{"id":181379,"date":"2010-08-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010"},"modified":"2017-04-05T23:40:27","modified_gmt":"2017-04-05T18:10:27","slug":"sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Erappa vs Sri Ningappa on 31 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Erappa vs Sri Ningappa on 31 August, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n
an 1 ..<\/p>\n
IN mg EQGH ccxxm or KARRATAKA xrBAHGAI,\u00a2;=m\u00ab:j%V%%%%  % R
\nDated the: 31\u00bb: day cf?-'-13'Qs\u00a32(}10        7<\/p>\n
:BEFORE:<\/p>\n
aaxmm 2m..ms*n<:E :  _j% %   '  <\/p>\n
E E3:<\/p>\n
am ERAPPA,
\nam FEDZLEAPPA,
\nAGEDABGUT48Y3'\u00a3AR$,
\nAamcvzmnm,  '  1  "  %
\nR;c:*r:ixJ1=pA.r:AKALL1'\u00a2\u00a7;='zLALc;e\u00abE,%  * _
\nJA&&LUR'I'ALUK,_.   "  "   A
\nmvmcmm n1s*:a1c;-at-5 '7' c:c2..f;-    '<\/p>\n
....   "    <\/p>\n
[By arm  " 7<\/p>\n
\u00a32<\/p>\n
 '   A  ..... .. \u00ab
\n 8-\/0.,L&TEBII\u00a5&APPA,
\nMESULWWW\u00bb
\nR] :2: p\ufb02wyymmuu vmmm,
\nRf "1'\ufb01'.I.3{3'K,<\/p>\n
  . 3   DAVAN{'.-3-ERE 33mTRIGT~5'f'? 992,.<\/p>\n
   131$; VALYAPPA,<\/p>\n
_ T._$}.C}'I.{\u00a3TE NB*I%.PPA,
\n' .__ "'AG;ED ABQUT 52 WE;
\n, " .4;GRICUL'i'URETS,
\n" ' x R,' C} THUPPA\u00a7AKLLI VHJAGE.<\/p>\n
VA   Jaaaaxxxmraxgrx,<\/p>\n
EAVAKGEE E1BTRI{\u00a7'1'-5?'? 602..<\/p>\n
3. am VAEAPPA,
\n3; as mm Hmcuappa,
\nsaw A3013? 47 mm,
\nAGRIGULTURETE,<\/p>\n
R! O THUPPADAHLLI VTLIAGE,
\nJA@;LU R TIFLLUK,
\nEAVAHQERE D1BT1?IC'I'-5'3"? 092.<\/p>\n
4- 9:3'? E ,<\/p>\n
mo mm mmmmm,<\/p>\n
man man': 2:4 mm,<\/p>\n
.ame1cuL*:*umm~s,  %<\/p>\n
R} 0 'nmPmnAm.L: VK.LAGE,~  '  <\/p>\n
.:A<m.UR mwlc,    & \u00a2<\/p>\n
EAVANGERE ms'm1c1'~,577 oaks. _
\n     *   3\u00a7::swmENTs<\/p>\n
(By Sri N s YAm    <\/p>\n
mrs 1?*i:.E\u00e9f ::;sg; _ 1a9  cy\u00e9; AGAHQWT ma:
\nJUBGMENT & 1 --Z\u00a3)Ii\u00a7!If.3;\u00a7EE   fa'4.o'3::Im m PASSEIJ IN
\n12.A.r:c:.1m.. smmx cm},
\nJUDGE, DAV\u00a7&;BEA;_GE\ufb02:;i\u20ac;x\u00a7LQ '}:'!l{i\u20ac3f_'THE APPEALARD sswrma
\nASEE mm  'Mensa DATE!):23.I0.\u00a30O8
\nmass}: m o,s.N<5.53i 2c:os%m\u00a3r THE FILE 012* 'ms: covm cm
\nQWB'<\/p>\n
'I'<\/p>\n
..... 3 ..\n<\/p>\n
allowed tlrm appwl \ufb01iad by the plakrm. The  V.<\/p>\n
decz\ufb01.\n<\/p>\n
2. 2 have mm learned wtum\ufb01l, g:g:m'nm   E <\/p>\n
tha only g'aw:1d put forward   <\/p>\n
Shri A.H.an.1.:3ztanthappa is  \u00ab\u00a2-mt   had
\nclis\ufb02\ufb01m\ufb01ed the suit an   barrad
\nby rw-iu\ufb01iwta: the    the said
\nmm and as::eq:\ufb01i:_;I__,   a\ufb01owad than
\nLA. magi 11:1   fZ*}\"; a\u00a7':\u00a7CPC by the second
\nplaixlw'  produced W\ufb02\ufb01 taken
\nmm of 313;}.  juam: of tm trial court
\n  that the lmvar appellate
\n($53  gag pzuvisians of Iaw mmasma in order<\/p>\n
  the ahaeawe of any am of the<\/p>\n
    the Lowm: appellate ccurt could not have at the
