{"id":180101,"date":"2010-11-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010"},"modified":"2014-12-27T13:14:11","modified_gmt":"2014-12-27T07:44:11","slug":"sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri. Govardhana Nayak vs Prabhakara Prabhu on 29 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri. Govardhana Nayak vs Prabhakara Prabhu on 29 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
(BY K.\n\nAND:\n\n1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGA\u00a3.,:OR_E~._v\n\nDATED THIS THE 29\" DAY OF NOVEMBE,R\u00a7,s:A..2m'.Q:\":   ~\n\nBEFORE  _\n\nTHE HON'\u00a3-3LE MR. JUSTICE A.N. :'\\\/EI\\{'UEG:0P;1\\_i'_#.' TGOTw,DLA\"*::,A_j\n\nWRIT PETITION NO.L:oB_Q5\/2O:.'O (GM\u00a7CRj\u00a7:\u00ab),.L \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSR1 GOVARDHANA NAYAK  S 2\n5\/0 LATE \\\/ITTAL NAYAK ._ ' .\nAGED ABOUT 53 YEARS  _  '\nR\/AT ARIADKA _v.1LLAGE  S .\nPOST E<A\\\/U, RBTTBR TA.LLjK}; \nD.K DISTRICT."  '   \n\nSHR1HAR:, FOR.LEAi'jmSTiC'1A,"'ADV.)\n\nRRABHAKAARA PRABHVUV\n\n" '~ S\/O -:;ATE,,1RAr\\4.As<R1SHN--A~ RRABHU\n AGED A.BOuT _48..,YEARS.\n\n VCVHA.NT'DvRASr\u00a5:E.\u00e9{AR PRABHU\n\nS\/OLATE RA-MAKRISHATA PRABHU\n\n* AGED---,,ABOvuT_4i5 YEARS,\n\n BOTH ARERESIDENTS OF\n\n" 'V.M,U'id*D\u00bbAKOCHI, ARIADKA VILLAGE,\n POST +<'jA\\\/U, PUTTUR TALUK,\n\n 574 223.\n\nA:'.f'M~GANGDHARA NAYAK\n'S\/O LATE VITTAL NAYAK\n\n" " " AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,\n\nR\/AT NRCC, IVEOTTETHADKA\nP.O.DARBE, PUTTUR TALUK.\n\n... PETITION ER\n\n \n\n\n\nM MOHAN NAYAK\nS\/O LATE VITTAL NAYAK\nMUNDAKOCHI\n\nARIADKA VILALGE, POST KAVU,\nPUTTUR TALUK\n\nD.K. 574 223.\n\nDR. M GOPALAKRISHNA NAYAK\nS\/O LATE VITTAL NAYAK '\nAGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,' _\nR\/AT ISHWARAMANGALA 9\nHEALTH CENTER,\n\nP.O. ISHWARAMANGALA\nNMUDNUR VILLAG2-:,_\nPUTTUR TALUK " '\nD.K.DISTRICT,\n\nSMT SHA.S.H::I:KALA \n\nxfv\/O"?;Az\u00a7V?H1AKt$\u00a71'S:4_A'N.:"EsHAT"'W A\nAGED 'ABO'U.T-SITYEARS, ' -\nR\/AT AJJAVARA'~\\\/ILE_AG.E.\u00bbAND POST\n\nSULLIA TALUK  .--\n\nD. T<.DISTR:cTj.._\n\n  vAsH\ufb01)"f;A. _____ -4 v\n_  W"\/O BHARATHI SHANKAR\n ._AC:fE'D"A._B"OUT 46 YEARS,\n\nR,\/_A'T_& KILP.N_.GODI HOUSE\n\n. '--..'BALIE';A,._VELLAGE AND POST\n SLJ,T._L1_A'j--.L--': 'ALL; K, D. K. DISTRICT.\n\nSMT2 KAUSTUBHA\n\n T  W\/'O BABAPRASAD SHARMA\n"R\/AT C\/O GANGADHARANAYAK\n"R\/AT NRCC MOTTETHADKA\n\nP.O.DARBE, PUTTUR TALUK.\n\nSMT INDUMATHI\n\nW\/O KAMALAKSHA PRABHU\nAGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,\n\nR\/AT NADUSARU HOUSE\nPUNACHA VILLAGE AND POST\n\n_R'T:\\{1ARY"' .\n\n\n\n2. Respondents 1 and 2 filed Ex.Case <\/pre>\n
to appoint a Commissioner to demarcate the path,   <\/p>\n
links wide (3 feet 4 inch) for the”userA_o’f <\/p>\n
(defendants 1 and 2) atythe<\/p>\n
Sy.\u00a3\\lo.347\/3A2 along with aVga.l:u”~{on eastern:s_idea:o’f”agalu)if<\/p>\n
without destroying the…V.tree.s””‘an_fd’iuiimprovements of the
\nplaintiffs. It was  help of a
\nsurveyor to  the path way
\na shown in” said second appeals<\/p>\n
on 27.=,1.1<39\u00a7.r3ii_\u00bb_..__'-, <\/p>\n
'3. in"An"app!ica.,tsion'\u00bbiVwas filed by respondents 1 & 2<\/p>\n
 ,_for._fa5pposi:ntment"of-a~–\u00abCourt Commissioner for demarcating<\/p>\n
    links and such other work as observed in<\/p>\n
the'dlecreej?'i_;'-ifcommission warrant was issued on 8.2.2010<\/p>\n
7.__to K.~Ra’ghunatha Rai, Advocate, Puttur. The said<\/p>\n
A’~Tf”CAommissioner after conducting the local inspection<\/p>\n
 spbmitted a report dated 6.2.2001. The execution Court<\/p>\n
 has allowed the Ex.Case entitling the decree holder to 5<\/p>\n
links path way at the eastern most edge of Sy.l\\lo.347\/3A2
\nE<\/p>\n
commissioner. One T.A.Manjunath, II Gradie-.’S_urye’yo’i’,g<\/p>\n
was deputed by the ADLR, Puttur, to  thjegcou-rt__i’r~i<\/p>\n
commissioner in the matter of execution ;of\u00ab_gthe’commgission<\/p>\n
warrant. After issuing _notice7\u00abto=. the,,’i–“-p.arties,\u00b0’3 <\/p>\n
commissioner has executed ‘t’i’.e\ufb01cogmmissioni’warraht and
