{"id":178125,"date":"2011-07-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011"},"modified":"2016-09-08T00:40:54","modified_gmt":"2016-09-07T19:10:54","slug":"ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Ruksa Sway Sahayata Samuh (Shg vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ruksa Sway Sahayata Samuh (Shg vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>IN\u00a0THE\u00a0HIGH\u00a0COURT\u00a0OF\u00a0JHARKHAND\u00a0AT\u00a0RANCHI\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\n     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0W.P.\u00a0(C)\u00a0No.\u00a03284\u00a0of\u00a02011\n\n Ruksa\u00a0Sway\u00a0Sahayata\u00a0Samuh\u00a0(SHG)                           ...... Petitioner\n                              \u00a0Versus\u00a0\n The\u00a0State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0&amp;\u00a0another                          ...... Respondents\n                              \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\n CORAM:\u00a0 HON'BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0D.N.\u00a0PATEL\u00a0\u00a0\n                              \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\nFor\u00a0the\u00a0Petitioner            :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0M\/s\u00a0Rajeeva\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0Advocate\n                              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Sarfraz\u00a0Akhtar,\u00a0Mithilesh\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Advocates \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\nFor\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents           :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0R.\u00a0Mukhopadhya,\u00a0S.C.\u00adII\u00a0\n              \u00a0     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\n                th\n\u00a003\/Dated:\u00a013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0July,\u00a02011\n                  \u00a0             \u00a0\n\n1.<\/pre>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0present\u00a0petition\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0preferred\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0passed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nSub\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Officer,\u00a0Pakur\u00a0dated\u00a06th\u00a0 June,\u00a02011\u00a0(Annexure\u00ad3),\u00a0whereby,\u00a0<br \/>\nthe \u00a0 license \u00a0 given \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 petitioner \u00a0 for \u00a0 running \u00a0 the \u00a0 fair \u00a0 price \u00a0 shop \u00a0 was\u00a0<br \/>\ncancelled.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\u00a0 \u00a0Learned\u00a0counsel\u00a0appearing\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0mainly\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0<br \/>\nadequate \u00a0 notice \u00a0 is \u00a0 given \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 petitioner \u00a0 before \u00a0 passing \u00a0 the \u00a0 impugned\u00a0<br \/>\norder.\u00a0It\u00a0is\u00a0an\u00a0admitted\u00a0fact,\u00a0even\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0paragraph\u00a05\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0counter\u00a0affidavit\u00a0<br \/>\nthat\u00a0only\u00a0two\u00a0days&#8217;\u00a0time\u00a0was\u00a0given\u00a0to\u00a0give\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0notice,\u00a0<br \/>\nissued\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0respondents\u00a0and\u00a0in\u00a0fact,\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0has\u00a0given\u00a0a\u00a0reply,\u00a0it\u00a0has\u00a0<br \/>\nnot\u00a0been\u00a0considered,\u00a0at\u00a0all,\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0respondents.\u00a0In\u00a0fact,\u00a0time\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nrespondents \u00a0 is \u00a0 highly \u00a0 insufficient, \u00a0 which \u00a0 tantamounts \u00a0 to \u00a0 violation \u00a0 of\u00a0<br \/>\nprinciple\u00a0of\u00a0natural\u00a0justice.\u00a0Moreover,\u00a0several\u00a0documents\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0relied\u00a0<br \/>\nupon\u00a0while\u00a0passing\u00a0the\u00a0impugned\u00a0order\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Sub\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Officer,\u00a0Pakur,\u00a0<br \/>\nbut,\u00a0not\u00a0a\u00a0single\u00a0document\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0given\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0and,\u00a0therefore\u00a0<br \/>\nalso,\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0violation\u00a0of\u00a0principle\u00a0of\u00a0natural\u00a0justice.