{"id":180762,"date":"2008-11-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008"},"modified":"2019-02-27T20:06:21","modified_gmt":"2019-02-27T14:36:21","slug":"smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt Lakshmi Ajith vs Sri M R Phanindra on 3 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Lakshmi Ajith vs Sri M R Phanindra on 3 November, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH couar or KARNATAKA AT BANGAL0Rg_\nDATED THIS THE 3\"\" nay or NOVEMBER, 2oa3\u00bbf;t=t\nBEFORE: 't V\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A,$. PACHHA\u00a7\u00a7?$'Lt_ _t\nCRIMINAL REVISION pETITIoRVN\u00a7.\u00a7\u00e97 \u00a7\u00a7f2o08'\\t&gt;t'\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nLakshmi Ajith,\n\nMajor, \"wt_\n\nW\/0. D.R.Ajitkumar, -1 f\"\n\nR\/at No.129, Residency R936, =_? 3a':\nBangalore~56O Q25,=_ ii I ;=-,'~}.u 4' PETITIONER\/S\n\n[By Sri. B.s;\u00e9gb$a\ufb01\u00a7\ufb01yam;*A\u00a7\u00a7;}:,3\n\nAND:\n\nM.R.Phanindra. .V ,t. 2\n\nSfo. RamaiahtSetty, '.\"\n\nMajor, .. \"   K_1 \". \"\n\nRfat NO}24y '\ufb02h\u00e9dgachala N1laya',\n\n:fGzound Flpgr, 3\" Main;\nIChama;ajpet;.x\n\nBanga1ore~;8,V:t\u00ab. , RESPONDENT\/S\n\n{By Mf\u00e9. t\ufb01t\ufb01\ufb01f\u00e9lidhar &amp; K.T.Venkateshmurthy, Advs.}\n'~k~ir~ir\n\nt7 * This Crl.R.P. is filed u\/Section 397 r\/w. 401\n\nt\"tCr}P;C. by the advocate for the petitioner, praying\n\nto set aside the Judgment of conviction and sentence\nof. fine dt. 10.10.03 passed by the XII ACMM.,\n\n.;*3v;ore, in c.c. No.2961\u00a7\/2000 and the Judgment dt.\n; 31.1.2008 passed 'by' the XXXVI Addl. City\" Civil &amp;\nS.J., B'lore, in Crl.A. No.615\/2003 and acquit the\n\npetitioner by dismissing the complaint, by allowing\nthe above Crl.R.P.\n\n\n\nThis Crl.R.P. coming on for Admission,_ this\nday, the court made the following: 1 1\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Though the matter is \ufb02 poated , toga} _ for}<br \/>\nadmission, with the consent of\u00a5Ahoth the fz\u00e9ahg\u00e9d *0<\/p>\n<p>counsel, the matter is taken uh for final-diegosal.<\/p>\n<p>2. The petitioner hes ohallengeo his conviction<br \/>\nfor the offence under Seotloh l\ufb01\u00e9 of the Negotiable<br \/>\nInstruments Aot \ufb01\u00e9herelnafterr referred to as &#8220;the<br \/>\nAct&#8221;] and the sentence i\ufb01egeon and confirmed in the<\/p>\n<p>appeal before the Sessions Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The faot$_rele\u00a7ant for the purpose of this<\/p>\n<p>appeal hreras under: V<\/p>\n<p>lg&#8217; rThe_*reshohdent filed a complaint before the<\/p>\n<p>ff,  Trial Court alleging that in the month of October<\/p>\n<p>:h_ 1999, athehaaooused approached him for a loan of<\/p>\n<p>Rf\ufb01e;1}0@,000-00 for business purpose with an<\/p>\n<p>lbL ass\ufb01rahoe to repay the said loan within a short<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01eriod. The complainant i.e., the respondent herein<\/p>\n<p>advanced the hand loan of Rs.1,00,000&#8211;00 and in turn<\/p>\n<p>0 the petitioner i.e., the accused herein issued the<\/p>\n<p>cheque bearing No.914679, dated 10.04.2000 for the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>said amount drawn on Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Ayenue<\/p>\n<p>Road, Bangalore. The respondent presented the said<\/p>\n<p>cheque to the bank for encashment and the samejnas&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>returned with an endorsement of _~&#8217;insufficient&#8217;=<\/p>\n<p>funds&#8217;. It is again on O9.10.2OQ0.jthe cheqne Rae<\/p>\n<p>presented for encahsment to_the banker and again it &#8216;,<\/p>\n<p>was returned with the sane &#8216;endcrse\ufb01enti dated\n<\/p>\n<p>10. 10.2000. Ultimately, ._ u,\\;&#8221;e.~3ponci\u00e9ht&#8221;&#8216;V issued<br \/>\nnotice dated 24.10.2006 denanding the amount and he<br \/>\nsent the said,  host and also<br \/>\nunder certificate&#8221; of&#8217; posting. ._ The said notice<br \/>\nreturned with an endorsenent by the postal officials<br \/>\nas &#8216;not ciainedi} the the petitioner did not comply<\/p>\n<p>with the dem\\a11d,x&#8217; ._the&#8221;v.&lt;:_::omplaint came to be filed<\/p>\n<p>_beforef the Trial_%\u00a7ourt for taking action under<\/p>\n<p>&#039;dSection 133 of the Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V:\ufb01&#8217; pnreuance of the summons issued, the<\/p>\n<p>VW,_\u00a7etitionergappeared before the Trial Court for the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;v charge nnder Section 138 of the Act. The trial was<\/p>\n<p>d&gt;,_held and the respondent was exmined as P.W.1 and in<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;the evidence he got marked documents Exs.P1 to 7.<\/p>\n<p>it The petitioner was examined as D.W.1 and document<\/p>\n<p>Ex.B1 was admitted in the evidence. The Trial Court<br \/>\nif:\n<\/p>\n<p>X&#8217;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>on appreciation of the evidence on record convicted<br \/>\nthe petitioner for the offence under Section l\ufb01h oi<br \/>\nthe Act and ordered to pay a fine of R3.2{6OrQQ\ufb01;Gdt_<br \/>\nand in default to undergo simple imprisonment :\u00a7;*~<\/p>\n<p>one year and further directed to p\ufb01y an mount oft<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,50,000wO0 to the reepondent_ as c\u00a2mpensatioh;:*,<\/p>\n<p>Aggrieved by the said &#8216;\ufb01nder? lthet&#8217;ipetitioner<br \/>\napproached the Sessione Court et hangelore in Crl.A.