{"id":182446,"date":"2009-02-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009"},"modified":"2016-04-14T00:17:35","modified_gmt":"2016-04-13T18:47:35","slug":"mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mohammed Ahsraf vs Aneesh Andrews @ Aneesh on 9 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Mohammed Ahsraf vs Aneesh Andrews @ Aneesh on 9 February, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 845 of 2006()\n\n\n1. MOHAMMED AHSRAF, S\/O. A.R. MOHAMMED\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. ANEESH ANDREWS @ ANEESH,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. AJITH BOSE, ARATTUKULAM,\n\n3. M\/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.ANTONY M. AMBAT\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\n\n Dated :09\/02\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n         R.BASANT & P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JJ.\n                     ------------------------------------\n                    M.A.C.A. No.845 of 2006\n                     -------------------------------------\n             Dated this the 9th day of February, 2009\n\n                              JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
R.BASANT, J.\n<\/p>\n
     The appellant herein was the claimant before the court<\/p>\n
below. He claimed compensation for personal injuries suffered<\/p>\n
by him in a motor accident. The claim was for an amount of<\/p>\n
Rs.10,00,000\/-. He was already a polio afflicted person. He was<\/p>\n
employed as the Secretary of a Grama Panchayat. It is submitted<\/p>\n
that polio has resulted in disability of 55% already before the<\/p>\n
accident was suffered. He was aged about 36 years on the date<\/p>\n
of the accident. He suffered multiple fractures. The accident<\/p>\n
obliged him to remain in the hospital as in-patient for a period<\/p>\n
exceeding 3= months. By-standers had to be engaged from the<\/p>\n
Red-Cross to attend on him. Before the Tribunal, PWs 1 to 3<\/p>\n
were examined and Exts.A1 to A22 were marked. The report of<\/p>\n
the medical board was secured by the Tribunal and that shows<\/p>\n
that the appellant had suffered permanent partial disability to<\/p>\n
the tune of 14% as a result of the injury suffered in the accident,<\/p>\n
in addition to what he had already suffered as a result of the<\/p>\n
polio. The Tribunal awarded a total amount of Rs.2,01,166\/-.<\/p>\n
The claimant is aggrieved by the quantum of compensation<\/p>\n
awarded.\n<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A. No.845 of 2006           2<\/span><\/p>\n
     2.   We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n
and the learned counsel for the Insurance Company. Detailed<\/p>\n
arguments have been advanced. The learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
appellant assails the impugned award on the following specific<\/p>\n
grounds:\n<\/p>\n
     i)   The quantum of compensation awarded under the<\/p>\n
head of loss of earnings is totally insufficient.<\/p>\n
     ii)  No compensation has been awarded for extra<\/p>\n
nourishment, damage to clothings etc.<\/p>\n
     iii) At any rate, the quantum of compensation awarded for<\/p>\n
the physical disability suffered is not sufficient and satisfactory.<\/p>\n
     3.   We have rendered our anxious consideration to the<\/p>\n
challenge raised in these specific grounds. There is evidence to<\/p>\n
show that for a period of about 2 years, the appellant\/claimant<\/p>\n
could not attend to his work. He was of course granted leave;<\/p>\n
but the total reduction in emoluments actually received is<\/p>\n
Rs.31,279\/- going by Ext.A19. The learned counsel submits that<\/p>\n
the Tribunal had not taken into account the fact that the<\/p>\n
appellant had lost his leave which he could otherwise have made<\/p>\n
use of for other purpose.           We take note of all these<\/p>\n
circumstances and we are of the opinion that the award of an<\/p>\n
amount of Rs.45,000\/- under the head of loss of earning (loss of<\/p>\n
leave) can safely be awarded.\n<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A. No.845 of 2006          3<\/span><\/p>\n
      4.   For the loss suffered for extra nourishment, damage<\/p>\n
to clothings etc., no amount has been awarded and we are<\/p>\n
persuaded to feel that an amount of Rs.5,000\/- can be awarded<\/p>\n
under this head considering the state of health of the appellant<\/p>\n
and also the period of treatment.\n<\/p>\n
      5.   The main thrust of the contention is that adequate<\/p>\n
compensation has not been awarded under the head of disability<\/p>\n
suffered. Though Ext.C1 report obtained by the Tribunal from<\/p>\n
the Medical Board shows that 14% disability has been suffered<\/p>\n
by the appellant, already a disabled person, on account of the<\/p>\n
injuries suffered, the Tribunal reckoned the percentage of<\/p>\n
physical disability at 10% and we are unable to find satisfactory<\/p>\n
reasons to justify such reduction. It cannot be lost sight of that<\/p>\n
the assessment of disability consequent to injury suffered in the<\/p>\n
accident is made by a Medical Board to which the Tribunal had<\/p>\n
referred the appellant. In these circumstances we find it safe to<\/p>\n
accept the report of the Medical Board that 14% physical<\/p>\n
disability has been suffered by the appellant as a result of the<\/p>\n
injury suffered.\n<\/p>\n
      6.   It is not in dispute that the appellant is continuing in<\/p>\n
employment and there is no actual reduction in the monthly pay<\/p>\n
packet on account of the disability suffered.        The Tribunal<\/p>\n
reckoned Rs.2,500\/- as the monthly income and computed the<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A. No.845 of 2006          4<\/span><\/p>\n
compensation assuming that 10% disability has been suffered.<\/p>\n
Inasmuch as there is no reduction in income now, this Court will<\/p>\n
have to take note of the fact that with 14% disability suffered, to<\/p>\n
perform the same work as he was doing earlier, extra strain on<\/p>\n
the part of th appellant is called for. That is because of the<\/p>\n
