{"id":18199,"date":"2009-04-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009"},"modified":"2014-05-04T20:01:01","modified_gmt":"2014-05-04T14:31:01","slug":"sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri V Shashidhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri V Shashidhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE\n\nIDATED 'i'}~i1S\"I'I:~iE 2ND DAY 0;' APRIL 200.9 j\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE I~ION'BLE MR. P.D. BINAl{ARAN, c}%::1\u00a7:\u00a7*1V;31js'~T1g\u00a3\u00ab3_V ' '\n\nAND\n\nTHE HONBLE MR.J{}Sj'}C,E V.i&lt;:},M \n\nWRIT APPEAL NQ.978 &#039;GM -9 Pouch\nBETWEEN: &quot; &quot; M  V&#039; &quot;\n\nSri VShashidha&#039;::f,&quot;  1 - _  - \nS\/o.Venugopa3=_.&quot;     _  \nAged about y.\u00a2\u00a3:z&#039;.s&#039;;_V &quot; Q  V&quot;    &#039; &#039;\n\nR\/a.No;vV\ufb01&quot;\u00e92;  \nLayout,  %   \nBaz:1galor1\u00bb.\/;~A0f'_4lI;{a\"I}' =.:gf;3l\u00a7al.\/_jl%1ighl l u\n\nCourt Act, 1962, praying to set'.'=__asjd.ef1 the' ..(5rde.:Wcia:eci\n\n9.3.2009 passed in W.P.N0.5627\/ 2009 dismiesing \"&lt;.vi*;&#039;it \n\npetition by the learned Single&#039;J1__1.clge 201&#039; this  \n\nThis WRA coming up for before\nCourt this day, SABHAHIT J.,eldeIiv\u00a7?red._f11e following:\n\nThis    peti\ufb01onez&#039; in\nWP. by the order dated\n\n9.3.20{)9A;&quot;w\u00a7::ereil*1lVtl*le l1c:.\u00ab.\u00a7n&#039;\u00ab.4,c1 Single Judge has declined\n\nto q:&#039;.1,;;*;sTl1e..tl1eV englofsei\u00e9xent issued by the 2M respondent .<\/pre>\n<p> ldamgi 1e\u00a7;}2\u00a729es. &#8220;&#8221;&#8221; ll<br \/>\n &#8216;~\\&amp;?;v.??.\u00bbf=\u00a3e\u00abll.\u20ac;ef27\/2009 was \ufb01ie\u00e9 by the appellant<\/p>\n<p>axferrixig  petitioner] appellant herein was werldng<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;as a Fo\u00a7iee Eionsiabie and he served the police department<\/p>\n<p>l   &#8221;  from $9&#8217;??? to 3991 and during that perim, he<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8221; llhalz\ufb01tl taken an initiative to organize police personnel and<\/p>\n<p>  ifkkhila Karnataka Police Mahasangha was established<\/p>\n<p>\\EW,9x<\/p>\n<p>during 1986-87 and this was not iiked by the higher<\/p>\n<p>officers. The petitioner\/ appellant herein was Vr\u00e9 I1:\u00a7ojsred<\/p>\n<p>from service and he wanted to contest the   _<\/p>\n<p>well as pariialnentary elections by jg)iz1i11g.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>of his choice and that he sought&#8217; Ibif&#8221; C\u20acT:r\u00a5i\u00e9:ij&#8221;1&#8217;A.ii&#8221;:fO&#8217;I4::n\ufb01.fi&amp;j\u00a31<\/p>\n<p>under the Right: to InforI11\u00e9ii;ic&#8211;x} Acx:t-,v.  ,pr&#8217;-2:&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>request, the infoI&#8217;r1;at.ion  fu:.x9i&#8217;1is1:1\u00a2df 5 The<br \/>\npetitioner\/appe\ufb02ant h\u00e9rfiin  -answers to the<\/p>\n<p>foliowing four qu._\u00a2s1;i0I3.$&#8217;i&#8221;  * :1 V<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;1, &#8230;. ._&#8217;i_&#8217;he_&#8221;f\u00e9Lt3;1i1y*&#8211;\u00bb._&#8221;::1em&#8217;ct2::s.\u00bb&#8217;state police who<br \/>\nthcmseiwas \ufb01at gc\u00e9vcrnment servant, if wants<br \/>\nb\u00e9eome &#8216;Pz&#8217;ajaI&#8217;ajyam er Congess<br \/>\n?ar&#8217;1:}aj ?53{:0IE1\u20acS- ..ii1e7g:-.;1L'&lt; <\/p>\n<p> _ Tiie-.Vp9:nip1;;3.e\u00a3:of Prajarajyam or Congess<br \/>\n  pan ii)t3.c1is&amp;,z&#039;ib1}.ted in non prohibited araa<\/p>\n<p> &quot; A _  lik\u00e9 :&#039;pQlisi;e quarters.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. Elm  the family members of police<\/p>\n<p>A &#8220;becoI&#8217;):&#8217;3\u20acj; \u00e9ctive members or office bearers of<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8221;&#8216;&#8212;p0E.i;ticai\u00b0 pariiies Wi\ufb02 that e\ufb02hct on the post of<br \/>\npralic\ufb01 sta\ufb01&#8221; (W111 they lose their post)&#8217;<\/p>\n<p> 4. The family memmrs of the state police<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;entirely if join. Prajarajyam er COI{1\u00a7&#8217;\u20acSS Party<\/p>\n<p>enbiock, Whether state election cemmis\ufb01on hats<br \/>\ngot any objection.