{"id":17957,"date":"2010-04-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010"},"modified":"2018-06-27T22:21:20","modified_gmt":"2018-06-27T16:51:20","slug":"sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sabbir vs The on 9 April, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
Sabbir vs The on 9 April, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Jayant Patel,&Nbsp;Honourable Z.K.Saiyed,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCR.A\/2012\/2009\t 8\/ 9\tJUDGMENT \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nAPPEAL No. 2012 of 2009\n \n\nWith\n\n\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nMISC.APPLICATION No. 2349 of 2010\n \n\nIn\nCRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2012 of 2009\n \n\n \n \nFor\nApproval and Signature:  \n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL \n\n \n\n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED\n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n1\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n2\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nTo be\n\t\t\treferred to the Reporter or not ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n3\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\ttheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n4\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tthis case involves a substantial question of law as to the\n\t\t\tinterpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order\n\t\t\tmade thereunder ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n5\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tit is to be circulated to the civil judge ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nSABBIR\nIQBALBHAI JUNAJ - Appellant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT - Opponent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMS\nROOPAL R PATEL for\nAppellant(s) : 1, \nMR KP RAVAL Ld. APP for Opponent(s) :\n1, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL\n\t\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\t \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nand\n\t\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\t \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 09\/04\/2010 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nJUDGMENT<\/pre>\n
(Per
\n: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED)<\/p>\n
1.\tThe
\npresent Criminal Appeal is  preferred by the appellant – original
\naccused no. 2, under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
\n1973, against the judgment and order of conviction dated 31.05.2006
\npassed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rajkot in Sessions Case No.
\n52 of 2005, whereby the accused has been convicted of the charges
\nleveled against him.\n<\/p>\n
1.1\tThe
\nappellant – accused has been ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment
\nfor seven years for offence u\/s 397 (u\/s 394 no separate sentence) of
\nIndian Penal Code  and fine of Rs. 5000\/- in default to undergo
\nsimple imprisonment for six months.  The learned Sessions Judge has
\nalso held the appellant – accused guilty for the offence under
\nSection 188 of I.P. Code and imposed fined Rs. 1000\/- in default to
\nundergo simple imprisonment for one month and fifteen days.\n<\/p>\n
2.\tIt
\nis the case of the prosecution that on 13.12.2004, the complainant
\nalong with four other people namely Driver Jaffarbhai, Umarbhai,
\nSureshbhai and Amin alias Tako was standing near Deepak Industries.