accident and certainly he is entitled to be compensated for such<\/p>\n
extra strain which he will have to put in to earn the same salary.<\/p>\n
The post retirement employment prospects of the appellant will<\/p>\n
also be necessarily impaired because of the disability suffered.<\/p>\n
That dimension of the loss will also have to be borne in mind.<\/p>\n
The disability suffered has reflections not only on the income<\/p>\n
earned from time to time, it has a reflection on the quality of life<\/p>\n
that the injured\/victim can aspire to live after the accident. The<\/p>\n
Tribunal did take that into reckoning and awarded an amount of<\/p>\n
Rs.20,000\/- under head of loss of amenities. Totally an amount<\/p>\n
of Rs.62,000\/- alone was awarded. The learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
appellant submits that this amount fixed is not fair and just. The<\/p>\n
fact that the appellant was already disabled and the disability<\/p>\n
suffered as a result of the accident has brought further misery to<\/p>\n
him in the quality of enjoyment of his life may be taken into<\/p>\n
account, contends the counsel.         Even though there is a<\/p>\n
contention that subsequently he is obliged to take leave<\/p>\n
frequently, there is no specific material to come to a positive<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A. No.845 of 2006          5<\/span><\/p>\n
conclusion on that aspect.      We are, in these circumstances,<\/p>\n
satisfied that resort to the multiplier-multiplicand method may<\/p>\n
not be proper, effective or just in the circumstances. We are<\/p>\n
satisfied that a global amount can be awarded for the permanent<\/p>\n
disability suffered taking into account the extra strain which the<\/p>\n
appellant will have to put in to perform the same amount of work<\/p>\n
which he was doing earlier without reduction in the monthly pay<\/p>\n
packet, the impairment of the post retirement employment<\/p>\n
prospects as also the reflection of the disability suffered on the<\/p>\n
quality of enjoyment of live which the appellant can aspire after<\/p>\n
the accident and the consequent disability.          After having<\/p>\n
rendered our anxious consideration to these aspects, we are<\/p>\n
satisfied that an award of Rs.1,10,000\/- as a global amount can<\/p>\n
be awarded for the reflection of the permanent disability suffered<\/p>\n
on the above aspect shall be clear and just.\n<\/p>\n
      7.   There is a contention that the interest awarded is not<\/p>\n
adequate. Only 6% has been awarded as interest. At least 7.5%<\/p>\n
must have been awarded, it is contended. We accept the same.<\/p>\n
      8.   We are not satisfied that the amounts awarded under<\/p>\n
any other head deserve modification.\n<\/p>\n
      9.   In the result:\n<\/p>\n
      a)   This appeal is allowed in part;\n<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A. No.845 of 2006          6<\/span><\/p>\n
      b)   The impugned award is modified and the appellant<\/p>\n
shall be paid the following further amounts (total Rs.68,000\/-):<\/p>\n
      i)   Loss of earnings      - Rs.15,000\/- more\n\n      ii)  Extra nourishment     - Rs.5,000\/- more\n\n      iii) The loss suffered on\n           account of physical\n           disability            - Rs.48,000\/- more.\n\n<\/pre>\n
      c)   The rate of interest is modified and it is directed that<\/p>\n
the interest shall be payable @ 7.5% per annum instead 6% per<\/p>\n
annum on the total amount.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                     (R.BASANT, JUDGE)<\/p>\n
                                (P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON)<\/p>\n
rtr\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Mohammed Ahsraf vs Aneesh Andrews @ Aneesh on 9 February, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 845 of 2006() 1. MOHAMMED AHSRAF, S\/O. A.R. MOHAMMED … Petitioner Vs 1. ANEESH ANDREWS @ ANEESH, … Respondent 2. AJITH BOSE, ARATTUKULAM, 3. M\/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD., For Petitioner :SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182446","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMohammed Ahsraf vs Aneesh Andrews @ Aneesh on 9 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mohammed Ahsraf vs Aneesh Andrews @ Aneesh on 9 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-13T18:47:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mohammed Ahsraf vs Aneesh Andrews @ Aneesh on 9 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-13T18:47:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1191,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Mohammed Ahsraf vs Aneesh Andrews @ Aneesh on 9 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-13T18:47:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mohammed Ahsraf vs Aneesh Andrews @ Aneesh on 9 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mohammed Ahsraf vs Aneesh Andrews @ Aneesh on 9 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mohammed Ahsraf vs Aneesh Andrews @ Aneesh on 9 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-13T18:47:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mohammed Ahsraf vs Aneesh Andrews @ Aneesh on 9 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-13T18:47:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009"},"wordCount":1191,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009","name":"Mohammed Ahsraf vs Aneesh Andrews @ Aneesh on 9 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-13T18:47:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-ahsraf-vs-aneesh-andrews-aneesh-on-9-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mohammed Ahsraf vs Aneesh Andrews @ Aneesh on 9 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182446","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182446"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182446\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182446"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182446"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182446"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}