{"id":180321,"date":"2009-04-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009"},"modified":"2018-11-13T22:42:46","modified_gmt":"2018-11-13T17:12:46","slug":"sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Poojari Pedanna S\/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 9 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Poojari Pedanna S\/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 9 April, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
 AND X  V\n\n \n\n34 M HIGH COURT as KARNATAKA AT BANG\u00a3sLTOR.fE:      \n\nDATE THIS THE 9?\" DAY OF ;3;\u00a5?'i=EIl., u   i  \nms HOMBLE MR. xusrzce  a;%Hx_:9c\u00a73::;E\u00a5z:'%kk \nwan 31% Ng,V.1 'BQ\"'*~-.1   A \n\n    \n\nBETWEEN    %\nsax PGOEARI PEQAMNA \n\n5\/9 RAMA 3ev1%\"T - . x 1; _  \nAGED ABf)UT*_?5 xfearza;     M .\nR,\/AT KADUBISANGAHALLE \" \nVARTUR HGBLI', 'A   \nBANGALORE EASTTALUK .\nagracsnmas mam '.31s'*:\"~ \n\n% _  %%%%%   PETITIGNER\n     (w_s:21 H mum KUMAR, AIDVGCATE)\n\n  THAE\"\u00abSTAv'._FE  KARNATAKA\n\n REP B'i'..I\"TS SECRETARY\n\"'DEPARTM.ENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE\n\n& V % .i(}iRHATAi(A GOVERNMENT secnsramr\n\n ' !:V\u00a5;~Se31~3ILDING, ma AMBEDKAR VEEDHI\n   BANGALORE --~ 560 001\n\n  2 we KARNATAKA INQUSTRIAL AREA\n\n DEVELQPMEPQT BGARD\n\n14\/3, I FLOOR, RASTR\u20ac)T\ufb02ANA PARISHAT BLDG\nNRUPATHUNGA ROM)\n\nBANGALORE\n\n\n\n3 W5 xew HORIZON AND EDUCATION TRUST     \"\n:90 FEET ROAD, momamcaaa % \"\naamcmone\nREP. av :73 MANAGING musnse\n\nSR1 MGHAN MUNGANI\nAGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.\n\n(av sax asvoas, AQA-:=~oR_R1, % *  \nSR1 BASAVARA3 V SABRJRD, -{FOR R2 AND\nSRI s SHEKAR sHETfr?;','A;3vr;<:%AT\u00a7LjV:=QR.,c\/R3)\n\nTHIS wan PETITION 15 511,53.' UNDER"AR1'I{;U:'S 226 AND 227\nOF THE c0Ns11TtITm:__ 09* INBLA % Paaymeg. T0 QUASH THE\nNOTIFIC'A"\u00a5'ION DT.295'.2QQ6 F\u00a5%JBLI:'\u00a7'HEi'3_Ii'\\!"'T.H.'E GAZETTE UNDER\nsecnow 3(1) Am3.3+3(1};E T.-*\u00a3'E._A{;fT ANQALSU THE NOTIFICATIGN\nPUBLISHED UNDER :\u00a7E(ITION. 2a;(4)'----c:F \"THE ACT DT. 16.3.2006\n!SSUE\u00a3) av me a1%VA1'*-Aa;p4E;:un\u00a3'c,~ E)___ANI3 E RESPECTIVELY IN so\nFAR rr REiATE$\"'\u00a3\"Q\"j;LANI1}S* IN~.\u00e9S-Y.NO.\u00a5\u00a3\"'T0 'me EXTENT or 1-35\nGUNTAS OF 1<ADu3%1sAVi~:A;L;%%vIs.fi;A<3E, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE\nEAST.  * V    Q\n\nBETWEEN . "  V\nMr': \\2Er:RA"(;A:\u00a21::'HAia~ BRAMHAIA\u00a7~\u00a3\n\nS!G*VENAKTA$~\\\u00bb\u00a71ARA RAD\nAGED AB<3w52' ""fEi1R;53. \n\n . R\/A snnrswx 'NAGAR. (VILLAGE)\n V f1~.'CHINTA\u20aci\u00a7}NTA. (P{:\u00a7':$17\n ARLAGADDA DGRNIPADU (MANQAL)\n_ KL;g:i:)oL DIST, I3.NDi*iRA PRADESH,\n\nTHR\u00a33LiG~H.THIS i3UE_Y CONS ll EU I ED\n\n 'PGWER or Anoausv\n ._8'.SUMA-NTH -KUMAR REDDY,\n'- s;o%a=. xwaaswmv assay,\n\n     sagzaz TOWN, BANGALORE 550 305\n\n0\u00a5)I",vLE-r?VR0MENADE, 39, PROMENADE YGWN\n PETITIGNER\n(BY SR1 NAVKESH BATRA FOR HIS. NANDI LAW CHAM\ufb01-ERS)\n\n   RJE$?{)'?4mjfNTS  %\n\n\n\nAND\n\nSTATE or-' KARNATAKA   \nREP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY \n\n{DEPARTMENT cw INDUSTRIES Am cc2M\u00a3e\u20ac]E;zc\u00a3LJJ"%  \u00bb   " A\n\nVISHANA souomx, i)R.AMBED!G9_sR VEEE)HI~\nBANGALORE 560 001 '    V\nTHE mos  \nA STATUTORY BOBY INcc.\u00a3;90RATED%.. j V\nUNDER THE 1966 ACT  ~ %  %\n\nHAVING rrs omcs AT 14\/3,2"'\u00b0rL\u00a2:o%r\u00a7_}':%%  \n\nRASTROTHAINEA PAa1sHAT,su1a.u:wG.%b% ' %\nNRUPATHUNGA Ema, B.\u20ac&r4GAi;::-R\u00a7"\u00ab5t3--<3 (:02\nREPRESENTEDBY ?;.,r\u00a2AGAR;:1   \nASSISTANT S.E\u20acRETAF\u00a7_Y" _;  '    \u00bb\n\nM\/S NEW %\ufb02OR1Zt3i\u00e9.;_EDUf' 'HON A.N\u00a32.\u00bb*\ncULmRAL"1*Ru,<;;T, 2-: "  '- _\nHAVIND ITS 0F!-ItE,_Ar No.5'.-2.__;.Nt':2 2\n\nAT OUTER RING  KA\u00a3)';!s\u00a7E\u00a5ESANA\u00a3riALLI\nVARTHUR 'H_08\u00bbLI, BAN'\u20ac3\ufb01.L0'RE '\n\nALSO AT 1em_=&.-':?"T R\u00a3')A\u00a3?, IMJIRANAGAR,\nREPRESENTED ml ITS TRUSTEE,\n\n _ SMT,;R,,ENU~KA MANawg\u00a7:\n\n VkA:2.1\u00a7A?\u00a7a:A ubvoe MITRA\n 3*" Rana, KHANIJA BHAVA (scum WING)\n\nr:o;4%_9,. Racacogsass ROAD\nBANGALORE 5'e';.r; 001\nREP."-ssv ITS MANAGING DIRECYOR, KUM,\n\n35:49 M\u00a3.MaER SECRETARY\n  :e.;..T SHIVANANDA '\n\n \n .  LATE RAMA saw}\n   AGED AEOU1" 55 YEARS\n\n \u00b0=R CHINNASWAMY\n" 510 LATE RAMA snow\n\nAGED ABOUT 52 YEARS\nl\\\u00a5{).525,. BOVIHATTI COLONY\nKADUBISAJNMHALLI\n\n\n\nSECTION 28(1) 0F4THE_ _, 'iQ6:6 VIBE ANN!-3X.N.\n\n ~  3,10 m"n=, \\}'ENKA?E\u20acjSHF;,\n 'wm SR1NNAS,,-R395? 10"" caoss,\n<:_mMAMuRmY MAGAR\n~ ~ ..