{"id":182287,"date":"2009-06-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009"},"modified":"2016-07-26T20:40:20","modified_gmt":"2016-07-26T15:10:20","slug":"smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Ramabai vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Ramabai vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH coum' er KARNATAKA :\" _ _  '\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAEA % kk  \n\nDATED THIS THE 25?\" nAY%'O,F\u00a7iJid\u00a3,X2\/9\u00a79. ,  A T\n\nSm'-*~*-vi-      \nTHE Hom3:..E MR. 3vL!.'\u00a7TICE.;'-'ss\u00e9-'4_;<;';%}'('*B'.. H1:\u00a7:'ci~:I<;\u00e9R1\n\n \n\n1. SMT      \nw\/o LATE QEE1?.E_NDRA,T'iL_GULg\nAGED A3euTkaoyzAa,s;kTkJ%%%"   \n\n2. sin HANU'M4ANTF\u00a73&._FiAO \ns\/o LATE DE'EREf*3VDRA'TILGUi.,\n . A Acm Asaur 65'-\u00a5E.A.RS:\n\n E33} sa:NzvAS%aAo\n%s;r:3 L\ufb01.TE-\u00ab..\u00a3)TEERENDRA m.<sm.\nAGED'  YEARES,\n\nkw\/0 HANUMANHTA RAD TILGUL\n\nM' 'V %  ~AGED\u00a7 AEOUT so YEARS,\n\n  s:z:Ai~:Am'H\n\n'  [sic HANUMANHTA RAG TILGUL,\n" AGED ABGUT 40 YEARS,\n\n\n\n6. SR} JAYANTH\nI S\/'O HANUMANHTA mo TILGUL,\n3 AGED Aaour 37 YEARS,\n\n7. SR1 PRAKASH\ns\/0 HANLIMANHTA RAG mam,\nAGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, \ns. SMT SRIDEVI\nw\/0 SRINIVAS RAD\nAGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,\n\n9. SM? SHILPA\n9\/0 SRINIVAS RAD    \nAGED ABOUT 26 YEAREI.,_  _ \n\n19. sm SAP!SlA"D,\/'_ '0 }sAmvA\u00a7s  \nAGED,ABOUT.2{l f{5ARs;._   A\n\nALL THE \u00abAsove AREA   \nsax SHANKAR _BUILD'I.N'G, _."'\n\nBARAKOTRL' \n oHA:rgwAo A~5AAA&% %%%%% \n\n ALL. ARE REPRESENTED\n\n ._BYATHAEvI'R.._\u00abPO'u'J.E_R OF ATTORNEY HOLDER\nSRI*--G.GV.K\u00a3l\u00a5,KARNI,S\/O GOVIND RAD KULKARNI,\nAGED Aaour 43 YEARS,\n\nA No.55, :--.3_EETHA APARTMENTS\n' VIJAYA MRGAR,\n\n%* &  V,H'U<B.L_.AI \u00abA530 026.  PETITIONERS\n\n A    %  (33; SR: s.s. PATIL, Aw.)\n\n\n\nAND;\n\n1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA I\nREPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,\nREVENUE DEPARTMENT, '\nM..S.BUILDING..\n\nBANGALORE 550 001\n\n2. THE nepuw commrssaifz\ufb02s\ufb01} R  \nDHARWAD sua DIVISION.    \nDHARWHD. _\u00a7 _--_a'-u\n\n3. THE TAHSILEAR::1}S:"V   \nOFFICE OE'TAHASImAR_,;~\u00ab--.,_   R S  R\nDHARWAD    R   .. \n\n4, KARNATAKA'U\u00a5's!1\\{ERSi1f'-..._ S  \nPAVATE NAGAR,'       .\nDHARWAD' _   \nREPRESENTED' BY  RE<5IsTRAR.\nKARNATAKA uurvensrm\n\n om;-;awAn,%  %%%%% \n\n 'T,:HE\u00bb DE.PUT\u00a5:.'C'O.MMISSIONER\n\nvHAaw.An. \nDHIKRWAD-RSDIETRICT.  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
  ” *RSS’iR:’Rag”sSa1R.k.R;\u00a5tAm, HCGP FOR R1,, R3 & R5;
\n % .f_’SRI w\u00bb.1.L1:<AaJur~: s. HIREMA11-!,ADV. FOR R4)<\/p>\n
 R   ….-THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
\n .227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
\n SSQRSERSPONDENTS NO, 1 TO 3 AND 5 T0 CONSIDER THE<\/p>\n
S REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS DT. 30.8.2006 AND<\/p>\n
1\ufb01.5.2007 ( PRODUCED AS ANNEXURES E AND E1) AND<\/p>\n
CONSEQUENTLY ISSUE A DE-NOTIFICATION UNDER..'SE\u20acfi10N
\n48(1) oe= THE ACT IN RESPECT or THE SCHEDULE~\u00ab.i'_R.1._1V3g’i’ Saptapura Village,<\/p>\n
Dharwad  tf\ufb01fatquisition on 05.03.1971
