{"id":180156,"date":"1997-05-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1997-05-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997"},"modified":"2016-06-29T08:03:12","modified_gmt":"2016-06-29T02:33:12","slug":"satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997","title":{"rendered":"Satbir Singh vs State Of Haryana &amp; Anr on 2 May, 1997"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Supreme Court of India<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Satbir Singh vs State Of Haryana &amp; Anr on 2 May, 1997<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: M S Manohar<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: J.S. Verma, Sujata V. Manohar<\/div>\n<pre>           PETITIONER:\nSATBIR SINGH\n\n\tVs.\n\nRESPONDENT:\nSTATE OF HARYANA &amp; ANR.\n\nDATE OF JUDGMENT:\t02\/05\/1997\n\nBENCH:\nJ.S. VERMA, SUJATA V. MANOHAR\n\n\n\n\nACT:\n\n\n\nHEADNOTE:\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT:\n<\/pre>\n<p>      JU D G ME N T<br \/>\nMRS. SUJATA V. MANOHAR,J.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The appellant  is a  Sainideclared\t us  of\t the  other<br \/>\nbackward classin the State ofHaryanaa notification dated<br \/>\n5.2.1991.   This notification  inter, providesthat persons<br \/>\nbelonging   to the Saini caste and residing in the  state of<br \/>\nHaryanawill  be considered  asforming  a  part otherback<br \/>\nclassesin the state ofHaryana.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Two advertisement bearing\tNo.1 of\t 1995and  No.7 of<br \/>\n1995 were  issued by  the    Subordinate  Service  Selection<br \/>\nBoard, haryanafor recruitment of candidates to\tvarious<br \/>\nposts.One of the posts so advertised was  that of lectures<br \/>\nin political   science. under Advertisement No.1 of 1995 15<br \/>\nposts of lecturers  in political science  were advertised of<br \/>\nwhich  one   was  reserved   for  backward   classes.  Under<br \/>\nAdvertisement No.7  of 1995,   inter  alia,  48 posts  of<br \/>\nlectures in  political sciencewere advertisedout of which<br \/>\n10 were reserved for backward classes.Out of these 10, six<br \/>\nwere reserved for backward  classes inthe &#8220;A&#8221;category and<br \/>\nfour were reserved for backwardclassesin the &#8216;B&#8217; category.<br \/>\nAfter the  Advertisement  1 of 1995 andbefore Advertisement<br \/>\n7 of 1995, instructionwere issued  bythe Chief Secretary,<br \/>\nGovernment of Haryana to all heads of departments  and other<br \/>\nauthorities stating   that  thereservation    for  backward<br \/>\nclasseswas   enhancedfrom 10%  to 27%\tandthat amongst<br \/>\nbackward classes,  it was  decided tocreatetwo\tblocks,<br \/>\nBlock &#8216;A&#8217;  and 11% would be reserved for backward classes in<br \/>\nBlock &#8216;B&#8217;  and 16%  of seats would be reserved for  backward<br \/>\nclassesin Block `A&#8217; and 11% would be reserved for  backward<br \/>\nclassesin  Block &#8216;B&#8217;  There was also  a reservation  of 10%<br \/>\nfor ex-servicemen   and 3%  for\t physicallyhandicapped.<br \/>\nCastes forming part  of Block&#8217;A&#8217; andcastes formingpart<br \/>\nof Block  &#8216;B&#8217; were enumerated.Saini caste wasin Block &#8216;B&#8217;<br \/>\nthat is why the\t advertisement7\t of 1995  divided the ten<br \/>\nseats for   backward   classesinto six\tseatsfor backward<br \/>\nclass candidates  in Block  &#8216;A&#8217;and  4 seats   for  backward<br \/>\nclass candidates  in Block  &#8216;B&#8217; Afterthese  instructions,<br \/>\ntherefore, theappellant formed a partof Block &#8216;B&#8217; amongst<br \/>\nbackward classes.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The appellant  applied for the  post  oflecturer  in<br \/>\npolitical   science. Both   theadvertisementswere clubbed<br \/>\ntogether in  selectionof candidates Advertisement No.7 of<br \/>\n1995 stated  that the  post which  were\t  advertised  under<br \/>\nAdvertisement No.7  of 1995  were in  additionto the posts<br \/>\nadvertised under  Advertisement\t 1 of1995 need\tnot apply<br \/>\nagain. Their  previous application would be considered.Thus<br \/>\napplication   under   both these  advertisementwere clubbed<br \/>\ntogether, candidates   were  interviewed and selected taking<br \/>\ninto   account theapplicationsunder both  these<br \/>\nadvertisements.The  appellant was  not of  the\tcandidates<br \/>\nselected   in the  backward class category.  Inthe order of<br \/>\nmerit, he  was at  serial No.  5 in  Block &#8216;B&#8217;of  selected<br \/>\nbackward classcandidates. Hewas\t  gives\t an appointment<br \/>\nletter dated  4.4.196. Pursuant to his\t appointment, the<br \/>\nappellant jointed  his post on\t18.4.1996.However,  he<br \/>\nreceived a  registered letter  dated 11.6.1996 statingthat<br \/>\nthere had  beenan   error  in issuinghim   an appointment<br \/>\nletter and  theappointment  letter   was  being\t withdrawn.<br \/>\nAccording to  the respondent  there wasan error in granting<br \/>\nan appointmentto the appellant\tbecause theone\tpost of<br \/>\nbackward  class\t  candidatewhich was  advertised  by<br \/>\nAdvertisement 1 of 1995\t was erroneously considered bythem<br \/>\nas forming a part of Block &#8216;B&#8217; while  it should have formed<br \/>\na partof Block\t&#8216;A&#8217; Hence  the appointment  given  to the<br \/>\nappellant  was withdrawn.  The appellant has challengedthis<br \/>\nfinding. He hasalso  urged that prior to his being selected<br \/>\nand appointed  he  washolding the  post\t oflecturer  in<br \/>\npolitical science  in Rajdevi  Multi-PurposeCollege for<br \/>\nWomenBehrian.  He resigned from\t his post in order to<br \/>\naccept the  appointment\t  offered  to him on his  selection<br \/>\npursuant to  the Advertisements 1 and 7 of 1995.  