{"id":181095,"date":"2009-07-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-06-01T04:18:56","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T22:48:56","slug":"chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Chennamada Naika S\/O &#8230; vs State By Saragur Police on 29 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Chennamada Naika S\/O &#8230; vs State By Saragur Police on 29 July, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.Sreedhar Rao C.R.Kumaraswamy<\/div>\n<pre> \n\n  sg\ufb01s\u00e9m POLICE\n\n '(}3&amp;*T'%;3Rr'\u00a7\u00e9;'Mi_. i\ufb01kawaz, ADDL. SPF)\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT cm KARNATAKA, BANGALORE\nDATED T1413 THE 2913 DAY OF JULY, 2009 A \nPRESENT L M  '\nTHE H()N'BLE MR. JUSTICE K:SREED%\u00a749. l\u00a7:R$\u20aci::  3\nAND   Av ' H  \nTHE HOIWBLE MR. .;Us*m:g. c.I\u00a7;---   \ncrm. NO.  2006\"     H\nBE'I'WEEN:- 5  '   \n\nCHENNAMADA NAIKA,  H\n\ns\/0. PU'I'I'AMAD_ANAIKA',\nCONVICI' NO. 314313-, \n\nCENTRAL PR:S{}N, ij '  \"\nMYSORE.     '\n\n 4. .V    APPELLANT\n{BY SR1 P.\"PRASAIn!N}i KIJEr'.AR AMICUS CURIAE)\n\nRESPONEENT\n\n Tr%;1s%%%cii1\u00e9L.A. IS FILED PREFERRED BY THE ABOVE\n\n  CONVECEIAPPELLANT\/ACCUSED AGAINSI' THE\n~?,\"---.V'\"..J.UI)GMENT m'.30.9.a5 PASSED BY THE 9.0., FTC-I,\nQMYSQRE, IN ss.c.rzo.?2?e;o1 - CONVICTING THE\n APPELLANT\/ACCSSED 3201; THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE\n_  u',Is.3o2 OF IPC AND SENTENCING HIM T0 UNDERGO 12.3.\n  .,,F\u20ac)R LIFE AND TO f'AY A mag 09 RS.20G0\/- IN DEFAULT,\n\nR1. FOR 2 MONTHS FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE\n\n'' U\/3.302 op' IPC. THE APPELLANT\/ACCUSED\/CONVICII'\n\nPRAYS THAT THE ABOVE ORDER MAY BE SET ASIDE.\n\n\n\nThis appeal is coming on for hearing this .--day,\nBREED!-[AR RAG, J., delivered the foilowings  \n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>The case: of the pmsecution is th\ufb01ltfy: S_Iu{_*-.  &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>Maludevamma is the Wife of the detg\ufb01as\u00e9\ufb01ii <\/p>\n<p>is the brother of tht: accused,\u00bb The acg\ufb01sed   L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>with the deceased had two \u00e9a\ufb01ghmm    One<br \/>\ndaughier was married ma    \u00e9th\ufb01r two<br \/>\nchildrma were young in age. v &#8216;i\u00a7?s\u00a5$;_&#8217;_.suspec\ufb01ng the<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01delity of his   frequently<\/p>\n<p>statingighat s\ufb01\u00e9}V&#8217;bas_:V;i1}i\u00a2i&#8217;%.Elationship with other man.\n<\/p>\n<p>I 2. &#8216;\u00ab    advised the accused not to<br \/>\nsusggg\u00e9ct the  {hat the deceased is a woman of<br \/>\n.    &#8216;}&#8217;hc\u00abtH;1H\u00a7&#8221;;,;&lt;\u00ab3eascd unable in bear the torture and<br \/>\n  the company of the accused and she<br \/>\n% _  her mother for some time. The degcased<br \/>\n &#039;bamt: back Eiuliguppa village (husba3:x\u00a3i&#039;s na\ufb01ve<br \/>\n   She was residing separately along with the chikimn.<br \/>\n 20.6.2001 around 4.30 pm. sen of E-&#039;W7 came an\u00e9<\/p>\n<p> inforzned PW&#039;? that the accused has severeiy asgauitcd the<\/p>\n<p>4\/<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9eceased. The PW&#039;? immediately rushed to the spat,<\/p>\n<p>the deceased lying with injuries. On enquiry    <\/p>\n<p>informed that, her husband has ass\u00e9iilted \u00ab&#039;}:1\u00a7.:r.    V <\/p>\n<p>was shifts&#039; d to the hospital. The   ~.<\/p>\n<p>injuries in the hospital.     the &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>police on the same day ;at..9.3Qp.&#8211; f\u00e9part-\u00e9iscbses<br \/>\nthat the death is   of shock and<br \/>\nhemorrhage as a_::&#8221;esuIt:&#8217;0&#8243;f&#8217; The death<br \/>\nis a homicidal    for committing<br \/>\nan o\ufb01&#8221;cn &lt;:_t\u00e9    <\/p>\n<p> J&#039;  of the accused and has<\/p>\n<p>}odgcd_ a  S ffii\u00e9t police. PW? claims that the<\/p>\n<p> = ._T\u00a7Il!5,l_CI\u20ac  declaration that tbs accused has<\/p>\n<p> &lt;&#039;:a1:1ASed._  PW4 and PW8 are the neighboars of the<\/p>\n<p> &quot;&amp;I;hja=i;i&#039;VE:vide:nce discloses that around 4.30 pm.<\/p>\n<p> th\u00e9g Q\u00e9ere fetching water fmm the public tap they<\/p>\n<p> V&#039;  cries from the house of the deceased, they went<\/p>\n<p> dcceaged on enquizy told that the accused has<\/p>\n<p>T &quot; \u00e9ria\ufb01sed {ha injuries. PW 4 and PW8 also speak to the motive:<\/p>\n<p>V that there used to be frequent quarrels between the accuseci<\/p>\n<p>4\/<\/p>\n<p>and the deceased since the aceusmd had suspected the<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01delity -of the accused.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. PW&#8217;? in the evidence has turned   3<\/p>\n<p>not support the prosecution case regauiing   <\/p>\n<p>declaration made by the deceased to&#8217;   <\/p>\n<p>the basis of the alone evidence of    <\/p>\n<p>the accused for an offence  11\/hxs\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Counsel for the appeiit\ufb01t sttenuotisiy. submitted<\/p>\n<p>that there is absolutelytt\u00e9tiiet&#8217;Actediizfie  against the<\/p>\n<p>aeeuseg. The  tiieeieses that when h1m&#8217; self<br \/>\nand PW&#8217;?