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>K2<\/p>\n<p>The foiiowing answer was given to the above questions<br \/>\nunder the Right to II1fOI&#8217;I}.&#8217;1ati(}I1 Ac:t, 2005:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;As per the 1&#8217;u1\u00a2:&#8217;:s 5(3) to (4) of Kaxnataka;*&#8217;6ix;j1 5<br \/>\nServices (Conduct) Ruies, 19665 &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Gcvemment servant or his\/her\u00bb  ..ffaJ_niiy . V<br \/>\nmembers can participats&#8217; &#8220;321    L&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>activities.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Beirig aggrieved by the said.&#8217;i1:fQ1ms;tid1%   v<\/p>\n<p>the Right to informati\u00e9n,   _V Act,&#8221;  i_ 5, the<\/p>\n<p>I petitianerj appellant h\u00e91*si:\u00a33_ \ufb01i.\u00a2d%.:_\u00bb&#8217;iP};&#8217;.&#8221;P,Vi%E\u00a7\u00a7L&#8217;5,627\/ 2009 ts the<\/p>\n<p>effect that the en-dQ_rseme11t  533%&#8217; respondent is<br \/>\nnot correct anti   .1zia\u00a53icj &#8216;i\u00e9\u00e9iitsguashed.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. &#8216;1&#8217;h\u00a7;3. 2 ducige by his order dated<\/p>\n<p>9.3.2099 LA hsid :iI1fD}&#8217;I}1ati{)I1 sought far by the<\/p>\n<p>  petitic\u20aciz\u00e9f;&#8217;af;p\u00a2Ha:it&#8221;}i\u00e9reiI} was fumished as per the Right<\/p>\n<p>its  2005 and the petitiorxer\/appeilant<\/p>\n<p>it  _ hersin is.__vi3ot.7cs11fem&#8217;ed with any right to chaiienge the said<\/p>\n<p>it   and the same amounts to abuse of the<\/p>\n<p> s._\u00ab;&#8217;3r;&lt;$Visio11 of Right to Infsrmation Act, 2605 and<\/p>\n<p>it ac\u00e9ordirigly, the writ petition has beer: dismissed. Being<\/p>\n<p>&#039; it aggieved by the order \u00e9aited 9.3.2009 dismissing the writ<\/p>\n<p>w<\/p>\n<p>=2:\n<\/p>\n<p>petition, this writ appea} is \ufb01led by the petitioner. The<\/p>\n<p>learned eozmse} appearing for the appeilant reitere\u00a3ed.tI1e<\/p>\n<p>arguments submiited befere the iearned  _<\/p>\n<p>further Submitted that the writ petition   to  .. <\/p>\n<p>allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. On the other hand, lear\ufb01ed <\/p>\n<p>argued in suppert of &#8220;tle oz&#8217;d&#8217;er&#8217;Vr.:&#8217;\u00a7e&#8217;e$d  learned<\/p>\n<p>Single Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>contentions &#8216;ur\u00e9gerii-&#8220;&#8216;*}.eerned emmsel appearing for<\/p>\n<p>the partieSV&#8221;eri\u00e9_sei&#8217;utLme\u00a7\u00b0; the materia} on record.<\/p>\n<p>  . V. ~5&#8217;r&lt;V3&#039;x&quot;1;1&#039;1i1&quot;i3*;xef\u00abVmateI&#039;ia1 on record weuid eleariy<\/p>\n<p>&#039;Vehes\u00e9z\ufb01 irpetitiorier\/appeilant herein sought for<\/p>\n<p> _answersgteiethe four questions under the Right to<\/p>\n<p>H H  frxfexieie\ufb01ee Act from the Director General and Inspector<\/p>\n<p> of Pelice. The endorsement has been issued and<\/p>\n<p>VT  &quot; tile Director General and mspecior General of Police has<\/p>\n<p>&#039; A. furnished answer &#039;me the said questions stating that as per<\/p>\n<p>W&#039;<\/p>\n<p>Rules 5[i) to (4) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Conduct)<\/p>\n<p>Rules, 1966, no government servant er i&quot;1iS\/h\u00a73I&#039;L&quot;f\u00a3\u00a7i1&#039;\ufb02ily<\/p>\n<p>members can participate in political  i &quot;   <\/p>\n<p>basis of answer gven by the .[)i_1_&#039;eetc_af    <\/p>\n<p>inspector General of Police, the wzzfit ifpetitiorz &#039;v.?s.s an<\/p>\n<p>the gonad that the enclorseteent is V not i&#039;eo:*:jeet,.  