{"id":180231,"date":"2010-02-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010"},"modified":"2017-11-06T10:24:24","modified_gmt":"2017-11-06T04:54:24","slug":"automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Automobile Part And vs The Principal Secretary on 26 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Automobile Part And vs The Principal Secretary on 26 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n
WP N039186\/2009\n\n: 1 :\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA\n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DI-IARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 26\"?\" DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010. Q\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE SUBHAQH' 'B;   '\n\nWRIT PETITION No.39186\/2O09\"ICS9R\ufb01S.i   I\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nAUTOMOBILE PART AND  \nCONSUMERS CO--OPERAfTiVE SOCIETY LTD\nHALIYAI.,REP BY PRADEEE?_E%ALRAE\u00a7;'E KA.RBH~OI\n\nS \/O LATE BALARAM ULLAS KARI:3}fQ'I _   *\n\nAGED ABOUT 42 YR_S   _    \"   '\n\nR\/AT GUDDANAPURA. 1GA:;LI,'HA.:LIYAL* TALIIK\n\nU K DISTRICT.   I .    1'   :.~.--PETITIONER\n\n(BY SR1.I\u00a7INESB.5I,I.I\u00a7:ULI<ARI\u00a7II, AD\\I) \nAND:  T' \n\n1. TI-IE, PRINCIPAL. SECRETARY\nGO~VERN1\\\/IENT ,\n-. CO\u00a5OPERATION 'DEPARTMENT\n\u00bb f~1vI_ S BUILDI~NG\n" BANGALORE " 1,\n\n'   2. "TEE-AD"DITI:OAIS REGISTRAR OF' COOPERATIVE\n\nS"OCI~ETI'ES\n (CONSUMER AND MARKETING)\n A NO.1';ALIASKAR ROAD\n" BANGALORE\n\n 3.  THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO--OPERATIVE SOCIETIES\n\n'T BELGAUM REGION\n\n\n\nWP No.39186\/2009\n\nBELGAUM\n\n4. SR1 NAGESH PUTTU GOANKAR\nDIRECTOR, K D C C BANK\nSIRS1, VINAYAKA COLONY\nSIRSI TALUK   e- --  \nU K DISTRICT. ...RESRjO.N'DENTSVF '  '\n\n[BY SMT.K.V1DYAVATHI, AGA FOR Ri=.A_TOI-3,; ii '\n\nSRI.S.R.HEGDE HUDLAMANE, ADRIFOR C\/I'<4 } - . , " \n\nTHIS PETITION IS FILED U,_ND,ER ARTICILE:S"'~--2i26w AND '\n\n227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF"-INDIA PRA_Y1'NG 'TO SET\nASIDE THE ORDER DT.11.12.2039."IN"-REVISION PETITION\nNO.CO\/37\/CAP\/2009 ON FILE__uOF_ THE RI VIDE\nANNEXUREMA BY ISSUING _A 'WEI'-I' o.1?,C\u00bbERTIORARY AS\nILLEGALAND ETC,  . '  \n\nTHIS RET1"IT'ION' OOIVIINEO  OI\u00a7I"'vv.EoR PRELIMINARY\nHEARING, THIS I3'AY~-,. .Q.(_)L?RT..'M~ADE.THE FOLLOWING:\n\n1. Smt.K:V\u00abi.oAya,vEt?rIIV,';_ "i~e:SI,:'ned AGA takes notice for\n\n.~v.respoIT$1entS 1 to   _____ \n\n  called in question an order dated\n\nII.I2..;:oo9  in Revision Petition No.CO\/37\/CAP\/2009\n\n \u00ab.;'m the \ufb01leof respondent NOR}.<\/pre>\n
 “”1’he brief facts of the Case are that the 431 respondent<\/p>\n
T  elected to the KDCC Bank, Sirsi, and it is alleged that he<\/p>\n
W:\n<\/p>\n
WP No.39186\/2009
\n: 3 :<\/span><\/p>\n
was disquali\ufb01ed to continue as a Director of the Bank on the
\nground that, he was Director of one Shamala Finance Company
\nwhich was formed for similar object and was running:
\nbusiness as that of the Co–operative Society to  0,
\nelected. In View of provisions of Section
\nKarnataka Co–operative Societies Act,
\nhe being carrying on business siniilar to”-the  of 2 S’<\/p>\n
the Co-operative Bank, he is not__iientitled to “coVntini’ue as a<\/p>\n
member of the Committee.\n<\/p>\n
4. In this regavr’d,..:Van .fi1_edj’bvefore respondent
\nNo.3. Respo1idenjtnN.0E;3’by*his iorderidaited 08.06.2009 declared<\/p>\n
