{"id":179182,"date":"2007-04-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-04-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007"},"modified":"2017-11-13T12:40:37","modified_gmt":"2017-11-13T07:10:37","slug":"sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007","title":{"rendered":"Sanilan K.M vs The District Superintendent Of &#8230; on 17 April, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sanilan K.M vs The District Superintendent Of &#8230; on 17 April, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(Crl) No. 80 of 2007(S)\n\n\n1. SANILAN K.M, AGED 37,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,\n\n3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,\n\n4. RAHIMA MELEKUDASSERY,\n\n5. MUKTHAR, AGED 22,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.SANIL KUMAR\n\n                For Respondent  :SMT.S.AMINA\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN\n\n Dated :17\/04\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>                         K.T. SANKARAN &amp; S. SIRI JAGAN, JJ.\n<\/p>\n<p>                   &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<\/p>\n<p>                                     W.P.(Crl) No. 80  OF  2007<\/p>\n<p>                  &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<\/p>\n<p>                                   Dated this the 17th April, 2007<\/p>\n<p>                                            J  U D G M E N T<\/p>\n<p>Siri Jagan, J:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         A   very   difficult   situation   arises   in   this   case.     The   petitioner   has<\/p>\n<p>approached  this court  seeking a writ of  Habeas corpus stating  that he fell<\/p>\n<p>in love with one Smt.  Rahima  who is a physically  handicapped lady and<\/p>\n<p>that   she   is   under   wrongful   confinement     by   respondents   Nos.   4   and   5   .<\/p>\n<p>Respondent   Nos.   4   and   5   are   the   mother   and   brother   of   the   said     Smt.<\/p>\n<p>Rahima .\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         2.   As directed by this Court, the second respondent has produced<\/p>\n<p>before us the said Smt. Rahima.   We had   talked with her at length.   She<\/p>\n<p>submits that she has no relationship of love with the petitioner and that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is only a good friend of hers. She is, to some extent, wrongfully<\/p>\n<p>confined     by     respondent   Nos.   4   and   5   in   the   sense   that   she   has   been<\/p>\n<p>forced to marry against her wish, a person far elder in age to her having<\/p>\n<p>four children, it is submitted.  She would submit that she has no intention to<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(Crl) No. 80  OF  2007<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                  2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>continue  the marital relationship with the said person and  intends to seek<\/p>\n<p>divorce     from   him,     for   which   the   respondent   Nos.   4   and   5   are   not<\/p>\n<p>permitting her.     She wants to get appropriate   assistance   to get divorce<\/p>\n<p>from   her   husband   as   the   marriage   has  been     totally  against   her   wishes.<\/p>\n<p>We had  occasion to talk to  the 5th respondent  also, who is the brother of<\/p>\n<p>Smt.  Rahima.  He admits that Rahima has been married to a person who<\/p>\n<p>had two children at the time of marriage and   has now two more children.<\/p>\n<p>The said Smt. Rahima  is not in illegal custody, he submits.<\/p>\n<p>        3.  Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, we<\/p>\n<p>dispose of this Writ Petition with the following directions:<\/p>\n<p>        Since the said Smt. Rahima expressed her desire to go back to her<\/p>\n<p>house   as she has nowhere else   to go, she would   be free to go to her<\/p>\n<p>house.  However, the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 shall not in any way detain<\/p>\n<p>her   against her wishes.   If the said Smt. Rahima wants to get divorce, it<\/p>\n<p>would be open to her  to take appropriate proceedings under her personal<\/p>\n<p>law to approach the   appropriate court seeking divorce.  Respondent Nos.<\/p>\n<p>4 and 5  shall not in any way  stand in her  way in prosecuting such petition<\/p>\n<p>for   divorce.     The   said   Smt.   Rahima   would     be   entitled   to   seek   the<\/p>\n<p>assistance of the petitioner or anybody else     in getting divorce   if she so<\/p>\n<p>wishes.   But Smt. Rahima categorically  asserts that she does not wish to<\/p>\n<p>go   with   the   petitioner   .   As   a   major   it   would     be   open     to   the   said   Smt.<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(Crl) No. 80  OF  2007<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                      3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Rahima to decide that question according to her wishes.   But we make it<\/p>\n<p>clear that the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 shall not in any way  prevent  Smt.<\/p>\n<p>Rahima from seeking appropriate  reliefs from the appropriate court  to get<\/p>\n<p>divorce from her husband if she wishes to do so.<\/p>\n<p>      With these directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.  Respondents<\/p>\n<p>Nos. 2 and 3 shall see that the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 do not stand in the<\/p>\n<p>way of the said Smt. Rahima  initiating and prosecuting  appropriate steps<\/p>\n<p>for   getting divorce from her husband, if she so wishes.   If the respondent<\/p>\n<p>Nos. 2 and 3 receives any complaint either written or oral   from the said<\/p>\n<p>Smt. Rahima or on her behalf, the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 shall enquire<\/p>\n<p>into such complaint   and take   appropriate action in the matter to enable<\/p>\n<p>the said Smt. Rahima   to   initiate and prosecute appropriate   proceedings<\/p>\n<p>to get divorce from her husband, without interference  from  respondents or<\/p>\n<p>anybody else.