{"id":181801,"date":"2009-08-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009"},"modified":"2016-09-16T00:59:48","modified_gmt":"2016-09-15T19:29:48","slug":"smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Venkatamma vs The New India Insurance Company &#8230; on 4 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Venkatamma vs The New India Insurance Company &#8230; on 4 August, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Manjula Chellur Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>   -Aged 15 yeafs,\nf\ufb02eing Hiirger represented by\n ' V.{\u00a7IT\u00e9l\"petitioner Mother guardian.\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED THIS THE 4th DAY OF AUGUS'lf,...2J'()V(')::$h3;e:4\"V\u00e9~ ~ \n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE \n\nAND\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUsT1eEf_'B.sREEN:vAsE,GowDA\n\nMiscellaneous  '\/ 20l)E\u00a7 (NW C)\n\nBETWEEN:    l\n\n1. Smt.   \nW \/ 0 late' C}_1ar1~1*1app'a,g ., x \n\nAged abo1;t:\u00bb.4:3_yeaifs..  ._  V'\n\n2. Rajannal... . 1 AV \n\n8\/ 0 late    2 \nAged about\u00ab.20lyea:'s.\"\".A' .  l\n\n Smt. \u00bb\u00bbS_\u00a7\\\u00a7\\farr1amI\"r1a,V,VVV V' V\n 'Bed wife cgfelate Chafmappa,\n'~._AgecI_, abgut ' 'years.\n\n.  \"  ..\n\n8\/ 0 A late Ch .,1;1ppa,\n\n\n\nAil are R\/ at Gollu (Krishnapura)\nDibbur Post,\nChikkaballapur Taluk,\n\nKolar District. 2 \n AEPELLANTS\n\n(By Sri. MB. Chandra chooda, Adv for    .\n\nA N D: \n1. The New India Insurance, \nCompany Limited, 0\nRep.by its Manager, 'A '\nRajajinagar Branch,\nDr. Rajkumar road,  _ \nBangalore -~ 560:0'-10.  _ V  .. . \n2. Sri. Bandeppa Redd\nS\/O   ' .; .4  - \nNo. I, 6\"\"  '12ih'CroSS_,  \nMa11es'wa.rarn;;_ 0' A V' =   ' \u00bb\n\nBanga_1ore;\u00bb';\u00a7 560  \n\n \" A A \"  A   '  RESPONEJENTS\n(By Sri.  Hegde.V'Pi\/iullghand, Adv. for R1,\nSri. Chita'p.pga,.VAdv_. for\n\n \u00abfi1_\u00a2.d' Under Section 173(1) of MV ACT\n\n   Judgment and award dated 01.09.2005\n 'p.assed._Vin  160.3442\/2002 on the file of the XI Add}.\n*-~}u.dge,--. :'Qonr't.--v\"of small causes and Member, MACT,\n\nI\\JIeti*opo1ita;1.5;Area, Bangaiore (SCCH--12], partly allowing\nthe'\u00ab. cl_aj1n~' petition for compensation and seeking\n\n'~ enhaneeirnent of compensation.\n\n\"    This appeal coming on for hearing, this day,\n_  'SREENIVASE GOWDA J., delivered the following:\n\n\n\nJ U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>This appeai is by the claimants &#8220;seeking<\/p>\n<p>enhancement of compensation awarded b_y&#8230;.the&#8217;i-&#8220;Ex\/{otor<\/p>\n<p>Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore (here_in&#8217;~-after&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>to as &#8216;the Tribunal&#8217; for short].\n<\/p>\n<p>2. For the sake of convenience xthe. parties are referred<\/p>\n<p>to as they are referred to  claini ~}oe&#8221;tition&#8217;;Ebelore the<br \/>\nTribunal. &#8216;3 it 3 V\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Facts of the case;  &#8216;T<\/p>\n<p>On 2sg;t06;v2&#8243;oog:tiug at  p.rn. when the<br \/>\ndeceased  returning to his village on his<br \/>\nbicycle road, a Tipper lorry<\/p>\n<p>bearingii.No.l{A~. 3330, came in a rash and negligent<\/p>\n<p>  dashed against him. As a result, he<\/p>\n<p>llsustajnecl\ufb01injnries and he succumbed to the injuries on<\/p>\n<p>V -V the&#8217;.44&#8217;W.a3%:gV.totithe hospital. The claimants being his legal<\/p>\n<p>3  have filed a claim petition in MVC No.34-422\/2002<\/p>\n<p>  the Tribunal, seeking compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.12,00,000\/&#8211;. The Tribunal by impugned judgment has<br \/>\nawarded a compensation of Rs.3, 18,000 \/ &#8211; with interest at<\/p>\n<p>6% pet. from the date of petition till the date <\/p>\n<p>Aggrieved by the quantum of compensation&#8221;  4_<\/p>\n<p>the Tribune}, the c1ai1nantsV~&#8211;a&#8217;re~.\u00a2in-&#8216;_:  j <\/p>\n<p>enhancement.