{"id":182793,"date":"2010-10-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010"},"modified":"2015-07-05T02:14:48","modified_gmt":"2015-07-04T20:44:48","slug":"parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Parshanath vs K B Nagaraj on 28 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Parshanath vs K B Nagaraj on 28 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 23TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2910\nBEFORE A %j\n\nTI-IE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.SREENIV;a.\ufb01$ME':\"f2vOW\u00a53~A \n\nMiscellaneous First Appeal No. .8099.VDf\"'i.i.O(59  \" * . \n\nBETWEEN\n\nParshanath\n\nS\/0. Bramhaiah,\n\nAge : 51 Years, V   *  ' \nOcc: Nil (before who1'ssa1e'bu;sin'e-ssv}  \nRes: Dadaga, Bindige Navile vH:Db_1_'1.,'---  \n\n'  Appellant\n    Adv.)\nl .  'VB',  N .   4' V.\n* --S\/0. Boregowd-a,\n\n  Majm-,V__Res: Kenchanahalli,\n'Nagamangala Taluk,\n\n  -vM'a.r1djza___D1str1ct. [Owner--Tract0r)\n\n\" A  M'-3-.1Dager,\n\n __C)1'i.ef'1ta1 Insurance Co. Ltd.,\n.. 317$ Main, 4th Cross, Chamarajpet,\n'Bangalore. (Policy: 42000477 07\/ 0598)\n\n Respondents\n\n[By Sri. K Sridhar, Adv. for R2,\nR1 \u00bb--- notice dispensed with V\/(). dated 01\/10\/2010)\n\n .\n\n\n\nThis MFA is \ufb01led U\/S 173(1) ofMV Act against the\nJudgment and award dated: 10.07.09 passed in MVC\nNo.l423\/2008 on the file of Judge, Court of Small\nCauses &amp; Member, MACT, Bangalore, partly allowing\nthe claim petition for compensation and seeking\nenhancement of compensation. \n\nThis appeal coming on for Orders, \nCourt, delivered the following: 1  V' -3- \"\nJ U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>This appeal is by the Claimant &#8216;fr)_r&#8217;l-.enhaneem&#8217;erit flat 9<\/p>\n<p>compensation awarded by the Tribtinal.<\/p>\n<p>2. Though the matter is  in t};1e_ or\u00e91tet5&#8217;s;ii\u00e9t.&#8217; with&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>the consent of learned  for the<\/p>\n<p>parties. itis taite-n&#8217;u.p&#8221;fo__f&#8217;*\ufb01na1 disposal.<\/p>\n<p>3.  &#8220;For  sake of convenience parties are referred to<\/p>\n<p>  arec_._referred to in the claim petition before the<\/p>\n<p>4.&#8221;-._ Brie&#8217;f\u00ab\u00bb&#8217;f&#8217;acts of the Case are:<\/p>\n<p>if Tfiat on 10-l2-07, when the claimant was going<\/p>\n<p>if  the extreme left side of the road towards<\/p>\n<p> &#8221; -&#8216;Santhebeedi Aralimara at Bellur, a tractor bearing<\/p>\n<p>registration No.KA&#8211;54&#8211;T&#8211;179 came from opposite<br \/>\ndirection in a rash and negligent manner and dashed<\/p>\n<p>against him. As a result, the claimant fell doxnirrcand<\/p>\n<p>sustained injuries. Hence, he \ufb01led a c1a;i1n.&#8217;.,&#8217;petiti_.oi1.<\/p>\n<p>before the MACT, Bangalore, seeking <\/p>\n<p>2&#8242;. 10,00,000\/-. The Tribunal aby <\/p>\n<p>and award has awarded.co.rnpens,ation  <\/p>\n<p>with interest at 8% p.a.  quantum of<br \/>\ncompensation awardedt7by&#8217;&#8211;.the&#8217;  the claimant is<br \/>\nin appeal seelting en}&#8217;iar1&#8211;cerr1ent__of.corri&#8217;rpensation.<\/p>\n<p>5. A-.s~~  dis: = no.&#8217;:pd.iVspu*te&#8230;.regarding occurrence of<br \/>\naccident,&#8217;  liability of the insurer of the<\/p>\n<p>offending&#8221;xtei1i.cle.,  point that remains for my<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;~  _ Cofn\u00b0si(?,eration in the&#8217; appeal is:<\/p>\n<p>_   &#8216;\u00ab..,V\\&#8217;7\u00bbTt1ether the quantum of<\/p>\n<p>._ &#8216; e&#8217;o\u00abm&#8217;pe&#8217;n,,siation awarded by the Tribunal is<\/p>\n<p> jus&#8211;t&#8221;j- and proper or does it call for<br \/>\nenhafncement?\n<\/p>\n<p>  ..f\\,:&#8217;ft\u20ac1&#8243; hearing the learned Counsel for the parties<\/p>\n<p> perusing the award of the Tribunal, I am of the<\/p>\n<p> = ~.&#8211;13\/iew that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is<\/p>\n<p>%<\/p>\n<p>not just and proper, it is on the lower side and therefore<\/p>\n<p>it is deserved to be enhanced.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. The claimant has sustained the following injuries:<br \/>\nfracture of left ankle and injuries <\/p>\n<p>and other parts of the body.