{"id":182015,"date":"2010-08-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010"},"modified":"2019-01-05T17:27:57","modified_gmt":"2019-01-05T11:57:57","slug":"sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri. D M Chandrappa vs Sri Muralidhar on 20 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri. D M Chandrappa vs Sri Muralidhar on 20 August, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT__E?\u00a7l\\NC\u00a7.A~i:,\u00a2R._E\" \n\nDATED THIS THE 20\"\" DAY OF AU.G-US T,. go; o_ _: \"  \n\nBEFORE  f: \n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTTCOTE A.i'\\E\"...\u00a7'\/'ENUC.fJ:VP;\u00a735#A.V\u00a7\u00a23WDA:i\"\n\nWRIT PETITION NO':2'2_'816V\/2O\"10._E$f\u00a7\u00a5-(ifPC)\nBETWEEN:   X   \n\nSr} D.M.Chandrappa,  \n\nSon Of Dodda_yy,3ppa',' \"  _   \nAged about\"54\"D:vYears1;.   4'   \nResidingat\"MeTeL:ote, \" V.   E\nTubagere Hoibi\u00e9,  T _  \u00ab_\nDoddVaTb.ai!\"ap_ur;&gt;:s--I;Ta_fu--k; '\nBangalor\u00e9O'RL$.rai E)ist.riCt,\n\n . .    ---- ...PETITIONER\n(By M'\/As. Mylar.aiah~.Ass.Ocia'tes, Advs.)\n\nANDD;\n\n \"  _  M u--ralidiTa T} \"\" 'A 'V\n\n, . :3Orsoo*f_KT,ishnappa,\n \"Ag_'ed_ abo_u{.32 years,\n\" .__Resir1'iv\u00bbn_gjat C\/o.B.\\\/.Ramakrishnappa,\n\n\"  Door !\\io.'191, 15' Cross,\n\nVe'nug'opafaswamy\u00bbTemple Road,\nBangafore.\n\nA   Sridhar,\n\n' \"Son of Krishnappa,\n\nAged about 30 years,\n\nResiding at C\/o.B.V.Ramakrishnappa,\nDoor No.191, 1\" Cross,\nVeraugopalaswamy Temple Road,\nBangalore.\n\n\n\n8. Smt. Mahadevamma,\nW\/o. Sri Venkateshaiah,\nD\/o. l-ianumantharayappa,\nAged about 44 years, 1 * ._ \nResiding at Meiekote Village,  . \nTubagere Hobli, \nDoddaballapura Taluk.' \n\n2.   \"v..2.'.=RE;i5l2(\u00a7NDENTS\n\nThis writ petition is f.ii'ed*u'nder._Articles 226 &amp; 227 of\nthe Constitution of India, pra\u00a7;_'ing\"'*~tovvi quash the order dated\n16.6.2010<\/pre>\n<p> passed on I_gA.N-o~.VI i_n2l&#8217;O_&#8217;;S.i$io.9\/2006 by the<br \/>\nLearned Civil 3udge._..(S&#8211;.r..Dna.)_ Dc;dda,ballapura, as per<br \/>\nAnnexure &#8211; G: and thereby dismijss the application filed by<br \/>\nthe responci&#8217;ent}:js~i?sio.6&#8243;&#8211; D_efenda~nt&#8217; No&#8221;.&#8221;6 under Order I, Rule<\/p>\n<p>10(2) read&#8217; \\Jvi.tFr&#8211;..S&#8217;e_ctio_ij~,1&#8217;E1.&#8217;o_f&#8217;t~he.\u00abCode of Civil Procedure.<\/p>\n<p>_T.his&#8217;2&#8243;Detit:i::n.coining&#8217;o&#8217;n~~for preliminary hearing this<br \/>\nday,,the comet n_1ade~th&#8217;e. _foi_lo&#8217;wing.<\/p>\n<p>2s2bRDER<\/p>\n<p> Plaintiff isthe-lpetltioner. He has instituted a suit for<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; ;p&#8217;artiatio_n~land&#8221;separate possession. 4&#8243;&#8216; defendant \ufb02ied the<\/p>\n<p>2&#8217; &#8216;written&#8217; stajtefrnent. 6&#8243; defendant has filed separate written<\/p>\n<p>sta.t&#8217;e.r.nent24which is at Annexure&#8211;C and was adopted by<\/p>\n<p>defendants 7 and 8. He has contended that, the suit<\/p>\n<p>lip-Eropierties are joint family properties and the plaintiff has<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Tiled the suit without including all the legal heirs of late<\/p>\n<p>Mariyanna and his sons and the suit is intended to take<\/p>\n<p>\\\/~ .\n<\/p>\n<p>J<\/p>\n<p>away the shares of le al heirs of late &#8220;Kaj&#8217;ri~va&#8217;r&#8217;2rna.,.<\/p>\n<p>Marishamanna and Doddalappayand tha_t&#8221;h&#8217;e&#8221;i:s&#8217;;val&#8217;so,&#8217;jentitled5 <\/p>\n<p>to a share in the suit properties and.\n<\/p>\n<p>Court fee for his share. He has stated that&#8217;.:thfe_ipl\u00bba.in&#8217;tiffeand<br \/>\ndefendants 1 to 5 alone  r.iVght&#8221;to clavirnsihare in the<br \/>\nsuit properties_inciud_i_h\u00abg the  of Kariyappa and<br \/>\nMarishamannaf Defendant  order 1 Rule<br \/>\n10(2) r\/w  as the additional<br \/>\nplaintiff, the prayer in the said<br \/>\n consideration of the<br \/>\nrecordleoif support from the decision of<\/p>\n<p>this.Courtu&#8221;&#8216;in:VA&#8217;the case&#8217; of K.L.Sl-HVANANJAMURTHY vs.