r\u00ab~ 2sa;a\u00a5L;2{i\u00a7:z3%%A BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUS&#8217;i'&#8221;I\u20ac::::i\u00a72\u00bb A.S.\u00a73f\ufb01PA&#8211;\u00a7F~I?i}\u20acg_: H WP NO M1322 _ BETWEEN: mama.- M\/S RAM-AC\u00e9C}I\u00a2;325gN&#8217;9\u00a7}1.;\u00a7\u00a3;LI &#8216;-M\u00a7mEs:\u00e9W&#8217;ARAPPA 3:\u00bb sons &#8221; 2 &#8216;}.*b.&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-176605","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Ramagondanahalli ... vs The Agriculture Poduce Marketing ... on 19 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Ramagondanahalli ... vs The Agriculture Poduce Marketing ... on 19 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-27T03:39:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Ramagondanahalli &#8230; vs The Agriculture Poduce Marketing &#8230; on 19 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-27T03:39:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":613,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Ramagondanahalli ... vs The Agriculture Poduce Marketing ... on 19 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-27T03:39:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Ramagondanahalli &#8230; vs The Agriculture Poduce Marketing &#8230; on 19 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Ramagondanahalli ... vs The Agriculture Poduce Marketing ... on 19 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Ramagondanahalli ... vs The Agriculture Poduce Marketing ... on 19 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-27T03:39:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Ramagondanahalli &#8230; vs The Agriculture Poduce Marketing &#8230; on 19 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-27T03:39:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009"},"wordCount":613,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009","name":"M\/S Ramagondanahalli ... vs The Agriculture Poduce Marketing ... on 19 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-27T03:39:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-ramagondanahalli-vs-the-agriculture-poduce-marketing-on-19-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Ramagondanahalli &#8230; vs The Agriculture Poduce Marketing &#8230; on 19 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176605","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=176605"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176605\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=176605"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=176605"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=176605"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}