{;\u00a7\u00a31!4i'BEQKARN.9.f3AR)\n _ _DFPRAV;\\f~1\u00a7)MAGAR POST,\n %.B;'eNGA_L<'3_RE"_~ 550 015.\n\nA  T] -(BXESRI K SUBRAMANYAM, mt. VENKAT REDDY, Aavocms)\n * .L.\u00abAr4:i"\n 17 ms s'm'E or KARNATAKA\n\nVARTHUR HOBLI\nBANGALORE EAST TALUK\n\n(AMENM9 AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 8.12.06};-..:<     %\n\n;.';"RE$_?O'N.DE.N'fS " ~ 2\n\n(BY sax DEVDAS,V'AGA FOR' R1',   \n\nSR! BASAVARA} V SABRAD;v--ABVOCATE .Fo.R\u00a712  'V  3\nSR! 5 snemasnem, ADVOCATE ma R3 A\n\nM\/S. LexPLExus%F:;R&R:4;%.% 1 \nSR} T.I..ABDULLA,  F'.  }M\\_lD R5)\n\nTHIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER-"#zR'\ufb01VC3wES 226 AM) 227\nGF THE CONSTTTUTIQH OF;'"INDI}5. 'PRA'\ufb02!4EG._ T0 QUASH THE\nDECLARATION UNDER 'SECTIOSEI 3{3.\u00bb}' OF .l(I\u00a3\\DB ACT, 1996 DT.\n2.6.2006 VIDE ANhEEX.lV\u00a7j.} ._DECiARATT\u00a73i'{'UNE)ER SECTION 1(3) 0?\nTHE IGADB ACT, 1996;f'DT;" \u00a3530. C1214-4:SPQ:2\u20ac#(}6,\nTHAT CHAPTER VI1--V..(A~C\u20ac}UIS1"FiON'v A\u00abND DIEPOSAL OF LAND) SHALL\nBE APPi..ICAB&"'"i3\\l_ RESP{ECT  THE"3CHE{)ULE PROPERTY VIDE\nANNEX,M., l.'RELIE4Ii'#_'aR\u00a7{ ".VN\u20ac;3f!TFICA_Ti0N DT, 2.6.2906 UNDER\n\n  A.  ..... \n\nSMVT; s:-\u00a7AsH1K.aLA;'  if \nAGED %Am:;uT 4-S"\u00a5.EARS,--~"\n\n NETITIONER\n\nREPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY\n\n\n\n3.4\n\nPTCL Act. when the PTCL preceedings wer'_\u00e9H:\u00a7ltllin\n\nthe knowledge of the respondent No.1----.4':\u00e9n\u00a2:iuA:';.z":.,r:"'<\/pre>\n
nonwissuance of mtlce to the~orlglna_l g_r\u00e9’ti~ie$;’t_lf:.eli%.. V’<\/p>\n
legal representatives is ;’l’at&l’_l” <\/p>\n
proceedings under       ‘
\n(lx)(a) The application for allotrs*s.\u00a7’rrtVVorf land; ‘by the third<\/p>\n
respondent is lnc\u00a3r\ufb01\u00a7_nlm{\u00a7. colurnrls, only 4
\nare filled up. rrlvlg\ufb01fnent also, the
\nprojecr  alas   this regard, he
\nr:’orii\u00a7ehfs of para 20 of the
\n ’55” September, 2006
\n(\ufb01llrwrextlre “reads as follows:\n<\/p>\n
\u00ab .. L    to furnish brief pmject<\/p>\n
 ~..(;g)'{–lger%\u00a7\u00a7’hging’Vtli\u00e9f\u00e9ctual posititm, the respondent No.1<\/p>\n
   not have resorted ta acquiring the land
\nL’ .rll%:1’%:n1q\u00a7e :til\u00a7n and allotting it to the third respondent.<\/p>\n
 1’l3g\u00a7’3~R.eaulation 4(a) of KIAD Regulations, 1969
\nr 2 fil\ufb01l\u00e9<\/p>\n
(hereinafter called ‘the said Reguiationsf;”fuz?..’.Vslts?5iVf’*3\u00a7:4r”‘ .<\/p>\n
The Regulation 4(c) reads as foiiews;   V  .<\/p>\n
“4. Form of application:\n<\/p>\n
(3) xxx xxx<\/p>\n
(b) xxxm   t t   it<\/p>\n
(c) Applications which a’re._V’\u00a2\u00a7ther incrqfnpiet\u00e9tg er
\nnot accompanied \u00a32y”‘tiii\u00e9.-fje.?ii22\u00a7ae:;t mti!iey’Vfee
\nof 125.109 sh\u00e9\u00e9fiiit:-\u00a3”f<\/p>\n
(ix)(t:) In View of am Re_g.Vs;i\u00e9.ti;>i\u00a7””.1v,.’ahd the third<\/p>\n
(X)<\/p>\n
respond\ufb01nt:\u00a7t’i’ ::;_:m:i:i’iicei:ti_:ii.:n __ it imfomgaiete, the very
\nc0nsitier\u00e9tiQ_n iiif  nittgitieniy premature but is
\naise  Vie}-3t_i_Vti\u00abn of:_tiig_ Rea uiaticm.<\/p>\n
sri’ s\u00e9tra 1stii’Vri$:’;.2:.\u00a7c\u00a7”‘~i’iVisf\u00e9ubmisstens stating the third<\/p>\n
_;’respentient’aippttia\ufb01hed the respondent Na.1 and 2<\/p>\n
   cry “I am stuck, bail me out.” The<\/p>\n
Vi”-‘___tr:\u00a7\u00a3S”\u00a7sr:{_r3ci\ufb02\u00a33z2it $10.3 entered inta an agreement of sale<\/p>\n
 wi__t’h -ii\u00e9\u00e9jari Peddanna, Rajanna and Chinnaswamy.<\/p>\n
 ..  itiias already paid an advance sale consideration of<\/p>\n
 \u00abf”Rs.S5,85,0Q0\/- (Rupees \ufb01fty \ufb01ve iakh eighty five<\/p>\n
thousand). Having paid an advance sate<\/p>\n
consideration, but not getting the non-agricuiturasi<\/p>\n
REM.\n<\/p>\n
provisions of PTCL Act, the respondent 5195.4 to 6 have _entefed<\/p>\n
into an agreement of saie with the reepondent Ne.3 its <\/p>\n
the property in qumtion, He also stateg that tie’ ‘* <\/p>\n
submissions urged by Sri Batra.\n<\/p>\n
5. Sri Baeavaraj Saberad, the learned :ouVo$e\u00a7V”for<\/p>\n
second respondent – Kamataka Ino\u00e9set\ufb01al Area_s”‘*x’i\u00a7eve\u00a7\u00a7opt’nent<\/p>\n
Board has made his sohmissie’foe_as  <\/p>\n
(i) The petitioner in ifgas no locus.\n<\/p>\n
stand} to \u00ab  t  proceedings.\n<\/p>\n
Admttteoty,  .:!e\u00a7gje.l:.A”‘he\u00a7:\u00a7fs::”vof…the original grantee
\nsoi’d'”the;  ot\u00e9e\u00e9ri Sentesh Kumar Gare
\nv\u00a7:i’t_hoo_t  of the Government
\nonde\ufb02othvehoroxrjeiottie of PTCL Act. when the
\n..f ‘\u00a7’\u00ab:e!\u00a7>_et2et\u00a7oo’ “oi~t.he\u00abvgranted lane in fatten: of \ufb01antosh
\n was void, the question of Gare