Now he is<br \/>\ndeprived   of both  these posts.  He  has alsostatedthat<br \/>\nhe is  a physically handicapped personand a  a sympathetic<br \/>\nview should be taken ofhis situation.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Under Advertisement 1 of 1995. 15 posts oflecturers in<br \/>\npolitical  science   were   advertised\t  while\t     under<br \/>\nAdvertisement 7 of 1995\t 48 posts of lecturersin political<br \/>\nsciencewere  advertised, making\t  of  total   of 63  posts.<br \/>\nSince applicants  of all these 63 posts were considered for<br \/>\nselection after the coming   into   force  ofinstructions<br \/>\ndated 20.7.1995,  we will  have\t to take  into account the<br \/>\nroster prepared\t under these instructions for reservation<br \/>\nof posts   forBlock  &#8216;A&#8217;  and Block&#8217;B&#8217;\tbackward  class<br \/>\ncandidates.  As per  the  roster  which\t forms a  part\tof<br \/>\ninstructions issued  on20th  of July,1995  the\tfollowing<br \/>\nroster points  are preserved  for   candidates belonging  to<br \/>\nBlock &#8216;B&#8217;.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Block &#8220;B&#8217;<br \/>\n     &#8220;9-18-27  (ESM)  -63-46-54(ESM)-63-\n<\/p>\n<p>     72-81 (ESM) -89(PH)-98&#8243;\n<\/p>\n<p>     Sixty three  postsof  lecturers in\t political  science<br \/>\nwere being  filled fifteen under Advertisement 1 of 1995 and<br \/>\nforty  eighty under advertisement 7 of 1995.  We will ignore<br \/>\nroster points  27 and  54 whichare for ex-servicemen.Thus<br \/>\nupto and  including   serial No.  63, five  roster point are<br \/>\nreserved is  atSerial No.5  inthe  merit list of backward<br \/>\nclass candidates   belonging  to Block &#8216;B&#8217; Theappellant is<br \/>\nat  Serial   No.5  in  the  merit  list of  backward  class<br \/>\ncandidates belonging  to Block&#8217;B&#8217; Therefore, the letter of<br \/>\nappointment  was   rightly  issued  tothe  appellant. The<br \/>\nrespondents were  required to consider the total of 63 posts<br \/>\nadvertised andgive roster   points  in accordance with the<br \/>\nroster which  forms a part of the instructions of 20th July,<br \/>\n1995. If  this is   how the appointments are examined, the<br \/>\nappellant has  been property  selected and   appointed. The<br \/>\ntermination ofthe appellant&#8217;s  service, therefore  is not<br \/>\njustified.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The appeal is accordingly allowed and the respondents<br \/>\nare directed   to  continue  the  appellant  in service\t in<br \/>\nservice. the  appellantshall  be accommodatedin the first<br \/>\navailable vacancy   fora backward class candidate belonging<br \/>\nto &#8216;B&#8217;category at  roster  point 63.There will, however,<br \/>\nbe no order as costs inthe circumstances of the case.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of India Satbir Singh vs State Of Haryana &amp; Anr on 2 May, 1997 Author: M S Manohar Bench: J.S. Verma, Sujata V. Manohar PETITIONER: SATBIR SINGH Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF HARYANA &amp; ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02\/05\/1997 BENCH: J.S. VERMA, SUJATA V. MANOHAR ACT: HEADNOTE: JUDGMENT: JU D G ME N T [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supreme-court-of-india"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Satbir Singh vs State Of Haryana &amp; Anr on 2 May, 1997 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Satbir Singh vs State Of Haryana &amp; Anr on 2 May, 1997 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1997-05-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-29T02:33:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Satbir Singh vs State Of Haryana &amp; Anr on 2 May, 1997\",\"datePublished\":\"1997-05-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-29T02:33:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997\"},\"wordCount\":895,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court of India\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997\",\"name\":\"Satbir Singh vs State Of Haryana &amp; Anr on 2 May, 1997 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1997-05-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-29T02:33:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Satbir Singh vs State Of Haryana &amp; Anr on 2 May, 1997\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Satbir Singh vs State Of Haryana &amp; Anr on 2 May, 1997 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Satbir Singh vs State Of Haryana &amp; Anr on 2 May, 1997 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1997-05-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-29T02:33:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Satbir Singh vs State Of Haryana &amp; Anr on 2 May, 1997","datePublished":"1997-05-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-29T02:33:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997"},"wordCount":895,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Supreme Court of India"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997","name":"Satbir Singh vs State Of Haryana &amp; Anr on 2 May, 1997 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1997-05-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-29T02:33:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satbir-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-anr-on-2-may-1997#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Satbir Singh vs State Of Haryana &amp; Anr on 2 May, 1997"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180156"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180156\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}