{"id":18017,"date":"2009-08-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009"},"modified":"2014-05-12T10:54:20","modified_gmt":"2014-05-12T05:24:20","slug":"sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Hemanagouda vs Sri Basanagouda on 7 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Hemanagouda vs Sri Basanagouda on 7 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n
was EIOWBLE mas. ausfrzw _\u00a7'_,_*:f\u00a7r%m4;s;z2% _ ;g ?m1~;*\u00a7k   7 n\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARRATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT BEARWAD V. \n\nxtmcrmzz THIS Tim 7111 ms: or AUGU$\"i'\u00a7\"2j{3}{('5'9\n\nBEFORE\n\nm-'A 1'i'().21}.58.\":1\u00ab,{__2 --\u00a7 Oi:8 1 \"\n\nBETWEEH:\n\nSRI.HEMANAC\u00a7Q\u00a7IDz'&?f3i AND.TRAIi,\u00a73R vkgggmziq\u00e9\n\n2\u00a7_x*'\u00a7? 3.935,\nVRESI1?)EN?\u00a3?,_QF\u00bb_\"f\u00a7;Afi'APiIR;\n\n:vVTAL{}i{1\u00a7.: _Is\u00a7IJ1*\u20ac._,DfP..EA 3:).\n\nam: %<::zs:}m}}V   ~ _\n'~ * H.<;-%=%~* &PPELL\ufb01RT\n\n(B35 ';."}\u00bbR_\u00a7.I-\u00a3;.3.')i<,\u00ab?\u00a7VgA%i~;?}hZ'3* Q;-ci\u00e9iammmagaagm, ABV.)\n\n'Oi\n\n' Siziggai\u00e9a\ufb01ageigm rvzgawavaym PATEL,\n\nAGE'; #38 YEARS, Qcxc; 9091,32,\n.E\u00a7i\u00bbf}\u00ab--H\ufb01\u00a7'I'AP{\u00a7R,\n\n1' . yaw Kym' TIRENAGAR?\n\n\u20ac31,-Q \u00a7*}f{}BL-E, EESBLE,\n\n1  mm': mia\ufb01wgg.\n\nSm'. &.I{\u00a3{z*\u00a7MMA\nW,i{"} BAsA:*4AGc:mA PATEL,\nAGE: 49 YEARS,\n\n\n\nta.)\n\nGCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,\nR\/AT TIPIINAGAR,\n\nOLD HUBL1, HUBLI,\n\nDIST: DHARWAD.\n\n'THIS MFA IS FILED L173 11231 (1} )__&ADI\"}L. MACT,\nI-IUBLI, AWARDIESIG A  \u00bbv.._CQMPENS}}.TI\u20ac\u00a7N 01:'\nRS.1,50,000\/- wrm IN'I'E\u00a7'RE_8'T.. 6% RA. mom THE\nDATE 01? ?E'I'ITION ':'*::..,., {)E1?C:S1T,'j  \"  M\n\n. THIS APPEAL c:;4:me:s'%%<3:~\u00e9:% ;  ORDERS THIS\nmug', THE :;:%::;:.;\u00a7;?*";* DEL.{\\fE:REI\ufb01 -'FHE} \u00a7'OLLOWING:\n\nf7\u00a5JH\u00a7GMhHT\n\n"t\u00a7:1ere' is a delay of 65 days; in \ufb01ling\nthe 3.i3'IjC'\u00a2'f;_1' {V I*\u00a32_v\u00a7*E:V   the: Iearzled Counsel for the\n\n\n\n    appeal is fiied by the awner of Eha\n\nH   the judgment and award }Z)\u00a3:'\u00a3$S6d ii":\n\n Mire {@590\/2004 0:1 77.03 by MAST, Hubii.\n\n The rsievant: facts of the case are that ans\n\n"~,_Sh:'*'ikantg0u\u00a7a wag pmeeeding in 9. 21'actQr-trai1er\n\n%\n\n\n\nbeamg E'~E@.E{A 26;'T~198\u00a7, 1986 b\u00a3:13nging;E'a9 {ha\n\nI'\u20acSp{}}f}d\u20ac\u00a7\u00a3T\u00a3\u00a5, on 18.8.:2,GQ:3 at 3.13011: \n\nGeiagerimath on Eioriikappattagudda r\u00a7)g;ii;..::.   \n\nvahicie Was; 1168!' QQnikappat \u00a3agz:\ufb01d a;._ the\u00bb .__"s;\u20aca;.aj313e"'$,1?\u00e9Ls\n\ndrivan 1:1 rash and me ii 613%: I:";a\u00a7.*;23:1:\u00e9j:I mad \u00e9:\u00e9\u00a7.