<\/p>\n<p>  (2fJfVO&#8217;\u00a7HA(6) KLJ 174), has found merit in the<\/p>\n<p> has allowed I.A.6. Defendant 6 was<\/p>\n<p>ord_eredc-tot-eh transposed as plaintiff by paying necessary<\/p>\n<p>Courtfepye. The said order has been questioned in this writ<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;_i\u00bb&#8221;$.l.I\/&#8221;.&#8217;?f.&#8221;i&#8217;9&#8243;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>2. Sri Siddamallappa, learned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner would contend that, the order is irrational<\/p>\n<p>\/&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>\/\u00b0<\/p>\n<p>and illegal. Learned counsel submitted tha-ti;  .<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;d&#8217;efend,a ht<\/p>\n<p>was not impleaded as a party to the p&#8217;roc&#8217;eedin&#8221;g&#8217;s,,_&#8221;_thegiot; <\/p>\n<p>himself impleaded as additionatdefendarit_&#8217;a~nd<br \/>\nnot open to him to seek-l.i:_rans&#8217;posVitfon&#8221;asA~~.;pl~ai.nt:iff and<\/p>\n<p>continue the suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. I have perused .ethe&#8221;-writ&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;;mi[e\u00a2rioiieiiiiea to I.A.6 and the<\/p>\n<p>4. A  &#8216;this;\n<\/p>\n<p>stand   the writ petition would<br \/>\n defendants 1 to 5 are now<br \/>\nsaiiind&#8221;\u00abtogether_.ia:nd&#8217;:&#8217;areLV&#8221;&#8216;d&#8217;esirous of partitioning the suit<\/p>\n<p>pF0p.ertieS4&#8243;4i::7&#8217;:i()l&#8217;i\u00a7&#8217;St thesmseives. However, 6&#8243;&#8216; defendant<\/p>\n<p>  hayixriing-.&#8221;ifiied,the written statement has contended that the<\/p>\n<p> ancestral properties and he is also<\/p>\n<p>er&#8217;i.ti&#8217;tled,to_ share. In the written statement itself he has<\/p>\n<p> taken&#8221; stand that, he is prepared to pay separate Court<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;&#8211;&#8220;_&#8217;s&#8217;ee&#8217; and obtain his share. In the circumstances and in View<\/p>\n<p> oi&#8217; the decision in the case of K.L.SHIVANANJAMURTHY<\/p>\n<p> (supra), the Trial Court has found merit in the application<\/p>\n<p>and has allowed the same. \\g\/<\/p>\n<p>\/J<\/p>\n<p> is it<\/p>\n<p>5. In the case of R.S.MADDANAPPQ.l(lj}fr;E\ufb01l&#8217;SED)&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>AFTER HIM sv HIS LEGALMREPR&#8217;ES&#8217;E&#8217;i\\l5f?(fi&#8221;\u00bb&#8217;.ES is-.3\/ks&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>CHANDRAMMA AND ANOTHER,  &#8216;rises&#8217;  if<\/p>\n<p>transposition of defendant\u00bb?-s._.a co}plaintift&#8221;&#8216;Q\u00a7a\u00bbsj&#8217;n&#8211;ot allowed<\/p>\n<p>by the Courts below.  ra.i.Se\u20acl.e__bY,i\u00a7 the other<br \/>\ndefendants was not A..e_orrec3tly;_conisigdemd and while curing<br \/>\nthe technical defect, it..has..be.e_n_hei&#8217;d as1v,.fo.Ilows:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;15. :l\\io&#8217;\ufb01r..regafdinglthellseclond&#8221;point, this objection is<br \/>\npureiyl&#8217;Vte.chnical.&#8221;=w.5fije&#8217; plain\ufb01ff sued for partition of the<\/p>\n<p>_suit_  &#8220;the ground that they were<br \/>\ninherifteftijoiiitly&#8217;hj?&#8217;h_er and by the first defendant and<br \/>\nKc-laimed&#8211;  of her share from the other<br \/>\ndefendants -whoflwere wrongfully in possession of the<\/p>\n<p>_l &#8221; roperti&#8217;es.,l: She also alleged that the first defendant<\/p>\n<p>A  did  co~\u00bboperate in the matter and so she had to<br \/>\n  &#8220;the suit. The first defendant admitted the<br \/>\n title to half share in the properties and<br \/>\ncigaiined a decree also in her own favour to the extent<br \/>\n&#8216;ofihe remaining half share in the properties. She<\/p>\n<p>if .