\n<\/p>\n<p>Injuries sustained by him are evidenft., fi&#8221;0:rnA the\u00bb it<\/p>\n<p>wound certificate &#8212; EX.P.3,  sl1i&#8217;nirnary&#8217;=::;_\u00a5<\/p>\n<p>Ex.P.4, Out Patient cards}-&#8216;\u00ab&#8211;..l$x.llE5;?.lll recentA\u00bb.i:x:.ray,:&#8217;3 <\/p>\n<p>&#8211; report &#8212; EX.P.8. X-rays &#8212;   Einpatient<\/p>\n<p>record &#8211;~ Ex.P.1O and~~..Sf\ufb01pporteti  evidence of the<br \/>\nclaimant and&#8217; doctor&#8217;  l=lP.Ws.1 and 2<\/p>\n<p>respectively-&#8216; V  V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;lias stated in his evidence that he<\/p>\n<p> p_ exaininedpvptheilclairriant on 5&#8211;i2~\u00ab08 and found that the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;  -._walking with limp on left side, there is<\/p>\n<p> in  joint and he is unable to perform his daily<\/p>\n<p> activities.&#8217; So he has stated the disability to the extent<\/p>\n<p>A   to whole body and 40% to left lower limb. He<\/p>\n<p>  has stated that he cannot say whether disability will be<\/p>\n<p>reduced if implant is removed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>8. Considering the nature of injuries, 320,000\/&#8211;<br \/>\nawarded by the Tribunal towards pain and suffering is<br \/>\non the lower side and it is deserved to be enhanced by<br \/>\nanother Rs.10,000\/~ and I award RS.30,000\/V:V_V&#8217;:&#8221;\u00e9ii&#8217;idv\u20acI&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>this head.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. As $13,600\/~ awarded bympthe &#8221; <\/p>\n<p>medical expenses is as per medical&#8221; A. <\/p>\n<p>the claimant for Rs.13,59_5&#8242;}&#8217;..:, the  andf&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>proper and therefore, it does&#8230;n:ot_ca1i for e&#8217;nhaneement.\n<\/p>\n<p>10. Claimant was V   inpatient in<\/p>\n<p>Adichunchun_a.giri.Hospital, {rem 10~12~07 to 4~1-O8 for<br \/>\na period_ of  the same, ?.3,000\/W<\/p>\n<p>awarded by theddribrinai towards incidental expenses is<\/p>\n<p>,A on the lowervside and it is deserved to be enhanced and<\/p>\n<p> \/&#8211; under this head.\n<\/p>\n<p> 11. &#8221; Ci-ainiant claims to have been earning i&#8217;. 1 1,000\/-<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;penmonth, by doing business in jaggery. But the same<\/p>\n<p>    not established. In the absence of proof of income,<\/p>\n<p>his income assessed by the Tribunal at 3&#8217;. 3,000\/&#8211; per<\/p>\n<p>month is just and proper. Nature of injuries suggest<br \/>\nthat, he must have been under rest and treatment for a<br \/>\nperiod of three months. Therefore, a sum of &#8216;1&#8217; .9,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>is awarded towards loss of income during laid u.pV_*p:e:iod<\/p>\n<p>as against ?&#8217; . 3,000 \/ &#8212; awarded by the Triburx&gt;\u00a7tl..&#8221; 0    .<\/p>\n<p>12. Considering nature of injuries.*&#8221;a1i&#8217;d::..&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>stated by the doctor and an arnou:ni..<\/p>\n<p>unhappiness which the claimant  to   0&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>rest of his life, 110,000\/y:__._afwarded .b&#8221;y*..theV,i\u00a7&#8217;i&#8217;ribuna1<\/p>\n<p>towards loss of amenities is  theilodwer side and it is<\/p>\n<p>deservecl. byvatdiother ?.5,000\/&#8211; and I<br \/>\naward&#8217;?     head.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.  of  iciiaimant is assessed at ?.3,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>   He &#8216;isiaiged about 57 years as evident from<\/p>\n<p>   Multiplier applicable to his age group<\/p>\n<p>  doctor has stated that he has suffered<\/p>\n<p> disabilii:;y of 40% to left lower limb and 20% to the<\/p>\n<p>  body. Tribunai has taken 10% disability. Which<\/p>\n<p>  not correct. As per 40% disability stated by the<\/p>\n<p>doctor to limb, disability caused to whole body comes to<br \/>\n&#8216;I3&#8217;. So, future loss of income works out to $42,120\/&#8211;<br \/>\n{?.3,000\/&#8211; X 18\/100 X 12 X 9) and it is awarded as<\/p>\n<p>against ? . 39,600\/- awarded by the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p>14. A sum of 335,000\/&#8211; is awarded  <\/p>\n<p>medical expenses.\n<\/p>\n<p>15. Thus the claimant is enti&#8217;t1_ed&#8211; forfollofwinvgsp<\/p>\n<p>compensation:\n<\/p>\n<p>1) Pain and    1, _?. H3V(A).000\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>2) Medical expe.n&#8217;ses-*  M T &#8216; p &#8220;33. l3,600\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>3) Incidental-expenses=_ &#8216; &#8221;  10,000\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>4) &#8220;If0wa&#8217;r_&#8217;ds loss of ineovnlifze V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p> _ 0 du&#8217;1fin_g&#8217;~]a&#8217;1&#8217;d_u-p__ period 3 9,000 \/-\n<\/p>\n<p>5) . Towa2f_ds:&#8217;ioss\u00bb..of amenities ?. 