\u00a7\u00e9;'1'\u00e9$V::.1\u00e9t"\u20aci\u00a7\u00e9::~V\n3 3 , . . T. . L\n\nvehicle teppiad mad Shrik\u00e9iziggouda Viciis\ufb01i T #911 Egcd\ufb01unz sf\n\ngrievczus irgiuries. C:f3riten<'i\u00a3z1;gVAt1'3g.i: f;h\u20acy 30$'; fzhsia" 3911 in\nthe said acci\u00e9\ufb01zm, 12i;\u00a7_ }3s;I'\u00e9jf1t:s3 3!;E_13\u00a7' ~T._'i1;Li*1\u00bb:: claim psti\ufb01an\nseeking confip\u00e9fiiizsati\u00e9g.  '"'    " \n\n 4. 'A *Ej.)*:f; s5una\u00a7 framed the f0}}owi:1g three issues fm' $13\n\n\" c:o3:1$:id6:*at;':31'x. Tha Same read at; fa\ufb01aws:\n\n51\n\nM _\n\/,4' \/\n\n\n\na. Whathar the petitmxa\ufb01rs prove: \n\n18.8.2383 at about 19 am. \n\nQ0121-Kappatgu\ufb01 mad naarf   V' ' '=~\n\nvane}: tha de$\u20ac:as1\"1'_ z2t;ic\u00a5 \n\n26\/ 198\u00a7\u00ab86 as:'c::g;11e%&:ve:::; pargi; ?.r;21;\u00a7Vt<i3 rsgszgf =\n\nand negligant    '\u00a7'%E3\u20ac\u20acd, the\ndriver 1cs:\u00a7t..V_Acon\u00a7.i1*\u20ac)iA the A\u00e9\u00e9hi\u00e9ie am} it\ntoppleq  51j,f;':*;=s_.:'i},_3 iv  "due to this\nShzikantagouria 3:ii.\u00a7d_   "Sinai?\nb.   entitisd far the\n   s }:'},: what ameunt arid frem\n """   _ \ns11a33'{ herein iii\ufb01 mat E\u00e9t-in mg? evi\ufb01ences\n\n \u00e9f maiafiai an raeerd, {he tribama}. avsarzfia\u00e9\n\n c$m}:\u00bb\u00a2 f:;Sa:tien sf R\ufb01e 1,.\u00a7$,GGG\/u with inier\ufb01giz (.3 6% part\n\nA ' . '  frem {he date of claim petitiern {iii \u00e9epogii.\n\n%\u00bb\n\n\n\nCha\ufb02engng the judwxent a\ufb01d award, this apj\ufb01eal is\n\nfiled.\n\n7'. The learned C0L't.1\"1se} far \n\nsubmits that in the instant case tlx\ufb01t' {Jf izl\ufb01\u00e9'. \n\ndeceased at fh\ufb01 f}}'St instance-\u00ab, hati A. 'preferz\ufb01i \n\nbefore the Workman C3?n:i1pe13sa{iQ1:. _   \n\ntherefore this c};aim__ peti'{i<}_\u00a31VVV:i5;;__ 1101  He\nalso submits that this,   an account of\nIzegligent of the deceased:i\u00e9zzj\ufb01i-.i\u00a7l1\u00a7:r\u00e9fG:f\u00e9; the appellant is\n\nnot 1'33:_spQ11$i'ZE;;i:e\u00ab~3;t5'sa\u00a3i._%\u00a7:(\u00a7,z_ 1116 award and that this is a \ufb01t\nsaga f0f"\u00e93;n;\u20ac:'fe'r\u20ac\ufb01\u00a7;e if\ufb01s appeal.\n\n   Ei\ufb01eard the ieazned Caunsel far the\n\n.A  ppa\u00a79\ufb01.r}'\u00a3.\u00e9;\u20ac1d on perrusai cf tha materiai on record, it is\n\nH '\ufb01iif i'i1' &.ii--is';:'i:st;e that tha acai\u00e9ant had {3ccurrad on\n\na\u00a7< :0;J1'\u00a7\u00a7;.'\u00a7f the dsceased fa\ufb01ing from the traiier,\n\n .. x1:f3;<~:.&;*efGi:'e the 1136 of 1:315 Vehicle is not in dispute. As far\n\n a@s 1:he other cozztention cf tbs appellant is czmcerrze\u00e9,\n\nV V aithmzgh writt\u20ac:1 statement had bve\ufb01n \ufb01led no evic\ufb01ence\n\n\n\n\n\nwas let: in to substantiate the fact that $116 \u00a3i,ecc:ase<:i\n\ndieti on acceurzt of his ow}: 111is1:ake. N0 matezjiai is\n\nplaced on record to Show that the par\u00e9iiirs _\n\ndeceased had aiso \ufb01led ihfi clagm pet;%aie\u00a7i:j~.}\u00a7\u00e9fV{0reV tjiea \n\nLabour Ceurt, Hubli and ease Zigefcr\u00e9z\n\nIn the absence of any exd\u00e9magze  the  *\n\nsigrli\ufb01caxatly, in the abs\u00a2;ic\u00a7:_ -.;}f them b\u00e9ing any\ninsurance poiicy in msgpeizt Qi'; in question, the\n\ntrihunai had no 0pf_i'013- W  mL\u00a2;: iiabmty on the\n\nappe\u00a7;1\ufb01fit"*e3.