\n any rights te the petitioner by the
\n exeeotton of sale deed does not arise at an. He<\/p>\n
AA ‘”~.,ofu29ti1er submits that the petitioner in<\/p>\n
HW.tP.Ne.1S628!@5 has given his consent to the
\nQBH;\n<\/p>\n
on _<\/p>\n
(iii)<\/p>\n
(iv)<\/p>\n
19<\/span><\/p>\n
acquisition and that therefore he is <\/p>\n
challenging the acquisition proceedlngss.–~\u00bb ff.   \u00ab<\/p>\n
The preposals submitted  thel..fthi’r\u00a2l: :lepo*nnlgl–l:e’<\/p>\n
were not rejected by thte’\u00ab.$tate*Le”vel  <\/p>\n
Clearance Committee   l_  <\/p>\n
He denies the alleealtienls-er<\/p>\n
The le\u00e9:all}fet:inl:en\u20ac;__t\u00a7ont7alned”””i’n the letter at<\/p>\n
Anne$\u00a7ttre”~}-kg  the tendered based on the
\nlivlforrr\u00e9eltien..g:li\u00ablled..:V6tlvt frem the file, which was sent<\/p>\n
witls.. the ‘ s.e%ceArlrl:”‘*\u00abres;5ondent’s letter, dated 16″‘<\/p>\n
 :”‘el;.ruaury*-,v 3086 eeelclnq legal opinion.<\/p>\n
   consent ef the owners, since the third<\/p>\n
 efternlsitiehlllef the land is of a small area and is<\/p>\n
 reepenieent was already holding agreements from<\/p>\n
 he  theowners of the land.\n<\/p>\n
“The pendency ef the preceedlnes under the PTCL Act<\/p>\n
is net reflected in the revenue records. The name ef<\/p>\n
the petitlener does not appear in the revenue<\/p>\n
HRH.\n<\/p>\n
  (i\u00a7c)*  The Research institutidn is an amenity as per the<\/p>\n
2G<\/p>\n
retards. He further submits that Spec\u00a7alV.V’\u00a7:\u00a7’s3d
\nAcquisitidn Qfflcer is net obliged ta: held  _
\nenquiry fear collecting everf bit
\nregarding who are all the inilfgrefli\u00e9d
\nland in Questicm. He furthgr slj’h\u00a7\u00e91’ltsV thaii
\nabundant caution, noti\u00a7\u00e9::d.xtv\u00a7cnV iv’.-:\u00a7”‘–l\u00a7$!t’.1V’::a\u00a2:l.’:Vf\u00a7lr2 the
\nKannada Daily, ‘i’%\u00a7lsga<;l:d \u00a7;E?Ar\u00e92\u00a72llf\u00e9:"'\u00abis_suelu"ddVted 24"'<\/p>\n
June, 2036 A calling  1ebjdd:i9n'43;\u00bb  ' ' 1" .. <\/p>\n
(vii) As tug ‘*&,3gg;i’}*.VliV:_..’1t;*–.f1<\u00a71,-j_;_V1<;_:;\u00e9s._ r:-d'\u00a7if,'v_fl'ive1d"'VVl:he cbjections in
\nre$pd:}:$eel_v'tdb'*l:\u00a71e p\u00a7fellmindry_.\u00a7lotl\ufb01catlen published in
\ntl\u00e9e newstiasfvdl\ufb01l  vested right ta challenge<\/p>\n
the \u00a355;-anclfd   rsetificatlon,<\/p>\n
I-f'"v–{4vll'l'\u00a7."':'T\u00a5a_a K\u00a53ateda'r$"'7and Anubhavadars cf the land in
\nl 3  'lgamely, Peejarl Peddanna, Rajappa and
\n'' Chvln\ufb01lgsa\u00e9\u00e9amy have voluntarily surrendered the<\/p>\n
:;d_sZ'\u00e93er.-:.sidr*: ef land $9 the acquiring authority,<\/p>\n
de\ufb01nitlen cdntalned in 2(1) of KIAD Act. The
\n\u00a33}:\n<\/p>\n
Government has aiready issued a
\n38″‘ March, 1991 in this re9_-‘vii?-\u00bb._ _    _ V\n<\/p>\n
6. Sri Shekar Shatty, the ieE:ii_’ne:f.’3~ . “f{:\u00a5V\u00a7~v.,\/,. “\ufb01,’.-I’,:a’:’
\nrespondent No.3 has mada his repivwsigibrriissii\u00e9ns a:a:’v:f1e;~’.i4ji:’:\u00a7\\zs.:i\u00a7\u00a7V:   .\n<\/p>\n
(i)(a) The petitioner in writ peiiitiiin NVo.iS?fif6_\/”f20\ufb01\u00a7 has no
\niocusmstandi to  land in
\nquestion was gra i\u00a7:t\u00a7\u00a7i__  and on his
\ndemisg,  if1’ai::}iii\u00a3\u00e9.iiy;Ji5oojari Peddanna,
\nRajap\ufb01g  h\u00e9came its ewners.\n<\/p>\n
  \u00a7l’\u00a7’ii’HiiL’)Vi3S permission of the
\nit to Santhosh Kumar Gare.\n<\/p>\n
_T..he s\u00e9ilez  fiairciiivr \u00e9ii\ufb01anthesh Kumar Garg is void ab
\n.f[j5\u00b0initi:e,’v–a\u00a7 t?i’\u00e9V\u00a7”ai’he is in violation ef Section 4(2) cf
\nV ”   readg as foiiews :\n<\/p>\n
”  No pemon shali, after die<\/p>\n
‘V ” coinm\u00e9hcamant of thIS Act, transfer or acquire by<\/p>\n
 .. ,  trazz\u00e9fer any granted land wiahout the previous
\nV’ a _ _ :’penn12asi*vn of the Government.”<\/p>\n
HEN.\n<\/p>\n
(V)<\/p>\n
25<\/span><\/p>\n
land for research purpose. In the pas\u00a7__a5:I$:\u00a2,’th\u00e9ii\ufb01n:i’–.’
\nwas acquired under KIAI5
\nnumber cf educational _instifuti\u00a3zn’s. ‘h2’:sn<\/p>\n
relied on a judgment of”tri:e.Horr’b*:\u00e91Sujipr\u00e9rsr\u00e9wduurt <\/p>\n
in the case of St\u00e9tg  arr\u00a3iV’A!i\u00a7\u00a7thar ‘ll’.
\nAll India m.gsm..m _.–‘r:_ \u20acV’;3=’:$.”g1\u00e9_’t_misation and
\nOthers  rs.$:\u00a3pk:;rte\u00a2s L  za\u00e9ti’ st: 1846 and
\nconteir:’rfi:’eT::3*–._Vit h”\u00e9::t..  cf iand for the main
\nma; \u00a7:e:rrri_rn’u’rrity hall, township and<\/p>\n
vrveek\u00e9nd  Lrpheld.\n<\/p>\n
Tha”v.rg$pon’de\ufb01t’ M\u00a7’;.3 is directed to pay the entire<\/p>\n
 cbgt of.Vat.q;V;i::=;’itiors indepenc\u00e9en\ufb02y cf the amounts pai\u00e9<\/p>\n
   respondent Ne.3 to Snyuths Poojari<\/p>\n
