{"id":18063,"date":"2003-12-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-12-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003"},"modified":"2018-06-07T10:11:38","modified_gmt":"2018-06-07T04:41:38","slug":"sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003","title":{"rendered":"Sebi vs Shri Sunil Kumar on 17 December, 2003"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Securities Appellate Tribunal<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sebi vs Shri Sunil Kumar on 17 December, 2003<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: A Batra<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p> A.K. Batra, Whole Time Member   <\/p>\n<p> 1. Investigations were conducted by Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as &#8216;SEBI&#8217;) into the dealings in the shares of Vatsa  World Limited (hereinafter referred to as &#8216;VWL&#8217;) for the alleged market  manipulations. Investigations conducted for the period April, 2001 to July,  2001 revealed that prices in the scrip were manipulated.\n<\/p>\n<p>1.1 Shri Sunil Kumar was one of the four largest trading clients in the scrip of  VWL at Delhi Stock Exchange during the relevant period. Shri Sunil  Kumar had dealt in the scrip through M\/S Supreme Investments, a sub broker  of Argus Stock Broking Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as &#8216;Argus&#8217;) <\/p>\n<p>2. Pursuant to investigations, a show cause notice dated May 22, 2003, was  issued to Shri Sunil Kumar, alleging him to have indulged in creation of  false market in the scrip and hindered true price discovery thereby violated  Regulations 3, 4(a), 4(b), 4(c) and 4(d) of Securities and Exchange Board  of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to  Securities Market) Regulations, 1995.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. No reply was received from Shri Sunil Kumar. Thereafter, Shri Sunil  Kumar was granted an opportunity of hearing before me on July 28, 2003,  which was communicated vide letter dated July 15, 2003. The hearing  1 was further adjourned to August 6, 2003 and the same was communicated  to him vide letter dated July 21, 2003. He choose not to appear for the  hearing.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. I have examined the findings of the investigation, which inter alia contains  the trading details of Shri Sunil Kumar, also incorporated in the show  cause notice issue to him.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4.1 VWL was incorporated as a private limited company in the name and  style of Ongoing Advertising and Packaging Pvt. Ltd. It was converted into  a public limited company on February 20, 1996. On June 24, 1996, the  name of the company was changed to Vatsa World Limited. On June 19,  2001, the name of the company was once again changed to Little  Kingdom World Limited after acquiring the business of Little Kingdom  Edutech Ltd., an education technology based company.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.2 The price volume data in the scrip of VWL on DSE for the period from April  9, 2001 to July 20, 2001 is as follows :\n<\/p>\n<pre> Date \t     Opening Price \t   Closing Price      HighPrice        LowPrice Traded \tQuantity \n09-04-01 \t12.50 \t\t\t12.50 \t\t12.50 \t\t12.50 \t\t 500 \n10-04-01 \t 9.50\t \t\t 9.50 \t\t 9.50 \t\t 9.50 \t\t 300 \n12-04-01 \t 9.55\t\t\t 9.55 \t\t 9.55 \t\t 9.55 \t\t 200 \n25-04-01 \t 8.00\t \t\t 8.00 \t\t 8.00\t\t 8.00\t\t 100 \n27-04-01 \t 7.00 \t\t\t 7.00 \t\t 7.00\t\t 7.00\t\t 100 \n30-04-01 \t 6.50 \t\t\t 6.50 \t\t 6.50 \t\t 6.50 \t\t 200 \n03-05-01 \t 5.00 \t\t\t 5.00 \t\t 5.00\t\t 5.00 \t\t 200 \n23-05-01 \t 6.50 \t\t\t 6.50 \t\t 6.50 \t\t 6.50 \t\t 500 \n24-05-01 \t 8.00\t \t\t 8.00 \t\t 8.00 \t\t 8.00 \t\t 500 \n25-05-01 \t10.00 \t\t\t10.00 \t \t10.00 \t\t10.00 \t\t 500 \n28-05-01 \t10.25\t \t\t11.15 \t\t11.15 \t\t10.25\t\t 800 \n29-05-01 \t11.00 \t\t\t11.00\t \t11.00 \t\t11.00 \t\t 200 \n30-05-01 \t12.00 \t\t\t12.00 \t\t12.00 \t\t12.00\t\t 200 \n31-05-01 \t13.00 \t\t\t13.00 \t\t13.00 \t\t13.00 \t\t 200 \n01-06-01 \t12.00 \t\t\t13.00\t\t13.00 \t\t12.00 \t\t 500 \n05-06-01 \t11.15 \t\t\t11.15\t \t11.15\t \t11.15\t\t 500 \n06-06-01 \t 9.90 \t\t\t10.50 \t\t10.50 \t\t 9.90 \t\t1500 \n08-06-01\t10.25 \t\t\t11.00\t \t11.00 \t\t10.25 \t\t1000 \n20-06-01\t13.75 \t\t\t13.75 \t\t13.75 \t\t13.75\t\t 900 \n21-06-01 \t17.15 \t\t\t17.15 \t\t17.15 \t\t17.15 \t\t 500 \n22-06-01 \t19.25 \t\t\t19.25 \t\t19.25 \t\t19.25\t\t1300 \n25-06-01 \t21.50 \t\t\t21.65 \t\t21.65 \t\t21.50 \t\t1100 \n26-06-01 \t23.35 \t\t\t23.35 \t\t23.35 \t\t23.00 \t\t1200 \n27-06-01 \t25.20\t\t \t25.20 \t\t25.20 \t\t25.20 \t\t2000 \n28-06-01\t27.05 \t\t\t27.20 \t\t27.20 \t\t27.05 \t\t1300 \n29-06-01 \t29.00 \t\t\t28.95 \t\t29.00 \t\t28.95 \t\t4800 \n02-07-01 \t30.35 \t\t\t31.25 \t\t31.25 \t\t30.35 \t\t 700 \n04-07-01 \t30.25 \t\t\t33.50 \t\t33.50 \t\t30.25 \t\t1800 \n05-07-01 \t34.00 \t\t\t36.00 \t\t36.00 \t\t34.00 \t\t 600 \n06-07-01 \t37.00 \t\t\t38.00 \t\t38.50 \t\t37.00 \t\t1200 \n09-07-01 \t40.00 \t\t\t40.00 \t\t40.00 \t\t40.00\t \t 500 \n10-07-01 \t43.05 \t\t\t43.05 \t\t43.05 \t\t43.05 \t\t 500 \n11-07-01 \t 0.00 \t\t\t43.00 \t\t0.00 \t\t0.00 \t\t 100 \n \n\n<\/pre>\n<p>4.3 During the above period, the closing price was found to have touched a  high of Rs.43.05 and a low of Rs.5.00. The traded quantity was highest at  4800 shares on June 29, 2001. Further, the price of the scrip had showed  a declining trend during the period from April 9, 2001 to May 3, 2001.  During this period, the closing price of the scrip was found to have  declined from Rs.12.50 to Rs.5.00. Thereafter the price of the scrip had  increased substantially to Rs.43\/- on July 10, 2001. The price was found  to have been increased by 760% during the period from May 3, 2001 to  3 July10, 2001, over 25 trading days. The scrip of VWL was found to have  been traded only for 33 days, and the total numbers of shares traded were  only 26,700. The average traded volume per day worked out to be about  810 shares. Both the decline in price as well as the subsequent increase  was found to have been accompanied by thin trading volumes, which in  many instances were as low as one or two trades. Thus it is clear that  there was very little trading interest in the scrip.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.4 Information was sought by SEBI from the eight brokers identified by DSE  as having dealt in the scrip during the period under investigation. The  statement of four trading members, who had dealt in at least 5000 shares  of the scrip on a gross basis, was recorded by SEBI during investigation.  Argus was one of the four trading members.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.5 A summary of the information collected from Argus Stock Broking Ltd. who  had dealt in the scrip on behalf of Shri Sunil Kumar during the period  under scrutiny is as follows:  <\/p>\n<pre>\n Sr.No. Settlement No.\n\t\/Date \t\tClient Name  \tBuy Quantity \tPrice \tSell Quantity  \tPrice \n1. \t25-04-01 \tSunil Kumar \t   100 \t\t8.15 \t    Nil \tNil \n2. \t27-04-01 \tSunil Kumar \t   Nil \t\tNil \t   100 \t\t6.85 \n3. \t30-04-01 \tSunil Kumar \t   200 \t\t6.65 \t   Nil \t\tNil \n4. \t03-05-01 \tSunil Kumar \t   Nil \t\tNil \t   200 \t\t4.85 \n5. \t23-05-01 \tSunil Kumar \t   500 \t\t6.65 \t   Nil \t\tNil \n6. \t24-05-01 \tSunil Kumar \t   Nil \t\tNil \t   500 \t\t7.88 \n7. \t28-05-01 \tSunil Kumar \t   300 \t\t11.00 \t   300 \t\t11.00 \n8. \t30-05-01 \tSunil Kumar \t   200 \t\t12.15 \t   Nil \t\tNil \n9. \t31-05-01 \tSunil Kumar \t   Nil \t\tNil \t   200 \t\t12.85 \n10. \t01-06-01 \tSunil Kumar \t   1000 \t12.50 \t   500 \t\t12.15 \n11. \t05-06-01 \tSunil Kumar \t   Nil   \tNil \t   500 \t\t11.03 \n12. \t06-06-01 \tSunil Kumar \t  1500 \t\t10.50 \t   Nil \t\tNil \n13. \t08-06-01 \tSunil Kumar \t   500 \t\t11.12     1500 \t\t10.61 \n14. \t11-06-01 \tSunil Kumar \t  2500 \t\t11.09 \t  2500 \t\t10.91 \n15. \t11-07-01 \tSunil Kumar \t  *Nil \t\tNil \t  100 \t\t45.84 \n\t\t\t\t\t\tTOTAL \t\t 6800 \t\t7400 \n* - Spot transaction.\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>4.6 I find that Shri Sunil Kumar had dealt in the scrip at prices ranging from  Rs.4.85 to Rs.45.84. During the investigations, when queried about the  above trades executed on behalf of Shri Sunil Kumar, Shri Utkal Ranjan  Mishra, the authorized representative of Argus Stock Broking and Shri  Salil Agarwal, the proprietor of Supreme Investments, admitted that the  above trades appeared to be manipulative transactions. However, they  also denied being aware of the manipulative intent of their client. They  also submitted that they do not have any procedure \/ systems in place  while allowing clients to trade in illiquid scrips.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4.7 Shri Sunil Kumar had dealt in the illiquid scrip of VWL. He purchased 6800  shares and sold 7400 shares, during the period under scrutiny, compared  to the total of 26,700 shares traded in the market and that he had squared  off most of his trades. I find that the deals were executed at prices ranging  from Rs.4.85 to Rs.45.84 over a period of 2.5 months.