{"id":18278,"date":"2009-02-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009"},"modified":"2016-02-03T17:02:18","modified_gmt":"2016-02-03T11:32:18","slug":"sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Rajanna vs Smt M Dhanalakshmi on 19 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Rajanna vs Smt M Dhanalakshmi on 19 February, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>This petition ceming on for admission,   \"\n\nCourt made the foilowing:\n\nQRDER\n\nThe chaiienga in this pet.\u00a7tie.n is V'm_\"the erdV7eV;f \n\n22.05.2008 passed by the \u00a5earn\u00e9'd.V\":3\"?V Ad\u00e9'iti._\u00a7nv$\u00a7 E\u00e9amiiy\nCourt Judge, Bangaiore and:.1M;%_}sc.;~$c$.~'1.rc$;.i2%aos, \u00e9v\u00e9\u00e9arding\nmaintenance amgmjt -of   En favour of\nthe reaspondeni.\"  ' ' A \n\n2.  th\u00e9iuwiiti\ufb02e petiticmer\/husban\u00e9\nmarried \u00a7i:g  =r\u00e9s;;V;:\u00e9\ufb01a?:\u00a7e_%it\/\u00a7\u00a7f%~fre~~~ on 09.93.1976. \ufb01e\n\nrespondent hL\u00e9':f_ \ufb01:e.\u00e9;- tkvaerinwetition in the Lower Ceurt<\/pre>\n<p> \u00e9&#8217;g;&#8211;aEns*\u00a3:&#8217;:&#8217;tr:e~. \u00a2et3tian\u00e9r&#8221;&#8221;a$vard\u00a7ng rrtaintenamta amount of<\/p>\n<p> which was apposed by the<\/p>\n<p>  petE\u00a3Eo_r\u00a7er. v.{i\u00a2::r;Vs&#8217;iT;:ler\u00a7ng the evidence 0? the parties and tha<\/p>\n<p> corgt\u00e9iwtiens, the impugrza\ufb01 orcier awarding the<\/p>\n<p>  ;&#8217;:2r\u00a7irzt;~\u00e9rri&#8217;ance ef Rs.6,60G\/&#8211;~ has been pas-zse\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>F 3. Heard Sri K.H.Ramu, Eearrzed ceuase\u00e9 for the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;g\ufb01etitioner an\u00e9 perused the impugned order. The teamed<\/p>\n<p>cozmsei fer the petitioner firstiy contended that, there is rm<\/p>\n<p>jzsstificatien fer the respondent to Eive ae\ufb01arately and c\u00e9aim<\/p>\n<p>\\<\/p>\n<p>the maintenance amount. Secondly, he conte\u00a7\u00a3\u00e9ee..&#8217;_&#8217;:\u00a7\u00a7:e*.:.-__<\/p>\n<p>the awaremg of maintenance amount at R.3;\ufb01,.:{fz{}{)&#8217;;&#8217;~~.&#8211;: pare&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>menth, when the pet\ufb01ziener has n\u00e9=,A_avQ.c\u00e9;ti6*r:_e:fic}- 4h&#8217;e&#8217;$-&#8230;_&#8217;;\u20ace.1v..&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>eaming capacity, is iiiegak an\u00e9.th4\u00a7_.rdEy\u00e9, &#8216;t_\u00a3}&#8217;e Lewef&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>not appreciates} the evidence&#8217; ee_ i&#8217;e\u00a7:or\u00a7\u00a7&#8221;&#8211;%;f\u00a7:T&#8217;tzheijpreeer<br \/>\nperspective, resuiting  the i.%%1&#8243;1&#8242;;:..\u00a7;g,;\ufb01&#8217;e:i_ order being<\/p>\n<p>erreneousiy passed.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.  **** &#8220;*E\u00a3y*&#8211;.Ehe&#8221;pe$%t\u00a7Eoner, he has married<br \/>\none Smt\ufb01ifn\ufb01aiaV:ee.&#8217;LseceVf\u00a7&#8217;de..:\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;ife.&#8217; Out of the saie wedlack,<\/p>\n<p>he has c:\u00a71i\u00a7dV reg\u00a7. v.AeceVrd.\u00bbEhg.._&#8221;~~io the petit\u00e9ener, respendent is<\/p>\n<p>.~-\u00e9he   an:dA&#8221;&#8221;t%zey_.a=veere at? Ewing together. &#8216;%&#8221;he very<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&#8221;.fec:f\u00a7&#8221;\u00a5;\u00a7i;at&#8211;v._\u00a7he:&#8217;\u00abeetitioner has: married enether woman and<\/p>\n<p>hes.V\u00e9&#8217;c\u00a71i!eVre\u00e9?\u00a7j&#8211;3&#8217;tefeugh her. Further, accerding re the<\/p>\n<p>gpet\u00a7t%oi raer;V..VE\u00a7&#8217;e. was paying Rs.S,Q60\/~ per moeth as<\/p>\n<p>  .;f\u00a53aA\u00a7ritce;ftaE&#8217;\u00a7&#8221;ce ta the respendent, which fact indicates that,<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;\u00a7.tb&#8217;e&#8217;:je&#8217;  rm harmony between the parties. in View of the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\ufb01pp5ef\u00e9t\u00a7ener marrying ancther weman, the respen\u00e9ent \u00e9s<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;4 justi\ufb01ed Er: iivieg seearateiy.\n<\/p>\n<p>X<\/p>\n<p>5. Since, R :5 mt the case of the petiti\u00a7;.;&#8217;;\u00e9\u00a7*&#8221;\u00a7\u00a7}a;*7t&#8217;v\u00bb..<br \/>\nthe raspendent is 3:3 earning person and has*.