\nAt that time, the original accused nos. 1 to 3 threatened them by
\nshowing knife.  The accused forcibly  took away gold chain worth Rs.
\n20,000\/- worn by the complainant, two gold rings worth Rs. 8000\/-,
\ncash worth Rs. 6000\/- and Nokia mobile phone worth Rs. 5000\/- from
\nthe complainant. When the complainant tried to protest,  the original
\naccused Asif also injured the complainant on his nose, stomach, ring
\nfinger of left hand with the knife.\n<\/p>\n
2.1\tThereafter
\non the strength of the complaint filed by the complainant, the
\noffence was registered against the present appellants for the
\noffences punishable u\/s 379, 394, 397, 504, 216(a), 188-114 of Indian
\nPenal Code and after their arrest  chargesheet was submitted against
\nthe appellants.  Thereafter, as the case was exclusively triable by
\nthe Sessions  Court, the same was committed to the Sessions Court.\n<\/p>\n
2.2\tThe
\ntrial was initiated against the appellant  and during the course of
\ntrial the prosecution examined the following 15 witnesses as oral
\nevidences:\n<\/p>\n
Chandubhai
\n\tJagabhai Patel\tEx. 18<\/p>\n
Vijay
\n\tBhimji Rupareliya\t\tEx. 36<\/p>\n
Jitenbhai
\n\tAnilbhai\t\t\tEx. 39<\/p>\n
Atulbhai
\n\tPremjibhai\t\t\tEx. 47<\/p>\n
Bharatbhai
\n\tBhagwanjibhai\t\tEx. 51<\/p>\n
Tejasbhai
\n\tBipinbhai\t\t\tEx. 52<\/p>\n
Ketanbhai
\n\tKhimjibhai\t\tEx. 53<\/p>\n
Umarbhai
\n\tGagubhai\t\tEx. 56<\/p>\n
Jaferbhai
\n\tTarmohmad\t\tEx. 57<\/p>\n
Amin
\n\talias Tako dadubhai\t\tEx. 63<\/p>\n
Dr.\n<\/p>\n
\tHemang Vasavda\t\tEx. 41<\/p>\n
Bhikhubhai
\n\tKesarisinh\t\tEx. 45<\/p>\n
Kishoresinh
\n\tJhanubha\t\tEx. 67<\/p>\n
Rakeshkumar
\n\tPrabhudasbhai\tEx. 78<\/p>\n
Jentilal
\n\tShantilal Joshi\t\tEx. 83<\/p>\n
2.3\tThe
\nprosecution also exhibited the following 27 documents
\nas documentary evidences:<\/p>\n
\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\t  \n\nOriginal\n\tComplaint\t\t\t\t\t Ex. 19\n\t  \n\nPanchnama\n\tprepared at Asif's house\t\tEx. 32\n\t  \n\nPanchnama\n\tabout seizure of muddamal\tEx. 37\n\t  \n\nPanchnama\n\tof local place\t\t\t\tEx. 40\n\t  \n\nCertificate\n\tby Dr. Vasavda regarding injury caused to the complainant\t\t\t\t\t\tEx.\n\t42<\/span>\n\t  \n\nHistory\n\tin hospital form\t\t\t\tEx. 43\n\t  \n\nTreatment\n\tpapers of the complainant in all  1 to 8 pages \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tEx. 44\n\t  \n\nCopy\n<\/pre>\n
\tof circular of arms prohibition\tEx. 46<\/p>\n
Regn.\n<\/p>\n
\tBook of herohonda no. GJ-3-PP-1277Ex. 55<\/p>\n
Original
\n\tcopy of the evidence of Bharat Keshavlal \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\tEx. 65<\/p>\n
\tArrest
\n\tpanchnama in respect of sessions case no. 32\/05\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tEx. 66<\/p>\n
Extract
\n\tof station diary no. 3570\/04\t\tEx. 68<\/p>\n
Application
\n\trequesting custody of accused Ex. 69<\/p>\n
Letter
\n\tgranting police custody of the accused from jail Ex. 70<\/p>\n
Arrest
\n\tmemo of accused\t\t\t  \tEx. 71<\/p>\n
Letter
\n\tregarding making note of arrest of the accused in the station
\n\tdiary.\t\t\t\t\tEx. 72<\/p>\n
Application
\n\tin the court by PSI for adding sections 216(1) and 411
\n\tEx. 73<\/p>\n
Muddamal
\n\treceipt no. 476\/04\t\tEx. 74<\/p>\n
Muddamal
\n\treceipt no. 475\/04\t\t     \tEx. 75<\/p>\n
Letter
\n\tfor handing over the muddamal by Gandhigram police station to
\n\tBhaktinagar police station   Ex. 77<\/p>\n
Application
\n\tsubmitted before the Judicial Magistrate to add section 379