V “-‘__.Peri’\ufb012iv_r}ri.\u00a7v,5″Rajappa and Chinnaswarny. There was<\/p>\n
 nce_”ba.r”‘to enter into an agreement cf purchase. In<\/p>\n
 A.  t:.?1’i’$..regard, he has raked an a judgment of the<\/p>\n
 ~EHon’bia Suprema Court in the case of M13.<\/p>\n
Murudeshwara C m Limited and Another V.\n<\/p>\n
H.\n<\/p>\n
26<\/span><\/p>\n
State of Kamataka and Others reported in ILR<\/p>\n
2902 KAR 273.\n<\/p>\n
(v\u00a7)(a) Issuance sf individual netices is not mandatgry bgt<\/p>\n
anly directory. In support at’ his arg_e;:r:*;\u00e9:.r;\u00a7\u00a7.\u00a7__j:”;’S\u00a2g}:i’<\/p>\n
Shekar Shetty relied on a judgment _nf..f\u00a71:\u00a7s    > <\/p>\n
the case of Malik L.\n<\/p>\n
Karnataka and 0tham_4_repr\u00a7rt_\u00e9d In   <\/p>\n
550. The relevant “V”L’pjz\u00a7’ragra:5h~..  Extracted
\nhereinbelowt   K ”\n<\/p>\n
“14 ……. ~19 Sectm %4{1-1A),fA tkezj\u00e9’ Sis; f\ufb01zthing to<\/p>\n
Show tha_tsefv\u00a7ceC\u00a7findi\u00a7{5\u00e9e:ai~~\u00a71et\u00a7c2e 1.35 irnandatory.<\/p>\n
It onIy…s\u00a7–:a;t\u00e9\u00a7: .EThe:fj_’r3\u00e9rtific.a__\u00a3.\u00e9;j;:. ‘uiiti\u00e9f sub-section
\n(1) of Sgecfian  the date on or
\nbefore\u00bb _  ‘ani:r’\u00bb_’i:z*:e ‘masyher in which we
\n\u00e9izjeciios V ‘i*a’jV- acquisit\u00e9on may be
\nmadgg’ In “hand $uch a speci\ufb01ca’ t\ufb01on is
\nmadezvs “:19 \u00a7+;ide_nt’f:”om the no\ufb01ficatian fzisued<\/p>\n
.. 4\u00a7{u\u00a72a’~2r $e\u00e9tie.n_4(1} (A:2nex:1:7e–E). In View of the
\n. \u00e9\u00e9hiic\u00e9t\u00e9qn 0!’ tb\u00e9noti\ufb01cation in the O\ufb01\ufb01cial Gazette
\nf% k ‘a\u00a3:vs:!_}:i:ub!i\u00a7\u00e9a{&0n of the substance of me mzi\ufb01cation
\n *–..%invV’tf\u00a7\u00e9_v’Lco:2\u00e9%\u00e9med Imaiity, the petitiener could have
\n meg a\ufb01j\u00e9ctions an ar beforne tbs-. date specified in
\nt\u00a31e”::a:’d mti\ufb01cat\u00e9an. we do not think that in the<\/p>\n
 am,<\/p>\n
absence ofse-{vice of individua! notice, Sectibaf 453+  %<\/p>\n
A) cannot be worked out and.t!2a.t_  \u00e9f   _
\nisdividua! notice is the only pt;>ceQ’L!{\u00e9rl %safeg::;=ra’.t
\npubtication afnoti\ufb01cationVt:1{:der’;\u00a7ett\u00a7on 4(1).’_fh we
\nOfficial Gazette and pubiwavtiog of tf;:.3_ 5t!\u00a33Sta%3Ii\u00a3.~’\u00ab\u00a7C\u00a5f’ <\/p>\n
the noti\ufb01cation in the concern:-ci–l;:acaiity’\u00ab.ct\u00a7:\u00a7stitute
\nsu\ufb01icient procedzz}’atA_   the v’Ao\u00a7~}ner
\nwhose land is soct\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7t’tc.i’   , Once we
\nhave neacbed  v~\u00a3\u00a7t3t?C!t\u00a3$\u00a7G1? ” ‘”thaf\u00ab ‘g\u00e9wgce cf
\nindividua}  is t not –1.’mat2t%’ato:y non–
\ncansicfaz\u00e9tigitt. ‘th\u00a2–..___\u00e9:\u20acFect”_of; .S\u00a7*:i:tion 45 in the
\ndecisions’7:m~\u00e9:g\ufb01\u00e9:3\u00a2e’  of reference do
\ng\u00e9t%”V?:ax.:gv_;;e.\u00a7:rihg. t>t\u00a7_’ the. \ufb01iiestion whether the
\ns\u00e9~r_vi::.\u00a2\u00a5- of ‘ ” tmhatice :3 directnry or
\nmahdaftory, “‘–in\u00e9ts\u00a7frn:,4}%:t:.  \u00e9s if at all service of<\/p>\n
_ .int\u00a3ividij3I_’h<;;t;i\u00a7e 1% a"}}2t;st than how such notice is
\n 'itcf  gerv\u00e9d i.::…,z2.:m1'it;ed under Section 4.5 of the
\n  Igtmgb-section (1) of Section 4 of the Act with<\/p>\n
  the publication of the noti\ufb01cat\ufb01cm in
\n 'meA mega; Gazette and the pubiscazien of the
\n sab\u00e9taabe of the noti\ufb01cat\ufb01an in the ccmcemed<\/p>\n
I\u00e9catity the word 'shall' is used and in the latter<\/p>\n
 'T '-part of it the wow? 'may' is used as ta causing cf a
\n' "copy of such a noti\ufb01cation ta be sewed on me<\/p>\n
owner or the occupier :32' the land, This aspect alse
\nsupports the View that the service of indfvidual
\nnotice on the Iand owner or accupier is only
\ndirectory".\n<\/p>\n
Egg<\/p>\n
(vi)(b) Non-service of natice, is no ground ta a!”VtV!:’V!i;i :’–1.;:?.V”I&<\/p>\n
noti\ufb01cation. To substantiate this <\/p>\n
IA!<\/p>\n
shetty read out Head hioteA;f’tim.\n<\/p>\n
in the case of Bhoie <\/p>\n
and Another vs. Stat};V_Kafiiata\u00a7tgV\u00bbvQIi\u00a7”i\u00a7\u20ac:h’iars, ” ‘<\/p>\n
reported in 19B7(..2)  T!3_e s\u00e9rf1ev.i.s..\u00a3-Extracted
\nherein beiowt ”  ‘  V.  V
\n“(A) LA{\u20acB.__ACQUIS3’i{f}N:”A ?} M –s.4(1) ._
\nReQUfF\u00a2R3f3\ufb01i}I’0\u00a7. SFWE 195%?’ 9f?” -‘3″ ew\ufb01wner of land
\nnot :21i’a:2d;\u00a7\u00a3Q?3\u00e9?”%. N}f>.1’\ufb01fs\u00e9n.r\u00a3c.e ‘of the notice cannot
\n \ufb01fiiignd c::2hQ=a:–!he’vNotificat.ion”.
\n(v\u00a7)(c) 1Pgr\u00a7sef_zn’a5:  of acquiring the iand ar
\n1pass\u00a7:1g%%awa:r;1 iAs.,_ho?\u00a7”L’an absoiute requirement of iaw.
