{"id":1802,"date":"2008-06-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008"},"modified":"2018-04-03T22:54:49","modified_gmt":"2018-04-03T17:24:49","slug":"kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Kalayithra Engineering &#8230; vs The Chief Engineer (Civil) on 11 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kalayithra Engineering &#8230; vs The Chief Engineer (Civil) on 11 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: V.G.Sabhahit &amp; S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n<pre> \n\nIII THE HIGH COURT BF KARKATAKA AT BAHGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 11\" DAY OF' JUICE, 2008 \n\nPRESENT\n\nmm nozrnu: smmmcm v.G.sAnnu\u00a3\u00a7r , [: \"  \n\nAND --\n\nTHE Honram mnausrncn    V\n\nmm 2\u20aco.584~8I2007 1 A  \" '\n\n%'l'WEE :\n\nKALAYITHRA ENG1NEERING_'CO'NS'I'RU\u20ac3TIQN,'\nREGISTERED PAr(1'm3RsH1P FIRM-._\n\nREP. BY ITS MANAGENG PARTNER .A * \n\nSRE K M JOSEPH HAvmG;n's  \"    % \nREGISTERED OFFECE AT 79, ':3'1fAGE\n1NDIRANA{.\u00a7A_R-- A     \n\nBANGALQRI-gss.  Q  V.  i;'1,'\u00a7'. AI'&gt;PELmNT\n\n(By Sri: K xvi JGiSEi;3H'V(  )1: V )\n\nAND :\n\n1\n\nTHE: gH1Er\u00bb{C1v1L)\nDEP'l'.&gt;QFTELECOMMUNICATIONS\ncro com=ouNn':s2A..1 BHAVAN ROAD\n\n.\u00bb +BAN~GALoRE 1. ..... ., .\n\n-  ALSG AT 36 C.R.AVENUE\n\n\"3\nAc\n\n' * \u00bb 'V \u00a7:ALc:ur:fI*.a.__ 12\n\n: 'l.ir1~iE\"'t_;v%p;1ti\u20ac\u00a7h:'\"oF INDIA\n\nA  REP- BY. ITS SECRETARY\n\n\".T)E;P'I'.' are COMMUNICATIONS\n\nN'EW~ DELHI\n\n\n\n3 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (civil; \namt. ow No.1 mo COMPLEX  _2\nNo.1 swam VIVEKARANDA \nULSOOR    \"  \nBANGALORE 1.   \n\n(By 811': s \u00ab:2 MAHADEVAMUR'm--\u00a5  _)\n\nTHIS MFA IS FILED 'UiAS'3'??(}}) 0?_'ARBiTRATIoN AND\nCONCILIATION am', AGAIHM j' THE wJ_::~RDER DATED\n21\/6\/06 PASSED' I__N A..'C\"'rm}.9j96. 02%: {I'\u00a5~IE FILE 0? VI\nADDL.C!'I'Y CI?a7fLg,iUD(}E,\u00a7 E'ANGAi;O5?E.-- cm (coca-3.1},\n\nDISMISSING.-T\u00a7r{E5I.I?E7T3TI\u00a7)N....F'I\u00a7:\u00abEl3 U[S.30 AND 16 RIW.\n\nSEC.33 OF? A123zfrRA*r1oNi;j vAL\"'-I'.,,.--F(AR\"' CHALLENGHIG THE\nAWARD pggrezxg 2T:_\u00abf:}Q,*1995. \"  3\n\n12:13 _M1F'1i\\..;VcgmV:' {Eng .,5n-\u00a7os~ hes' nag' this day, SABHAHIT\nJ.,    ' \n\n  appc\ufb01l\"by.._.thc pe\ufb01trioner in AC..9\/96 gs \ufb01led being\n\n'by\u00ab..ihs.._oIdcr dated 21.6.2005 pamed by the VI\n\n  Sessions Judge, Baum\": City (econ-\n\nV -V 11)  the petition \ufb02ied under Sections 30 and 16\n\nH A   of the Arbiuanion Act (for short 'tbs Act') c \n\n   dated 27. 10.1995.\n\n\\;;=:,f~.\n\n\n\n.. 3 ..\n2. The essential facts of the case leading upto this\n\nappeal with reference to the rank of the panics befon':\"1f.he\n\ntrial court are as foliows:\n\nAn age-ement was entered into between  M\n\nherein and respondent for  . of  P   u<\/pre>\n<p>quarters at Hebbal, Bangalore.  <\/p>\n<p>between the perm&#8217; s, the mattee &#8221; .. __ &#8216;tzc\u00e9itor &#8221; L\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>in View of the clause in   refer&#8221; the djepute to<br \/>\nthe schedule pmperty\ufb01    zefened to<br \/>\nSri. S.K.Ahuja so1e:&#8217;a_r_bit1jater*   Vz.a:..j%\u00a3ni&#8221;.ezdj11dieate me<br \/>\ndispute of  JOY.    Arbitrator after<br \/>\n passed an award<br \/>\non 27.13.95  to the mrdcs aad thereafter<br \/>\n\ufb01led the   on 3.9.4.96. The appellant<\/p>\n<p>heme;  a\u00a7;V:p1i:j:Vat\u00a7son&#8217;V&#8217;u1;der Section 14(2) of the Act and<\/p>\n<p>  I6 I&#8217;\/&#8217;W. 33 of the Act averting that<\/p>\n<p>  made by the appellant had been wrongly<\/p>\n<p>  Arbitrator and the saki cl\ufb01xms.