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. As there is no appe\u00e9ddifiledttdbgr  <\/p>\n<p>chailenging the \ufb01nding of ribunai&#8217; -on issue No.1<br \/>\nholding that the claimants   the deceased<\/p>\n<p>died on 29-6-V0.2&#8242; due  zfjasih-_Vparidazinegligent driving of<\/p>\n<p>the tippe_r.  they are entitled to seek<br \/>\ncompentsatiorrlr  oni3}4&#8217;V.&#8217;issue that remains for our<\/p>\n<p>cons_\ufb01deration&#8221;&#8216; is\ufb02uwhether the compensation awarded by<\/p>\n<p>  is just and proper or it calls for<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; tr &#8216; &#8216; it<\/p>\n<p>  learned Counsel appearing for the claimants<\/p>\n<p>at-.s&#8217;ubii&#8211;:its that the Tribunal in spite of noticing that the<\/p>\n<p>it  Wdeceased was an agrieulturist, and doing miik Vending<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01g<\/p>\n<p>business and rearing cocoons, as evident from Ex.P.3, the<br \/>\nagricultural pass book showing that he wasfrearing<\/p>\n<p>cocoons and Ex.P.4 is the pass book of <\/p>\n<p>Society, showing that he was supplyingH__ni~i.,lk; <\/p>\n<p>P.15 are the RTC extracts    rt.\n<\/p>\n<p>agriculturist still erred &#8216;inn ass&#8217;essing<br \/>\nRs.3,000\/&#8211; per month and   of<br \/>\ninstead of &#8217;13&#8217;   &#8216;cornnensation of<br \/>\nRs.2,88,000\/&#8211; tVowarcis._.lvoss   He submits,<br \/>\neven the   Conventional heads<\/p>\n<p>is on the\u00bb, iio\ufb01ger    therefore, he prays for<\/p>\n<p>enharieernent &#8211;\u00ab.e_ompe_fisation.<\/p>\n<p>6. __\u00a7i&#8217;Per contra; the learned Counsel appearing for the<\/p>\n<p>.I11su1&#8217;ance&#8211;.:C.ompany submits, the contention of the<\/p>\n<p> deceased was earning Rs.10,000\/&#8211; per<\/p>\n<p> doing milk Vending business and rearing<\/p>\n<p>  colc-oonvs, is not established. Therefore, he submits, the<\/p>\n<p>luigjicorne assessed by the Tribunal at Rs.3,000\/&#8211; per month<\/p>\n<p>5%<\/p>\n<p>and applying the multiplier of &#8217;12&#8217; as per the law<br \/>\napplicable at that time, is correct and he submits that<br \/>\nthere is no scope for enhancement of  <\/p>\n<p>he prays for dismissal of the appeal.<\/p>\n<p>7. The deceased was aged abo&#8217;L1_t&#8221;5O  <\/p>\n<p>from the post mortem 1&#8217;epo1&#8217;tlu&#8211;&#8216;\u00a71&#8243;I3_&#8217;VV.26V.&#8211;&#8216; &#8216;~  accident is of<br \/>\nthe year 2002. The  that the<br \/>\ndeceased was __an  milk vending<br \/>\nbusiness  by producing<br \/>\nEx.P.3,     that the income of<br \/>\nthe deeeasedplasse_ssed:l.]o\u00a7&lt;&#8230;t1ie.&#039; tribunal at Rs.3,000\/&#8211; is on<\/p>\n<p>the lower&#039;-side.\n<\/p>\n<p>  Fro.tn.4vth,e material on record, it can be easily said,<\/p>\n<p>lithe.&#8217;-.VdeceVa_sed;;.Rivas earning more than Rs.4,500\/&#8211; per<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;V month,&#8221;&#8221;V.pVl]\u00b03Fd of his income has to be deducted towards<\/p>\n<p>it l::e\u00bb..hist-pperslonal expenses and the loss of dependency has to<\/p>\n<p>*  heevlorked out from the balance of Rs.3,000\/&#8211;, by applying<\/p>\n<p>the multiplier of &#8217;13&#8217; as per the latest judgment of the<br \/>\nSupreme Court in Sarla Verma&#8217;s ease. Thus, the loss of<\/p>\n<p>dependency would work out to Rs.4,68,000\/&#8211; &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>x 12 months X 13 multiplier) as <\/p>\n<p>awarded by the Tribunal. I <\/p>\n<p>9. Rs.}5,000\/&#8211; awarded by as Tzjibt\u00e9riali._.towafd$a..1ossA\u00abof <\/p>\n<p>estate, Rs.5,000\/&#8211; towards&#8217;1os_s ofiiie-oiisortiuurlltiij,=RsV,5&#8217;3,ObO<\/p>\n<p>towards Ioss of expeetaneyi&#8221;-and\u00bb_v  towards<br \/>\nfuneral and other eiipehses ;  Iower side. The<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal has riot awa&#8217;1&#8217;d&#8217;e*d[&#8216;A ar1j,t&#8221;a.aInou_.I:it&#8221; of compensation<\/p>\n<p>d&#8221;a.ffecfti0n.