that respondent   “disquali\ufb01ed to continue as a<\/p>\n
member of the\u00ab–..(_V3io:nrnittee of Bank, Sirsi.<\/p>\n
  aggrieifed__by.the same, the 4th respondent \ufb01led an<\/p>\n
i”aAppVea1,Vbeifore*._thve__ 2nd respondent and the 2nd respondent<\/p>\n
con\ufb01\u00a3medi”t1-i.\u00e9:p: of the 3111 respondent by his order dated<\/p>\n
*i4.08.if2O.Q\u00a7.pVproduced at Annexure–D. Being aggrieved by the<\/p>\n
 iiorderiiipassed by respondents 2 and 3, respondent No.4 filed a<\/p>\n
 Petition before the State Government. ‘Fhe State<\/p>\n
\u00ab%\u00a3u<\/p>\n
WP No.39186\/2009
\n: 4 :<\/span><\/p>\n
Government by considering the provisions of Section 29 (C) and
\nalso judgment of this court in the case of Bore Gowda–.yVs.
\nAssistant Registrar of Co–operative Societies (ILRV.\n<\/p>\n
260) held that disquali\ufb01cation incurred by any
\nthe election could be adjudicated on1y”un’der_
\nSection 70 of the Act by raisinn\u00e9ya
\ndisquali\ufb01cation incurred after the:el_ection Vcould’v_:be’–lienq1iired ii
\nu\/ s 29 (C) of the Act and..furthe1″‘heldi”-shat respon..dent No.4
\nhaving incurred the  election to the
\nbank, has to be  accordingiy<\/p>\n
allowed the R4e*iis_ioh:..f.Pe’titi.of1-,_an’diifset aside the orders of<\/p>\n
respondents   the said order, this writ
\npetition has been  ~_ ,.\n<\/p>\n
6. S;ri;vDi.nesh V-i1’\\\/liilitilkarniii, learned counsel for the petitioner<\/p>\n
 Sectionii\u00e9ig (C) prohibits a member to be elected<\/p>\n
or-.ap.poi”nted…vo1~ continued as a member of the Committee if he<\/p>\n
2  had A ‘-i..ncu_r~r’e_cl}* disqualification enumerated therein. He<\/p>\n
 er-nphasisedii’ the word ‘continued’ and submitted that, even if<\/p>\n
is   No.4 has suffered the disquali\ufb01cation prior to the<\/p>\n
i  .election he cannot be continued as a member as Section 29–C<\/p>\n
$44′
\n~r”‘=:”‘T<\/p>\n
WP No.39186\/2009
\n:5:<\/span>
\nprohibits continuing of such member who has suffer the<\/p>\n
disquali\ufb01cation. in this regard he also relied on Section–“2_9–C<\/p>\n
(8) and submitted that any member of the Committeennofv <\/p>\n
operative Society suffers disquali\ufb01cation during 1′-i’.i_s” t6:nure”ihe3_’i ‘<\/p>\n
can be disquali\ufb01ed by the authority speci\ufb01ed t1r{_4ere.i.n:”andipowei-~.,n<\/p>\n
is conferred on the Registrar. Relying’on’theseiprovi,sions;<he'V.<\/p>\n
further submitted that the orders–.pia-ssed by._re'sponde.nts~2'jand "<\/p>\n
3 do not suffer from any i11ega–1ity'.-. "–A_1ternatix..ie1y..'\u00a7he also
\nsubmitted that respondent'  himself to
\nthe jurisdiction of respondewntis'  and:'3_n1neI  now raise an<\/p>\n
objection as regard  ;;'urisdic.tiofn of respondents 2 and 3<\/p>\n
and subnjiitted: tiiat of the State Government is per se<\/p>\n
contrary to the Vproy_iisi.ons'"Qf."Section 29–C and is liable to be<\/p>\n
quashed. .,<\/p>\n
  contrary, learned counsel for the contesting<\/p>\n
re'sponderi~tfsiitbrriitited that Section 29-0 though provides for<\/p>\n
 disqua.1i\ufb01ca*tioVn3 to be continued as a member but has to be
\nif  consonance with the other provisions of the said
\n  He submitted that interpreting Section 29-0, the<\/p>\n
afidivision bench of this court in the case of Govindappa Vs.<\/p>\n
%(,e'\u00ab.!i?\n<\/p>\n
-~:”*<\/p>\n
WP No.39186\/2009<\/p>\n
Sornashekhar Ishwarappa and Others (1979 (1) KLJ 124) has
\nheld that if a person suffers a disquaii\ufb01cation prior:
\nelection, the remedy is avaiiabie to raise a dispute  .