\n this point, he reiied on a Judgment\n<\/p>\n
 —9fv.,t_he\u00a7’*F\u00a7ii–\u00ab.Banch of Punjab High Court in the case 91′
\nAA%%s.at.e,;:p….aab vs. auraian Sing}: nd another
\n  :e\u00a7:;;r\u00a3?ed in AIR 1934 Punjab And Haryana 1.<\/p>\n
: ‘(vi)(_d) Hcitice has to be issued ta a person, whase name<\/p>\n
   figures in the revenue retards. In this regard, he<\/p>\n
83%<\/p>\n
also brings to my netice the Horfble Suereme Ce_urt’s<\/p>\n
judgment in the case of commissiener, <\/p>\n
Development Authority v.\n<\/p>\n
repertee in (zone) 3 sec 3.3’\ufb01\\:g-.’xAS-“‘\u00a7h.V\u00e9!tVb’:”.V;b.V:iV’ t?ie4_’_f’-fu\u00a5’E.,, ”<\/p>\n
Bench of Madras High Cent”; \u00a5:\u00a7\u00a7t’tthe’tt’-:rese’yv <\/p>\n
Thanikavekr vs. ”  \ufb01aileetor ” L’<\/p>\n
fer Land Acq:;i;siti<:;g,_..u:E\ufb01adg#;as htantvrl ehother,
\nreported in AIR   Bench);\n<\/p>\n
individual ‘ ;fs’et_1ce   te vc’:g..’i.1:%jr”.these persona
\n    ‘ ‘fevenue retards or
\n _    as persens interested
\ndz} lnfeA\u00a7\u00e9’fi’\u00e9.~t\u00a7:e_::%3″recei\ufb01\u00e9ved’ t-‘hreuah reliabie source. 511<\/p>\n
\ufb01hetty? centetide  the petitioner’s name dees<\/p>\n
“._i eet. appee\u00e9itltn the revenue records and as the<\/p>\n
   has not responded to the Neti\ufb01cation<\/p>\n
 the Gazette and newspaper, the<\/p>\n
qu.feet;e’h ef considering his ebjectiens to the<\/p>\n
 AA  a\u00e9eeisition dees-not arise at an.\n<\/p>\n
3337′,<\/p>\n
(38?) As per Sectian 6(2) 91′ the Karnataka<\/p>\n
(Facilitation) Act, 2092, the Single Windqgf cie:a:1r3;+1\u00ab:%\u00ab;-;+%’T  <\/p>\n
Committee is required ta ccsn\u00e9ider we p\u00a7’\u00e9}5:!$~\u00e9\u00a7~v|s–1′;’o\u00a7””A<\/p>\n
putting up fresh projects’  ‘fe\u00e9:–{ thT\u00e9”~.<\/p>\n
expansicn of the exi\u00e9ti-:i\u00a7~~..%proj \u00e9ct,g 5irigIv\u00e9:.v “\\?i\u00a5Ensdow ‘V<\/p>\n
Ctearanca Cemm\u00e9ttge haS”i’&t5  a:Jtb9rItyA’ tQ’*con\u00a7ider.<\/p>\n
(viii) The petiticmer hag @\u00e9’\u00e9’:\u00a7l,’;:ci~%e this Honiaie
\ncourt to;_”C\u00e9\u00a7i\u00a7nu\u00e9=._tha \u00a7.fite”r5ff:’*:s7erd.e.?A after 09.95.2003
\nin wjig Mg;g\u00a7\u00e9$a41:\u20ac\u00a7[e\u00a7\u00a7:(ks%c\u00bb\u00e9sfr)k.A<\/p>\n
(ix)(a) $t_a\u00a7\u00a7;i cured by the caperation
\nofASeV3:ti9n’   which reads as. falhzwsz<\/p>\n
1 * ~ f’1,2!  galidity of proceedings; No
\n giosre or ‘praaeedings itaken ti\ufb02def this Act size};<\/p>\n
‘A ‘ = .. _   merely an the gmund;\n<\/p>\n
   vacancy or defect 5!? {he mnstitazian
\n” ‘ -Gf the \ufb01\ufb02afd or of any committee tizereori: or<\/p>\n
 * 4_  of any defemf or irregularity in such act or<\/p>\n
preceeding no: affecting the merits cf the
\nC353″,<\/p>\n
33%.\n<\/p>\n
(\u00a7\u00a7<)(\u00a53) The learned ceunsei reiied can the <\/p>\n
judgment at this Cam': in the Case of  V
\nand others V. The <\/p>\n
Belgaum Sub-Divisitxn;'~v..\ufb01el\ufb01agim.'\u00e9fntti"utiiers " L'<\/p>\n
reported in 11.5! 3,916  wh\u00e9z*e\u00a7n is heid
\nthat net mentinnihgtt_rca'rt\u00a7irriv in the notice
\nunder Sectimg 28:=_(2')' \u00a5\u00a7\u00a7:a_:'m:erg Viv-rr\u00e9giriarity cured by<\/p>\n
the af3r*:'a~.r_eiEt.ra\u00a7Vct\u00bb.a\u00a5\u00a73 ..;_\u00a7r–<)_vI:~:'\u00a7o\u00a7r;*.r.V_ .<\/p>\n
?.  _s.\u00a7\u00a7vbVr\ufb01issions in w.P. No,<\/p>\n
15628f2\u00a33G6   <\/p>\n
 (E) ..\u00ab.{:.'Th'e petiti'e.\ufb01fr____h:as rte Iacus-stand! to file this writ<\/p>\n
A   p.\u00a7tAit%ia-r1;~–. _He and his two brothers have entered late<\/p>\n
 \u00e9.'gLre'e\u00a7\ufb01i…ent w\u00a5th the third respondent fer the saie<\/p>\n
 9f~–Vtt1'e";property,. Further, they have aise given their<\/p>\n
V' "  c\u00e9hsent to the acquisitien at an stages cf the<\/p>\n
V' preceedings.\n<\/p>\n
The petiticner and his twe brothers
\nhave received a sum cf Rs.55,8S,0(}0\/- (Rs. Fifty five
\niakh etehty \ufb01ve thousand only) pursuant tea the sale<\/p>\n
agreement, dated 23.06.2095 (Annexure-R1). The
\n\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01f<\/p>\n
petitioner himseif has received Rs.?,45,t3\u00a330\/-. Sr:<\/p>\n
shekar Shetty brings ta my notice the ccnsent letter,<\/p>\n
dated 14.95.2095 (Annexm-e\u00bb R3) submit\u00a7g\u00e9’L:\u00a7”%%%t\u00a7i%e.<\/p>\n
Special Land Acquisitian Df\ufb01cer af  <\/p>\n
reapondent — KIADB indicat-i:1″g”*~!<!is;   t.h\u00e9-, V<\/p>\n
acquisition ef the land for res;2<\u00a7r1d.en\u00a7:;'L.L;:"'iei\u00e91._<\/p>\n
further submits that  th:\u00a7'~~..petii\u00a7ic2r3.er–,_\u00a7';;d"'~-\ufb01g' Ewe " V<\/p>\n
bmtherg have de}iver ed** i..t__h.e '"-\u00bbpess\u00e9s$i–a\u00abn.~'\u00a7 of the
\neroperty in questi\ufb01n'_te"'t.b\u00e9:i5\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9:Iia\u00bb! Land Acquisition<\/p>\n
Qfficer, ;s.j:i'sv.,_eviej:i'o'.5v~.\u00a5:\u00a7i:'f2'orf:'\u00ab.ims$es$\u00a7$n fetter, dated
\nNil\n<\/p>\n
(ii) sr: shekar :’:\u00a7hetty\u00ab..$u.bmiLts that ance the csaim for<\/p>\n
c;\u00a7mpe\u00e9h\u00e9f2\u00a7iti9.r;_Vn:'<is  .0: accepted by a party, he<\/p>\n
iodsagthe'r\u00e9gh\u00a7 ':.:f_f$'Isfing the acquisitien of iands.\n<\/p>\n
8. $21. Sh”e”$;a r’V.iS!1e%:ty’\u00e9 suhmissiens in WP. No.<\/p>\n
 are a\u00a7_f’\u00a7.lsAtV:’.V=}”:i” Av<\/p>\n
 {:3  “‘$:fi\u00ab..Si\u00e9\u00e9k af_.Shetty denias that the petitioner is the<\/p>\n
” .._’4″V%da1;.gh {\u00a7.’;e;*T:; sf Venkatesh. when she is not the<\/p>\n
33<\/span><\/p>\n
daughter of Venkatesh, who is the son of the ariginal
\ngrantee — Rama Bhovi, she has no legal r\u00a7aht_,___titIe<\/p>\n
and interest in the land in questican. He.jftj’;tb!1evr<\/p>\n
draws to my natice the averments conta_\u00a7~:’\u00e9.e;d’_ <\/p>\n
2 of the niaint, which reads a$..to3?\u00b0W$t'”””‘CY .  ‘<\/p>\n
“The deceased Venkf\ufb01tesb  At ‘fart?  t’ ‘ ~  it<\/p>\n
Ramaiah alias Rama ‘.\u00a33!7’m{i) was: ma;~irvied._’v\u00ab–toVV
\nCtbinnamma and t!2roug1i” he ‘-  tare
\ndaughters by na:z;e=.g:ino{e’;tiiai:;ti\ufb01\u00a7e._n2 and 3 who
\nare reptmnted by”–rzbe. ‘;vIa’i:2tt;ff who is their
\nsenior Aunt, An AAind\u00a3:per2de.&;t *’;3ppi\u00e9t+a2t\u00a3on under
\nOlder   .1 &5-,2 1c>\u00a3’,.{;’od\u00e9’~v:3;F’P:ucedu:e is
\nalso 1′:’\u00a7ed”a;_’: zyegarr qr\ufb01ntggtorepiainziits 1 and 2″.<\/p>\n
9. Sr! P;e9Jna”be set up with an investment of more than Rs.3<\/p>\n
\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01.\n<\/p>\n
Venkatesh died leaving behind him two daughters, the petitioner
\nand her younger sister Lakshmi (deceased). They all constituted<\/p>\n
Hindu undivided Farniiy.\n<\/p>\n
(b) O.S.Ne.831\/G3 is filed by the petitioner an}: <\/p>\n
nieces seeking the partition of the three “items; ef <\/p>\n
inciuding the {and in questien, and for’:’the–eiiotrreent\u00bb.of<\/p>\n
share therein and for the reiief ef’Qeeeearather..poeeeeei’en”\u00a7'” The ‘V<\/p>\n
relationship between the p–Iazintif\u00a3.r”‘eerj’: ti:e_ defeedents (the
\npetitioner and the resporrdeet  6 herein
\nrespectively) is admittggtg ex  Therefore the
\nthtrd respendent\ufb01z.  the petitioner is not
\nthe daughter’  “!s”‘~everru|ed. On a stray
\nambiguous  the petitiener cannot be
\ndenied the vaiuebieinnVeritenCe’:_rieht in the immovable preperty.