\u00a0Some\u00a0report\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0<br \/>\ncalled\u00a0for\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Sub\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Officer,\u00a0Pakur\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0has\u00a0never\u00a0been\u00a0<br \/>\ngiven \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 petitioner \u00a0 and \u00a0 it \u00a0 has \u00a0 been \u00a0 relied \u00a0 upon \u00a0 while \u00a0 passing \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nimpugned \u00a0 order. \u00a0 Similarly, \u00a0 some \u00a0 statements \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 alleged \u00a0 ration \u00a0 card\u00a0<br \/>\nholders\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0recorded,\u00a0but,\u00a0none\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0statements\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0supplied\u00a0<br \/>\nto\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0is\u00a0entitled\u00a0to\u00a0defend\u00a0its\u00a0case\u00a0and,\u00a0<br \/>\ntherefore,\u00a0the\u00a0impugned\u00a0order\u00a0deserves\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0quashed\u00a0and\u00a0set\u00a0aside\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nmatter\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0remanded\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0appellate\u00a0authority\u00a0so\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0give\u00a0<br \/>\nadequate\u00a0opportunity\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0to\u00a0represent\u00a0its\u00a0case.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\u00a0 \u00a0I\u00a0have\u00a0heard\u00a0learned\u00a0counsel\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0respondents,\u00a0who\u00a0has\u00a0submitted\u00a0<br \/>\nthat\u00a0notice\u00a0was\u00a0given\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner,\u00a0as\u00a0stated\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0counter\u00a0affidavit,\u00a0<br \/>\nbefore\u00a0passing\u00a0the\u00a0impugned\u00a0order.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0reply\u00a0was\u00a0given\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0time\u00a0limit\u00a0<br \/>\n                                       \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad2\u00ad<br \/>\nis\u00a0over\u00a0and,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0considered\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0respondents\u00a0<br \/>\nIt \u00a0 is \u00a0 fairly \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 by \u00a0 learned \u00a0 counsel \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 respondents \u00a0 that \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\ndocuments,\u00a0relied\u00a0upon\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Sub\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Officer,\u00a0Pakur\u00a0while\u00a0passing\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0impugned\u00a0order,\u00a0have\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0supplied\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner.\u00a0Nonetheless,\u00a0<br \/>\nthe \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 is \u00a0 provided \u00a0 against \u00a0 the \u00a0 impugned \u00a0 order \u00a0 and, \u00a0 therefore, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\npetition\u00a0may\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0entertained\u00a0by\u00a0this\u00a0Court,\u00a0at\u00a0this\u00a0stage.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Having\u00a0heard\u00a0learned\u00a0counsel\u00a0for\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0sides\u00a0and\u00a0looking\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0facts\u00a0<br \/>\nand \u00a0 circumstances \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 case, \u00a0 I \u00a0 hereby \u00a0 quash \u00a0 and \u00a0 set \u00a0 aside \u00a0 the \u00a0 order\u00a0<br \/>\npassed \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Sub \u00a0 Divisional \u00a0 Officer, \u00a0 Pakur \u00a0 dated \u00a0 6th\u00a0 June, \u00a0 2011 \u00a0 at\u00a0<br \/>\nAnnexure\u00ad3\u00a0mainly\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0facts\u00a0and\u00a0reasons:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>    (i)\u00a0The\u00a0petitioner\u00a0was\u00a0given\u00a0license\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a02009\u00a0to\u00a0run\u00a0the\u00a0fair\u00a0price\u00a0<br \/>\n    shop. \u00a0 Thereafter, \u00a0 the \u00a0 petitioner \u00a0 continued \u00a0 with \u00a0 fair \u00a0 price \u00a0 shop, \u00a0 in\u00a0<br \/>\n    question,\u00a0for\u00a0several\u00a0months.\u00a0Not\u00a0on\u00a0a\u00a0single\u00a0occasion,\u00a0any\u00a0breach\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\n    any \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 conditions \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 license \u00a0 have \u00a0 been \u00a0 found \u00a0 out \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n    respondents.\u00a0Thus,\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0was\u00a0working\u00a0in\u00a0accordance\u00a0with\u00a0law.