\nunder SeCt\u00a7\u20acii\ufb01  aftii.\u00e9A’t\u00a7’ii:\ufb01’:L;\u00a7\u00a2quisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter
\ncalled ‘the .saidi4’Act’)’f:$ir t.izeVAwiiuri3o.\u00a7e \ufb01nd bene\ufb01t of the fourth
\n ii;1ive;fsit3i.”Tii\u00a7E finai notification under Section 6(1)
\nofitii\u00e9ipubiished on 11.03.1974. The award in<\/p>\n
 respect at the  is said to have been passed an 23.99.86.<\/p>\n
‘”~~.\u00abl’iT%:e”‘pgatitiohE.sE\u00a7 have not received the award notice, much less<\/p>\n
V  A  Attmjccingai\u00e9nsation amount.\n<\/p>\n
  The learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri 5.5. Pati!<\/p>\n
 that simiiariy piacg cavered by the same<\/p>\n
noti\ufb01cation were withdrawn from the acquisition proceedings.<\/p>\n
He submits that the lands standing at Sy. Nos.6:_2\/S:Ve’h:\u00e9i’\u00bbV:?’v-sef<\/p>\n
Saptapura Viiiage are already deleted from  <\/p>\n
proceedings.\n<\/p>\n
3. The secend submissieh-ef theA!eernw’t:e.uhsei  thetii *<\/p>\n
the tend requirement of the  ..VV:t_J:’r:ii\\rtV\u20ac_-frsity has
\nundergone a change, as t’i\u00e9.e”‘j?J_ni’\u00a7:tersity’heiho bifurcated and
\ntrifurcated. He submits_….th_et   ceiieqes and<\/p>\n
engineering coiie\u00a7.ee’.’:.1’e:er:ie: \u00e9f\ufb01iixiatedvvite'”Karnataka University,<\/p>\n
are new tieiinkedV”‘fr\u00e9ia’h”  University in View of the
\nestablishment “ef_ itajiii \u00a7ua:ja*h’i:_”..’University of Heaith Sciences and
\ny.isveshy:ere\u00a7eh Teehnei9_gicai University. Sri Patii aiso read out<\/p>\n
the  giete\u00a3.*.,A’V’f;’6_.11.O6, which states that the respondent<\/p>\n
  Uni\\fetsi’ty’is’Vnet%:.e$2\u00a7\u00e9ht:ing interest te take over the possession of<\/p>\n
 the iane.’ z\ufb01eaaisio reiied an the judgment of this Court in the<\/p>\n
ow. Gama immv v. THE secxerenv on-zennmem<\/p>\n
” aeiamms ma omens reported in IL}! zoos am: 5692.<\/p>\n
 ‘  iiriiaigihg these submissions, he requests that either a deciaration<\/p>\n
 the effect that acquisition pxgceedings have iapsed or an order<\/p>\n
‘ 6
\nfor the deletion of the lands from the acquisition proceedings be<\/p>\n
made.\n<\/p>\n
4. Sri R.K. Hatti, the learned Government Pleader has<\/p>\n
filed the statement of objections. Its perusal reveals that the<\/p>\n
possession of the lands in question is not taken.\n<\/p>\n
5. Sri Mallikarjun SJ-lirernath, the learned~~~~:o_tin’sel:._for<\/p>\n
the respondent University submits that the possession ‘theI<\/p>\n
lands could not be taken over on accogint oif’t\u00abhe_\ufb01iiAne_’:<\/p>\n
Detition brerlthe netioo–nsel~sr””tiie also submits that the lands in
\nquestion is “indleedV”  to meet the growing land
\n\u00a7fequirem.ents~ of the V–tl:nHiy_erslty. The University has proposed to<\/p>\n
‘set  .,deoal’_trnents like biotechnology.<\/p>\n
  see any foundation for seeking the reiief of<\/p>\n
\u00ab “–\u00ab..:jV\u00bb-d\u00ab\u00e9lC5\u00bb3TatiO\ufb01 .t_i_i3et the acquisition has lapsed. Section 11–A of the<\/p>\n
 A_c_:nhisition Act provides for the lapsinc of the acquisition<\/p>\n
. eltooeedinos, if no award is passed within two years from the<\/p>\n
‘i i\u00bb\u00bbdiate of the issuance of the declaration. The proviso to the said<\/p>\n
 Section states that where th said declaration has been<\/p>\n
pubiished before the commencement of the Land <\/p>\n