\n eireVedy__A.rnede out the prima facie case in<\/p>\n
G.:S;.t\u00a7e.V831\/03,’A.eie.i’is ._evIdent frem the granting cf the interim<\/p>\n
 __erder ei’   she were not the daughter of Venkatesh<\/p>\n
viendgthe e4ren\u00e9\u00a7.’Vdenehter of Ramaieh, it weuid not have been<\/p>\n
HEM<\/p>\n
their rights are determined in W.P.i\\ies,15342\/07  <\/p>\n
and oniy thereafter cheiienge the ecquieitien\u00bb–preceeiiihji;\u00a7e’,_ ‘.iIe4.’_the,A K V’<\/p>\n
event ef their succeeding in the said we: :::\u00a7A.etiiiee::_V ‘7efif,e:fVV <\/p>\n
years and thereafter fiiing the w?i\u00a3..:ii:jp’\u00a7\u00a7itiee3.__te.V_\u00a2ii’\u00a7a{‘ie\ufb01ge”fhe ” L’<\/p>\n
acquisition preceedinas, they,ygreule,-be..”eeiifrpnteewithviithe fait
\naccempii -~ an actien which the persens
\naffected by it are in_ ej;’:;ee\u00a5ti;ee’:te:;;qiie\u00abr\u00a7r–‘.Vei’vV- it. If the
\nparties are meeegei1s.feviii:i:\u00a2__ei;’e_i.i.eege=.th:e_veeeiiiieition ereceedings
\n2:12 \u00a3heir rigigtsieage ii:\u00a3\u00a7sia:iize\u00e9ii;% igiyai\u00e9ia have the effect of
\nrendering them = the acquisition ereceedinos
\nare cempieteeierigl the  is deveioped, the deck<\/p>\n
Cafiil\ufb01t be  beck  qeeeiiing the acquisitioe proceedings.
\n “‘(e)V”*Thti-S; t\u00e9ethe petitioners in w.P.!\\ies.1,5716\/96 and<\/p>\n
395Cieji3’2-ueref’t.ifive’ pei?e.ons interested in the land, I hold that<\/p>\n
 have tiie~”_i\u00a7r::iV’s-sterzdi to me and meintase these writ<\/p>\n
‘ ” ~.eie[titi’eriAei<\/p>\n
A     Re Question Nmz – (e) The eetitiener, Peejari<\/p>\n
‘i;*e{\u00a7Vdave.ea has given his consent te the Speciai Land Acquisition<\/p>\n
 ef the second respondent KIADB. The same is evident<\/p>\n
\u00a33}!<\/p>\n
(C) It is trite position in Law that ence the ctaim Es made by
\na party either far the determination of the market value at for<\/p>\n
the enhancement, he cannot chaitenoa the acquisiticm per”t\u00a7\u00e9’;\u00ab.:T’En<\/p>\n
this regard, it is prcfitabte to refer to the <\/p>\n
judgment of this Court in the case of   ‘ <\/p>\n
State af Kamataka reported in Ink   <\/p>\n
reievant pertion of the $aid Judgmettt”i~sV_extra-stat! _h\u00e9t\u00e95i\u00ab\u00e9\u00a7tse!.axAt:<\/p>\n
“Mi There is one other aspectwwtzich ha\u00e9’ 3 taeagi\u00e9g.
\nAdmittedly; the petition\u00e9,_r$_={“j%fEiet–?A thge Vt’:-fain\u00a7”‘statement on
\n31.3.1933 and the Writ Petizscg ‘wasfiiedtto;;tv .1t9;_22.1933,
\nWe have heft? in’ \u00a7ri\u00ab’r;’_t App\u00e9\u00e9i’.\u00a7\u00a7\u00a2.?8.z}’\u00a79  of on
\n5″‘ Navember      <\/p>\n
“This  at ~ k\ufb01ichiiiwrit Petition
\n m\u00e9i\u00e9tatha\ufb01ie  admittedly
\nhit had’  iit\u00e9gplicat\ufb01on claiming
\ncozr\u00e9tzetrsaticia t!2\u00a7\u00e9”*!ahd in aues\ufb01on. It is
\n_well settt\ufb01g-fa Viatv t\u00a72a{“\u00a7vhere 3 pasta\u00bb asked
\n  he cannot maintain .3 Writ
\n P:\u00a7tft\u00a7z3:;”\u00a3::;der Article 226 of the Ccnstitution
\n t tssttzgds\u00e9ttttttyme 70 Cafcutta Weekly mes,
\n“”‘pag’e’v71″1{?t?. Thextafare, we ages with the
\n vietk taken by the teamed aingie Judge and<\/p>\n
 n T drsrtiiss the Writ Appeal.”\n<\/p>\n
.. FIE!-l.\n<\/p>\n
‘A f’ I\ufb01dusviai estate” any site salected by the State<\/p>\n
”   fog’ use by any indzstniw or class cf indwt\ufb01\ufb01;<\/p>\n
   : ES.2(7)(a) “lndusmfal infrastructuta! faci!ities” means<\/p>\n
said with certainty is that the land can be
\npurpase of industriai deveiepment. tan’ bghH\u00a7i:j\u00a7ir\u00a7:\u00e9d’.’.1’feiV..’V’
\nestablishing the indu-stria\u00a7 area, indu\u00a7t;*i\u00e9s’\u00a7A.A_T’\u00e9st\u00e9ta; <\/p>\n
infrastructural facilities and for crea’b*i:–\u00e9.::j’q~.V;;ivi<i.V'amenV\u00a7iivgs';':~. '"  <\/p>\n
(b) The statutory pra”\u00a7i $i%nns’_’AVcg\ufb01t’\u00e9\u00abi.\u00a7sV%.\ufb01c\u00ab.%the \u00e9efinition of
\nthese termg are extracted herginibeith\u00e9\u00e9f    ‘  _ ‘<\/p>\n
52(1) Amenity’?  rpa\u00e9,  water: or
\nelactnicrity,  ‘Stw;-t”-V’ ‘7’..;’i\u00a7tht;_’ga_g;~.  “*’;irafna3e. sewerage,
\nconsewancy. ‘ag\u00e9d   cunggiience, as the State
\nGovemghent ;.. t;y’A?:;a\u00a3!t”;ira;fo::  to be an amenity
\nfor the  of   <\/p>\n
82(6) ‘f .I;2dusir:’.3[:Va:’.\u00a2:.\u00a7–” me\u00e9h\u00e9 any area declared to be an<\/p>\n
 V.  ind:,;si*riaI_ ar\u00a2a b;?”‘t!:\u00a32___.5fate Gevemment by noti\ufb01cation<\/p>\n
V ]w:::\u00a2h  zxexzeveioped and where industries ans tn be<\/p>\n
 a\u00a2c:g:::m\u00a7e3:\u00e9\u00a7%vTa;2d industriai inftastmctutal racmties and<\/p>\n
 amenit\u00e9asaa at\u00bb be pmviaed and includes, an industrial
\n_ estate;  ‘ ”\n<\/p>\n
 . i\ufb01\u00e9vaahment where factories and other baiidfngs are built<\/p>\n
fac\ufb02itim which contribute ta the deveiopment 03′
\nindustries aetablished in fndustriai area suacrh as reaearch<\/p>\n
A’ ‘ yaiuabie important tight and having regard to the .<\/p>\n
materials should be such which are  ‘to
\ncollected by the authonrm snagged the;’ea-far7.jj~VTiie: i _
\naumo\ufb01tim must act within mfweffouif mmers’ offhgz.  ”
\nstatzite. An opinirm formed eve}; oiixmtfi\u00e9 ofain ”  1
\nadvice by an autharity wizizfii is hot
\nunder the statute iB\ufb02\u00a3}’el’S ‘decisiciii~.b}\u00e9d–Vin <\/p>\n
A statutory authority is ‘b\ufb01u.~i\u00a7_2i– .by\u00bb._the i\u00e9nzcedtire<\/p>\n
fend down in the V$ta}fu\u00a3e’–.an4gi   within the
\nfourcomeis thereof.”  ._ “i ‘V ‘i h’  ‘V<\/p>\n
In the case of Hia\ufb01us\ufb01bh ‘   gigifporatbn Ltd.<\/p>\n
1:. Karma   (2065) 7 sec
\n52.7, It_Es..heIt\u00a7..\u00a7s;bi~3:\u00a7\u00a3.\u00a2w$.: ‘   <\/p>\n
 *9.’ It”is’j’\u00a3:}ite,_’ti2.\u00a2\u00a7tv**hssairing given ta 3 person
\nmuf..~:\u00a3_be%a:\u00e9 “and not a mere formality,
\nEorm3ifon”af_o_9inipn’~35 regards the pubiic purpose<\/p>\n
, .{_as me gistaitxiiity thereof must be preceded by
\n apgsmagn of mind as regards consideration of
\n  faajtois and rejection of irreievaiit onm.
