{"id":180745,"date":"2008-09-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008"},"modified":"2015-05-20T23:17:00","modified_gmt":"2015-05-20T17:47:00","slug":"k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"K M Janardhana Reddy vs N P Ramachandra Naidu on 5 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
K M Janardhana Reddy vs N P Ramachandra Naidu on 5 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Deepak Verma Gowda<\/div>\n
II? TEE HIGH COIERT OF KARKATAKA AT BAHGALORE3\n\nDATE!) TIHS THE 5% DAY or SEMEMER 2093 T  .\n\nPR.E8EH\"1'\n\n-'rrm HOH'3I.E \u00a3&R.J'D'S'1'ICE nmmrm  V  I[ _\n\nTHE Hozwmz ma. mswxan  ' . T 7 A\n\nPdiS%LLAHE\u00ab0US FIRE'?     V\n\nEETWEEH :\n\n\u00a3<\u00a7;Ev\u00a3.Jana1'\u00e9ihana Raddy '  ..\n\nAgassi 44 years " '\n\nSen cf E{.Mu1f1iyappa H   u -- -.\n\u00a7'\u00a7'0.i2;'2, 15:12 Main_   3  _  % \nH\u00e9xi. QM Stage, I:_ic13;:';\u00bb;::1a.g_2=,\u00a3r    _  \nBajlgalore 56{}'i";}38_  ' V.  '\n\n(By Sri K.Varadaraj'g1n,  \n\n~Appe}1a11t\n\nAND:\n\n1; " 'N_.P.R-31i1?a\u00a2ha:;dra Na;d._1,1\u00ab\n"  Majnr by \u00e9ge ' 'a\nVf5\u00a7:\u00a70':1.<f:i -N * 'P.,VC;P iai\u00e9i11\nNo. 49.93 f2'*~:h' :\u00a3?,1"C:s$-.,~'\nsra Stage, Indixiamagm\n\n2  Banga-1oI'ev___5\u20ac;\u20ac} 38\n\n' '\u00e9 " -'1'F1<:ANexv Imiia Assurance\n\nA ' \u20acI{;111ps;nyLimited\n" Mahlalakshmi Chambers\n"N0.Q\u00a72, 123" P3901", 1'si\u00a3G.R0ad\n\nVA  'Bangalore 560 001\n\n *33y its Divistionai Manager -Resp<:v11den.t$\n\n(83; Sri ID.S.Sreedhar, Acivocate for' R2; Notice ta RE\ndispensed with) W\n\n\n\nta. It has \ufb01at baa}: di_sp{1f:ed befam us, which em\u00e9z';\n\notherwise sta\ufb01ds prove-:::i in the \ufb01nding recorded \n\nClaims Tribuzzal deaiing sszith Essue N0. 1, that": on t11\u00a2:':\u00a7e:1cvV:\u00a7\u00a7ifs;\u00a5\u00a7% --  M\n\nciaaifz the offending vehis1e\u00abb11s was bei:fr_g"'driszen'_\u00a2by_.  \n\nand was owned by responder\ufb01; N<3J ;aiz--<iA'  \n\nRespandent N212. The acci\u00e9ent 2:-s';curI:cd 0:: T2:iv.f_:<:VV'c';::\u00a7.'iV:1i' {Sf\nrash and zzegligemz driving" Gf the 'iI:_s driv\u20ac:r.\u00a7 a\ufb01d in\nany Case, the ap;::e1\u00a7.a11t was r'i5c:i;_T:\u00ab;2;':, fa1j;;'1f;  'aisa net. beam\n\ndisputed that in tI:1c4s a.ie:i_   herain had\n\n-sustained i3Qcii--1y*  .. thus was entitled to be\n\nc\u00ab:::mpenSa\u00a3:e{i 1:3; jghe V;f\u00e9V'5p\u00a7$:[;;c1\u00bbe\ufb01'i.;s.4\n\n E5113 xque$'ti\u20ac\u00a7ii'V 7:\u00a31e:*ef:\";e\" . us is whether apgellant ha$ been\n\n\"=4:zward\u20aca7.__ just,  and adequate compensation or it\n\n-. . _}:'\u00a7..*:':.;*.s<'~;\u00bb:t.f7LI*es is 'be Enhanced.\n\n.'     For the said ptzrposes, '\u00a7e'\u00a7?\u20ac have criticaiiy\n\n :  Te:s\u00a33:;i3j;iIied the record and heard the learned counsel fer the\n\n "p\u00e9i1;\u20ac;ies.