\u00a7\u00a7%c:r\u00a7\u00a7:\u00e9L ii}: &#8216; &#8221;<br \/>\nmaintain herseif and aise the fair-:t&#8221;&#8216;i;e&#8217;2as&#8217;: <\/p>\n<p>himself has paid to the resgscndent R$.::1\u00a7_g\u00e9&#8217;\u00a76}\u00a5&#8217;;f\u00a7er.,:n\u00e9}\u00a7&#8217;t\u00a7\u00e9A V&#8217;T&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>as mainterzancej, the ciairzi &#8216;-.. :&#8221;\u00a5&#8217;:,f-xde &#8220;s&#8221;&#8216;a:&gt;;r&#8217; -.payf%:..\u00e9%\u00a7&#8217;i&#8221; x\u00e9f<\/p>\n<p>maintenance Es justified.  _<\/p>\n<p>6, The oniy g&#8217;g&#8217;rc&gt;zJi&#8217;:f:d;._&#8221;=..whVi&#8217;.:\u00a73&#8242;:&#8217; survive for<br \/>\ncensideratEcn_i.s:&#8217;-.1:  &#8216; &#8221; &#8220;&#8221; H<br \/>\nf&#8217;f&#8217;\u00a7\u00a5he:t;&#8217;\u00e9:,&#8217;\u00ab:.;;:}; \u00a2 _a W\u00e9\u00a3'(i\u00a7i}g__ Gfi maitzteiaamie at<\/p>\n<p>Rs.6,'{380f~\u00ab _;:;\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7 mVe::;ii}2% bjygfh-c:_ L{3&#8243;&#8216;\u20ac&#8217;a5&#8217;\u20acI&#8217; Caurt is justified?<\/p>\n<p>3?. A\ufb01c._&lt;;:h:3\u00a7nf\u00a7&#039; _t&#039;{).\u00a7\ufb01\u00a3;::_&quot;_.:J\u00e9titEerzer, ha has two houses<\/p>\n<p>_..V.beari::\u00abg:\u00a7g.&quot;v &#039;?%!o.32&quot;,Ia._. __\u00a7;}t\u00a7! 136\/C, bath situated at<\/p>\n<p>IA&#039;Q$\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7nthV;\u00ae\u00a7ar,:VE.a.nga\u00a7ore 5680235&#039;, csmprising cf gmizsz\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>a\u00e9\u00e9ei \u00a7\u00a7:%s;t&quot;&quot;F\u00e9V%\u00a7_a:\u00bbr,&quot;Ti;;M1Ech proaerty was parchaseci by him?<\/p>\n<p>  be\u00e9r:g &#039;ar} &quot;5e;{n&#039;;z&#039;\u00a7&#039;;oyee of ETI factery. 803: the parties have<br \/>\n:  &#039;&quot;;,a,\u00a7V:a::s:d4_.Aex?VE\u20aci.\u00a7nce before the Lower Coam, wmch has mean<br \/>\n4&#039;.&#039;_&#039;&amp;&lt;::;3&#039;i:&#8211; ;:45E\u00a5:\u00a5\u00e9;=.A:red by it. The adm\u00e9ssicm cf the petitioner that, he<\/p>\n<p>VT  .. &#039;u&#039;s&#039;\u00e9\u00a7:\u00a7 is pay Rs.S,\u00a790;&#039;&#8212;- per manta as maintenance to the<\/p>\n<p>sreapandent, shaws that he had the\\:apacity to pay<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Rajanna vs Smt M Dhanalakshmi on 19 February, 2009 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda This petition ceming on for admission, &#8221; Court made the foilowing: QRDER The chaiienga in this pet.\u00a7tie.n is V&#8217;m_&#8221;the erdV7eV;f 22.05.2008 passed by the \u00a5earn\u00e9&#8217;d.V&#8221;:3&#8243;?V Ad\u00e9&#8217;iti._\u00a7nv$\u00a7 E\u00e9amiiy Court Judge, Bangaiore and:.1M;%_}sc.;~$c$.~&#8217;1.rc$;.i2%aos, \u00e9v\u00e9\u00e9arding maintenance amgmjt -of En favour of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Rajanna vs Smt M Dhanalakshmi on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Rajanna vs Smt M Dhanalakshmi on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-03T11:32:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Rajanna vs Smt M Dhanalakshmi on 19 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-03T11:32:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":554,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Rajanna vs Smt M Dhanalakshmi on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-03T11:32:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Rajanna vs Smt M Dhanalakshmi on 19 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Rajanna vs Smt M Dhanalakshmi on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Rajanna vs Smt M Dhanalakshmi on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-03T11:32:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Rajanna vs Smt M Dhanalakshmi on 19 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-03T11:32:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009"},"wordCount":554,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009","name":"Sri Rajanna vs Smt M Dhanalakshmi on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-03T11:32:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajanna-vs-smt-m-dhanalakshmi-on-19-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Rajanna vs Smt M Dhanalakshmi on 19 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18278\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}