\u00a0\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    (ii)\u00a0It\u00a0appears\u00a0that\u00a0suddenly\u00a0a\u00a0notice\u00a0was\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0pointing\u00a0out\u00a0several\u00a0<br \/>\n    irregularities\u00a0in\u00a0running\u00a0the\u00a0fair\u00a0price\u00a0shop\u00a0and\u00a0only\u00a0two\u00a0days&#8217;\u00a0time\u00a0was\u00a0<br \/>\n    given\u00a0to\u00a0give\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0notice.\u00a0\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    (iii)\u00a0It\u00a0also\u00a0appears\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0facts\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0show\u00a0<br \/>\n    cause\u00a0notice\u00a0was\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0time\u00a0limit,\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0<br \/>\n    the \u00a0 respondents \u00a0 i.e.\u00a0 after \u00a0two\u00a0 days \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 receipt \u00a0of \u00a0 the \u00a0 copy\u00a0 of \u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n    notice.\u00a0Looking\u00a0to\u00a0these\u00a0facts,\u00a0it\u00a0appears\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0respondent\u00a0<br \/>\n    authority,\u00a0who\u00a0has\u00a0given\u00a0notice,\u00a0has\u00a0lost\u00a0sight\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0that\u00a0such\u00a0a\u00a0<br \/>\n    short\u00a0time\u00a0ought\u00a0not\u00a0to\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0given\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner.\u00a0Looking\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n    nature \u00a0 of \u00a0 allegation \u00a0 labelled \u00a0 against \u00a0 the \u00a0 petitioner, \u00a0 at \u00a0 least \u00a0 ten \u00a0 days&#8217;\u00a0<br \/>\n    time\u00a0ought\u00a0to\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0given\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0<br \/>\n    can \u00a0 adequately \u00a0 represent \u00a0 its \u00a0 case \u00a0 before \u00a0 the \u00a0 concerned \u00a0 respondent\u00a0<br \/>\n    authorities. \u00a0 Too \u00a0 short \u00a0 time \u00a0 to \u00a0 give \u00a0 a \u00a0 reply \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 show \u00a0 cause \u00a0 notice\u00a0<br \/>\n    tantamounts\u00a0to\u00a0violation\u00a0of\u00a0principle\u00a0of\u00a0natural\u00a0justice.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    (iv)\u00a0It\u00a0further\u00a0appears\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0facts\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0that\u00a0while\u00a0passing\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n    impugned\u00a0order,\u00a0the\u00a0Sub\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Officer,\u00a0Pakur\u00a0has\u00a0relied\u00a0upon\u00a0some\u00a0<br \/>\n    report\u00a0privately\u00a0called\u00a0for\u00a0by\u00a0him.\u00a0Neither\u00a0the\u00a0copy\u00a0nor\u00a0the\u00a0gist\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n    report\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0supplied\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner.\u00a0Whenever,\u00a0the\u00a0respondents\u00a0<br \/>\n    are\u00a0relying\u00a0upon\u00a0any\u00a0document\u00a0while\u00a0passing \u00a0the\u00a0impugned\u00a0order,\u00a0a\u00a0<br \/>\n    copy\u00a0whereof\u00a0or\u00a0summary\u00a0thereof\u00a0ought\u00a0to\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0supplied\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n    petitioner.\u00a0\u00a0Likewise,\u00a0several\u00a0\u00a0statements\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0ration\u00a0card\u00a0holders\u00a0have<br \/>\n                                             \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad3\u00ad<br \/>\n           been\u00a0relied\u00a0upon.\u00a0Nobody\u00a0knows\u00a0who\u00a0says\u00a0what\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0<br \/>\n           and\u00a0nobody\u00a0knows\u00a0whether\u00a0they\u00a0are\u00a0really\u00a0ration\u00a0card\u00a0holders\u00a0or\u00a0not.\u00a0If\u00a0<br \/>\n           the \u00a0 Sub \u00a0 Divisional \u00a0 Officer, \u00a0 Pakur \u00a0 is \u00a0 relying \u00a0 upon \u00a0 this \u00a0 statement \u00a0 for\u00a0<br \/>\n           cancelling\u00a0the\u00a0fair\u00a0price\u00a0shop\u00a0license\u00a0then\u00a0these\u00a0statements\u00a0or\u00a0summary\u00a0<br \/>\n           thereof\u00a0ought\u00a0to\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0supplied\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0facts\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n           present\u00a0case,\u00a0no\u00a0such\u00a0statement\u00a0or\u00a0summary\u00a0thereof\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0supplied\u00a0<br \/>\n           to\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       5.\u00a0 \u00a0In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0aforesaid\u00a0facts\u00a0and\u00a0reasons,\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0gross\u00a0violation\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\n       principle\u00a0of\u00a0natural\u00a0justice\u00a0while\u00a0passing\u00a0the\u00a0impugned\u00a0order.