{"id":178340,"date":"2011-10-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-10-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011"},"modified":"2015-04-26T03:05:25","modified_gmt":"2015-04-25T21:35:25","slug":"anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011","title":{"rendered":"Anuj Sharma & Ors. vs University Of Delih on 3 October, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
Anuj Sharma & Ors. vs University Of Delih on 3 October, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: Kailash Gambhir<\/div>\n
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI\n\n\n                        Judgment delivered on: 3rd October, 2011\n\n                           W.P.(C) 6933\/2011\n\nAnuj Sharma & Ors.                               ......Petitioners\n\n                        Through: Mr. Kush Chaturvedi and Ms.\n                                 Priyanka Priyadarshini, Advs.\n\n                                 Vs.\n\nUniversity of Delhi                                 ......Respondent\n\n                        Through: Mr. MJS Rupal with Ms. Shawana\n                                 Bari, Advs.\n\n\n\nCORAM:\nHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR:\n\n1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may\n   be allowed to see the judgment?                         Yes\n\n2. To be referred to Reporter or not?                      Yes\n\n3. Whether the judgment should be reported\n   in the Digest?                                          Yes\n\nKAILASH GAMBHIR, J. (Oral)\n<\/pre>\n
*\n<\/p>\n
1.            By this petition filed under Article 226 of the<\/p>\n
Constitution of India, the petitioners seek directions to direct<\/p>\n
W.P.(C) No. 6933\/2011                       Page 1 of 8<\/span>
\n the respondent           to convert the OBC category seats to the<\/p>\n
general category which have remained unfilled                        after<\/p>\n
31.8.2011.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.            Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, learned              counsel for the<\/p>\n
petitioners       submits that 50 seats of the OBC category are<\/p>\n
still lying vacant which were never converted to the general<\/p>\n
category by the respondent University after filling the seats<\/p>\n
in the OBC category as directed by the Apex Court in P.V.<\/p>\n
Indiresan Vs. Union of India, Civil Appeal No. 7084\/2011<\/p>\n
decided on 18.8.2011. Counsel submits that there is a clear<\/p>\n
defiance on the part of the respondent University of the<\/p>\n
directions given by the Apex Court in the matter of                   P.V.<\/p>\n
Indiresan (Supra), as          in terms    of the said judgment the<\/p>\n
respondents were legally bound to convert the vacant OBC<\/p>\n
category seats into the general category seats. Counsel also<\/p>\n
submits that            the rank of some of the petitioners in the<\/p>\n
present petition         are immediately after the rank of the last<\/p>\n
candidate      who       was   granted    admission     in   the   general<\/p>\n
category.       The contention of the counsel for the petitioners<\/p>\n
W.P.(C) No. 6933\/2011                         Page 2 of 8<\/span>
\n is that     if all the unfilled       seats of       OBC      category are<\/p>\n
converted into the general category, then                     certainly the<\/p>\n
petitioners would have a chance to get admission in the LLB<\/p>\n
first year course in the 2011-12 session.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.            Mr.       M.J.S.   Rupal,    learned     counsel      for      the<\/p>\n
respondent very fairly admits that there are still 50 unfilled<\/p>\n
OBC seats in the first year of the LLB course of the<\/p>\n
respondent University. Counsel, however, submits that since<\/p>\n
the academic session has already begun from 1.8.2011 and<\/p>\n
will close on 13.11.2011, therefore the petitioners                         have<\/p>\n
belatedly approached this court to seek their admissions in<\/p>\n
the LLB first year course.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4.            I have heard learned counsel for the parties.<\/p>\n
5.            The following directions were given by the Apex<\/p>\n
Court in the case of P.V. Indiresan(supra):<\/p>\n
     “41. We therefore, dispose of this appeal, affirming the decision
\n     dated 7.9.2010 of the learned Single Judge of the High Court,
\n     subject to the clarifications\/observations above, and subject to the
\n     following conditions:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
W.P.(C) No. 6933\/2011                           Page 3 of 8<\/span><\/p>\n
      (i) In regard to the admissions for 2011-2012, if any Central
\n     Educational Institution has already determined the ‘cut-off marks’ for
\n     OBCs with reference to the marks secured by the last candidate in
\n     the general category, and has converted the unfilled OBC seats to
\n     general category seats and allotted the seats to general category
\n     candidates, such admissions shall not be disturbed. But where the
\n     process of conversion and allotment is not completed, the OBC seats
\n     shall be filled by OBC candidates.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
     (ii) If in any Central Educational Institution, the OBC reservation
\n     seats remain vacant, such institutions shall fill the said seats with
\n     OBC students.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
     Only if OBC candidates possessing the minimum eligibility\/qualifying
\n     marks are not available in the OBC merit list, the OBC seats shall be
\n     converted into general category seats.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
     (iii) If the last date for admissions has expired, the last date for
\n     admissions shall be extended till 31.8.2011 as a special case, to
\n     enable admissions to the vacant OBC seats.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
There is not even an iota of doubt that the respondent is in<\/p>\n
clear defiance of the above directions given by the Hon’ble<\/p>\n
Apex Court. No explanation has come forth from the side of<\/p>\n
the respondent University as to why the unfilled 50 OBC<\/p>\n
seats were not converted into the general category after the<\/p>\n
same remained unfilled after the counseling for the OBC<\/p>\n
candidates. The respondents were no doubt awaiting for the<\/p>\n
directions of the Hon’ble Apex Court and due to that reason<\/p>\n
the counseling process to fill the OBC seats was deferred.<\/p>\n
W.P.(C) No. 6933\/2011                             Page 4 of 8<\/span>
\n As per the respondent, an open house counseling was held<\/p>\n
on 20.8.2011 and even         after granting admission to OBC<\/p>\n
candidates who had participated in the said counseling, still<\/p>\n
50 seats of OBC category were left unfilled.<\/p>\n
6.            It is quite shocking that the non compliance of the<\/p>\n