\n\n\\+$\n\n\n\n5\n\n8. Pram the evi\u00e9ence 0f PW~4 Ihx\ufb01rappa Redd}\u00a7___it\n\nis established that the iefi: ham? perma.r1\u20acnt diaabiiityz\n\nthe extszzt of 3:') per cent am}. in the hip ;7c)\u00a7.nt it    ~\n\ncent, and, as compared :0 the whoie ha-i3?,_i_t is_'E\u00a7G'V'p\u00e9.t\u00bb\u00e9\u00e9':14\u00a7.g \n\nThere is no reason to doubt the c0rre<E\u00a5::1e::\u00a7S*~iheI'\u00ab*st<3f._.. If\n\nWe proceed on the assumption "tbs p\u00e9irn1V:a..me\ufb01f.:V\u00a7ii$a"i2iljt\u00a7\nto me agapellant as cempargad ta i;_11&\u00a7i'za?_t1a:1},e b\u00a7\u00a7ciy.,i\u00a7;  the\nextent of 58 per cent. Dr.Er\u00e9;p\u00a7}a. Raddy  fi1::t_11e1* deposed\n\nthat the agpe\ufb02ant would b{.:-req:;i;r\u00e9d..A."\u00a3Q'  ccsrrective\n\nsurgeries inivfutureg '9'v3h,i<;:h,E1\u20ac:' so [far not undergone.\n\n9. '1'i1eV'a;}pella:3_t,}1\u00a7\u00a7 'a31bnti0I1e<:i herein above, is an\na ;;\u00a7::*.c\u00a7ca;\u00a5:ev_"ii}z p;_\u00a3*of\u00a2;ssi0"Ii; \u00aba_t:d.was aged 41?, yams at {he time caf\n\nth\u00e9 -- a<;{;j.dc-..1}i.~w  % " A\n\n The \u00e9fgqie\ufb02ant had filed income tax returzxs for\n\n""K.~}11\u20ac__\u00e9;S$\u20ac$SIIi\u20acvI%i years 1.994-95, 199396, I99\u20aca~9'7, i2QOl~CI';2,\n\n 2003-04. According to the aype\ufb02ant, at the\n\n _Qf--\u00a7aCCi{i\u20acI1t. he was earning Rs.:35.{}0G\/ -- per mamh as\n\n _ i;E1f3IVZ}V111\u20ac from his legai profession, and if ha had 1143?. met with\n\n" 'the accident. his income W\ufb01liid have gone tr} Rs.\u00a7{}.(LiC\u00a7(}l--\n\nwas\n\n\n\n13.111. As mentiened herein abeve, after appreeiatiene\ufb01bf\nevidence available on record, the Claims 'Z'ribu1;,e41\ufb02" \nawarded a beta} sum of I\u20acs.5,1?,896\/- be we   --\ncompensation together with i:1te:\u00a3est; at   eate 'ef    J \n\nper annum fmm the date of peti\ufb01ozz  of re.\u00e9:1;i:Se.?;i9V:3.\\'.,,4 "\n\nWe \ufb01nd free; the impugned awaf\u00e9, tI1e_V_\u00e95;:1{e31iif;J:eVVVas\n\nawarded. are given hereur3.de1*;.._\n\n~\ufb01'.'L\u00bb'\n\niv)\n\nv\ufb01}. _\n\nveg\n\nviii)' \n\n Total coexpensation:\n\nPam and su\ufb01eri.r:g   .  .\n\nCost of medical egigjen\u00e9ees  "\n\nCost  fut.1;.i"e 'L  ' \u00ab  ' - _.. _\nCost of'atten\u00e9_a11_t ' If V.   .\nCast ef foiI<:)W--up t:eA3;\u00a7:i:e-fit\n\nCo$1il:r:)'v\u00a3' fmtxi\ufb01euse \n\nV " Lees of earning capacity\n\n.__ LOSS' ef\n\nCastef atfe1}d5ant {driver}\n\n% ;.