15.000\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>8)   Future elossltof income ?. 42, 120\/ &#8211;<br \/>\n  1&#8242; 7) u&#8221;F_uture Inedial expenses 2&#8242; 5,000\/~<\/p>\n<p>Total ?. 1,24,&#8217;720\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>  the appeal is allowed in part and the<\/p>\n<p> Judgtnent and award of the Tribunal is modified to the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;it extent stated herein above. The claimant is entitled for<\/p>\n<p>V&#8221;  &#8216;iii total compensation of &#8220;&lt;&#039;.1,24,720\/- as against<\/p>\n<p>1&#039;. 87,200 \/ &#8212; awarded by the Tribunal with interest at 6%<\/p>\n<p>iE&#039;i.r&quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>p.a. on the enhanced compensation of ?.37,520\/&#8211; from<\/p>\n<p>the date of claim petition till the date of realisation.<\/p>\n<p>17. The Insurance Co. is directed to deposi&#8217;t&#8211;.pthe<\/p>\n<p>enhanced compensation amount with iI1tE:.1&#8242;&#8221;~\u20ac3&#8243;:o4&#8243;&#8221;\u00a3&#8217;L&#8217;~d_\\_K\/&#8221;i&#8217;VI&#8217;;1&#8242;,IlVVi&#8221;1&#8242;..\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>two months from the date of receipt of.&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>judgment.\n<\/p>\n<p>18. Out of the enhanced co1&#8217;f1pe&#8217;nsatior;AISOAOA; <\/p>\n<p>proportionate interest is ordvered to he; in FD.<br \/>\nin any nationalized&#8217;or&#8217;]sch&#8217;ed\u00a7:.ied.._Bans}: in the name of<\/p>\n<p>the claimant for a period_ of   the remaining<\/p>\n<p>amount   is ordered to be<\/p>\n<p>released in his .favoiu1v*.&#8221; &#8212; &#8221; &#8216; \u00ab <\/p>\n<p>   order &#8220;as.._t.o costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-Vi<br \/>\nIudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Parshanath vs K B Nagaraj on 28 October, 2010 Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 23TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2910 BEFORE A %j TI-IE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE B.SREENIV;a.\ufb01$ME&#8217;:&#8221;f2vOW\u00a53~A Miscellaneous First Appeal No. .8099.VDf&#8221;&#8216;i.i.O(59 &#8221; * . BETWEEN Parshanath S\/0. Bramhaiah, Age : 51 Years, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182793","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Parshanath vs K B Nagaraj on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parshanath vs K B Nagaraj on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-04T20:44:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Parshanath vs K B Nagaraj on 28 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-04T20:44:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1008,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Parshanath vs K B Nagaraj on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-04T20:44:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parshanath vs K B Nagaraj on 28 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parshanath vs K B Nagaraj on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parshanath vs K B Nagaraj on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-04T20:44:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Parshanath vs K B Nagaraj on 28 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-04T20:44:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010"},"wordCount":1008,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010","name":"Parshanath vs K B Nagaraj on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-04T20:44:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parshanath-vs-k-b-nagaraj-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parshanath vs K B Nagaraj on 28 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182793","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182793"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182793\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182793"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182793"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182793"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}