= As against Rs.30,000\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>towards loss  &#8216; an<br \/>\nawarded &#8220;under&#8221;differetitconventional heads, which is on<\/p>\n<p>the tower side&#8221;, axdseviaw\u00e9trd a sum of Rs.40,000&#8217;\/&#8211;.<\/p>\n<p>.  V.&#8217;I&#8217;hus&#8217;;~.the eiaimants, in all are entitled for a total<\/p>\n<p>a&#8217;&#8211;asanzi;aeasa:\u00a7:aaiiaf Rs.5,08,000\/&#8211; as against Rs.3,18,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>awarded the Tribunal with 6% interest p.a. from the<\/p>\n<p>  }date of &#8216;claim petition till the date of payment.<\/p>\n<p>g<\/p>\n<p>11. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed in part and the<br \/>\njudgment and award of the Tribunal is modi\ufb01ed. The<\/p>\n<p>claimants are entitled for a total compeijsatloni\u00e9 of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.5,08,000\/&#8211; as against Rs.3,18,000\/&#8211; a.~l2sjz;%;1rg1\u00a2%};:i&#8221;.tt&#8217;byT &#8216;-the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal with interest at 6% p;aT fmm\ufb02the&#8221;datexioffclaimlT <\/p>\n<p>petition till the date of payment.\n<\/p>\n<p>12. In all other aspects. &#8216;..tl1o.\ufb02:av\u00a7fard oftt&#8217;he~Tribuna}. is<\/p>\n<p>undisturbed and no ordefaso&#8211;to ;co._3ts&#8211;{_&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p> tttt   T T sd\/~<\/p>\n<p> ooooo  JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Venkatamma vs The New India Insurance Company &#8230; on 4 August, 2009 Author: Manjula Chellur Gowda -Aged 15 yeafs, f\ufb02eing Hiirger represented by &#8216; V.{\u00a7IT\u00e9l&#8221;petitioner Mother guardian. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 4th DAY OF AUGUS&#8217;lf,&#8230;2J'()V(&#8216;)::$h3;e:4&#8243;V\u00e9~ ~ PRESENT THE HON&#8217;BLE MRS. JUSTICE AND THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-181801","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Venkatamma vs The New India Insurance Company ... on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Venkatamma vs The New India Insurance Company ... on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-15T19:29:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Venkatamma vs The New India Insurance Company &#8230; on 4 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-15T19:29:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":813,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Venkatamma vs The New India Insurance Company ... on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-15T19:29:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Venkatamma vs The New India Insurance Company &#8230; on 4 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Venkatamma vs The New India Insurance Company ... on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Venkatamma vs The New India Insurance Company ... on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-15T19:29:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Venkatamma vs The New India Insurance Company &#8230; on 4 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-15T19:29:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009"},"wordCount":813,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009","name":"Smt Venkatamma vs The New India Insurance Company ... on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-15T19:29:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-venkatamma-vs-the-new-india-insurance-company-on-4-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Venkatamma vs The New India Insurance Company &#8230; on 4 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181801","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=181801"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181801\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=181801"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=181801"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=181801"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}