\n%  aima the LA. am by the mponam-m-<\/p>\n
 As such, thn ma\ufb01a' requm-w' remand to the<\/p>\n
S  appellate mutt. It was f1.11\"th3E:I' cazrbez\ufb01ed that the<\/p>\n
appellant is Gm owner of the suit property and \ufb02zwefam,
\n531' this rm.mz1ako,%n.d becomm mammary. The above<\/p>\n
\/ 9\"\/,<\/p>\n
\".4...\n<\/p>\n
aub\ufb01ion is supperwd by the Apex Court ru\ufb01ng reported<\/p>\n
in\ufb01m 2% SC 579.  wm made <\/p>\n
M315 and 16 and aim para 17 of the ma <\/p>\n
'I'@'efore, suhmissitm. made is  '4 'A <\/p>\n
Cium\ufb01on cf kw rafmed in the appml   4'  <\/p>\n
3.. 0n the other hand,<\/p>\n
Sh:-i N.sh..,.,mm,..m
\nplaizn\ufb01 arguad that the\n<\/p>\n
3. datazh :1 order on I.A.Ho.J: mama' of<\/p>\n
additional  avidmme and truly
\nafter haanng'_  sixi\ufb01, IJL1 wag allowad by the
\n   '~'--}--\u00a2\u00a3s\u00a7re am, no cabjwtions wm filed.<\/p>\n
_ appellant. Fzartltum subzrmksinn<\/p>\n
'xmade  the writtm statemztt, the appellant<\/p>\n
  up any mud 'ha the gases: am he is the<\/p>\n
 suit pmperty, but a plain leak at the<\/p>\n
V' <\/p>\n
 in the writtxaz smmmsmt gun in show that<\/p>\n
 dengfmg the plaint avssrmm, net\ufb01m mom is<\/p>\n
\"Stated by the appeknnt. Undm theae cirmumstanam, tin<\/p>\n
lowezr appellaw mart was justi\ufb01w Em allawing I.A.N\u00a2.1 an\ufb01
\nakoi11re&iI:g\ufb02:nej11d@r:taft1'1en~iaicaurt. As Earns<\/p>\n
9:\/,<\/p>\n
.. 5 ..\n<\/p>\n
thn recs-judimta mum putufarwawd *3 concerned, learmd
\ncuurmei argued that suit *5 for heat injunction' <\/p>\n
thpemfom, cause sf' action \ufb01or the present aagiiaf\" <\/p>\n
scemewhem in the month (if May 2908 wgm'      ' <\/p>\n
suit was mm in impact 62' a di\ufb01wetig  5f', E<\/p>\n
the mum af ac\u00e9an for the  mgit   .<\/p>\n
put as in the year 2090-01. 'I'h.eret_\"   appellagvj te
\nmuff cxrtm\ufb01ttae\u00e9 m  12'iaI cnur\ufb01a
\nE E. 3% an the q11\u00a2l!; ',--2i\u00a2I1 91' i\ufb02zr all time<\/p>\n
1-mm, the aygail    if; . '<\/p>\n
4.   aidm, in as far as am facts
\nare  the.  took up the atand that they are<\/p>\n
\ufb01azfseassinn of suit acl\ufb01ule property<\/p>\n
   in survey N920\/6 ef Tuppadahani
\n  Ta!-uk am: it is. the  anmm-ax<\/p>\n
    plain\ufb01 aha reliad on the erdcew passed by<\/p>\n
%  +.iz\u00a7=. _D;e\u00a7puty Tahamld' at in ER'? cg m:.11,:2nw\u00bb2m7 to<\/p>\n
 in thak plaint that they are the ownm at' the wit
\nJaciwdule pcro@'ty. Fszllowirzg the  e by 'km<\/p>\n
defsndant in the Last week at' May 2%, suit far  t
\nirgjrgxzztcr\ufb01srm t\u00ae%m bmam n\ufb01eary. The stand of the<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
.. 5 ..\n<\/p>\n
prrwmt appellant in the writtm statmnt was on: of
\ndenying the plakzt wammerrm and suit was also <\/p>\n
be dhmimd an the grouzmd at' that: piaint\ufb01a' '' <\/p>\n
