{"id":177330,"date":"1996-12-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1996-12-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996"},"modified":"2017-10-31T20:46:50","modified_gmt":"2017-10-31T15:16:50","slug":"patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996","title":{"rendered":"Patel Mafatlal Jethalal vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 December, 1996"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Patel Mafatlal Jethalal vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 December, 1996<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: (1997) 3 GLR 2212<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S Keshote<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: S Keshote<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>S.K. Keshote, J.<\/p>\n<p>1. In both these Special Civil Applications not only the parties are common, but the facts and grounds raised therein are also common, and as such, the same are being disposed of by this common order.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The facts are being laken from Special Civil Application No. 241 1 of 1986 as agreed by both the Counsels lor the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The petitioner is doing the business of mustard seeds for which the petitioner is holding the licence No. H\/193\/81. On 6-7-1984, the respondent No. 3 seized the petitioner&#8217;s goods, namely. 74.32 quintals of mustard seeds. The petitioner was served with a show-cause notice for the proceedings under Section 6(A) of the Essential Commodities Act. 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 1955) for the confiscation of seized mustard seeds. The petitioner submitted objections to the show-cause notice. The respondent No. 2 under its order dated 9-9-1984 ordered for confiscation of the seized mustard seeds of 74.32 quintals. The petitioner being aggrieved of the aforesaid order preferred an appeal before the respondent No. 1. The respondent No. 1 partly allowed the appeal and passed the order to confiscate 10 quintals of mustard seeds instead of 74.32 quintals of mustard seeds as ordered by the respondent No. 2. Hence this Special Civil Application.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. In addition to the aforesaid two orders of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, the petitioner has further challenged in this Special Civil Application, the notifications of the Government dated 6-1-1984 and 2-2-1984.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. The notification dated 6th January, 1984 has been issued by the respondent in pursuance of Sub-clause (1) of Clause 24 of Gujarat Essential Articles (Licensing, Control &amp; Stock Declaration) Order, 1981. It has been provided under this order that every licence-holder shall, with effect from 6th January, 1984 furnish to the Collector of the District or as the case may be to Food and Civil Supplies Controller, Ahmedabad, information regarding sale including agreement to sell, disposal, delivery or distribution of edible oil seeds or as the case may be edible oil outside the State of Gujarat in the form appended hereto in duplicate in such a number so as to reach the aforesaid officer within forty-eight hours before moving such edible oil seeds or edible oil from the place where it is stored with a view to sell, including agreement to sell, dispose of or delivery or to distribute the same outside the State of Gujarat.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. Vide order dated 2nd February, 1984, the earlier order dated 6th January, 1984 has been amended.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that the notifications dated 6th January, 1984 and 2nd February, 1984 are arbitrary and have no rationality whatsoever. It causes unnecessary inconveniences to the licence-holders to carry out the mandate contained therein. It has next been contended that the confiscation of the mustard oil seeds made of 10 quintals of the petitioner is illegal and arbitrary. Lastly, the Counsel for the petitioner contended that the orders dated 6th January, 1984 and 2nd February, 1984 are bad in law as the approval thereof has not been taken by the State of Gujarat from the Central Government.\n<\/p>\n<p>8. On the other hand, the Counsel for the respondents contended that it is a case where the petitioner has made the contravention of the order dated 6th January, 1984 as amended by the order dated 2nd February, 1984 and as such, the confiscation which has been ordered by the authority is not perverse or arbitrary. It has next been contended by the Counsel for the respondents that the orders dated 6th January, 1984 and 2nd February, 1984 have been issued under Clause 24 of the Gujarat Essential Articles (Licensing, Control &amp; Stock Declaration) Order, 1981 by the Government for which no approval of Central Government is required. The approval or concurrence of the Central Government is required to the order which has been framed under Section 3 of the Act, 1955 and these orders are not being framed under the said section.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the submissions made by the learned Counsels for the parties. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has not disputed that the petitioner has contravened the order dated 6th January, 1984 as amended by the order dated 2nd February, 1984. Only in case these two orders are declared to be invalid by this Court then only it can be said that he has not made the contravention, but not otherwise. So the substantial grievance of the petitioner is against the order dated 6th January, 1984 as amended by the order dated 2nd February, 1984.\n<\/p>\n<p>10. Firstly, I may deal with the contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the orders dated 6th January, 1984 and 2nd February, 1984 are bad in law as the same has been made without approval or concurrence of the Central Government.\n<\/p>\n<p>11. The Gujarat Essential Articles (Licensing, Control &amp; Stock Declaration) Order, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as the Order, 1981) undisputedly has been made in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Act, 1955 and with the prior concurrence of the Central Government. Clause 24 of the Order, 1981 empowers the State Government, the Director of Civil Supplies, the Director of Food, the Collector of a District or any licensing authority to issue the directions to dealers or producers in accordance with the provisions of this order and for ensuring fair and equitable distribution of the essential article by general or special order, issue to any dealer or producer or class of dealers or producers such directions regarding maintenance of accounts, maintenance of stocks, storage, sale, submission of returns, furnishing information, display of prices, issuance of invoice or cash memo, weighment, disposal, delivery or distribution of any essential article as it or he may deem fit.