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4.8 I find that the scrip of VWL was illiquid and few clients had traded in the  scrip and built up artificial volumes and price. The scrip otherwise did not  elicit any interest from the general investors. These clients had put the  trades without any interest in transfer of beneficiary ownership. Shri Sunil  Kumar was one of the largest trading client in the scrip. In the facts and  circumstances of the case, particularly the trading pattern adopted, I find  that Shri Sunil Kumar was responsible for creating false and misleading  appearance of trading and artificial price rise in the scrip of VWL. Unless  these acts are prevented, innocent investors will be induced to trade by  such false appearance of trading in the securities market.  5<\/p>\n<p>4.9 Shri Sunil Kumar has thus indulged in creation of false market in the scrip  of VWL and hindered true price discovery. Therefore, I find Shri Sunil  Kumar guilty of violating Regulations 3, 4(a), 4(b), 4(c) and 4(d) of  Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and  Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Markets) Regulations, 1995.\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. From the aforesaid discussion, I find that the conduct of Shri Sunil Kumar  is detrimental to the safety and orderly development of the securities  market. In view of the above, I, in exercise of the powers conferred upon  me under Section 19, read with Section 11(4) and 11B of the SEBI Act,  1992 read with regulation 11 of Securities and Exchange Board of India  (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to  Securities Markets) Regulations, 2003, hereby prohibit Shri Sunil Kumar  from buying, selling or dealing in securities, in any manner, directly or  indirectly for a period of two years.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.1 This order shall come into force with immediate effect.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Securities Appellate Tribunal Sebi vs Shri Sunil Kumar on 17 December, 2003 Bench: A Batra ORDER A.K. Batra, Whole Time Member 1. Investigations were conducted by Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as &#8216;SEBI&#8217;) into the dealings in the shares of Vatsa World Limited (hereinafter referred to as &#8216;VWL&#8217;) for the alleged [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18063","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sebi vs Shri Sunil Kumar on 17 December, 2003 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sebi vs Shri Sunil Kumar on 17 December, 2003 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2003-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-07T04:41:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sebi vs Shri Sunil Kumar on 17 December, 2003\",\"datePublished\":\"2003-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-07T04:41:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003\"},\"wordCount\":1076,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003\",\"name\":\"Sebi vs Shri Sunil Kumar on 17 December, 2003 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2003-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-07T04:41:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sebi vs Shri Sunil Kumar on 17 December, 2003\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sebi vs Shri Sunil Kumar on 17 December, 2003 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sebi vs Shri Sunil Kumar on 17 December, 2003 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2003-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-07T04:41:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sebi vs Shri Sunil Kumar on 17 December, 2003","datePublished":"2003-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-07T04:41:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003"},"wordCount":1076,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003","name":"Sebi vs Shri Sunil Kumar on 17 December, 2003 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2003-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-07T04:41:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sebi-vs-shri-sunil-kumar-on-17-december-2003#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sebi vs Shri Sunil Kumar on 17 December, 2003"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18063","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18063"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18063\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18063"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18063"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18063"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}