{"id":177586,"date":"2011-04-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-04-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011"},"modified":"2015-11-23T12:19:53","modified_gmt":"2015-11-23T06:49:53","slug":"kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011","title":{"rendered":"Kailash & Anr vs State on 22 April, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur<\/div>\n
Kailash & Anr vs State on 22 April, 2011<\/div>\n
                                     1\n\n   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT\n                       JODHPUR.\n\n\n                         J U D G M E N T\n\n\n\nKailash & Anr.                 vs.              State of Rajasthan\n\n\n\n             D.B.Criminal Jail Appeal No.60\/2007\n             against the judgment dated 20.9.2003\n             passed by Additional Sessions Judge\n             (Fast Track) No.1, Sirohi, Camp Abu\n             Road, in Sessions Case No.92\/2002\n             (64\/2001).\n\n\n\nDate of Judgment                     ::               22nd April, 2011\n\n\n\n\n                          P R E S E N T\n\n            HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR\n              HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.M.TOTLA\n\n\nMr. Pradeep Choudhary, amicus curiae, for the\nappellants.\nMr. KR Bishnoi, Public Prosecutor, for the State.\n                         ....\n\n\n\nBY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE MATHUR,J.)<\/pre>\n
           The present appeal is directed against the<\/p>\n
judgment   of    the    learned          Additional   Sessions   Judge<\/p>\n
(Fast Track) No.1, Sirohi Camp Abu Road in Sessions<\/p>\n
Case   No.92\/2002      dated    20.9.2003.       Learned   Additional<\/p>\n
Sessions Judge has convicted the accused appellant as<\/p>\n
under:-\n<\/p>\n
                                     2<\/span><\/p>\n
       OFFENCES                         PUNISHMENT<\/p>\n
Section 302\/34 IPC                Life imprisonment and a fine
\n                                  of Rs.5000\/- each in default
\n                                  of payment of fine, one year
\n                                  additional imprisonment.\n<\/p>\n
Section 397 IPC                   Seven year RI and a fine of
\n                                  Rs.5000\/-, in default of
\n                                  payment of fine, additional
\n                                  one years imprisonment.\n<\/p>\n
Section 201 IPC                   One years RI and fine of
\n                                  Rs.1000\/-, in default of
\n                                  payment of fine, six months
\n                                  additional imprisonment.\n<\/p>\n
\n              The prosecution was launched on the basis of<\/p>\n
a report Ex.P\/16 lodged by Amra Ram, Sarpanch, Gram<\/p>\n
Panchayat Aamthala at Police Station Abu Road Sadar on<\/p>\n
14.5.2001 at about 12:00 Noon. It was given out by the<\/p>\n
complainant that on 14.5.2001 at about 10:00 AM, he<\/p>\n
was at the bus stand Aamthala where, he heard that in<\/p>\n
the    village    Aamali    Fali    and    Nopa    Fali    where      three<\/p>\n
roads meet, in the bushes a dead body wearing pant<\/p>\n
shirt       is    lying.     After        having        received       this<\/p>\n
information,       he    alongwith      Secretary        of     the    Gram<\/p>\n
Panchayat Shri Virendra Vyas went on the site and saw<\/p>\n
that    a    person     wearing    blue     pant    and       light   blue<\/p>\n
coloured shirt and black sandals in foot was lying<\/p>\n
dead in the thorny bushes. It was expressed that this<\/p>\n
person was killed some time on 13.5.2001 and 14.5.2001<\/p>\n
and has been placed here.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
              On this information, a case was registered<\/p>\n
under       Section     201\/34    IPC     and     397    IPC.    At    the<\/p>\n
investigation, three accused persons were traced to be
\n                                    3<\/span><\/p>\n
accused being Kiran, Kailash and Umesh. The accused<\/p>\n
persons were chargesheeted. They were made over to the<\/p>\n
trial where, the trial court framed charges against<\/p>\n
them under Section 302\/34, 201\/34 and 395 IPC. At the<\/p>\n
trial,    the   prosecution       examined         21   witnesses.     The<\/p>\n
accused were examined under Section 313 Cr.P.C. The<\/p>\n
accused    appellant      Kiran    produced        two    witnesses     in<\/p>\n
defence.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
            After        considering         the        case     of    the\n\nprosecution,       the   trial    court   convicted        the    accused\n\nappellants as under:-\n\n\n\nNAME               OFFENCES                   PUNISHMENT\n\nKiran,Kailash      Sec.302\/34 IPC Life imprisonment and a\nUmesh                             fine of Rs.5000\/- each in\n                                  default of payment of\n                                  fine, one year additional\n                                  imprisonment.\nKiran,Kailash      Sec.397 IPC         Seven years RI and a fine\nUmesh                                  of Rs.5000\/-, in default\n                                       of payment of fine,\n                                       additional one years\n                                       imprisonment.\n\nKiran,Kailash      Sec.201 IPC         One years RI and fine of\nUmesh                                  Rs.1000\/-, in default of\n                                       payment of fine, six\n                                       months additional\n                                       imprisonment.\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n
