{"id":179590,"date":"2009-05-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009"},"modified":"2017-06-21T19:04:20","modified_gmt":"2017-06-21T13:34:20","slug":"ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Tricom Technologies vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 29 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Tricom Technologies vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 29 May, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H N Das<\/div>\n<pre>KRWEST; BANGALORE\nBY comssiama.  RESPONDENT\n\nN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE V.  ._\n\nDATED arms THE 293\" my 01:' MAY, 2099\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE I~ION'BLE bum. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOILf{\ufb02\u00a7'i\u00a7Af\u00a7. S'  4'\n\nwart PETITION No. 14232;29o9L\u20aci?*\u00ab;S;,*P(:;.     \n\nBETWEEN I\n\n------------------------u-\n\nM\/'S TRICOM TECPBNIOLOGIES  \nA REGISTERED PARTNERSHE? \n\nNo.21S7, m CROSS, B.1vLKAvAL; , 'A S\n\nI-IALIII STAGILBANGALORE,     77 =    _ \n\nBY ITS PARTNER RPERHMAL.  _  Bmmomzn\n\n(By Sri. C M NAc};A:3i,I$rOi}A1*--?A;  4' I; V\n\nAND:\n\n\"ma BANGALORE 1'.)_E'\u00bb'E3'-.OP'1\\\ufb01V\u00b0'r'\u00a71T\nAUII{O}L3.'I'Y  A ~\n\nO  WRIT. \" O':-;t'15LT1'IIC)NIS max) UNDER AR'I'iCLES 225 AND\n\n 2:27 01? THE {JONfs'ITI'U'I'ION OF }INDIA mm A PRAYER TO CALL\n-.jjj..F:~; OF CS.N0.9518!0l, ON um mg ()1? ma\n_ \" S .HQN*SLE DC\" ADDL. cmr CIVE &amp; SESSIONS IUDGE AT\n\n\" .B;!1.N\u20ac}ALi'JRE {ccc-51, QUASH 1 SET ASIDE THE 01195.11\n\nDT.I'5_.4;'i}\u00a7, PASSED ON IA.NO.10, E3 OS.NO.9518\/01, AT ANN-E,\n\n  'I'I$R.EBY ALLOW IA.NO.10, FELED BY TIE PETITIONER AS\n\n'O _'E'RA'\u00a3ED FOR AT ANN-C' AND ETC.\n\n THIS WRIT PETITION COMENG ON FOR P ARY\nHEARHQG THIS DAY, THE COURT FASSEI.) THE FOLLOWING;\n\now\n\n\n\ndeclare that they are the owners in possession and  of\ufb02tlie\nschedule prowrty mad for consequential    X, T \n\npleadings the Trial Court \ufb01asmed ti1eVfol1_ovvi11igf.is'si:es  \n\nissues.\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Petitioner \ufb01led o.s. No. 951312001 against the si  <\/p>\n<p>Whether plaintiff   iheiiis .&#8217;sia._assemi\u00a2&#8217; osmer in<br \/>\nIawfui possession, peaeei\ufb01sl  of \ufb01re<br \/>\nsuit    iboendaries and<\/p>\n<p>     \ufb01ling of the suit?\n<\/p>\n<p>   that the defendants<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;ii&#8217; out   &#8220;title or interest over the suit<\/p>\n<p>  in the possession and<\/p>\n<p>   the said site for public auction thus caused<br \/>\n  plainti\ufb01 is entitled to have a reiief of<br \/>\n  &#8221; ii 321} injunction agsmst the defendants as prayed?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;1&#8217;owharo;-senate decree&#8217;?\n<\/p>\n<p> = : i\ufb01dsditiottal issue<\/p>\n<p>i.\n<\/p>\n<p>Whether ihe plsinti\ufb01 proves that it had perfected its title to<\/p>\n<p>the suit schedule property by law of adverse possession?<\/p>\n<p>5-.\u00bb<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2. After completion of evidence and at the time of arguments <\/p>\n<p>petitioner \ufb01led LA. No. 10 under Order 5 Rule 17 cm to  ~<\/p>\n<p>plaint by way of incorporating additional prayer as under: H __  &#8211;  V   <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;To deem em plaintimas perrec?&#8221;&#8216;*llitsel~:ies&#8217;llte \ufb01le  CH.  T&#8217; T X<\/p>\n<p>schedule property bylaw of  &#8216;;&amp;.esseseie:a.&#8221;&#8216; V<\/p>\n<p>3. Under the impugned oreleitlxe rejected&#8217; 10<br \/>\n\ufb01led by me petitioner. Hence, this writ &#8221;  &#8216;- A&#8217; &#8216; ee <\/p>\n<p>4. Issue ml;  franied by the Trial Court<br \/>\ntakes care of &#8220;Elie;   althe  that in the absence of<br \/>\nspeci\ufb01c prayer. it     the prayer is to declare<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner    ~poe3\ufb01:sien of the schedule property. Wheiher<\/p>\n<p>  tile pefiiiener__is by Virtue of any title deeds or by adverse<\/p>\n<p>li\ufb01sseeeien  that is to be detezmined by the Trial Court on the<\/p>\n<p>V  Ville circumstances I \ufb01nd ne justi\ufb01abie gound to<\/p>\n<p> xsirnpugned order. Accordingly the petition is hereby<\/p>\n<p> \/&#8217; \u00a7ejeeteai.4_An3}&#8221;&#8216;oheexvan7on made by the Tzial Com&#8217;: in the impugned order<\/p>\n<p>Vlietlsxfluence the Court at the time of \ufb01nal disposal of the matter.<\/p>\n<p>T  accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n<p>LRSISOQSBOO9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court M\/S Tricom Technologies vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 29 May, 2009 Author: H N Das KRWEST; BANGALORE BY comssiama. RESPONDENT N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE V. ._ DATED arms THE 293&#8243; my 01:&#8217; MAY, 2099 BEFORE THE I~ION&#8217;BLE bum. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOILf{\ufb02\u00a7&#8217;i\u00a7Af\u00a7. S&#8217; 4&#8242; wart PETITION No. 14232;29o9L\u20aci?*\u00ab;S;,*P(:;. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-179590","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Tricom Technologies vs The Bangalore Development ... on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Tricom Technologies vs The Bangalore Development ... on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-21T13:34:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Tricom Technologies vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 29 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-21T13:34:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":295,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Tricom Technologies vs The Bangalore Development ... on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-21T13:34:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Tricom Technologies vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 29 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Tricom Technologies vs The Bangalore Development ... on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Tricom Technologies vs The Bangalore Development ... on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-21T13:34:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Tricom Technologies vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 29 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-21T13:34:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009"},"wordCount":295,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009","name":"M\/S Tricom Technologies vs The Bangalore Development ... on 29 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-21T13:34:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tricom-technologies-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-29-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Tricom Technologies vs The Bangalore Development &#8230; on 29 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179590","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=179590"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179590\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=179590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=179590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=179590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}