C3.S.\u00a7o.8BI20\ufb0131 @113' t the pwenmxt V'<\/p>\n
amassed and see: also: the LA.  <\/p>\n
R.A.19'?I2002. Taldq the    V.<\/p>\n
pm 91' suit being mm by 1:21;  ciid not
\nset up any title in the suit   tn any
\nfact umeh waul\u00e9 g:.~t% to   is ma
\nawxm of suit      <\/p>\n
cf the \"dismissed thc suit at' the
\n  gr am j  mgaz-ma the<\/p>\n
   as far as pesmsaim af the suit<\/p>\n
   is comm-md. and defendanfs<\/p>\n
 man \"Suit was nat mm' mm' me \ufb01x v:ew' of the<\/p>\n
V' \"  \ufb01eeme in C1.S.Ne.88\/2063. was aha accepted.<\/p>\n
 the suit t.hm'e\u00a3ore- 3%. the p1am1\ufb01'a' ' 13) move the<\/p>\n
 % A '-'\u00e9tppellata csnsurt in R.A.Nc:.103[2008.<\/p>\n
5,'Ihe1wrxwdJudgeafthe!awm-apmllamcmxrt
\nfaurxd\ufb02mt\ufb02zeuisalaaurtwaa\ufb01nerrorizzrmrdinga\ufb01ndirg
\nin&v::uroft11eappe!1antir1s ofar&ast1aaep}m::{zm~<\/p>\n
'\/,<\/p>\n
R<\/p>\n
.. '3 ..\n<\/p>\n
ju\u00e9imta is mmemed and taking mate of the di\ufb01brcnt cause
\nc:facImx1' Ear the in suit ar\ufb01 the aarlim suit, <\/p>\n
the \ufb01nditw in 1:13: mrlisr awlt did mt \" <\/p>\n
comma, the krwar appellate court  <\/p>\n
axic3.33.1o' ' nal evidaxme placezi,   k%<\/p>\n
about the actual arm   the
\n\u00abmum and the   gamma
\ns.uthori.tim mm: that an p;aa--r\u00a2\ufb01\"\u00a7k of the
\nsuit property,     219.2015 and<\/p>\n
  tin mntaratium gut \ufb01rward by the<\/p>\n
   menial): that tm Iowa' appellam oeurt;<\/p>\n
 in  the 1.5.80.1 for addithxml  , it<\/p>\n
'V     tn talus non: of the provisima contammd'<\/p>\n
%  4:. Rule 27 of cm and sa\ufb01 order mam it clear<\/p>\n
' - 'denim my; be wiued at tho:<\/p>\n
kxzsmme of the parnes' $eekmg' m mam the adaim\ufb01<\/p>\n
evidmhwon\ufb02xcgtnux\ufb01of\ufb01wmrtymtlm\u00e9ngabkem
\npm\ufb01uce \u00e9ocu\ufb02ts dsupihe merwe {sf cine': diligence, but a<\/p>\n
3%<\/p>\n
.. 8 ..\n<\/p>\n
can-sful readizxg -anfclausee (b) fRuk= 27 of Qrdcr 41 will alas
\ngo to irniicaba that apart \ufb01nm the circumstances. <\/p>\n
in the said ordar, if tha appellate court \ufb01nds
\not11m* mxbstaxrtial cause, the addit\ufb01nnal   \"
\npermitted, 'chm the mutt has get  <\/p>\n
a.dxi1t1o' ' nal evkiexme  pIa:ced.an_. <\/p>\n
7. In the light cf zm afgzmai\ufb01  \u00a7$f'iaw; in the
\nimam man, the mm:   allewing<\/p>\n
I.A.I\u00a7o.1 has    in the murse<\/p>\n
cf am dergitea   pmduetasun at' aciditienal
\namumgm b,;w+;;.y  evidaznca is xmmxy in
\n juatim and aha havkg regard tn<\/p>\n
   to the praducticn of docuwts by<\/p>\n
. :f--v\u00a73~.,af   , the court was of the View that
\n   dacuwba fxzrnmmd by time appellanm befcre it
\nV  as 'u was not possible to pa-entrance the<\/p>\n
  an me;-ins witlmut am said aocumn. In the<\/p>\n
   light a: he afcrmaid mom gum by the lower appellate<\/p>\n
aeurt W'hi}\u00a3. albwing I.A.Ker.1 and mmmd far tbs appe\ufb01ant