\u00a0I\u00a0therefore,\u00a0<br \/>\n       quash\u00a0and\u00a0set\u00a0aside\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0passed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Sub\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Officer,\u00a0Pakur\u00a0<br \/>\n       dated\u00a06th\u00a0 June,\u00a02011\u00a0at\u00a0Annexure\u00ad3\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0memo\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0petition.\u00a0<br \/>\n       Liberty\u00a0is\u00a0reserved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0respondents\u00a0to\u00a0take\u00a0appropriate\u00a0steps\u00a0against\u00a0<br \/>\n       the\u00a0petitioner,\u00a0if\u00a0the\u00a0respondents\u00a0want\u00a0to\u00a0take\u00a0such\u00a0action,\u00a0at\u00a0least\u00a0after\u00a0<br \/>\n       following\u00a0the\u00a0principle\u00a0of\u00a0natural\u00a0justice.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       6.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0writ\u00a0petition\u00a0is\u00a0allowed\u00a0and\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>                                                    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(D.N.\u00a0Patel,\u00a0J.)<br \/>\nAjay\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court Ruksa Sway Sahayata Samuh (Shg vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2011 IN\u00a0THE\u00a0HIGH\u00a0COURT\u00a0OF\u00a0JHARKHAND\u00a0AT\u00a0RANCHI\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0W.P.\u00a0(C)\u00a0No.\u00a03284\u00a0of\u00a02011 Ruksa\u00a0Sway\u00a0Sahayata\u00a0Samuh\u00a0(SHG) &#8230;&#8230; Petitioner \u00a0Versus\u00a0 The\u00a0State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0&amp;\u00a0another &#8230;&#8230; Respondents \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad CORAM:\u00a0 HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0D.N.\u00a0PATEL\u00a0\u00a0 \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad For\u00a0the\u00a0Petitioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0M\/s\u00a0Rajeeva\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0Advocate \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Sarfraz\u00a0Akhtar,\u00a0Mithilesh\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Advocates \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 For\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0R.\u00a0Mukhopadhya,\u00a0S.C.\u00adII\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad th \u00a003\/Dated:\u00a013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0July,\u00a02011 \u00a0 \u00a0 1. \u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0present\u00a0petition\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0preferred\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0passed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0 Sub\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Officer,\u00a0Pakur\u00a0dated\u00a06th\u00a0 June,\u00a02011\u00a0(Annexure\u00ad3),\u00a0whereby,\u00a0 the \u00a0 license \u00a0 given \u00a0 to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-178125","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ruksa Sway Sahayata Samuh (Shg vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ruksa Sway Sahayata Samuh (Shg vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-07T19:10:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ruksa Sway Sahayata Samuh (Shg vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-07T19:10:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":928,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Ruksa Sway Sahayata Samuh (Shg vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-07T19:10:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ruksa Sway Sahayata Samuh (Shg vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ruksa Sway Sahayata Samuh (Shg vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ruksa Sway Sahayata Samuh (Shg vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-07T19:10:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ruksa Sway Sahayata Samuh (Shg vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-07T19:10:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011"},"wordCount":928,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011","name":"Ruksa Sway Sahayata Samuh (Shg vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-07T19:10:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ruksa-sway-sahayata-samuh-shg-vs-state-of-jharkhand-anr-on-13-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ruksa Sway Sahayata Samuh (Shg vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Anr on 13 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178125","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=178125"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178125\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=178125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=178125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=178125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}