<br \/>\nNo.615\/2003 and the said eppeal cane to be dismissed<br \/>\nby Judgment andtggrder\ufb01\ufb02datedLihi;Oli2d08 confirming<br \/>\nthe conviction and the \u00a7ehtence.,&#8217;Aggrieved by the<br \/>\nconcurrent&#8221;findind of conniction; the petitioner has<\/p>\n<p>approached this Court in reyiaion.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.p. I heve heard the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>; petitioner and also the respondent.<\/p>\n<p>a\ufb02 E, rgathsgne learned counsel for the parties<\/p>\n<p>Vdbefore&#8221;&#8211; thist; Court submit that taking into<\/p>\n<p>r,jh\u00a2on\u00a3ideration the financial condition of the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;petitioner, the compensation may be reduced to<\/p>\n<p>RtR$,1;30,000-00 and the fine amount payable and to be<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;H&#8217;~credited to the State may be reduced to<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; Rs.25,000-O0. They do not have anything to say with<\/p>\n<p>regard to the appreciation of the material placed on<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">54<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>record and with regard to the validity 0f the Order.<br \/>\nThey have confined their submission only wfor<br \/>\nreduction of the compensation and also the &#8220;fine,<br \/>\namount. 3 h l K V\n<\/p>\n<p>6. Taking into consideration, the is\u00a7hmisaion7,<br \/>\nmade by both the counsel and lalso&#8217; thee fineneiaili<br \/>\ncondition of the petitioner} i think in the interest<br \/>\nof justice, it would he just end prooet to reduce<br \/>\nthe total fine amount to Rs.1g\u00a75}0o\u00a74QO and out of<br \/>\nthe said fine amount, on nmonng of eoi1,3o,ooo\u00aboo<br \/>\nshall be payen;e&#8217;;ne _\u00a3hQn&#8221;\u00a7e\u00a7bono\u00e9nt5 and the fine<br \/>\namount of \u00a7e.2h;D\u00a7%;0oQn\u00e9halliWte credited to the<br \/>\nState. In&#8221;thecitcemetances, I proceed to pass the<\/p>\n<p>following:L<\/p>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p>  is allowed in part by modifying<\/p>\n<p>Vl_ the Ju\u00e9gmegt hand Order of the courts below. The<\/p>\n<p>nfanount\u00bbof fine is reduced to Rs.1,s5,ooo~oo. Out of<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;*c_tno&#8217;\ufb01ot\u00e91 fine amount, an amount of Ro.1,3o,ooo\u00aboo<\/p>\n<p>i shall be paid to the respondent as compensation and<\/p>\n<p>l&#8217;\u00bb the remaining amount of Rs.25,000~0O shall be<\/p>\n<p>Vlcredited to the state. The amount in deposit shall<\/p>\n<p>5 K<br \/>\n\ufb01in\ufb01x<\/p>\n<p>be paid to the respcmdent and the remaining amcgaunt<\/p>\n<p>shall be paid within one month frczam this <\/p>\n<p>in default, the petitioner is ordered  <\/p>\n<p>simple imprisczanment for a period_Vgf_ 6 mg:&gt;h&#8217;ti1\u00e9t;&#8217;:.&#8217;V&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> I udqett<\/p>\n<p>Ksm*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Lakshmi Ajith vs Sri M R Phanindra on 3 November, 2008 Author: A.S.Pachhapure IN THE HIGH couar or KARNATAKA AT BANGAL0Rg_ DATED THIS THE 3&#8243;&#8221; nay or NOVEMBER, 2oa3\u00bbf;t=t BEFORE: &#8216;t V THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE A,$. PACHHA\u00a7\u00a7?$&#8217;Lt_ _t CRIMINAL REVISION pETITIoRVN\u00a7.\u00a7\u00e97 \u00a7\u00a7f2o08&#8217;\\t&gt;t&#8217; BETWEEN: Lakshmi Ajith, Major, &#8220;wt_ W\/0. D.R.Ajitkumar, -1 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Lakshmi Ajith vs Sri M R Phanindra on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Lakshmi Ajith vs Sri M R Phanindra on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-27T14:36:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Lakshmi Ajith vs Sri M R Phanindra on 3 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-27T14:36:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":799,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt Lakshmi Ajith vs Sri M R Phanindra on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-27T14:36:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Lakshmi Ajith vs Sri M R Phanindra on 3 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Lakshmi Ajith vs Sri M R Phanindra on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Lakshmi Ajith vs Sri M R Phanindra on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-27T14:36:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Lakshmi Ajith vs Sri M R Phanindra on 3 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-27T14:36:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008"},"wordCount":799,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008","name":"Smt Lakshmi Ajith vs Sri M R Phanindra on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-27T14:36:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-lakshmi-ajith-vs-sri-m-r-phanindra-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Lakshmi Ajith vs Sri M R Phanindra on 3 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180762"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180762\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}