\naka be\ufb01ig \ufb01d in 1:% matter thaugh rm objacztjons have<\/p>\n
9\/<\/p>\n
. J<\/p>\n
.. 13 ..\n<\/p>\n
\ufb011xdmftl'1sem1m:rurtcaffact'm therefore mt \ufb01ablato be
\ni1:1'hm*w& withinthe smut}.  . 3<\/p>\n
Fur the above reasons, rm substantial A'  %\n<\/p>\n
3.:-hm far aensidm-atalon and the apgzreal
\nmmmx cf the mom: mm
\nof defendant astablislaing has  W  <\/p>\n
wt in the mm ufthe  .\u00a7ppmmh%  % 'the
\nwarm to antabzish his  made hereain<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Erappa vs Sri Ningappa on 31 August, 2010 Author: V.Jagannathan an 1 .. IN mg EQGH ccxxm or KARRATAKA xrBAHGAI,\u00a2;=m\u00ab:j%V%%%% % R Dated the: 31\u00bb: day cf?-‘-13’Qs\u00a32(}10 7 :BEFORE: aaxmm 2m..ms*n<:E : _j% % ' E E3: am ERAPPA, am FEDZLEAPPA, AGEDABGUT48Y3'\u00a3AR$, Aamcvzmnm, ' 1 " % R;c:*r:ixJ1=pA.r:AKALL1'\u00a2\u00a7;='zLALc;e\u00abE,% * _ JA&&LUR'I'ALUK,_. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-181379","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Erappa vs Sri Ningappa on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Erappa vs Sri Ningappa on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-05T18:10:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Erappa vs Sri Ningappa on 31 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-05T18:10:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1256,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Erappa vs Sri Ningappa on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-05T18:10:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Erappa vs Sri Ningappa on 31 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Erappa vs Sri Ningappa on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Erappa vs Sri Ningappa on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-05T18:10:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Erappa vs Sri Ningappa on 31 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-05T18:10:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010"},"wordCount":1256,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010","name":"Sri Erappa vs Sri Ningappa on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-05T18:10:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-erappa-vs-sri-ningappa-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Erappa vs Sri Ningappa on 31 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181379","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=181379"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181379\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=181379"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=181379"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=181379"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}