{"id":177406,"date":"2010-10-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010"},"modified":"2017-09-17T13:11:06","modified_gmt":"2017-09-17T07:41:06","slug":"s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"S.P.Abdul Rasheed vs P.Suresh Kumar on 22 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
S.P.Abdul Rasheed vs P.Suresh Kumar on 22 October, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 3034 of 2004(D)\n\n\n1. S.P.ABDUL RASHEED,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. P.SURESH KUMAR, S\/O.THEYYAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :22\/10\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                           P.Q.BARKATH ALI, J.\n                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                          Crl.R.P.No.3034 OF 2004\n                   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                  Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2010\n\n                                     ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
       Challenge in this revision petition by the accused in<\/p>\n
C.C.No.410\/1999 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court V,<\/p>\n
Kozhikode and appellant in Crl.Appeal No.1\/2003 on the file of<\/p>\n
Sessions Court, Kozhikode is to the judgment of the Magistrate dated<\/p>\n
December 12, 2002 convicting the revision petitioner\/accused under<\/p>\n
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo<\/p>\n
simple imprisonment for three months. The accused was also directed<\/p>\n
to pay a compensation of Rs. 20,000\/- to the complainant, in default to<\/p>\n
undergo simple imprisonment for one month. On appeal by the<\/p>\n
accused, the lower appellate court confirmed his conviction and<\/p>\n
sentence by judgment dated August 17, 2004.\n<\/p>\n
       2.   The case of the revision first respondent\/complainant as<\/p>\n
testified by him as PW1 before the trial court and as detailed in the<\/p>\n
complaint in brief is this :\n<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.3034\/2004               2<\/span><\/p>\n
      The accused availed a loan of Rs. 1,40,000\/- from the<\/p>\n
complainant. In discharge of that debt, the accused transferred the<\/p>\n
chitty fund standing in his name in the Kerala State Financial<\/p>\n
Enterprises for Rs. 70,000\/- . For the balance amount of Rs. 70,000\/-,<\/p>\n
the accused issued two cheques, one for Rs. 20,000\/- and another for<\/p>\n
Rs.50,000\/-.     Ext.P2 is the cheque for Rs.20,000\/- issued by the<\/p>\n
accused in favour of the complainant dated December 5, 1998 on the<\/p>\n
understanding that Ext.P2 cheque will be encahsed after March 1,<\/p>\n
1999.     The cheque when presented for collection was returned<\/p>\n
dishonoured for want of sufficiency of funds in the account of the<\/p>\n
accused in the bank and that inspite of the notice Ext.P5 dated April 9,<\/p>\n
1999, the accused did not repay the amount.              Therefore, the<\/p>\n
complainant filed the complaint before the trial court under Section 138<\/p>\n
of Negotiable Instruments Act.\n<\/p>\n
      3.     On receipt of the complaint, the learned Magistrate<\/p>\n
recorded the sworn statement of the complainant and took cognizance<\/p>\n
of the offence.     The accused on appearance before the trial court<\/p>\n
pleaded not guilty to a charge under Section 138 of Negotiable<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.3034\/2004                 3<\/span><\/p>\n
Instruments Act. Complainant was examined as PW1 and Ext.P1 to<\/p>\n
P5 series were marked on his side. When questioned under Section<\/p>\n
313 of Cr.P.C., the accused denied the entire transaction. Ext.D1 was<\/p>\n
marked on his side.\n<\/p>\n
      4.     The learned Magistrate on an appreciation of evidence<\/p>\n
found the revision petitioner guilty of the offence punishable under<\/p>\n
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, convicted him thereunder<\/p>\n
and sentenced him as aforesaid which is confirmed in appeal. The<\/p>\n
accused has now come up in revision challenging his conviction and<\/p>\n
sentence.\n<\/p>\n
      5.     Heard the counsel for the revision petitioner\/accused and<\/p>\n
the counsel for the revision first respondent\/complainant.<\/p>\n
      6.     The following points arise for consideration :<\/p>\n
                 1)   Whether the conviction of the revision
\n           petitioner  under    Section   138    of   Negotiable
\n           Instruments Act rendered by the trial court which is
\n           confirmed in appeal can be sustained ?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                 2)   Whether      the  sentence    imposed   is\n           excessive or unduly harsh ?\n\n      Point No.1\n\n<\/pre>\n
      7.     Complainant as PW1 testified in a convincing manner<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.3034\/2004                4<\/span><\/p>\n
before the trial court regarding the transaction. Nothing was brought<\/p>\n
out during his cross examination to disbelieve his evidence. Further his<\/p>\n
evidence is supported by Exts.P1 to P5 series.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      8.     The specific case of the accused as suggested during the<\/p>\n
cross examination of PW1 and as stated by him when questioned under<\/p>\n