\n ‘~–.i’Ti\u00a7\u00a3:’  Vii: its decision-making pnoc\ufb01s must not<\/p>\n
 cogmriifany misdirection in law. It is aiso not in
\ndispute that Section 5-A of the Act confers a<\/p>\n
 –*provisions contained in Arricie 300-\u00abA of the
\nConstitution it has been heid to be akin to a
\nfcmdamen ta! High 3:\n<\/p>\n
33,34,<\/p>\n
19. Furthermore, the State is required to app-tyi
\nits mind mt onty an the objections filed   <\/p>\n
owner of the land but also on the report   V   A<\/p>\n
submitted by the Celia-ctar u;;:o(_7,.;f;3;fs_1tr’:e:3’_g31\u00a7\u20aciV  _<\/p>\n
further enqz\ufb01ries thetefori as’ ; 313:1′
\nrecemmendations made 5? him }1′?__ tit??? beh3i’f* “me ”  <\/p>\n
.State Government may”tfL)rt;f2er i\u00a7?Q\u00a3.I\u00a7{.\u20ac
\nmatter, if any cam is  cut Vtfztetf\u00e9fzir, for
\narriving as its own:*’s\u00a7tisfa5’titmnt_;a’;\u00e9tit is n\u00e9ceasitzy
\nto deprive a cit\u00a3zen”eft’hS:?’g.\u00a7t:. It is in
\nthat situation tt2atAVp_:fo_d;:c-tt\u00e9ni  by the
\n5tateisf?ec?SS8ry.1: {   ‘  ‘
\n23; Altt\u00e9t\u00e9\u00e9ggh 2\u00e9sv*5.”–J:\u00a7:\u00a7.?s?\u00e93t:t’t’ofv’;\u00a7e\u00e9\u00a7sons is that part
\nos\u20acp;1mf:;\u00a21\u00abes ‘n\u00e9fufai mtg; necessity thereof
\nz\ufb01vay ix’: tak\u00e9rf’-away  statute either exprexly or
\nby  ‘i::\u00a7p!i\u00a23t._1’\u00a7i;;” A decfaratian contained
\nV51; at z\u00e9dtificeticin  under Section 6 of the Act
\n  not \u00e9nntat\ufb01atcry season but such a notification
\n_  mtg:  the decision of the appmmaze
\n ” ‘\ufb01\u00e9it\u00e9ty\u00e9htefntt when a decfsiogz is required to be
\n  giving an opportunity of hearing to a
\n pegistzr\ufb01wha may suffer civil or evil consequences
\n5;; \ufb01reason tfrereof, the same wou\ufb01d mean an
\nAt ‘T L” 4., geff\u00e9ctive hearing. ”\n<\/p>\n
  (‘d;)”I’ri the light of the afore\u00ab-extracted judgments and in<\/p>\n
 ‘V..__Vth\u00e9{hght of there being :19 materiai whatsoever on tha recerd of<\/p>\n
53%.\n<\/p>\n
required to hold the roving enquiry for the purpose of c9\u00a7t\u00e9.\u00a7tin_g<\/p>\n
the infarmatien as to who are an the persons interest\u00e9\u00e9-\u00ab’.,i’n..J: _<\/p>\n
iand. In the instant case, the rapondent warn; \u00ab. <\/p>\n
aware ef the fact that the tend in questtnin  <\/p>\n
af the pendency at the PTCL proceedinaS”.t;’\u00e9fore  <\/p>\n
Commiss\u00e9oner and the Deputy Cnrnrni$$i\u00e9net_;: that the
\nrespondent N953. and 2   _thevunrnceedinas
\nunder the PT CL Act is (e_vident_.fr\u00a7S_m Mute (Annexure\n<\/p>\n
1.) to Writ petitien\ufb02N\u00a7:’.VttS?.3:5\/2Q’ti:6..:_”ttntngratnh 5 cf the said<\/p>\n
agenda nete read\u20acs_VV.a5z\ufb01__fe;g\u00a7i9t#&3:_:”5ff_-   ‘<\/p>\n
“\ufb01t (gin v\u00a7:~:$f5c$:\u00abz\ufb01\u00a3<1:_?;'caf\u00a3he\u00a7"p.tnpa$al :21' M3; New Horiznn
\nEducationai Trnst,   that the Iand in 5y.No.41
\nmeasuring  \u00e9aadre  .ganVt\u00e93._Lif Kadubeesanahaili village :3<\/p>\n
 V'  anafvth\ufb01enzre the' Re-mtciti\u00e9f 'Depadmant is not in position to
\n aiak\u00e9 52.:-r::2i$T\u00a7:3-If" 'far sank under Section 189 of KLR Act in<\/p>\n
 \u00abt"'f7t:":'_ Suva." E 12 ' lied
\nic')Vvihgntfe.}r;recee(t1{:3':\u00a7sag:\u00e9I%wv'?zithi{1 the knawledge of<\/p>\n
_ _t_'%_:!.'g\u00bb:-',3'a\u00a7;thor\u00a7tie\u00a7;;_the minimum that is expected of the 513:. Land<\/p>\n
 'i.gis\u00a2\u00a7n2:itstti\u00e9n'~..tofficer is ta get tha addresses' of the persons<\/p>\n
 ".'i~nt\u00a2-festaad' in the iand from the office of the Assistant<\/p>\n
33%.\n<\/p>\n
Cemmissioner or the Deputy Commissioner. Gettivn’c’..:””the<\/p>\n
information based egg? records dees not amount te__\u00a7\u00a7’oi\u00a2!.iV;f:e;jj:   _<\/p>\n
roving enquiry. . \u00abT\ufb01e service of notice on _ev!–!.v.uteeV9;\u00a7\u00a7ersohe” <\/p>\n
interwted in the land is a mandatory  \u00e9n’e..:tftevveeni-v’:’<\/p>\n
cempliance thereof would render funfrer  V  e<\/p>\n
bad. In taking this view, I am fofii\ufb01ee  the ‘\u00ab_i’.’1IixViisi2e\u00a71 Bench
\njudgment of this Court in  liekhri v.\n<\/p>\n
State of Kamataka A;feporte;1V_V:i’v_’eA..V’:\u00a3L\u00a3;_\u00a7 3203. The
\nre\u00a5evant portion of   herembelew:\n<\/p>\n
‘*7 ….. .. It\u20ac%&_Vfa\u00a3\u00a5:_’4_}?g:_Jet” as e1!j”:i5if!iee’!t.e’fof\u00bb\u00a7t?1e respondents to
\nascertain’ “‘t{2e:”3ari\u00a7e::’- ti? the gjetii\ufb01iners because the
\npmceec:\u00a3\u00a7ng._weSV\u00a7’e:’egf’en’ the petitioners and the
\nappiicanesr )3?”I,A.3\u00a5\u00a7;\u00a7LI:.:\u00a3\u00e9!idef t\u00a7?e Kamataka Land Reforms
\nAct for great.’ of e;eupa\u00a72cy7i2’ght. There-fbte, it is not<\/p>\n
 pessi\u00e9ne to acce’.’et._die centention of the respondents and
\n g};e\u00a7–.”ape\u00a7\u00a3:jants i}iW?.A.Ne.I that in the event of the
\n  5’e\u00a7a:t:’: ‘e\ufb01reer of the fend pnoposed to be acquired
\nme; the names of the heirs \u00abof the deceased
\nowner are’ 9.: entered in the nevenue seconds it is not
\nincumeeet upon the State Government and the Special<\/p>\n
K ‘V V’ .:L’ei::d4_.’AcQ\u00a3:isi1iee O\ufb01icer exemfsing the power under the<\/p>\n
  Aetei ascertain the names of the heirs and eerve eet\ufb01ce
\n.   upon them merely on the ground that the namm of the
\n“~, bei:7s cf the deceased owner are not entered in the<\/p>\n
relevant revenue records. By the acquisition piivatg<\/p>\n
property of an individual is taken away. A
\npmpeny of an individual cannot be taken aw\u00e9y  ‘-ii
\nacquired except in accordance with _Jiaw.__ As’ “pa;-1L_<..f::\u00a7%'V  . V
\nsection (2) of section 23 of the Act it wasL'::acu_mbent'ta. _ii '  T T<\/p>\n
serve notice upon the pet:itione:s…,.,.\u00a7. "':__ <\/p>\n
(d) The Horvble Supreme Coukfi*L\u00bb%,ir}”ithe ca”s\u00e9_ ‘af:’V?4}$:.’VV.\u00a7hs:ja V<\/p>\n