~ 3"?,Q%7m00\n   :jQ25,.34e.00\n\n1,?5,00e.e0\n1,450.00\n590,60\n3,009.00\n75,500.03\n15,000,0o\n35,800.00\n\n Rs.S,17,896.0Q\n\nA' 1*,  As mentiened herein above, fmm the evidence of\n   ".'1\u00a73}g;;el1a11t, which else stands corroborated by the medical\nm5s;z'i\u20aciE=I3Ce, appeliant has; suffered 56} per cent ef the\n\nH.pe;*ma\u00a31e11t diesab\ufb02igf to the whale body. We have ales seen\n\nW 1\n\n\n\n M31343 req1iired--.. i:\u00a73'vf  months. Lacking to '\u00a3116: nature\n  on by the appeilant, it is obvious\n\nthat \u00a7iLis\"\u00a7\u00a5_1'\u00a3;tCi;is\u00a7\u00a7-:.,;}21';'st'have suifered severe set back. He was\n\n\"Eb\n\n \n\n\n\n__1.4. Naedless to say, the appeilant needed an\n\nattezxdant during the period, when he was bed riddexl and\n\ngetting medical treamcznt. Apart from. the facts \n\nabmre, he must have ais\ufb01 spent amounts 0:1 11uf:riti\u20ac;:.1S   ' ~\n\nIt is a matter sf comman knowledge thap if one i:_\u00a7'\u00e9%1;d11ii.?,1rr\u00a7(*l  \n\nthe hospital, apart from the medical   t\u00a75'x'ss\ufb01rri's if\n\none is required to spend maize}? \"(.2-3;; i:1:1cide:3.ta.i ' ,e\u00a7 t::1s\u00a7:.sL\nThus, looking to the totality of the _f a:&::t:$ axi\ufb01 \u00e9i1'Cumst_\u00a7snces\n\nof the case, We are of the\u00bbL30A:3;si11 that \u00a31162\n\namount awa\u00e9rd\u00e9\ufb01 1  _\":i iVV<;$\u20ac1'vces to be suitabiy\nenhanced.  'afe  of the fact that while\nawarding file _ a.1r4i4\u00e9L1:v:i".':i '(Sf (g{"JI1VIl'.ii'1;\u20aciI1S8.ti{}I}, it is the be kept in\n    "" "\u00e9flgi adequate mmpensatiezz is\n\nreq\u00a3iir\u00e9d_T.I':Q?'  It Ashouid net be treatsd either as\n\n . "'bo:3anza'--\u00ab;jr l\u20ac3f.?:'\u00a3;~:=~._1f\u00a7-".; Thus, We precea\u00e9 {{2} do so.\n\n   #11111-i2'u.r modest {:ompui;atio;t1, the fe\ufb02ewmg would\n\n jf{1':~:.'\u00a3;V proper to be awanied to the appeilant.\n\n Painand suffering  1,530,090.00\n\n Medicai \u20acXp\u00a3if.'iS\u20ac'S  1,125,346.60\n Cost 9}? corrective surgery  1,?'S,\ufb01{)G.C3('}\n\n'T\ufb01\n\n \n\n\n\nE13\n\niv} (lost Qf atte1:c:ia:<1$;  \nv} Cosizgf fOHO\u00a7?\u20ac"i.1p trczatmexit   \n\nvi) Com \u00absf nutritioug food    \n\nviii) Future 1038 ef earning\n\n'2_.,'O\u20ac};\u20aci\u20ac)\u00a73.'{3@  _  u\n\nviii) Loss ofamesciities in \ufb01fe   j.  \n\nix) Cost ofa\u00a3te11dant(drive_r}   06 n  \n\n'Fetal compensation new am?ar{iei\u00a7--~.   \nagainst the resgondents jointiy an\u00e9 $\u00a2'v\u00ab::ra1_ly. ' 7\n\n16. Ths diiiferentiai a1=.".\u00a3\u00a3:j311:if; ';fs;9c;1iIi1 ':c:;ai1'r3;' i1"\u00a71EI'6S'C at\nthe rate of 6 per carxt peg? a11:\u00a31'{1'13:1--    petiticazl til}\n\nit is aca:ua11g, paid. X ' \n1?. 'E'11eV'\u00a7:;*3;p'ug11\u00a2dA'~:%\ufb01;$afd is accardi\ufb01giy madiiiaci as\n1ga\u20acz1,tio n:\u00a7$i'\u00ab\u00a2.'h{\u20ac_if.eix1 ab~:\u00a7i\u00a3*:3.v H ..... .. *\n\n 'A\ufb015peaiz_fs"Lr\u00a7:1ciS---_a}10W:3d to the extent as mentioned\n\n' \u00b0   above=,". \n\n }L\u00bbo<31;ti:1\u00a7.:_td the facts, Respondent No.2 ti) bear the<\/pre>\n
