{"id":176678,"date":"2009-03-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009"},"modified":"2017-05-05T09:15:35","modified_gmt":"2017-05-05T03:45:35","slug":"har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Har Sukh vs Lakshmi Chand on 3 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Har Sukh vs Lakshmi Chand on 3 March, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>RSA No. 4068 of 2002                   1\n\n        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA\n                     AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                          RSA No. 4068 of 2002\n                          Decided on :03-03-2009\n\nHar Sukh\n                                                      ....Appellant\n\n                   VERSUS\n\nLakshmi Chand\n                                                      ....Respondent<\/pre>\n<p>CORAM:- HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER<\/p>\n<p>Present:-   Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the appellant<\/p>\n<p>            Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate for the respondent<\/p>\n<p>MAHESH GROVER, J<\/p>\n<p>            This is plaintiff&#8217;s second appeal directed against the judgements<\/p>\n<p>of the learned Trial Court dated 13.1.2001 and that of the First Appellate<\/p>\n<p>Court dated 28.8.2002.\n<\/p>\n<p>            The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for permanent injunction<\/p>\n<p>seeking to restrain the respondent from raising any construction on the<\/p>\n<p>disputed property by alleging that the land is joint between all the co-sharers<\/p>\n<p>which has not been partitioned and that the respondent cannot raise any<\/p>\n<p>construction to the detriment of other co-sharers.<\/p>\n<p>            The respondent who was on notice denied all the allegations<\/p>\n<p>and pleaded that there was oral partition between the parties and the land<\/p>\n<p>had been purchased from Gopi, who was the original vendor and who in<\/p>\n<p>turn was in the settled possession of his property.<\/p>\n<p>            The parties went to trial on the following issues:-<\/p>\n<p>            1. Whether the plaintiff is co-owner of the suit property and the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> RSA No. 4068 of 2002                      2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>               suit land has not been partitioned so far ? OPP.\n<\/p>\n<p>             1(A) If issue no.1 is proved, whether the plaintiff is entitled to<\/p>\n<p>             the relief of permanent injunction? OPP.\n<\/p>\n<p>             2. Whether the suit is not maintainable in the present<\/p>\n<p>               form?OPD.\n<\/p>\n<p>             3. Whether the plaintiff is estopped from filing the present suit<\/p>\n<p>               by his own act and conduct? OPD.\n<\/p>\n<p>             4. Whether the suit is bad on account of non-joining of<\/p>\n<p>               necessary parties?OPD.\n<\/p>\n<p>             5. Relief.\n<\/p>\n<p>             On appraisal of the evidence before them, both the Courts came<\/p>\n<p>to the conclusion that the respondent was in settled possession of his share<\/p>\n<p>which he has purchased from Gopi and dismissed the suit of the plaintiff-<\/p>\n<p>appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>             In Regular Second Appeal, learned counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n<p>has based his contentions broadly on the averments that he made in the<\/p>\n<p>plaint to contend that the respondent being a co-sharer cannot raise any<\/p>\n<p>construction to his detriment.\n<\/p>\n<p>             On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent has<\/p>\n<p>referred to the statement of the plaintiff himself recorded during the course<\/p>\n<p>of proceedings wherein he has admitted the factum of construction having<\/p>\n<p>been raised before the filing of the suit and also referred to his admission<\/p>\n<p>that Gopi the vendor from whom the interest was derived by the respondent<\/p>\n<p>was in settled possession of land which he has sold and that all co-sharers<\/p>\n<p>are cultivating their exclusive shares.\n<\/p>\n<p>             On the strength of this, learned counsel for the respondent<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> RSA No. 4068 of 2002                   3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>contended that once settled possession is proved then the respondent was<\/p>\n<p>very well within his rights to raise construction and it was raised prior to the<\/p>\n<p>filing of the suit. Reliance was placed on decisions of this Court in cases<\/p>\n<p>titled as &#8216;Bachan Singh versus Swaran Singh&#8217; 2000(3) CCC 2 (P&amp;H) and<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;M\/s A.G.Enterprises versus State of Punjab and others&#8217; 2007(4) PLR 522.<\/p>\n<p>             I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused<\/p>\n<p>the impugned judgments.\n<\/p>\n<p>             In this case, testimony of PW2, the plaintiff-appellant is<\/p>\n<p>relevant who himself has candidly admitted the possession of the<\/p>\n<p>respondent to be exclusive.       Not only this, he has admitted that the<\/p>\n<p>possession of vendor Gopi was exclusive and was in lieu of the land which<\/p>\n<p>was given by Gopi to him and subsequently sold to the respondent.            He<\/p>\n<p>admitted that he was cultivating some other land exclusively implying<\/p>\n<p>thereby a partition based on the conduct of the parties and reflecting<\/p>\n<p>exclusive possession of each of the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>             In this view of the matter, the contention of the learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>for the appellant necessarily has to be repelled and it is to be held that the<\/p>\n<p>findings of both the Courts below can neither be termed to be perverse nor<\/p>\n<p>erroneous so as to warrant any interference in regular second appeal. No<\/p>\n<p>substantial question of law has been shown to have arisen in the present<\/p>\n<p>appeal and the same being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed.<\/p>\n<pre>March 3, 2009                                   (Mahesh Grover)\nrekha                                              Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Har Sukh vs Lakshmi Chand on 3 March, 2009 RSA No. 4068 of 2002 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 4068 of 2002 Decided on :03-03-2009 Har Sukh &#8230;.Appellant VERSUS Lakshmi Chand &#8230;.Respondent CORAM:- HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-176678","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Har Sukh vs Lakshmi Chand on 3 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Har Sukh vs Lakshmi Chand on 3 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-05T03:45:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Har Sukh vs Lakshmi Chand on 3 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-05T03:45:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":669,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Har Sukh vs Lakshmi Chand on 3 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-05T03:45:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Har Sukh vs Lakshmi Chand on 3 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Har Sukh vs Lakshmi Chand on 3 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Har Sukh vs Lakshmi Chand on 3 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-05T03:45:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Har Sukh vs Lakshmi Chand on 3 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-05T03:45:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009"},"wordCount":669,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009","name":"Har Sukh vs Lakshmi Chand on 3 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-05T03:45:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/har-sukh-vs-lakshmi-chand-on-3-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Har Sukh vs Lakshmi Chand on 3 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176678","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=176678"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176678\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=176678"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=176678"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=176678"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}