            The trial court, after considering the case<\/p>\n
of the prosecution, came to the conclusion that there<\/p>\n
is   no   direct    evidence      in   the    case,      however,     five<\/p>\n
circumstances      were    held   proved      against      the    accused<\/p>\n
persons and those are :-\n<\/p>\n
                              4<\/span><\/p>\n
(i) On 13.5.2001, accused Kiran, Kailash and Umesh
\nhired a taxi No.GJ-6\/3222 at about 7:00 PM from
\nPalanpur, whose driver was deceased Sadique.<\/p>\n
(ii) In morning of 14.5.2001, the dead body of driver
\nSadique was lying at Aamali Fali and Nopa Fali where,
\nthree roads meet.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
(iii)The death of the driver Sadique was caused by
\nstrangulation.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
(iv) On 16.5.2001, accused Kailash and Kiran were
\ncaught roaming with Sadique’s vehicle Tata Estate in
\nmysterious condition. Kailash and Kiran had changed
\nthe number plate.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
(v) From the possession of Kiran, the purse of the
\ndeceased containing Insurance of his vehicle No.GJ-
\n6\/3222 and photograph of deceased was recovered. From
\nthe possession of Kailash, ring of the deceased was
\nrecovered.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
         Accused Kiran assailed conviction made under<\/p>\n
the judgment impugned dated 20.9.2003 by way of filing<\/p>\n
an appeal i.e. DBCr.Appeal No.1118\/2005 and that came<\/p>\n
to be accepted by this Court on 11.8.2005.<\/p>\n
         The   present    accused     appellants      preferred<\/p>\n
this appeal after acceptance of the appeal preferred<\/p>\n
by accused Kiran.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
         Arguing    the   case   of   the   accused   persons,<\/p>\n
learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the
\n                                         5<\/span><\/p>\n
circumstances which have been held proved against the<\/p>\n
accused persons are not at all sufficient to give a<\/p>\n
finding of conviction. The circumstance held proved<\/p>\n
about availability of the dead body of driver Sadique<\/p>\n
at Aamali Fali and Nopa Fali on 14.5.2001, as per<\/p>\n
counsel      for     the        appellants,         is     quite      innocuous<\/p>\n
circumstance and i.e. of not much consequence so far<\/p>\n
as     adjudication        of    the     matter       is    concerned.       The<\/p>\n
circumstance about the fact that Sadique died due to<\/p>\n
strangulation, is a benign circumstance for all the<\/p>\n
accused persons. It is empathetically submitted that<\/p>\n
PW-1    Kadar      Khan,    PW-2       Arif       Mohd.    and   PW-4    Mayub,<\/p>\n
though identified accused Kailash and Umesh @ Udayram,<\/p>\n
but the identification so made is of no consequence in<\/p>\n
view of the fact that the accused persons were not<\/p>\n
kept under well. It is also asserted that the trial<\/p>\n
court itself has not relied upon trustworthiness of
\nPW-1 Kadar Khan and PW-2 Arif Mohd., therefore, no<\/p>\n
part    of   their     statements            is    required      to    be    read<\/p>\n
against the accused persons. With regard to recovery<\/p>\n
made from the accused persons, it is stated that those<\/p>\n
have not been established.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
             Heard    counsel          for    the    appellants        and   the<\/p>\n
Public Prosecutor.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
             The    circumstances            against       accused     Umesh   @<\/p>\n
Udayram are that PW-1 Kadar Khan identified him as a<\/p>\n
person who came to hire the taxi. The other accused
\n                                       6<\/span><\/p>\n
Kailash too was identified by PW-1 as the person who<\/p>\n
came for hiring the taxi alongwith Umesh and Kiran.<\/p>\n
Accused Kiran was not identified by this witness. PW-4<\/p>\n
Mayub also identified accused Kailash as the person<\/p>\n
who came to deceased Sadique for hiring the taxi. The<\/p>\n
another circumstance against this accused is recovery<\/p>\n
of a silver ring from him. Pertinent to note here that<\/p>\n
no      evidence      is        available          on      record       about<\/p>\n
identification of the ring itself. A presumption is<\/p>\n
drawn about ring on the basis of mark of letter “S” on<\/p>\n
it. Similarly, the circumstance against the another<\/p>\n
accused Umesh is his identification as the person who<\/p>\n
came alongwith Kailash and Kiran to hire the taxi and<\/p>\n
recovery of a wrist watch. So far as recovery of wrist<\/p>\n
watch is concerned, that was not found reliable by the<\/p>\n
trial    court     itself.      As    such   the        only   circumstance<\/p>\n