directions of the Apex Court is not by any other institution<\/p>\n
but by a       Faculty   of law, University of Delhi,   which is<\/p>\n
considered to be one of the premier law institutions in the<\/p>\n
country. The Admission Committee of the Law Faculty must<\/p>\n
be comprising of law teachers and how can they who teach<\/p>\n
and impart education to the students who would become<\/p>\n
future lawyers, the means of dispensation of justice of the<\/p>\n
society, ignore the directions passed by the Apex Court of the<\/p>\n
country is baffling and alarming to say the least. To obey the<\/p>\n
mandate of the highest Court of the country is the bounden<\/p>\n
duty of all and by adopting a cavalier approach, the<\/p>\n
respondents in a most brazen and outrageous manner have<\/p>\n
given a go by to the directions of the Apex Court.<\/p>\n
W.P.(C) No. 6933\/2011                    Page 5 of 8<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
 7.            The plea taken by the respondent             that the<\/p>\n
academic session        of the LLB first year course has already<\/p>\n
begun does not cut any ice in view of the fact that the<\/p>\n
petitioners cannot be made to suffer for no fault on their<\/p>\n
part. Ordinarily, the mid stream admissions are not the<\/p>\n
preferred norm, but in the case like the present one where<\/p>\n
there is a sea of opportunity but is not open to the ones<\/p>\n
willing to avail, due to the unreasonableness and high<\/p>\n
handedness of the respondents, the court will lean in the<\/p>\n
favour where justice can be done and the principles of equity<\/p>\n
and good conscience are the torch bearers.<\/p>\n
8.            The Courts have also consistently held that every<\/p>\n
endeavour by the         University       and all other institutions<\/p>\n
should be made to fill all the seats as wastage of seats is not<\/p>\n
only at the cost of the public exchequer but at the cost of<\/p>\n
depriving a number of aspiring students struggling to get<\/p>\n
admission       in coveted institutions    and universities such as<\/p>\n
the Delhi University, which is a dream of many.             Hence,<\/p>\n
considering the aforesaid circumstances, the respondent is<\/p>\n
W.P.(C) No. 6933\/2011                        Page 6 of 8<\/span>
\n hereby directed to         hold   a special counseling    to fill the<\/p>\n
vacant 50 OBC           after converting   the said vacant 50 OBC<\/p>\n
seats into the general category in terms of the directions of<\/p>\n
the Hon’ble Apex Court in            the matter of P.V. Indiresan<\/p>\n
(Supra). The said special counseling shall be conducted by<\/p>\n
the respondent university after duly notifying the candidates<\/p>\n
belonging to the general category through notice board           and<\/p>\n
through their website.         At least seven days time shall be<\/p>\n
given to the candidates through such a notice inviting them<\/p>\n
to participate in the said special counseling. The respondent<\/p>\n
is also directed to publish an advertisement to this effect in<\/p>\n
a national daily so that the candidates can be made aware<\/p>\n
that the admissions have yet not been closed so that not only<\/p>\n
the present petitioners        but the other candidates standing<\/p>\n
higher in rank can try their luck to seek admission          against<\/p>\n
the unfilled vacant seats.        It is further directed that   after<\/p>\n
filling the said 50 seats, the Faculty of Law shall conduct<\/p>\n
special classes for such students so that they can cover their<\/p>\n
curriculum       to appear in their first semester examination.<\/p>\n
W.P.(C) No. 6933\/2011                       Page 7 of 8<\/span>
\n The attendance of such students shall also be reckoned from<\/p>\n
the date of their admission in the course and not from the<\/p>\n
date when the current academic session had begun.<\/p>\n
9.            With the above directions, the present petition<\/p>\n
stands disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
October 03, 2011                    KAILASH GAMBHIR, J\nmg\n\n\n\n\nW.P.(C) No. 6933\/2011                  Page 8 of 8<\/span>\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court Anuj Sharma & Ors. vs University Of Delih on 3 October, 2011 Author: Kailash Gambhir IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: 3rd October, 2011 W.P.(C) 6933\/2011 Anuj Sharma & Ors. ……Petitioners Through: Mr. Kush Chaturvedi and Ms. Priyanka Priyadarshini, Advs. Vs. University of Delhi ……Respondent Through: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-178340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAnuj Sharma & Ors. vs University Of Delih on 3 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Anuj Sharma & Ors. vs University Of Delih on 3 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-10-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-25T21:35:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Anuj Sharma & Ors. vs University Of Delih on 3 October, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-10-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-25T21:35:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1266,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011\",\"name\":\"Anuj Sharma & Ors. vs University Of Delih on 3 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-10-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-25T21:35:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Anuj Sharma & Ors. vs University Of Delih on 3 October, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Anuj Sharma & Ors. vs University Of Delih on 3 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Anuj Sharma & Ors. vs University Of Delih on 3 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-10-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-25T21:35:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Anuj Sharma & Ors. vs University Of Delih on 3 October, 2011","datePublished":"2011-10-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-25T21:35:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011"},"wordCount":1266,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011","name":"Anuj Sharma & Ors. vs University Of Delih on 3 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-10-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-25T21:35:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anuj-sharma-ors-vs-university-of-delih-on-3-october-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Anuj Sharma & Ors. vs University Of Delih on 3 October, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=178340"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178340\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=178340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=178340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=178340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}