{"id":177142,"date":"2010-06-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010"},"modified":"2015-05-20T18:30:07","modified_gmt":"2015-05-20T13:00:07","slug":"harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010","title":{"rendered":"Harikrishnan A.S. vs The State Of Kerala on 11 June, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Harikrishnan A.S. vs The State Of Kerala on 11 June, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 37274 of 2009(D)\n\n\n1. HARIKRISHNAN A.S.,MINOR AGED 17\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. JERY JOY, MINOR AGED 17\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE STATE OF KERALA\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS\n\n3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (D.D.E)\n\n4. THE APPEAL COMMITTEE, REVENUE DISTRICT\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN\n\n Dated :11\/06\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                               S.SIRI JAGAN, J.\n                       ==================\n                       W.P.(C).No. 37274 of 2009\n                       ==================\n                  Dated this the 11th day of June, 2010\n                               J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The petitioners are students of Std. XII, who participated in the<\/p>\n<p>Science Fair organised by the 1st respondent at BVMHS, Kalparamba,<\/p>\n<p>on 25th and 26th of November, 2009. They scored A grade and they<\/p>\n<p>were ranked first in their item of competition. Thereafter, at the<\/p>\n<p>revenue district level at Chalakkudy on 9th and 10th December, 2009,<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners&#8217; project was placed in the third position, which,<\/p>\n<p>according to the petitioners, is because of partisan judging, thus<\/p>\n<p>depriving the petitioners of a chance to participate in the State Science<\/p>\n<p>Fair to be held at Thrissur from 28th December, 2009 onwards. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioners filed an appeal, which, according to the petitioners, has not<\/p>\n<p>yet been considered. The petitioners&#8217; contention is that the intention of<\/p>\n<p>the respondents is to return the appeal itself as infructuous and<\/p>\n<p>prevent the petitioners&#8217; participation at the State Science Fair, wherein<\/p>\n<p>they had stood first on an earlier occasion, when the petitioners were<\/p>\n<p>studying in Std.X. It is under the above circumstances, the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>have filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      &#8220;(i)  direct the project submitted at the Revenue District Science Fair be<br \/>\n            re-adjudicated and the petitioners be granted the First Rank at the<br \/>\n            said Fair.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      (ii)  Issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or<br \/>\n            direction directing Respondent No.4 to dispose of Ext.P5 appeal<br \/>\n            after hearing the petitioners or their representatives.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      (iii) Issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">w.p.c.37274\/09                            2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>              direction directing the Respondents No.1 to 3 to permit the<br \/>\n              petitioners to participate and submit their project at the State<br \/>\n              Science Fair, 2009 to be held at Thrissur from 28.12.2009, pending<br \/>\n              final hearing and disposal of the above Writ Petition.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       2.     This Court, by order dated 22.12.2009, allowed the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners also to participate in the State Fair and the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>scored A Grade and 2nd prize. But they are not being given the<\/p>\n<p>certificate and grace marks due in respect thereof.<\/p>\n<p>       3.     The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits<\/p>\n<p>that although the petitioners scored second prize in the State Science<\/p>\n<p>Fair, since the petitioners did not score more marks than the persons<\/p>\n<p>who were selected from the petitioners&#8217; district, as per the clause in<\/p>\n<p>the manual which requires that a candidate who appears for the State<\/p>\n<p>Science Fair on the basis of a court order would have to secure more<\/p>\n<p>marks than the regularly selected candidates for being eligible for<\/p>\n<p>getting the prizes and certificates,            the petitioners were denied<\/p>\n<p>certificates.\n<\/p>\n<p>       4.     I had occasion to consider an identical question in W.P.(C).<\/p>\n<p>No.36787\/2009, in which, I had passed the following judgment:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>              &#8216;The petitioners in this writ petition are students who have<br \/>\n       participated in the District Level Science Fair in Higher Secondary Schools<br \/>\n       in the State of Kerala introduced by the Government from this academic<br \/>\n       year.     As per the scheme of the competitions, competitions are<br \/>\n       conducted in school level, sub-district level, district level and state level.<br \/>\n       The First prize   winners of school level are permitted to participate in<br \/>\n       the sub-district level.    Winners of sub district level are qualified to<br \/>\n       participate in district level and so on. The petitioners are students who<br \/>\n       participated in the sub-district level competition. Since the declaration of<br \/>\n       results were not in accordance with Manual, the petitioners              filed<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">w.p.c.37274\/09                           3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      statutory appeal before the A.E.O in time. The same was rejected on 28-<br \/>\n      11-2009 without hearing and without considering the provisions<br \/>\n      contained in the Manual. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioners<br \/>\n      approached the Munsiff&#8217;s Court,         Kuthuparamba by filing O.S. No.<br \/>\n      277\/2009.      The Munsiff passed an interim order directing the 2nd<br \/>\n      respondent to permit the petitioners to participate in the district level<br \/>\n      competition. The petitioners participated in the district level competition.<br \/>\n      But, the results of the petitioners were not declared.       The petitioners<br \/>\n      approached this Court at a time when the state level competitions were<br \/>\n      about to commence from 28-12-2009, seeking the following reliefs:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              &#8220;i)    to issue a writ of mandamus or such other          order or<br \/>\n              direction directing the 1st respondent to allow the petitioners to<br \/>\n              take part in the state level Science, Mathematics, Social Science,<br \/>\n              Work experience, fair to be held on 28-12-2009 to 01-01-2010 at<br \/>\n              Model Higher Secondary School Girls, Trichur.