Industries Limited V. Stat\u00a7’~~anf \ufb01nd  (AIR<\/p>\n
2063 so 3519) hag held as foll\u00e9w\u00e9iii?”*;’he~\u00abzfii\u00e9.i:t\u00a7:3′.\\of ncm-service<\/p>\n
cf notice in the cent;ax’:g\u00a7fia;{d a\u00a3\u00a2’iiis’iti\u00a7’\u00a7\u00a7i:– .. <\/p>\n
“13. It   above order that
\nservice cafi\u00abno\u00a3$iteE3′.oii*1;3f. ;Ja\ufb02\u00a7f:::1_Vshosvn..a\u00e9 owner or occupier
\nin the iiecorcl Abf’v\ufb01g!2\u00a7\u00a75%i:E<.S\u00a3If!ici\u00a2.-nt even though we said
\nperson ixaci \u00ab aifE'\u00a7dj\u00e9A:_j land prior to the said
\nnotificatiotiii' ugigss it is Q<\/p>\n
eid<\/p>\n
 mt abiiged ta make roving enquiry
\nab\u00e9gt the owiaeiship cf the land ….. _. " (emphasis supplied)<\/p>\n
'<._(e) while the right to property has ceased to be a<\/p>\n
  '._'_\u00a7mdi\u00e9i'\u00a7;1e{fit;3i righgit ccntinues to be a legal right. It has naw<\/p>\n
 V~'iTt:e_\u00e9\u00a76mai\u00e9; a constitutiareal and a human right too. The land<\/p>\n
\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02;\n<\/p>\n
 V’fiV4j_”Aa.\u00a7\u00a7.r2isition law is an exprepriatory legislation; the pmvision of<\/p>\n
and acquisitien statute sheul\u00e9 be striciziy cn.r:strued,___as it<\/p>\n
degrwes a persen cf his and withcut his cunsent. In tavk\u00a7:j\u00a7fi:hv\u00a7s<\/p>\n
View I am forti\ufb01ed by the judgment Qf the Henfb-\u00a7V\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7”S;\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7’s?\u00e9rt::\u00e9”,<\/p>\n
Court in the case cf Hindustan  “‘<\/p>\n
Limited (mpra).\n<\/p>\n
(f) It is aiso pro\ufb01tabie ta refer A!.\u00a7.\u00a5*:.,e: Har.; ‘:i:s%:Asl’v$L2\u00a73?;f.\u00e92’z9\u00a7\u00e9’\u00ab.VL<\/p>\n
Cezurfs judgmant in the case at nta\ufb01gindervh Sizfgh The V’<\/p>\n
Horfbie Supreme Ceurt haL”~.;.V_A’thisV'”i:\u00a7 . g:a\u00a7\u00a7”-,\u00a5’n ;2Aa r\u00e9  cf its<\/p>\n
judgment.\n<\/p>\n
“55; Tbe4~a p\u00a7r<i%_\u00a7r;b mgye {gm Quit. is; this bezzazc is:
\n$1.1!' apiniea; is $93.31!)! '\u00e9rzm\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01as;  m\u00e9kision sf a statute
\nis airhfsf %f::3:24:?ata:\u00a7'7f\u00a7r :b7\u00a7;j\u00a2\u00a7c*to:\u00a7?{""'Eiren if a nmvisinn is
\ndin-:~c\u00a3oE;s?.;\/g me saga: -s\u00a7'2c2;iI'a?.1 2t:—-sL:\u00a32stant:22rlA\/ compiied with;
\nIt ca:m+\u00a7i'.._b}3. ig71':'::\u00a323:i'*  \u00e9n\u00a3\u00e9;ety onfy iwcause the
\ngrevfsipn 7:s "'!3eV\u00a7d .tc;;.  d\ufb01r\u00e9ctoty and not an imperative<\/p>\n
 (g_)  If  'ngzn-ascertaining of the names cf the !ega\u00a5<\/p>\n
rep%\u00e9se\u00a7\u00e9t;\u00a3iv{\u00e9}s;,, _csf'V:'Ehe orig\u00a7na\u00a5 grantee, even when the<\/p>\n
V".;– "f'espenc\u00a7\u00e9nt !\u00a5E_i:iss.-:IA.:"'asAnd 2 were aware of the pendency \u00abcf the PTCL<\/p>\n
3%.\n<\/p>\n
not fee\u00a7 the need ta fermutate the questior:s ”<\/p>\n
submissicms.\n<\/p>\n
19. In the result, I abilayv  <\/p>\n
w.P.No.19504\/07 by quashina  impVt\u00a3n3n\u00a7d*v’: a\ufb01quisitien
\nnetificatians and all furthe:;4_._”proc–\u00e9e<;\u00a3i\u00a7\u00a7g's_'ihenfeto. I dismiss<\/p>\n
w.P.No.15628\/Q6. Noprder Aa_s..\u00a7<;:'–.c\u00a7'.*\u00a7VtAs;_  V '<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Poojari Pedanna S\/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 9 April, 2009 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri AND X V 34 M HIGH COURT as KARNATAKA AT BANG\u00a3sLTOR.fE: DATE THIS THE 9?” DAY OF ;3;\u00a5?’i=EIl., u i ms HOMBLE MR. xusrzce a;%Hx_:9c\u00a73::;E\u00a5z:’%kk wan 31% Ng,V.1 ‘BQ”‘*~-.1 A […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180321","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Poojari Pedanna S\/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Poojari Pedanna S\/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-13T17:12:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"29 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Poojari Pedanna S\\\/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 9 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-13T17:12:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":4920,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Poojari Pedanna S\\\/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-13T17:12:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Poojari Pedanna S\\\/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 9 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Poojari Pedanna S\/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Poojari Pedanna S\/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-13T17:12:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"29 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Poojari Pedanna S\/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 9 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-13T17:12:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009"},"wordCount":4920,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009","name":"Sri Poojari Pedanna S\/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-13T17:12:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-poojari-pedanna-so-rama-bovi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-9-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Poojari Pedanna S\/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 9 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180321","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180321"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180321\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180321"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180321"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180321"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}