Section 313 Cr.P.C. was that he has discharged the debt due to the<\/p>\n
complainant. In an attempt to prove his case, the accused produced<\/p>\n
Ext.D1, a note book containing several entries. But Ext.D1 does not<\/p>\n
help the accused to prove his case. No other evidecne was adduced by<\/p>\n
the accused before the trial court. That apart, as the execution of the<\/p>\n
cheque Ext.P1 was admitted by the accused, presumption as envisaged<\/p>\n
under Section 118 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act is available<\/p>\n
to the complainant. No evidence was adduced by the accused to rebut<\/p>\n
the above presumption.\n<\/p>\n
      9.     For all these reasons, I hold that the trial court as well as<\/p>\n
the lower appellate court is perfectly justified in accepting the evidence<\/p>\n
of PW1 and finding that the accused has committed the offence<\/p>\n
punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.3034\/2004                 5<\/span><\/p>\n
convicting him thereunder. Therefore I confirm the conviction of the<\/p>\n
revision petitioner under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.<\/p>\n
      Point No.2<\/p>\n
      10.    As regards the sentence, the Trial court imposed a sentence<\/p>\n
of simple imprisonment for three months and to pay a compensation of<\/p>\n
Rs.20,000\/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month,<\/p>\n
which is confirmed in appeal. Taking into consideration the fact that<\/p>\n
the transaction is of the year 1999, a lenient view is taken. I feel that a<\/p>\n
sentence of imprisonment till the rising of court and a compensation of<\/p>\n
Rs.25,000\/- with default sentence would meet the ends of justice.<\/p>\n
      In the result, revision petition is allowed in part. The conviction<\/p>\n
of the revision petitioner under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments<\/p>\n
Act is confirmed. The sentence imposed by the trial court which is<\/p>\n
confirmed by the lower appellate Court is modified to the effect that<\/p>\n
revision petitioner is sentenced to undergo imprisonment till the rising<\/p>\n
of court and to pay a compensation of Rs.25,000\/- to the complainant<\/p>\n
as provided under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C., in default to undergo simple<\/p>\n
imprisonment for one month.        The revision petitioner shall surrender<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.3034\/2004               6<\/span><\/p>\n
before the trial court on or before 15\/11\/2010 to receive the sentence.<\/p>\n
Time is granted till 15\/11\/2010 for payment of compensation. His bail<\/p>\n
bonds are cancelled.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                               P.Q.BARKATH ALI
\n                                                        JUDGE<\/p>\n
sv.\n<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.3034\/2004    7<\/span><\/p>\n
                             P.Q.BARKATH ALI
\n                                   JUDGE<\/p>\n
sv.\n<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.3034\/2004    8<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court S.P.Abdul Rasheed vs P.Suresh Kumar on 22 October, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3034 of 2004(D) 1. S.P.ABDUL RASHEED, … Petitioner Vs 1. P.SURESH KUMAR, S\/O.THEYYAN, … Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC For Petitioner :SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN For Respondent :SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM) The Hon’ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-177406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nS.P.Abdul Rasheed vs P.Suresh Kumar on 22 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S.P.Abdul Rasheed vs P.Suresh Kumar on 22 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-17T07:41:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"S.P.Abdul Rasheed vs P.Suresh Kumar on 22 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-17T07:41:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":934,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010\",\"name\":\"S.P.Abdul Rasheed vs P.Suresh Kumar on 22 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-17T07:41:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S.P.Abdul Rasheed vs P.Suresh Kumar on 22 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S.P.Abdul Rasheed vs P.Suresh Kumar on 22 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S.P.Abdul Rasheed vs P.Suresh Kumar on 22 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-17T07:41:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"S.P.Abdul Rasheed vs P.Suresh Kumar on 22 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-17T07:41:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010"},"wordCount":934,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010","name":"S.P.Abdul Rasheed vs P.Suresh Kumar on 22 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-17T07:41:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-p-abdul-rasheed-vs-p-suresh-kumar-on-22-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S.P.Abdul Rasheed vs P.Suresh Kumar on 22 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177406","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177406"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177406\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}