-mts may be<\/p>\n<p>   by} modifying the award passed by the Arbitrator and<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\u00e9ia\u00e9i<\/p>\n<p>.. 4 ..\n<\/p>\n<p>the same was numbered as AC.No.9\/96. Notice was issued<\/p>\n<p>to the respondents in the said application No.AC 9\/96. IN<\/p>\n<p>the said applicatien, the respondents filazi objec\ufb01ona<\/p>\n<p>contending that the application was barred by nine <\/p>\n<p>an the craim made by the appellant befoxe the  _<\/p>\n<p>been considered and then: was no  in the &#8216;4  <\/p>\n<p>The tria} court by oxtier dated <\/p>\n<p>application \ufb01led by the appe\ufb02anjz &#8220;is    L.<\/p>\n<p>and on merits heki that the  is aging \u00e9o  for<\/p>\n<p>* Cm &#8220;dad Rs. 1,4G,O00\/- with inter:-,_s&#8221;t\u00ab.at   till the date<br \/>\nwe cow\u00bb &#8221; &#8216; &#8216; &#8216; %<br \/>\nOvdarr<br \/>\n&lt;:l+-34.11.03<\/p>\n<p>.a{1i;rv\\a,QaoQ~.;\n<\/p>\n<p>P3 3&#8217;0 Ho\ufb01kiv SW5&#8242;:  who<\/p>\n<p>of actual payment. Being  by.v fiAie:V  order, this<br \/>\nappeal is \ufb01w     court.\n<\/p>\n<p>appeaxed  -&#8216;and the learned counsel<br \/>\nappearing   <\/p>\n<p>350 the contentions urged, the points<\/p>\n<p>  _eonsidemt11on axe:\n<\/p>\n<p>Lee\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;1. Whether the finding of the trial <\/p>\n<p>application \ufb01led by the appclhnt<br \/>\nis justi\ufb01cd or ca\ufb01s for   apptai?    &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>2. Whether the    Iioiiing that<br \/>\naward passed by the   set aside and<br \/>\nthat the appe1l*a1ii:;   of Rs.1,40,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>,wg?;;-;_&#8221;\u00a7%$\u00a2\u00ab<br \/>\n3; Cm&#8221; deg&#8217; with interest gt   the date of payment<br \/>\nvide Coulrit V&#8217; V &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Oreiasm.\n<\/p>\n<p>01+: twnuos<\/p>\n<p>M&#8217; Q AL: 3.   <\/p>\n<p>Pa ka Hon&#8217;L\u20acnsnss:\u00a7  .,<br \/>\n ._     points m \ufb01xlw:\n<\/p>\n<p>is justir&#8221;see1L%orT.\u00a2=\u00a7~;z11s   this appeal?<\/p>\n<p>%  :.%N\u00a7. 1%:i( The smmg of the ma court that the<\/p>\n<p> by the appc\ufb01ant is barred by time is imble to<\/p>\n<p> set asi\u00e9e as the same iserxoneous.<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;   f5Point No.2: The \ufb01nding of the trial court that the<\/p>\n<p>   _a;\u00a7pc23ant is entitled to award of Rs.\u00a3,40,000\/&#8211; with inimest<br \/>\n30.9\u00bb 31+ 4:\n<\/p>\n<p>* Co:a:s\u00e9&gt;r\u00a2f$\u00e9\u00a7{     at 13% pa \ufb02ora an the date of paymt is \ufb01ahk to<br \/>\nVI; 9. Ch}!<br \/>\ndq*\u00a7J:  bf: S61&#8242;. S\ufb01id\ufb01.\n<\/p>\n<p>1. x 1. 0% \\\u00a7:.2&#8243;~<\/p>\n<p>j.\u20ac~&#8217;\u00a2m~aQw&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>:92\u00bb in tuiov\u00a7U2n.sr\\ss3<\/p>\n<p>.. 5 _.\n<\/p>\n<p>Point No.3: As per the \ufb01nal order 531&#8242; the <\/p>\n<p>I\/W. 33 of the Act was \ufb01led by the  xiii   K V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>sand&#8217; appficalfaon was \u00a2i1smzssed&#8217; &#8216; by:&#8221;g1d:&#8217;tjf&#8217;r&#8217;~da\u00a3cdj:V  _&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>However, on application \ufb01led  f &#8216; 21 <\/p>\n<p>was aiimved and<br \/>\napplication was     __of dehy. Being<br \/>\n and the matter<br \/>\nwas      consiicm\ufb01an of the<br \/>\n  mmansi, on behaif of<br \/>\nthe  appellant was erxammed as<br \/>\nP&#8217;W.1  h\u00e9*g;\u00a7; to P69. 