__eould also have prayed for her transposition as a co\u00bb<br \/>\nplaintiff and under O.I R.lO[2) CPC, the Court could<br \/>\nhave transposed her as a co\u00bbplaint1&#8217;ff. The power<br \/>\nunder this provision is exercisable by the Court gygn<\/p>\n<p>suo motu. As pointed out by the Privy Council in<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Bhupendra V.Rajeswar, 58 End App 228;-XAIR&#8217;V:-:sf:9\u00e93:.l.___Pc<\/p>\n<p>162} the power ought to be exercisedtay <\/p>\n<p>doing complete justice betweer;&#8211;the 7pa1jties:\u00bb.&#8217;l&#8217;_<\/p>\n<p> legnpliiasis  A .  7]:\n<\/p>\n<p>6. Keeping in View th.e&#8221;s.tandA&#8221;ta-i\u00a7*&#8221;&#8216;V&#8221;ciel&#8217;\u00b0&#8217;endant<\/p>\n<p>in the written statement  fact that &#8216;theplaintiff and<br \/>\ndefendants I to &#8216;settle the dispute<br \/>\namongst thernse_lves:,&#8221;th&#8217;e jvtllstified in allowing<br \/>\nI.A.6 and  to transpose<br \/>\nhimse_lf_VVas&#8217;~,a;&#8217;  i&#8217;  is no irrational act or<br \/>\nillegality co}n_ml.~tteAll&#8217;ti&#8217;iiilay:Ath\u00a7._l::i&#8217;ri_al&#8217;t Court, calling for<\/p>\n<p>interference in th=e_wriVt <\/p>\n<p>  l:_e.su&#8217;i\u00abt, writpetition fails and is dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>HowVe~.-get,&#8217;  the petitioner\/plaintiff to oppose the<\/p>\n<p>:i:i:l.aim afterthe tralnlsplosition, in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p>sd\/- :\n<\/p>\n<p>JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri. D M Chandrappa vs Sri Muralidhar on 20 August, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT__E?\u00a7l\\NC\u00a7.A~i:,\u00a2R._E&#8221; DATED THIS THE 20&#8243;&#8221; DAY OF AU.G-US T,. go; o_ _: &#8221; BEFORE f: THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTTCOTE A.i&#8217;\\E&#8221;&#8230;\u00a7&#8217;\/&#8217;ENUC.fJ:VP;\u00a735#A.V\u00a7\u00a23WDA:i&#8221; WRIT PETITION NO&#8217;:2&#8217;2_&#8217;816V\/2O&#8221;10._E$f\u00a7\u00a5-(ifPC) BETWEEN: X Sr} D.M.Chandrappa, Son Of Dodda_yy,3ppa&#8217;,&#8217; &#8221; _ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182015","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri. D M Chandrappa vs Sri Muralidhar on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri. D M Chandrappa vs Sri Muralidhar on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-05T11:57:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri. D M Chandrappa vs Sri Muralidhar on 20 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-05T11:57:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":889,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri. D M Chandrappa vs Sri Muralidhar on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-05T11:57:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri. D M Chandrappa vs Sri Muralidhar on 20 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri. D M Chandrappa vs Sri Muralidhar on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri. D M Chandrappa vs Sri Muralidhar on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-05T11:57:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri. D M Chandrappa vs Sri Muralidhar on 20 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-05T11:57:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010"},"wordCount":889,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010","name":"Sri. D M Chandrappa vs Sri Muralidhar on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-05T11:57:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-d-m-chandrappa-vs-sri-muralidhar-on-20-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri. D M Chandrappa vs Sri Muralidhar on 20 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182015","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182015"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182015\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182015"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182015"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182015"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}