The-&#039;<\/p>\n<p>petitioner\/appellam herein es.x1.rioi?.. \u00a5:1eLAag,gI&#039;ieved_.;3erso1} as<br \/>\nno action whatsoever has   &quot;er: the basis of<\/p>\n<p>information   the information<\/p>\n<p>sought &#039;i&#039;(&#039;}1&quot;*   i&quot;-}oetiitioiiez&#039;\/Vleappe\ufb02ant herein, the<br \/>\nH\ufb02ornia\ufb01oii  has&#039; ftiiittished as per the Right to<\/p>\n<p>I11f&#039;\u20ac)I&#039;IIv}_8\u00a7I,i01&#039;;1i4&#039;)5.CV1i&#039;,   aggieved by the irlformation<\/p>\n<p> V&#039; &#039;-f12rni.si1e\u00a7i.A by the &#039;2\ufb01&#039;~&quot;&quot;~&#039; respondent, the writ petition was<\/p>\n<p>&quot;1 Judge has rightly held that the Act<\/p>\n<p>has  apolieaiiorz te a case where a party wants te put<\/p>\n<p>questidi1.s&#039;3~and get answers an\u00e9 even if some answers are<\/p>\n<p> T.&quot;g\u00a5,ve.n_:&#039;.&#8211;&#039;u31der a misceiiception that the Authorities are<\/p>\n<p>    te give answers to the questions put by an<\/p>\n<p>&quot;VVappiiea1&quot;\ufb02; and this itself would not confer any right; on the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner] appellant herein and it shall amount to abuse<\/p>\n<p>of the provisions of the Righ{ to Information <\/p>\n<p>Leanied Single Judge has rightly dismiss_63:\u20ac1&quot;&#039;   <\/p>\n<p>petition. Having regard to the above sais\u00e9  9&amp;1&#039;  <\/p>\n<p>record, the order passed by tI1e:&#039;\u00bb1ea1f\ufb01e\u00e9i  <\/p>\n<p>justi\ufb01ed an\u00e9 does not su\ufb01&quot;er&quot;f_&#039;1&quot;o.m atiy \u00e95:1ro1&#039;T&#039;{\u00a7fAVVi\u00a7}egaiity as;  L&#039;<\/p>\n<p>to call for mtexferexgge    appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, We hold  -is&#8217; deveid sf merit<\/p>\n<p>arid pass me ._ h . . _.\n<\/p>\n<p>The   <\/p>\n<p>$d\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>Chief Justice<\/p>\n<p>3\u00bb sdl&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;  l;;:\u00a7dex::&#8217;A.&#8217;?f%\/ No<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri V Shashidhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE IDATED &#8216;i&#8217;}~i1S&#8221;I&#8217;I:~iE 2ND DAY 0;&#8217; APRIL 200.9 j PRESENT THE I~ION&#8217;BLE MR. P.D. BINAl{ARAN, c}%::1\u00a7:\u00a7*1V;31js&#8217;~T1g\u00a3\u00ab3_V &#8216; &#8216; AND THE HONBLE MR.J{}Sj&#8217;}C,E V.i&lt;:},M WRIT APPEAL NQ.978 &#039;GM -9 Pouch BETWEEN: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18199","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri V Shashidhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri V Shashidhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-04T14:31:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri V Shashidhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-04T14:31:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":933,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri V Shashidhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-04T14:31:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri V Shashidhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri V Shashidhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri V Shashidhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-04T14:31:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri V Shashidhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-04T14:31:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009"},"wordCount":933,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009","name":"Sri V Shashidhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-04T14:31:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-shashidhar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-2-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri V Shashidhar vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18199","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18199"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18199\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18199"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18199"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18199"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}