-.Went   were present. PW2 does not<\/p>\n<p>speak a\ufb01yt\ufb01ing .abve&#8221;u_tt\ufb02&#8217;._:e  dying decimation. The theory<\/p>\n<p> _ of preeeeution t1ta1i.t3;e__d.eceased has made dying declaration<\/p>\n<p> ie  belied by the evidence of PW2. Hence,<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7&#8221;rg:1&#8217;L\u00abd.Af&lt;5r<\/p>\n<p>  .  &#039;thorough consideration of the evidence, we<\/p>\n<p>151:-d,etthat&quot;&#039;the evidence of PW.4 and PW8 is natural and<\/p>\n<p>  They are the immediate neighbours of the deceased.<\/p>\n<p>  &quot;Their evidence discloses that immediately on hearing the<\/p>\n<p>&quot; Vexies they go to the scene, they found the accused running<\/p>\n<p>4\/<\/p>\n<p>deceased lying injured. The deceased requested water. They<br \/>\ngave water to the deceased. On enqujxy the deceased<\/p>\n<p>informed that the accused has caused the iI1jlJ1&#039;iCS..&#039; &quot;The<\/p>\n<p>evidence of these witnesses clinchingly estab&#039;1isi\ufb01e$&#039; <\/p>\n<p>complicity of the accused with the o\ufb02ence. n..I  <\/p>\n<p>also corroborates the versian that the&quot;d;eath_   <\/p>\n<p>case of the prosecution that   the<br \/>\ndeceased had illicit m1a::\u00a7r.shi;;$   &#039;I&#039;heAaoc1  Jsed in<\/p>\n<p>a gave   state of quarrel caused<br \/>\nthe de\u00e9ith &quot; of V  of the suspected illicit<br \/>\nnel.atio_nshiij.&quot;~\u00ab..  the circumsmnoes, woujd he<\/p>\n<p> &lt;   9A\ufb01&quot;e33.ee&#039;u,i..s9.A304 &#8211;Part 1 {PC and not 11\/ 3 302 IPC.<\/p>\n<p>   View the appeal is allowed in part. The<\/p>\n<p>0.3..  is altered to 304&quot; Part 1 IPC. The accused<\/p>\n<p>   the date of anest on 22.6.2001. The accusaw.<br \/>\n   detention almost for a period of 8 years. The<\/p>\n<p> period of detention is imposed as sentence of<\/p>\n<p>Ar<\/p>\n<p>7. With regard to the  o\ufb011e:1ee,A   <\/p>\n<p>imprisonment. The accused is deemed to have <\/p>\n<p>sentence.\n<\/p>\n<p>The accused is directed to  <\/p>\n<p>required ti) be detained in aay\u00bbTnth.cr <\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-&#8216;<br \/>\nJUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Chennamada Naika S\/O &#8230; vs State By Saragur Police on 29 July, 2009 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao C.R.Kumaraswamy sg\ufb01s\u00e9m POLICE &#8216;(}3&amp;*T&#8217;%;3Rr&#8217;\u00a7\u00e9;&#8217;Mi_. i\ufb01kawaz, ADDL. SPF) IN THE HIGH COURT cm KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED T1413 THE 2913 DAY OF JULY, 2009 A PRESENT L M &#8216; THE H()N&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE K:SREED%\u00a749. l\u00a7:R$\u20aci:: 3 AND Av [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-181095","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Chennamada Naika S\/O ... vs State By Saragur Police on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chennamada Naika S\/O ... vs State By Saragur Police on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-31T22:48:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chennamada Naika S\\\/O &#8230; vs State By Saragur Police on 29 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-31T22:48:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":700,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Chennamada Naika S\\\/O ... vs State By Saragur Police on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-31T22:48:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chennamada Naika S\\\/O &#8230; vs State By Saragur Police on 29 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chennamada Naika S\/O ... vs State By Saragur Police on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chennamada Naika S\/O ... vs State By Saragur Police on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-31T22:48:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chennamada Naika S\/O &#8230; vs State By Saragur Police on 29 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-31T22:48:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009"},"wordCount":700,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009","name":"Chennamada Naika S\/O ... vs State By Saragur Police on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-31T22:48:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chennamada-naika-so-vs-state-by-saragur-police-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chennamada Naika S\/O &#8230; vs State By Saragur Police on 29 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181095","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=181095"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181095\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=181095"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=181095"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=181095"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}