011 behaxr of the<\/p>\n<p>   and Ex:s.R1 and R2 were<\/p>\n<p>    court after considering the oonten\ufb01on<\/p>\n<p>of  the mateniai on zecord held that the<\/p>\n<p>   by the appellant herein was barmd by time<\/p>\n<p>  Viiwas not \ufb01led within thirty days from the date of maxing<\/p>\n<p>\\,\/s<\/p>\n<p>4&#8217; Cioweoiecl<br \/>\n&#8216; VubkCou9cI<br \/>\nOroler<\/p>\n<p>C:-H:&#8217;:}lu|og<\/p>\n<p>ct\ufb01xcndcc\ufb02ui<\/p>\n<p>PE. ks eacrils\ufb01cswsu<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-7-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>notice regarding \ufb01ling of the award in court and<br \/>\nthat on mezits the appncatscc is entitled to  A-<\/p>\n<p>appellant wou\ufb01d be entitled to an award for.VcR5;&#8217;i;\u00a73{\u00a7;0SI\u00a7:{}\/  &#8216;A V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>  ._  <\/p>\n<p>with interest at 18\u00b014: p.a.      7&#8242;?<\/p>\n<p>payment. However, since the   ..ha\u00a31ed  L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>by time, the appIicati.on__was    by<br \/>\nthe said older dated  in AC.9\/96<br \/>\nhas Prcfened this,3PP\u00b0a:1,c_   i   V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>5. it    am by<br \/>\nthe     xeith the notice of \ufb01ling<br \/>\nthe  ._ the material on record would<br \/>\nshow     application under Section<\/p>\n<p>14(2);df&#8221;t11e Act  came in the court and according to<\/p>\n<p>since  was not served with the notice of<\/p>\n<p>   the court he could \ufb01k: application 011<\/p>\n<p>  i23.A8-E96  same is \ufb01led within thirty days fmm the<\/p>\n<p> of  of the film&#8217; g of the award. The trial&#8217; court<\/p>\n<p>   on the basis that the award was passed on<\/p>\n<p>Lei\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>_,,8___ <\/p>\n<p>25.1.95 and \ufb01led in the court on 9.4.96 and  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>was \ufb01bd in 2000 and penzod of  t&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>application to set aside the award   f&lt;j5i5:.<\/p>\n<p>reconsideration is thirty dayQt__fti&#039;9m the jdatet&#039; of = L&#039;<\/p>\n<p>notice of \ufb01ling of the     is<br \/>\nbarred by time. whenkmgsom \u00a393&#039; from the trial<br \/>\ncourt as to whethe:    rcgaxding the<br \/>\n\ufb01ling of the   numbered as<br \/>\nAC.23\/96     reported that no<br \/>\nnotice    herein in AC.23\/96<br \/>\n t  the court by the appe\ufb01ant<\/p>\n<p>and    the appellant was numbered as<\/p>\n<p>.- &#039;.    . . . . . .&#039; _ -D.   . I I in<\/p>\n<p>  ufshow that the award is \ufb01led in thc court on<\/p>\n<p>   was issued to the appellant herein and<\/p>\n<p> &quot;V}vheref\u00a3:1ft\u00a7;:. the finding of the trial court that the application<\/p>\n<p>A  tiipt been \ufb01led Within&#039; t1mty&#039; days n\ufb01mn the date of se:&#039;Vx::e&#039;<\/p>\n<p> ofgnotice is erroneous as the same is not based upon the<\/p>\n<p>&#039;  tlxatexial on record and the appeliant is not served with<\/p>\n<p>Lksi<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;&#8230;]_1&#8230;..\n<\/p>\n<p>8. The learned oouns\u00e9l agpmring for the<br \/>\nhas also submitted that the xnattsr may be  _<br \/>\ntrial court for consideration of the  \ufb01ne<br \/>\nmerits, in accordance with law, w\u00a2%az;mr  <\/p>\n<p>No.2.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. POINT No.3: xngsw gr   to points 1 and<\/p>\n<p>2, we pass the foI}o\\vingvoxd\u00a7&#8217;:If:V. &#8216;v V . &#8216; V&#8217; V<br \/>\nThe appeal     of the ma&#8217; 1 court<br \/>\nthat the   AC9\/96 is barred<br \/>\nby tiineiis  that the application \ufb02ied<br \/>\nby the app;11a;:t3u; {A&#8217;c.43\/96) is msiaomd to the \ufb01le<br \/>\nof v1A.Aa;11.