(Amendment Act) 1934 (as of 1934), vthse-swaifd  oasseuii it<\/p>\n
within a period of two years from the  x<\/p>\n
As the amendment has come intoforge on 24;Q9>;g{\u00a7,,;\u00a7”nd’ es the V<\/p>\n
award in this case is passed on 23–;ti’9f;86..rend’ one dey prior to
\nthe expiry of the tirne–frsrrie_’io:+e\u00e9\u00e9d:io@f_ the statute, no
\ndeciaratory reiief that the e\u00e9ovuisjition..’:’VspgoeeedVihas have lapsed,<\/p>\n
can be granted,   ‘V ‘<\/p>\n
7.  on case (supra) does
\nnot come tovzthe  eth_e-jroetitioners in any way, as the facts
\nof the reported Ease’ and ttiei\u00e9instant case are entirely different.
\n ifriatter ofxHth’e”‘reported decision was the issuance of
\n Section 16(2) of the Land Acquisition Act<\/p>\n
 that_4::’toov.i&iten; the beneficiary of the acquisition was an<\/p>\n
..,_.’_j’e\u20acl\u00a3ioationai”  which was not entitled to take the land,<\/p>\n
 hed taken the permission under Section 1&9 of the Land<\/p>\n
  Act, 1951.\n<\/p>\n
serious consideration. It is t<\/p>\n
8. But the alternative prayer of the petitioners merits<\/p>\n
te possession in law that if<\/p>\n
 Hg<\/p>\n
similarly placed persons are treatted disslmllarly, it offends Article<\/p>\n
14 of the Constitution of In\u00e9slla. when the lands at Sy. N\u00a7s;6:2A<\/p>\n
‘ and ? of the same village, covered under the same.~\u00abnetl\u00a7l_\u00a2el:l:\u00a7;2,<\/p>\n
acquired for the same purpose, are deleted from’_,t’h~e_aieqll\u00e9lsltlgn  <\/p>\n
proceedings, the Government has to;:r:Aerjsld\u00abe’r_the<\/p>\n
request also.\n<\/p>\n
9. No material is placed on Athefr.ec:erd ef”thls Ceurt as ta<\/p>\n
whether the land requiremersts\u00abef’–t_heA:.rese’e.htierlt University are<\/p>\n
audited at   llihllizersity and the Government
\nto decide th’e.e’xl:er;t: jreqhulred ta be acquired, but the
\nsame 31593., towlhel’   ebjectlve assessment of the
\n The “a”tq’ui*sitlon of the lands is for an extent of<\/p>\n
  water has \ufb02own since 1971, the year of<\/p>\n
it2….vissuahlcelef th.e”eer.elimlnary netiflcatlon. Earlier when the land<\/p>\n
. .:%_lAr’_;\u00ab:a;esl,Isltlon’eras raorted to, the resplendent University was a big<\/p>\n
 having the jurisdiction over the entire North<\/p>\n
 V\u00ab’i”K_r:rnaltaka Hyderabad Karnataka region. with the establishment<\/p>\n
V’eV4j”‘rApffcsulbaraa University, ‘there ls change in the territorial<\/p>\n
 eujurlsdlctlen of the fourth respondent Karnataka University. The<\/p>\n
58%<\/p>\n
Court also takes judicial notice of the change in the number of
\nthe coiieges affiliated to the respondent University. <\/p>\n
establishment of Rajiv Gandhi University of HeaIth41’t\u00a7cie\ufb01ces <\/p>\n
Visveshwaraiah Technological Univer_si.ty__ancE.5\/\u00e9t\u00a2\ufb01the.rY”‘ <\/p>\n
University, the medical, engineering;veterinary”~cb:5e\ufb01tesfs:?e<\/p>\n
deiinked from Karnataka University.’ The”vLsw. Urihr\u00e9ifs\ufb01vty. is ahlseih<\/p>\n
in the making. Therefore,__ it is  thst’*the Gv\u00e9vernment
\nand the University take a reiosk Air}. }tf\u00a7.e:vch’efrrz;red. circumstances.<\/p>\n
10. cm the5.vefe:\u00a7fesa:fd\u00bbtrfeassrrstvVI dispose of this petitien
\nwith a directior: to ~the’j_jVe_6v–ern\u00abrrrent to take a decision in the