%V5.;;)1\u00e9;\u00a7i%1g;:':'*:\u00a7}ia.ndf E3,1\u00e91<?e__b\u20ac%gi:1\n\ncontra evidence placed on' rgcoxfi'  the " L.\n\nsigxii\ufb01caxatiy in the absentg\u00e9'  '  i\u00e9xalid and\neffmtive ixxsurance   is"s;21<:1y liable\nto satisfy the aware}.   to observe\nthat si:1c:\u00a73:_   the I'f3S\u00a7)0I}d\u20acI1t\nbafoxi\u00e9f the' : b\u00a7 :.a::~c%::I1c1uded and compexlsaticzn\nof Rs.   awarded with inter\u00e9st @ 6%\n\npeg"; 5512311111, V"i;1_ a\u00a511y islaim peiitian that may have 13%;":\n\n  .\u00a7y..V:11\u20ac: respondents. b\ufb01f\ufb02f\ufb01 the Labour Of\ufb01car<\/pre>\n
 lggi.-.i\u00a31ii:s\u00bbi’\u00a7i’_’v_a_1’1\u20ac\u00a7”ii: {:16 event {if any award bemg ma\ufb01a an<\/p>\n
tii\u00e9’  Cl\u00e9ina petition, ‘WGUIC1 1201: have to be satss\ufb01a\u00e9. by<\/p>\n
V.   “\u00a7h<.=:_.a\ufb01\u00a7:&l\u00a7an!:.y<\/p>\n
IL Learned Coungei far the appe\ufb01ant iastiy<\/p>\n
 'V  —$u.bmi\u00a3ted that no apportunity was given for ietting in<\/p>\n
934<\/span><\/p>\n
any evidemce of the appeilant in the instant cas\u00e9 ‘–3.\u00a7:I721’}e<\/p>\n
he has brought to my notice the order ‘_ Ztht\ufb01<\/p>\n
proceeding before the tribunal. On    <\/p>\n
sheet, it is found that an  <\/p>\n
examined but the appe1}a;n%;’s4W.$Cu11se1:,.”.;v’;isA’ aE3$e:ii;<\/p>\n
Despite: giving su\ufb01iciezait op\u00a7<'3;*i*;11z'1ity;"'Cr\u00e9s\u00e9z-examixxatien<\/p>\n
of PW~1 was taken   of V\ufb01hexciaimants
\nwas conciuded. On ivifaurt posted the<\/p>\n
Case to  fjor' "i'e\u20ac;i3t\u00a711c?e;\ufb011t's evidence" i.e.,<\/p>\n
  , appaliant or his
\ncoun\u00e9\u00e9gl\u00e9u afid therefore, the evid\ufb01nce was<\/p>\n
takfzrit as  Tl\u00e9\ufb01  was {I161} posted to 08.01.2008<\/p>\n
" V.   an that day also, the z:l;aima11t's<\/p>\n
  V\u00e9s::1i:1.'~:\u20ac{\u00e9f:\u00bb.A. ":\u20ac:as_1~~ heard and naatter was pasted to<\/p>\n
}@234.,_\u20ac32,_'.ZC*'\u00a3\u00a7\u00a73TiG hear the respondent i.e., the appe\ufb02ant:<\/p>\n
 A\u00a7:[eLr&.i.:z1..– 1 G11 18.92.2068, appe11ant's 4301111333 was absent.<\/p>\n
\u00ab'  ir\u00e9bunai has recorded that despit\ufb01 sufficient<\/p>\n
%  = – ri\u00e9ppartunity beixxg gvezz 110 steps has been taken by the<\/p>\n
appailan\ufb02s counsel and arguments on his side was<\/p>\n
9%<\/p>\n
taken as 313,}. Thereafter, the matter was pasied on<\/p>\n
17xa2o0s andiimxea\ufb01\ufb01ritis posux1on_?;a2\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7{:\u00a7x;<\/p>\n
pamsal of the above dates it is clear that  <\/p>\n
did not cr<:.:ss–exan1i.x1e the c}a;imaI_\u00a7t's;, '\u00a71\u20aciV\u00a7 I'1\u20ac1'4'\u20ac&52%\u00a7.\u00a7iI1:y'<\/p>\n
evidence let in from the siVde_4of _3:LppeBzguitAahd 1i\u00a5;2i\u00a3Ir1ef" ,<\/p>\n
was any argumeyat address\u00e9Ld.,_V ' It is  that the