against accused       Umesh      is    his   identification         as   the
\nperson who came to deceased Sadique for hiring a taxi.<\/p>\n
            The circumstances relied upon are not at all<\/p>\n
sufficient to hold a person guilty for commission of a<\/p>\n
serious offence of murder. It is well settled that to<\/p>\n
establish    guilty        of    a    person       the     circumstantial<\/p>\n
evidence     should        be    of       strong        nature    and    all<\/p>\n
circumstances should frame a complete chain to reach<\/p>\n
at a definite conclusion. In the instant case the only<\/p>\n
settled circumstance is identification of the accused<\/p>\n
persons by PW-1 and PW-4. PW-1 was not found reliable<\/p>\n
even by the trial court, therefore, the only evidence
\n                                              7<\/span><\/p>\n
    available is identification of accused Kailash by PW-<\/p>\n
    4. The identification so made is only as a person<\/p>\n
    hiring taxi. The nature of the evidence is too weak<\/p>\n
    and   that    is   not   at    all       sufficient          to       convict   the<\/p>\n
    accused      appellants.      As     a       matter     of     fact      whatever<\/p>\n
    circumstances established be taken on totality, then<\/p>\n
    too they do not indicate conclusively involvement of<\/p>\n
    the   accused      appellants      in         the   crime.        A    reasonable<\/p>\n
    doubt exists with regard to their participation in the<\/p>\n
    crime and, therefore, a benefit of doubt is required<\/p>\n
    to be extended in their favour.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                 Accordingly,             this            appeal             deserves<\/p>\n
    acceptance, thus, is allowed. The judgment impugned<\/p>\n
    dated 20.9.2003 passed by learned                     Additional Sessions<\/p>\n
    Judge   (Fast      Track)     No.1,          Sirohi     Camp      Abu    Road    in<\/p>\n
    Sessions Case No.92\/2002 is quashed. The conviction of
\n    the accused appellants for the offences under Sections<\/p>\n
    302\/34, 397 and 201 Indian Penal Code are declared<\/p>\n
    illegal and, therefore, the same is set aside. As a<\/p>\n
    natural      consequence       the           sentence    imposed          too    is<\/p>\n
    quashed. Accused Umesh be released forthwith, if not<\/p>\n
    required in any other case. The sentence of accused<\/p>\n
    Kailash has already been suspended and he is availing<\/p>\n
    that, therefore, the bail bonds and sureties furnished<\/p>\n
    by him be discharged.\n<\/p>\n
    ( C.M.TOTLA ),J.                                    ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J.<\/p>\n
Mathuria KK\/ps.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur Kailash & Anr vs State on 22 April, 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. J U D G M E N T Kailash & Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan D.B.Criminal Jail Appeal No.60\/2007 against the judgment dated 20.9.2003 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-177586","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-rajasthan-high-court-jodhpur"],"yoast_head":"\nKailash & Anr vs State on 22 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kailash & Anr vs State on 22 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-04-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-23T06:49:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kailash & Anr vs State on 22 April, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-23T06:49:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1226,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011\",\"name\":\"Kailash & Anr vs State on 22 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-23T06:49:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kailash & Anr vs State on 22 April, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kailash & Anr vs State on 22 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kailash & Anr vs State on 22 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-04-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-23T06:49:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kailash & Anr vs State on 22 April, 2011","datePublished":"2011-04-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-23T06:49:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011"},"wordCount":1226,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011","name":"Kailash & Anr vs State on 22 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-04-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-23T06:49:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kailash-anr-vs-state-on-22-april-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kailash & Anr vs State on 22 April, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177586","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177586"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177586\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177586"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177586"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177586"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}