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                           Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                       K.T. SANKARAN,<\/p>\n<p>                                                          JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n                                                             Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                        S. SIRI JAGAN,<\/p>\n<p>                                                           JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nlk<\/p>\n<p>                                    \/true copy\/<\/p>\n<p>                                                         P.A. TO JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>? IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM<\/p>\n<p>+WP(C) No. 8084 of 2004(K)<\/p>\n<p>#1. K. BALAKRISHNAN @ KUTTAN NAIR,<br \/>\n                      &#8230;  Petitioner<\/p>\n<p>                        Vs<\/p>\n<p>$1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE<br \/>\n                       &#8230;       Respondent<\/p>\n<p>2. THE ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,<\/p>\n<p>3. THE SECRETARY, KUTTIPPURAM GRAMA<\/p>\n<p>!                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR<\/p>\n<p>^                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER<\/p>\n<p>*Coram<br \/>\n The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH<\/p>\n<p>% Dated :21\/03\/2007<\/p>\n<p>: O R D E R<br \/>\n                                KURIAN JOSEPH, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                       &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>                          W.P.(C). NO. 8084 OF 2004<\/p>\n<p>                      &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>                Dated this the 21st day of March, 2007.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                    J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n<p>        This writ petition is filed praying for a direction to the 3rd respondent to<\/p>\n<p>pay the entire amounts  in respect  of the works executed  by the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>The   stand   taken   in   the   statement   filed   by   the   2nd  respondent   is   that   the<\/p>\n<p>eligible amounts have already been paid.  Therefore, it is for the petitioner in<\/p>\n<p>view   of   the   surviving   dispute   to   pursue   the   matter   before   the   Civil   Court.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of making it clear that, in the event of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner approaching the Civil Court, the time taken for prosecuting this<\/p>\n<p>writ petition shall stand excluded.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                   KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>smp<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Sanilan K.M vs The District Superintendent Of &#8230; on 17 April, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(Crl) No. 80 of 2007(S) 1. SANILAN K.M, AGED 37, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-179182","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sanilan K.M vs The District Superintendent Of ... on 17 April, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sanilan K.M vs The District Superintendent Of ... on 17 April, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-04-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-13T07:10:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sanilan K.M vs The District Superintendent Of &#8230; on 17 April, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-04-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-13T07:10:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007\"},\"wordCount\":836,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007\",\"name\":\"Sanilan K.M vs The District Superintendent Of ... on 17 April, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-04-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-13T07:10:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sanilan K.M vs The District Superintendent Of &#8230; on 17 April, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sanilan K.M vs The District Superintendent Of ... on 17 April, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sanilan K.M vs The District Superintendent Of ... on 17 April, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-04-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-13T07:10:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sanilan K.M vs The District Superintendent Of &#8230; on 17 April, 2007","datePublished":"2007-04-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-13T07:10:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007"},"wordCount":836,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007","name":"Sanilan K.M vs The District Superintendent Of ... on 17 April, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-04-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-13T07:10:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanilan-k-m-vs-the-district-superintendent-of-on-17-april-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sanilan K.M vs The District Superintendent Of &#8230; on 17 April, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179182","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=179182"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179182\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=179182"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=179182"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=179182"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}