&lt;ii1y &#039;ciw\u00a3f: Judg\u00e9 (cccrm 1), Ban\ufb01losc City. The<br \/>\n  of  that the appelmu is enti\ufb02cd to an<br \/>\n   I\u00e9\u00e9..T:I:;~;10,0o0\/- with interest at 18% p.a. ftm\n<\/p>\n<p>-A&#8217; cn~wgg+~ea Eii\ufb01 till tkmdate ofpayment is set aside and the mum is<\/p>\n<p>Vida, &#8216;L&#8221;:3uv&#8217;c.    . . . .\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  to the ma} court for consxderatzaon of the claun of<\/p>\n<p> % o\u00ab+aw:%%%%%%%% \u00e9<\/p>\n<p>Pgs, g~;&#8221;_S\ufb01   to appear before the trial court on 8.7.2008 to stack<br \/>\n47 _ \\&#8217;\/\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;appellant, in accordance with law. The par\ufb01es are<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; 3.2 &#8212; .\n<\/p>\n<p>further instxuctions. Let the lower court records in <\/p>\n<p>and AC.23\/96 shall be  tins <\/p>\n<p>forthwith, along with the copy&#8217;;;ar%%ft1a;s oxiier, V    <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Kalayithra Engineering &#8230; vs The Chief Engineer (Civil) on 11 June, 2008 Author: V.G.Sabhahit &amp; S.N.Satyanarayana III THE HIGH COURT BF KARKATAKA AT BAHGALORE DATED THIS THE 11&#8243; DAY OF&#8217; JUICE, 2008 PRESENT mm nozrnu: smmmcm v.G.sAnnu\u00a3\u00a7r , [: &#8221; AND &#8212; THE Honram mnausrncn V mm 2\u20aco.584~8I2007 1 A &#8221; &#8216; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1802","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kalayithra Engineering ... vs The Chief Engineer (Civil) on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kalayithra Engineering ... vs The Chief Engineer (Civil) on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-03T17:24:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kalayithra Engineering &#8230; vs The Chief Engineer (Civil) on 11 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-03T17:24:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1061,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Kalayithra Engineering ... vs The Chief Engineer (Civil) on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-03T17:24:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kalayithra Engineering &#8230; vs The Chief Engineer (Civil) on 11 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kalayithra Engineering ... vs The Chief Engineer (Civil) on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kalayithra Engineering ... vs The Chief Engineer (Civil) on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-03T17:24:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kalayithra Engineering &#8230; vs The Chief Engineer (Civil) on 11 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-03T17:24:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008"},"wordCount":1061,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008","name":"Kalayithra Engineering ... vs The Chief Engineer (Civil) on 11 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-03T17:24:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalayithra-engineering-vs-the-chief-engineer-civil-on-11-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kalayithra Engineering &#8230; vs The Chief Engineer (Civil) on 11 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1802","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1802"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1802\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1802"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1802"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1802"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}