\n<\/p>\n<p>12. Sub-clause (2) of Clause 24 of the Order, 1981 further provides that every dealer or producer to whom any direction is issued under Sub-clause (1) shall comply with such direction. Clause 24 of the Order, 1981 nowhere provides that any order passed by the authorities as given out therein has to be made only with prior concurrence of the Central Government. I find sufficient merits in the contention of the Counsel for the respondents that the order issued under Clause 24 of the Order, 1981 by the authority mentioned therein does not require any prior concurrence of the Central Government as this is not the order made under Section 3 of the Act, 1955. The learned Counsel for the petitioner is unable to cite any provision from the Act, 1955 or any provision from the Order, 1981 made thereunder that any order made by the authorities specified in Clause 24 of the Order, 1981 which requires the concurrence of the Central Government. The concurrence is only required to the order framed under Section 3 or under the delegated powers as given under Section 5 of the Act, 1955 by the State Government or the Central Government and not to any order or direction made under the aforesaid provision.\n<\/p>\n<p>13. So far as the challenge to the orders dated 6th January, 1984 and 2nd February. 1984 on the ground that they are arbitrary and not workable is concerned, it is suffice to say that this contention has no merits. From the plain reading of the order dated 6th January, 1984 as amended by the order dated 2nd February, 1984 it is clear that for maintaining the supply of essential commodities of mustard oil seeds and edible oil seeds and for their equitable distribution and availability at fair price, these orders have been made. It is necessary to mention here that the petitioner has not challenged Clause 24 of the Order. 1981. He has only challenged the orders made under the aforesaid clause. These orders only require the licence-holders to intimate to the concerned authorities of the sale or agreement to sell before 48 hours of the movement of such edible oil seeds or edible oil from this State to other States. This has been done with the object to have control over these two essential commodities and for maintenance of supply and distribution thereof at fair price. The petitioner being the licence-holder is under obligation to comply with the said orders which in no manner affects his right of trade or business. The orders dated 6th January, 1984 and 2nd February, 1984 are perfectly legal and justified. The petitioner has contravened the provisions of the order which as per Sub-clause (2) of Clause 24 of the Order, 1981 has to be complied with by him, and as such, the Confiscation of 10 quintals of mustard oil seeds has rightly been ordered.\n<\/p>\n<p>In the result, these Special Civil Applications fail and the same are dismissed. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, granted by this Court stands vacated.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Patel Mafatlal Jethalal vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 December, 1996 Equivalent citations: (1997) 3 GLR 2212 Author: S Keshote Bench: S Keshote JUDGMENT S.K. Keshote, J. 1. In both these Special Civil Applications not only the parties are common, but the facts and grounds raised therein are also common, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-177330","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Patel Mafatlal Jethalal vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 December, 1996 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Patel Mafatlal Jethalal vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 December, 1996 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1996-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-31T15:16:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Patel Mafatlal Jethalal vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 December, 1996\",\"datePublished\":\"1996-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-31T15:16:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996\"},\"wordCount\":1428,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996\",\"name\":\"Patel Mafatlal Jethalal vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 December, 1996 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1996-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-31T15:16:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Patel Mafatlal Jethalal vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 December, 1996\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Patel Mafatlal Jethalal vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 December, 1996 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Patel Mafatlal Jethalal vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 December, 1996 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1996-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-31T15:16:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Patel Mafatlal Jethalal vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 December, 1996","datePublished":"1996-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-31T15:16:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996"},"wordCount":1428,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996","name":"Patel Mafatlal Jethalal vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 December, 1996 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1996-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-31T15:16:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-mafatlal-jethalal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-ors-on-10-december-1996#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Patel Mafatlal Jethalal vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 December, 1996"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177330","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177330"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177330\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177330"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177330"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177330"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}