\nAct and person who suffers disquaii\ufb01cation after”
\nmember, the enquiry couid be made:’\u00bb..unc_ieri.’ef_:
\nSection 29~\u00bb~C. In this regard, heV’i”iurt_pherire.1ied on
\nof this Court in the case of Bore   1’A’L.S.SiVV:S’t:a-:r1t. :f?.egistrar<\/p>\n
of Co~operative Societies  and ‘pointed out<\/p>\n
that the said View has been,.rei.terated:.gby’xthiVs”i\u00bbceurt.<\/p>\n
8. On inter’preVtati:ei*iIV’_Voi  29-C of the Act, this
\ncourt has”obseriaedgt*that’=.Section—–7.0′; provides for raising a
\ndispute in7–.the S  touching the constitution of<\/p>\n
the Co~operati.ve Soicieties;  disqualification is also one of<\/p>\n
 the issue that couiidialso be gone into in a dispute u\/s 70 of the<\/p>\n
  View has been reiterated by subsequent<\/p>\n
judgrnent of t’his”eo’urt aiso.\n<\/p>\n
 It isniot in dispute that the allegation against R4 is that<\/p>\n
   suffered disquali\ufb01cation prior to the election. Such<\/p>\n
 .\/\ufb02disp\ufb01utes can be raised u \/ s 70 of the Act where full-\ufb02edged<\/p>\n
%:(\/if<\/p>\n
WP No.39186\/2009<\/p>\n
enquiry could be held. The Division Bench and subsequently<\/p>\n
the learned Single Judge of this court have consistentl3z.pta1;:e;1<\/p>\n
View that, such matters could be adjudicated only  _<\/p>\n
not 11\/ s 29-0. As regards whether respondent” :is~V::re–a1l3.\u00a7r <\/p>\n
disquali\ufb01ed or not is a matter required toA.beii’consider’ed,,_ <\/p>\n
View of the above, the proceeding initiated L1\/is jgare <\/p>\n
required to be quashed. IN the  of the”a’eoVe, \ufb01nd no
\nmerit in the writ petition. thewrit petition fails<\/p>\n
and the same is dismissed.     i\n<\/p>\n
10. Smt.K.Vidyl’aV_aithi’;_ -is permitted to file memo of
\nappearance’  four weei;s–. l l<\/p>\n
Sd\/*
\nIUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Automobile Part And vs The Principal Secretary on 26 February, 2010 Author: Subhash B.Adi WP N039186\/2009 : 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DI-IARWAD DATED THIS THE 26″?” DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010. Q BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE SUBHAQH’ ‘B; ‘ WRIT PETITION No.39186\/2O09″ICS9R\ufb01S.i I BETWEEN: AUTOMOBILE PART […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAutomobile Part And vs The Principal Secretary on 26 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Automobile Part And vs The Principal Secretary on 26 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-06T04:54:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Automobile Part And vs The Principal Secretary on 26 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-06T04:54:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":925,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Automobile Part And vs The Principal Secretary on 26 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-06T04:54:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Automobile Part And vs The Principal Secretary on 26 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Automobile Part And vs The Principal Secretary on 26 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Automobile Part And vs The Principal Secretary on 26 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-06T04:54:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Automobile Part And vs The Principal Secretary on 26 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-06T04:54:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010"},"wordCount":925,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010","name":"Automobile Part And vs The Principal Secretary on 26 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-06T04:54:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/automobile-part-and-vs-the-principal-secretary-on-26-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Automobile Part And vs The Principal Secretary on 26 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180231"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180231\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}