\n\tEx. 79<\/p>\n
Yadi
\n\tto districts and police stations \t    Ex. 80<\/p>\n
Special
\n\treport of serious offence\t\t    Ex. 81<\/p>\n
Investigation
\n\torder by Bhaktinagar PSO\t    Ex. 82<\/p>\n
Forwarding
\n\tletter by complainant\t\t    Ex. 84<\/p>\n
Yadi
\n\tto Executive magistrate for taking dying declaration\t\t\t\t\t\t    Ex. 85<\/p>\n
Yadi
\n\tto police control room with respect to investigation of stolen
\n\tmuddamal\t\t    Ex. 86<\/p>\n
At
\n\tthe end of trial,  after recording the statement of the accused, and
\n\thearing arguments on behalf of prosecution and the defence, the
\n\tlearned Sessions Judge convicted the appellant of the charges
\n\tleveled against him by judgement and order dated 31.05.2006.\n<\/p>\n
Being
\n\taggrieved by and dissatisfied with the aforesaid judgement and order
\n\tpassed by the Sessions Court the appellant has preferred the present
\n\tappeal.\n<\/p>\n
Ms.\n<\/p>\n
\tRoopal Patel, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant
\n\t  accused has submitted that the prosecution has miserably failed
\n\tto prove the charges under section 394, 144, 188 and 397 of Indian
\n\tPenal Code.  She has submitted that the prosecution has also failed
\n\tto prove the role of the present appellant   accused. She has
\n\tcontended that the identification of the present appellant is not
\n\tproved beyond reasonable doubt and the T.I. Parade is also not
\n\tcarried out as per the provision of law and only in the Court room
\n\tthe appellant accused was identified and due to such type of
\n\tidentification the present appellant   accused cannot be held
\n\tguilty for the charges alleged against him. She has also contended
\n\tthat the recovery as alleged by the prosecution is also not proved
\n\tbeyond reasonable doubt. She has contended that the prosecution has
\n\tfailed to appreciate that ingredients of robbery and decoity  have
\n\tnot been proved successfully by the prosecution. She has contended
\n\tthat the prosecution story is based on mere presumption and
\n\tsurmises. She has contended that the prosecution has failed to lead
\n\tcogent evidence which would prove the guilt of the accused in the
\n\talleged offence. She has contended that the injury which is alleged
\n\tto have been caused to the complainant is not a grievous in nature
\n\tand even if the case against the appellant   accused is assumed,
\n\the ought to have been convicted under Section 394 of I.P. Code and
\n\tnot under Section 397 of I.P. Code. She has also relied upon the
\n\tJudgment of this Court in Criminal Appeal No.520 of 2007, decided on
\n\t24.7.2009, which was filed by the co-accused and contended that the
\n\tratio of the said Judgment would be applicable in the present case
\n\talso.\n<\/p>\n
Mr.\n<\/p>\n
\tK.P. Raval, learned APP appearing for the respondent State has
\n\tsupported the order of the trial court and submitted that looking to
\n\tthe facts of the complainant and the driver Jaferbhai and Umarbhai
\n\twho was an employee of the complainant, the trial court’s
\n\tappreciation of the fact and evidence is just and proper. He has has
\n\tsubmitted that the prosecution has successfully proved the presence
\n\tof all the three accused at the time of the incidence and has
\n\tconvicted the accused as per law.  However, Mr. Raval is not in a
\n\tposition to controvert the submission regarding wrong imposition of
\n\tsection 397.\n<\/p>\n
We
\n\thave gone through the judgement and order passed by the trial court.