\nmatter af.deIeti’ii9..:Vihe’.’–lsivsds”\u00b0in question from the ecquisitien<\/p>\n
rjrbceedvihf\ufb01s:_t.sk\u00a7ng lnte me.-‘airainafui consideration:<\/p>\n
‘A  s;\u00ab%%C  requirements cf the University ;\n<\/p>\n
 Witthdhrawai ef the similariy pieced lands fmm the
\n AA  accguisltien praceedlngs;\n<\/p>\n
ht   The Assistant Commissienefs letter that the
\n1 University has not been evincing interest to take<\/p>\n
over the psssession of the iand.\n<\/p>\n
\u00a35343<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
11. The petitioners’ applications for de-n9t’\u00a7fj(‘i-ti”et:.V”t.he<\/p>\n
{ands in question are to be disposed ef within  <\/p>\n
the date ef issuance of the certifie:<i""'\u00a2;-any\/A bf x"%tn <\/p>\n
accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n
12. Nee\u00e9less to observe  G(;\\?E3’j{3fT#:eR.\u00a3f\u00a7Sh3!l also
\nafford an oppartunity to’   th\u00e9 Havxcquisition,
\nnamely; the respongent  b’\u00e9ft$f:eu1’i.\u00bbV\u00ab–t\u00e9kina the \ufb01nai
\ndecision. Accordirr\u00a7h’k’:.:tt\u00a5V9}i_Vs, petatio\ufb01  of. No order as to<\/p>\n
costs.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Ramabai vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2009 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri IN THE HIGH coum’ er KARNATAKA :” _ _ ‘ CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAEA % kk DATED THIS THE 25?” nAY%’O,F\u00a7iJid\u00a3,X2\/9\u00a79. , A T Sm’-*~*-vi- THE Hom3:..E MR. 3vL!.’\u00a7TICE.;’-‘ss\u00e9-‘4_;<;';%}'('*B'.. H1:\u00a7:'ci~:I<;\u00e9R1 1. SMT w\/o LATE QEE1?.E_NDRA,T'iL_GULg AGED A3euTkaoyzAa,s;kTkJ%%%" 2. sin […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182287","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Ramabai vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Ramabai vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-26T15:10:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Ramabai vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-26T15:10:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1191,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Ramabai vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-26T15:10:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Ramabai vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Ramabai vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Ramabai vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-26T15:10:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Ramabai vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-26T15:10:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009"},"wordCount":1191,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009","name":"Smt Ramabai vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-26T15:10:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramabai-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Ramabai vs State Of Karnataka on 25 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182287","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182287"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182287\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182287"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182287"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}