f   “casts through 0111:.\n<\/p>\n
 \u00a7i\u00a7ot\u00a7i;1_sel’s fee is fixed at Rs,f5,{)\u20ac}{}\/ ~.<\/p>\n
” W’};,’..6\u00e9,9:I”I”i\u20ac’i*\u20ac1 czeunsei fer the res;;:aI1dent;sprayed far 8 weaks<\/p>\n
 i\ufb01ims ta depmit the \u20ac}f1Iii”\u20ac amount. 03:: such dapcmit being<\/p>\n
\\\ufb02><\/p>\n
3.1<\/p>\n
ma\ufb01a, the fzatal amouni 0fc0mpez1sat:i011 shali be    A<\/p>\n
apyeilant. forthwith.\n<\/p>\n
rk.\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court K M Janardhana Reddy vs N P Ramachandra Naidu on 5 September, 2008 Author: Deepak Verma Gowda II? TEE HIGH COIERT OF KARKATAKA AT BAHGALORE3 DATE!) TIHS THE 5% DAY or SEMEMER 2093 T . PR.E8EH”1′ -‘rrm HOH’3I.E \u00a3&R.J’D’S’1’ICE nmmrm V I[ _ THE Hozwmz ma. mswxan ‘ . T 7 A […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180745","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nK M Janardhana Reddy vs N P Ramachandra Naidu on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K M Janardhana Reddy vs N P Ramachandra Naidu on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-20T17:47:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K M Janardhana Reddy vs N P Ramachandra Naidu on 5 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-20T17:47:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":84,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008\",\"name\":\"K M Janardhana Reddy vs N P Ramachandra Naidu on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-20T17:47:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K M Janardhana Reddy vs N P Ramachandra Naidu on 5 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K M Janardhana Reddy vs N P Ramachandra Naidu on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K M Janardhana Reddy vs N P Ramachandra Naidu on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-20T17:47:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K M Janardhana Reddy vs N P Ramachandra Naidu on 5 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-20T17:47:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008"},"wordCount":84,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008","name":"K M Janardhana Reddy vs N P Ramachandra Naidu on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-20T17:47:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-janardhana-reddy-vs-n-p-ramachandra-naidu-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K M Janardhana Reddy vs N P Ramachandra Naidu on 5 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180745","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180745"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180745\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}