\nhas submitted the report,_dat’ed:_Otiiiu\u00e9i\ufb01-Q01.  <\/p>\n
9. The  passing the
\nimpugned   that, the
\ncommirss’ion’er:,.report  \u00e9i_J”ri’ch%alIengecf. Indisputedly,
\nthe pVetiti”o,nerv: of objections dated<\/p>\n
20.02_.20(5Ii..to’  co.m’m’i’ssioner report. He has also filed<\/p>\n
 withva——\u00abprayer not to accept the report as<\/p>\n
  piroperor’correct. The impugned order does not make any<\/p>\n
reFe’renc.eto__ either the said statement of objections or the<\/p>\n
affida~.rit;’;. In the circumstances, the contention put forth on<\/p>\n
A  of the petitioners that, there is no application of<\/p>\n
 jtidicial mind to the materiai on record and that, the<\/p>\n
impugned order is based on surmise and conjectures, is<\/p>\n
weiI–founded. The execution court ought to have taken
\n2<\/span><\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
\/ .\n<\/p>\n
_cons_id erati on .’ t.\n<\/p>\n
   No “costs.\n<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
into consideration the objections and the a_f.fi_c_’4i4aV\\k:it4:faind\u00e9
\npassed a reasoned order. In not doing ‘is
\ndereiiction of duty and violation 0;FAAlfur.dar–nen’tai_”prin:ciple\u00a7c<\/p>\n
of law. In the circumstances, Vinterfe.re:n.ce is ne_cessary=;.4  V<\/p>\n
In the result, the writ petition stands atIllo._we_d and the
\nimpugned order stands”\u00ab(:iii;asi’i\u00a7eci;}’   <\/p>\n
The exe.c:.=:tio:~n  heirelbycv_.di:re’cted to consider
\nthe objections and’:-tiiire?’    the petitioner to
\nthe commissio’n.ert-re\u00abportp’and….__paSs order as early as
\npracticable andat any e”\\;’.rei1.t;”‘-isiitwhin a period of six weeks
\nfrom theoate a co’py:_V’oVf this order is placed on record of<\/p>\n
the either of the parties.\n<\/p>\n
CoVntent_ior.:S_r.c:of both parties are kept open for<\/p>\n
Sd\/~
\n}U-DGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri. Govardhana Nayak vs Prabhakara Prabhu on 29 November, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda (BY K. AND: 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGA\u00a3.,:OR_E~._v DATED THIS THE 29″ DAY OF NOVEMBE,R\u00a7,s:A..2m’.Q:”: ~ BEFORE _ THE HON’\u00a3-3LE MR. JUSTICE A.N. :’\\\/EI\\{‘UEG:0P;1\\_i’_#.’ TGOTw,DLA”*::,A_j WRIT PETITION NO.L:oB_Q5\/2O:.’O (GM\u00a7CRj\u00a7:\u00ab),.L BETWEEN: SR1 GOVARDHANA NAYAK S 2 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri. Govardhana Nayak vs Prabhakara Prabhu on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri. Govardhana Nayak vs Prabhakara Prabhu on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-27T07:44:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri. Govardhana Nayak vs Prabhakara Prabhu on 29 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-27T07:44:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":497,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri. Govardhana Nayak vs Prabhakara Prabhu on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-27T07:44:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri. Govardhana Nayak vs Prabhakara Prabhu on 29 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri. Govardhana Nayak vs Prabhakara Prabhu on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri. Govardhana Nayak vs Prabhakara Prabhu on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-27T07:44:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri. Govardhana Nayak vs Prabhakara Prabhu on 29 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-27T07:44:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010"},"wordCount":497,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010","name":"Sri. Govardhana Nayak vs Prabhakara Prabhu on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-27T07:44:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-govardhana-nayak-vs-prabhakara-prabhu-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri. Govardhana Nayak vs Prabhakara Prabhu on 29 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180101"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180101\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}