\n\tWe have also perused the oral as well as documentary evidence led by
\n\tthe trial court and also considered the submissions made by learned
\n\tAdvocate for the appellant as well as learned APP.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\ttrial court has gone through the evidences of the complainant as
\n\twell as witnesses at length.   The complainant in his deposition has
\n\tstated that there were three persons who has roughed him up and
\n\tforcibly taken jewellery,  cash and a mobile phone from him.  Apart
\n\tfrom the jewellery, the cash and mobile phone and other muddamal
\n\tarticles have been recovered from the accused.  It appears that the
\n\tgold ornaments had been sold off to some jeweller.  However, no
\n\tevidence regarding the same is coming forward.  The prosecution has
\n\tproved the recovery of the rest of the muddamal successfully.\n<\/p>\n
Moreover,
\n\ton a close scrutiny of the evidences of the witnesses, it is borne
\n\tout that there are no contradictions in the evidences of the
\n\twitnesses.  As regards the proper identification of the accused
\n\tthough the incident took place late night, it is clear that the road
\n\twas sufficiently lit up by street lamps of the municipality.  It is
\n\talso observed that there are certain industries and factories in the
\n\tvicinity which also added to the light.  The said observations are
\n\tnot controverted by the learned advocates for the accused.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\tappellant has taken up a contention that the identification parade
\n\tis done in the court room for the first time.  However, considering
\n\tthe other facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the
\n\tevidences against the accused, this contention will not support the
\n\tcase of the appellant.  Identification parade is only a mode to
\n\tsatisfy a complainant, the investigating agency and the court with
\n\tregard to the actual person\/s involved.  It cannot be considered as
\n\tprimary proof.  In the instant case, the witnesses have identified
\n\tthe accused and even the evidences are against him.  Hence the
\n\tconviction seems to be just and proper.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\ttrial court has also gone through the evidence of Dr. Hemang Vasavda
\n\tP.W. 4 Ex. 41.  The injuries nos. 1, 2, 3 & 5 more particularly
\n\ton nose, upper left lips and rear part of the stomach on right side
\n\twere caused due to some sharp object.  The medical officer has very
\n\tclearly stated that these injuries required only a period of about
\n\tten days to heal and are not grievous in nature.  The doctor has
\n\talso stated in his cross examination that the injuries are general
\n\tin nature and that the complainant was treated for only two days in
\n\tthe hospital.\n<\/p>\n
In
\n\tthe above view of the matter, we are of the considered opinion that
\n\tthe trial court was completely justified in convicting the appellant
\n\t of the charges leveled against him.  However, considering the
\n\tnature of the hurt and injury which is general the trial court ought
\n\tnot to have convicted the accused under section 397.  The said
\n\tcontention of the appellant is required to be accepted.\n<\/p>\n
Accordingly,
\n\tthis appeal is partly allowed.  The conviction of the appellant
\n\tunder Sections 394 & 188 of the Indian Penal Code vide judgment
\n\tand order dated 31.05.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge,
\n\tFast Track Court No. 5, Rajkot in Sessions Case No. 52 of 2005 is
\n\tupheld.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\tconviction and sentence imposed upon the appellant under Section 397
\n\tof the Indian Penal Code vide judgment and order dated 31.05.2006
\n\tpassed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 5,
\n\tRajkot in Sessions Case No. 52 of 2005 is quashed and set aside.
\n\tHowever, the appellant  – accused is held guilty for the offence
\n\tunder Section 394 of I.P. Code and he is ordered to undergo rigorous
\n\timprisonment for five years.  The remaining part of the judgement
\n\tand order of the trial Court is confirmed.\n<\/p>\n
As
\n\tthe main Criminal Appeal is disposed of, no order is passed in
\n\tCriminal Misc. Application No. 2349\/2010 and the same is disposed of
\n\taccordingly.\n<\/p>\n
(JAYANT
\nPATEL,J.)<\/p>\n
(Z.K.SAIYED,
\nJ.)<\/p>\n
sas<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court Sabbir vs The on 9 April, 2010 Author: Jayant Patel,&Nbsp;Honourable Z.K.Saiyed,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CR.A\/2012\/2009 8\/ 9 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2012 of 2009 With CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 2349 of 2010 In CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2012 of 2009 For Approval […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17957","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSabbir vs The on 9 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sabbir vs The on 9 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-27T16:51:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sabbir vs The on 9 April, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-27T16:51:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1687,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010\",\"name\":\"Sabbir vs The on 9 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-27T16:51:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sabbir vs The on 9 April, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sabbir vs The on 9 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sabbir vs The on 9 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-27T16:51:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sabbir vs The on 9 April, 2010","datePublished":"2010-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-27T16:51:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010"},"wordCount":1687,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010","name":"Sabbir vs The on 9 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-27T16:51:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sabbir-vs-the-on-9-april-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sabbir vs The on 9 April, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17957","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17957"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17957\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17957"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}