\nmatter was posted   -\u00a3_,2\u00a7I')f3.'%? an \ufb01a\ufb01ous dates
\nup ta 7.7.2008' izhat is  jvvz\ufb01onths \u00a311116 was<\/p>\n
' given ta    not utilized. It<\/p>\n
is Whoily u;1jiiS"L —   \u00e9\u00e9ppeiiarat to now
\n<::Qr:te11d thaf'-rf\u00e9  given by the trilbtxnal.
\nHence, \u00a7:\u00a71e_$_aid \u00a3\u00a7\u00e93r; t<::ntiof\u00a3'visV'iiajected.<\/p>\n
  _ \u00a7\u00ab'_:\u00a71\u00a7th;c5"'a\u00a5_:)ove reasans, the appeal is rejected.<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Hemanagouda vs Sri Basanagouda on 7 August, 2009 Author: B.V.Nagarathna was EIOWBLE mas. ausfrzw _\u00a7’_,_*:f\u00a7r%m4;s;z2% _ ;g ?m1~;*\u00a7k 7 n IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARRATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT BEARWAD V. xtmcrmzz THIS Tim 7111 ms: or AUGU$”i’\u00a7”2j{3}{(‘5’9 BEFORE m-‘A 1’i'().21}.58.”:1\u00ab,{__2 –\u00a7 Oi:8 1 ” BETWEEH: SRI.HEMANAC\u00a7Q\u00a7IDz’&?f3i AND.TRAIi,\u00a73R vkgggmziq\u00e9 2\u00a7_x*’\u00a7? 3.935, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18017","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Hemanagouda vs Sri Basanagouda on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Hemanagouda vs Sri Basanagouda on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-12T05:24:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Hemanagouda vs Sri Basanagouda on 7 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-12T05:24:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":393,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Hemanagouda vs Sri Basanagouda on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-12T05:24:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Hemanagouda vs Sri Basanagouda on 7 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Hemanagouda vs Sri Basanagouda on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Hemanagouda vs Sri Basanagouda on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-12T05:24:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Hemanagouda vs Sri Basanagouda on 7 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-12T05:24:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009"},"wordCount":393,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009","name":"Sri Hemanagouda vs Sri Basanagouda on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-12T05:24:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemanagouda-vs-sri-basanagouda-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Hemanagouda vs Sri Basanagouda on 7 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18017","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18017"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18017\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18017"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18017"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18017"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}