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              ii)    to declare that the petitioners are competent and eligible to<br \/>\n              take part in the State Level Science, Mathematics, Social Science,<br \/>\n              Work experience, Competition in the item improvised experiments<br \/>\n              in Science fair.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              2. This Court, by interim order dated 23-12-2009, permitted the<br \/>\n      petitioners to participate in the state level competition provisionally.<br \/>\n      Pursuant to the same, the petitioners participated and they obtained A<br \/>\n      Grade. The petitioners&#8217; grievance now is that on the ground that the<br \/>\n      petitioners did not score higher marks than the regularly selected<br \/>\n      candidates, namely, respondents 4 and 5, they are not entitled to<br \/>\n      certificates as per a condition in the Manual wherein persons who have<br \/>\n      participated by virtue of orders of the Court would be entitled to get the<br \/>\n      benefit of the results of the competition only if they score more marks<br \/>\n      than the regularly selected candidates in the competition.     According to<br \/>\n      the petitioners, the said action of respondents 1 to 3 is clearly<br \/>\n      discriminatory and      illegal. They would submit that when the Court<br \/>\n      permitted them to participate in the competition that is because the Court<br \/>\n      was prima facie satisfied that they were legally so entitled to participate.<br \/>\n      The fact that they could not fair better than the regularly selected<br \/>\n      candidates on the particular day does not mean that they are disentitled<br \/>\n      to the results of the competition, is their contention.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              3. I have considered the rival contentions in detail.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, I confirm<br \/>\n      the interim order and declare that the petitioners have              validly<br \/>\n      participated in the competition.        In view of that declaration, the<br \/>\n      participation of the petitioners in the state level competition would<br \/>\n      amount to legal participation like other regularly selected candidates.<br \/>\n      That being so, the petitioners cannot be discriminated on the ground that<br \/>\n      they appeared on the basis of a court order.           The performance of<br \/>\n      candidates need not necessarily be consistent all along. On a particular<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">w.p.c.37274\/09                            4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       day, they may fair better or below par than others. But they cannot be<br \/>\n       denied the benefit of the results they obtained on the ground that since<br \/>\n       they participated on the basis of the court order, they have to fair better<br \/>\n       than the other regularly selected participants.          If that be so, the<br \/>\n       petitioners are entitled to keep the results they had obtained in the<br \/>\n       competition.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 1<br \/>\n       to 3 to issue certificates to the petitioners in accordance with the rules of<br \/>\n       the competition and also to award grace marks, if they are entitled for<br \/>\n       the same in accordance with the scheme.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>My above findings squarely apply to the case of the petitioners herein<\/p>\n<p>also.\n<\/p>\n<p>       In view of the circumstances mentioned in the writ petition, I am<\/p>\n<p>satisfied that the petitioners were rightly allowed to participate in the<\/p>\n<p>State Science Fair. Therefore, the petitioners are entitled to be<\/p>\n<p>considered as regularly selected for participation in the State Science<\/p>\n<p>Fair. Consequently, the petitioners are entitled to keep the results of<\/p>\n<p>the competition at the State Science Fair. Therefore, the respondents<\/p>\n<p>are directed to issue certificates to the petitioners in accordance with<\/p>\n<p>the results of the State Science Fair and give grace marks if they are<\/p>\n<p>eligible for the same as per the conditions for the same. The same<\/p>\n<p>shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two<\/p>\n<p>weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.<\/p>\n<p>       The writ petition is allowed as above.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                  Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<pre>sdk+                                                      S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE\n           \/\/\/True copy\/\/\/\n\n                                   P.A. to Judge\n\nw.p.c.37274\/09    5\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Harikrishnan A.S. vs The State Of Kerala on 11 June, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 37274 of 2009(D) 1. HARIKRISHNAN A.S.,MINOR AGED 17 &#8230; Petitioner 2. JERY JOY, MINOR AGED 17 Vs 1. THE STATE OF KERALA &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS 3. THE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-177142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Harikrishnan A.S. vs The State Of Kerala on 11 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Harikrishnan A.S. vs The State Of Kerala on 11 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-20T13:00:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Harikrishnan A.S. vs The State Of Kerala on 11 June, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-20T13:00:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1292,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010\",\"name\":\"Harikrishnan A.S. vs The State Of Kerala on 11 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-20T13:00:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Harikrishnan A.S. vs The State Of Kerala on 11 June, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Harikrishnan A.S. vs The State Of Kerala on 11 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Harikrishnan A.S. vs The State Of Kerala on 11 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-20T13:00:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Harikrishnan A.S. vs The State Of Kerala on 11 June, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-20T13:00:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010"},"wordCount":1292,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010","name":"Harikrishnan A.S. vs The State Of Kerala on 11 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-20T13:00:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harikrishnan-a-s-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-11-june-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Harikrishnan A.S. vs The State Of Kerala on 11 June, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177142"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177142\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}