{"id":180409,"date":"2010-09-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010"},"modified":"2015-02-10T21:44:36","modified_gmt":"2015-02-10T16:14:36","slug":"kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Kum Roopalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Kum Roopalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n
.....l....\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 14'-*1 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010.\u00bb\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MRJUSTICE1 SABDUL  \"7  '\n\nWRET PETITION No.26832 (W26-10'    \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nKUM. ROOPALAXMI\n1:)\/o LATE KRISHNA DEV\n\nAGED ABOUT 24 YEARS\n\nR\/AT DOOR NO.\"i'm112,\n\nMOIZ)U-- SAGRU WARD, ._ # ~_  V .\nMANOLIGUGI. SHIVALLI ViLL._AGE;._  \n\nUI)UPI~5'i'6102   '  ;V  PETITEONER\n\n{By M\/8;.\" b1%,5\u00a7:aMAsHi{EE: Ass::C(:*1uArr\u00a7;s, ADVS.}\n\n1 TH EESTATE 017' KARNA_H'AI{A\nVREP BY*3'.f'S SECRETTALRY\n Ms. BUILDING.\n._ _\"~AI_'_JEBE.DKAR V'E3E'7..}HI,\nBANG_AI\u00ab_.QREw56O 001\n\nI   VEs2\u00a7fEc:A%f;'E~Q'F*\u00a7'1cER\n\n\"--.~'CEN'T\u00a32.AL>ISED ADMISSEON CELL.\n CE}1'\u20ac'i'_R;\u00a3'L[, JUNIOR COLLEGE BEHLDING.\n\"  ROAD, BANGALORESEO 002\n\nh    'rm\u00e9:v1cE CHANCELLOR\n\n\"~\u00ab.MANGALoR1R ms \"  * ~-- C 1'\nSR1 KANAND, ADV. FOR R2?!' \"  \nSR1 M.1.ARUN, ADV. FOR \n\n ASHOK HARNAHALLI A,( T \":jVs\u00a7 ' \u00abBf.yOR.,V\u00a7\\1] _ ., , .  77: .\n\nTHIS WRIT PB3'I'E'I'ION rs F11-;eb.UNDERAR'rieCifi\u00a3 \u00e9'2eAND V\n\n227 OF THE c0Ns'm'U'r10N OF INULA. P.RAY1N'GffO QUASH THE\nCIRCULAR DATED 20....03.2Qri'0 --  THE \"MA\u00a3\\EGALORE\nUNIVERSITY, RESPONDENT N03, . [\\F{.lT_)'1\u00a73_ 'ANNE:XURE A} AND<\/pre>\n
THIS wR1T’PErri’1f1’ON * V(:;oM1.1Sssr; (\u00a7.N..:F'{a)’R PRELIMINARY
\nHEARING ‘B’ cgtiamgp T3152; DAY; ‘[‘H_IE}.V_QQ[JR’1’ PASSED THE:
\nFOLLOWING_:,.  ~    <\/p>\n
   y ‘ AQAAL
\nT’h\u00abe”peiit_ibriferMwas.__a’d_r1iitted to the 501 respondent
\ncoliege forthe  \u00bb cV).’t”=;,1’~’5′ year B.Ed., Course for the<\/p>\n
aca\ufb01exnie year’ She was admitted by the<\/p>\n
” V’ ‘-v_y(:o11ege:y_i;1 its n1a1″1’a1~\u00a7e111e11t, quota. She has passed BSC.<\/p>\n
  aggregate marks in the B.SC. is 745 out<\/p>\n
“‘<:\u00bbf h-1+50011ntjliiriing the marks obtained in internal<\/p>\n
assE:ssr__ne1:5u.'{)\u20acl_..” _}’i’he <\/p>\n
petitioner has challenged th_el”s_aid_q communication in<\/p>\n
this Writ petition.\n<\/p>\n
for  PE_>t.ietlVor1;3.;\u00a7_~eontend t.hat the petitioner has
\nscored   includes the marks obtained<\/p>\n
byxjqheree. in t’l1.e_Vllin.t,erna1 assessment. The eligibility<\/p>\n
. erit_eri._a wfozfadmission to the course in question for the<\/p>\n
H  200940 has been stated ion the<\/p>\n
brolcht1re”i4ssued by the State Governnient. As per the<\/p>\n
2  “sat-:1 brochure, it is sufficient if the student belonging to<\/p>\n
the general merit category secures 45% in the qualifying<\/p>\n
e,xam.i11ation. The petitioner having scored 49.66%<\/p>\n
marks was eligible for admission to the course in<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
“Ky<\/p>\n
__ 4 ..\n<\/p>\n
question. ‘l’herei’ore. the University ought to have<\/p>\n
approved the admission of the petitione1*.<\/p>\n
3. On the other hand, Sri Ml ”\n<\/p>\n
Counsel appearing for the Uni\\=*ersit.ycontends t1’1at_ as-‘<\/p>\n
per the Regulations of the”Universi\u00bbt.f, a  Irlerit <\/p>\n
candidate has to secure not    taking
\ninto consideration thVE3’\u00bb.p.ria.rlt.\u00a7’ examination of
\nall the three years e2{:e’l{i’di:r:ig.”‘iriternalifaslsessment and
\nclass   not secured 50%<\/p>\n
marls:s:<,_in  'with__the eligibility criteria fixed in
\nthe Regulationijniversity. That is why the<\/p>\n
admission of ti1e_VVpet.ii:i.on.er has not been approved.<\/p>\n
 2    learned Advocate appearing for the<\/p>\n
4*" fcsp\u00a2nd':}11t, submits that Section 32 of the National<\/p>\n
 Co1:.r1eil"for Teacher Education Act, 1993 {for short 'the<\/p>\n
}%\u00a7.(\u00e9t'.'} provides for making Regulations to earryout the<\/p>\n
purposes of the Act. In exemise of the power conferred<\/p>\n
under t;l'1e said provision, the NCTE has framed
\nE
\nE<\/p>\n
__ 5 ……\n<\/p>\n
Regulations known as ‘National Council for Teacher<\/p>\n
Education {Recognition Norms and Proceciiire]<\/p>\n
Regulations, 2009’, which provides for the <\/p>\n
standards of Bachelor of Education Prograinrney ll\ufb01adl\ufb01gl \u00ab.<\/p>\n
to B.l33d. Course. Clause 2   <\/p>\n
Regulation provides for  eligibility   for <\/p>\n
admission of the students  As per
\nthe said clause, the  50% marks
\neither in the I.3a:ei1elor:’s” l\\llaster’s degree
\nor any other  are eligible<\/p>\n
for adn1is_sioli*i’\u00ab”tf\\\u00bb._the’prograrrime. The noti\ufb01cation has
\nbeen gazetted  Neither the State<\/p>\n
Goyvernn1ent”‘nor the University can fix any norms,<\/p>\n
 than what has been prescribed by the<\/p>\n
H   petitioner has secured less then 50%<\/p>\n
marl<..s"in  qualifying examination, she is not eligible<\/p>\n
A V. ior"admfi.ssion to the said course.<\/p>\n
5. Sri K.Anand, learned Advocate appearing for
\niespondent No.2 and Sri M.KeshaVa Reddy. iearri-ed<\/p>\n
_ 5 ..\n<\/p>\n
Advocate appearing for respondent No.1 submit that the<\/p>\n
State Govemment has framed Rules in CX\u20ac1″(3iS\u00e9E?,sUf1\u20ac<\/p>\n
powers conferred on the State Gove1*11m_e’fit:~fL:–nd\u00a5::_1″ <\/p>\n
Section 14 of the Karnataka Edneatio1’1aE’~J.i\u00a7st.it1jt.i.o1;s”  <\/p>\n
{Prohibition of Capitation tee]     .i<\/p>\n
is applicable for admission *s__tude’nts to  <\/p>\n
by the State Government.   eligibility
\ncriteria for admission  The minimum
\nmarks for they pt’1rposeVoi”. Course for
\na general    it  <\/p>\n
Bn\ufb01aving’-the contentions urged, the<\/p>\n
question for etansider\u00e9ition is:\n<\/p>\n
  the petitioner was eligible for
\nadniisdsion to B.Ed., course for t.he academic<\/p>\n
“session 2009-20101\u00bb.\n<\/p>\n
7. It is not in dispute that the petitioner had
\nobtained 745 marks out of 1500 marks in agg\u00a7regat.e in<\/p>\n
the qualifying examination namely, BBC. In other<\/p>\n
.. ‘7 __
\nwords. she has secured 49.66% after including the<\/p>\n
marks in the internal assessment. The Regulation\ufb01of<\/p>\n
the University Clearly indicates that. the m21rk.s”‘obt:’ai.ned__  _<\/p>\n
in the internal assessment has to be ex(:11.1cieed\ufb02.Whether6 <\/p>\n
the marks in the internal &1SS\u20acSSITI;\u20ac1″\u00a3’;”has to be”in’C;I:ur__jeec}_A<\/p>\n
or not need not be Consi’d.ei’e\u00a7i in”v-this v\u00a7{ritf;3etit’ion, . *<\/p>\n
because even after the  of  l3j1’1t\u20ac3I’1’lE11
\nassessment marks, \ufb02seenred 49.66%
\nmarks in 6  If We go by
\nnotification Stateij\ufb01\ufb01oyeirnmeiit, the marks<\/p>\n
obtaiiied in has to be included. If the
\nsaid  are”‘inei_nded.;’bercentage of the marks will<\/p>\n
be b_e1ow 5O%”.AA._iTherefore, petitioner was not eligible for<\/p>\n
 the course in question. The NCTE<\/p>\n
‘F3.eg–t1’1atio’r_i-__ eleeirly iridieates that a general merit<\/p>\n
ean  J<\/p>\n
KLY \/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Kum Roopalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer …..l…. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 14′-*1 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010.\u00bb BEFORE THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE1 SABDUL “7 ‘ WRET PETITION No.26832 (W26-10’ BETWEEN: KUM. ROOPALAXMI 1:)\/o LATE KRISHNA DEV AGED ABOUT 24 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180409","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKum Roopalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kum Roopalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-02-10T16:14:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kum Roopalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-10T16:14:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":800,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Kum Roopalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-10T16:14:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kum Roopalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kum Roopalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kum Roopalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-02-10T16:14:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kum Roopalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-10T16:14:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010"},"wordCount":800,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010","name":"Kum Roopalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-10T16:14:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kum-roopalaxmi-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kum Roopalaxmi vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180409","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180409"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180409\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180409"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180409"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180409"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}