{"id":182846,"date":"2010-03-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010"},"modified":"2018-09-23T23:25:57","modified_gmt":"2018-09-23T17:55:57","slug":"vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010","title":{"rendered":"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 22 March, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 22 March, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H.B.Antani,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/12026\/2009\t 6\/ 6\tJUDGMENT \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 12026 of 2009\n \n\n \n \nFor\nApproval and Signature:  \n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n1\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n2\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nTo\n\t\t\tbe referred to the Reporter or not ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n3\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\ttheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n4\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tthis case involves a substantial question of law as to the\n\t\t\tinterpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order\n\t\t\tmade thereunder ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n5\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tit is to be circulated to the civil judge ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\nMAHAMMED\nRAFIQ ABDUL REHMAN MEMON\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT &amp; OTHERS\n \n\n=========================================================\nAppearance\n: \nMR\nMM TIRMIZI for Petitioner. \nMS TRUSHA K PATEL, ASST. GOVERNMENT\nPLEADER for\nRespondents. \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n: 22\/03\/2010 \n\n \n\n \n \n ORAL\nJUDGMENT<\/pre>\n<p>\tBy<br \/>\nfiling this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of<br \/>\nIndia, the petitioner has challenged the order of detention No.<br \/>\nPCB\/DTN\/PASA\/629\/2009 dated 01.10.2009 passed by the Police<br \/>\nCommissioner, Ahmedabad City respondent No.2 in exercise of powers<br \/>\nunder sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti<br \/>\nSocial Activities Act, 1985 [hereinafter referred to as the PASA Act]<br \/>\ndetaining the petitioner as a bootlegger, as being illegal, invalid,<br \/>\narbitrary, void ab-initio and suffers from total non-application of<br \/>\nmind and also in violation of the provisions of Articles 21 and 22 of<br \/>\nthe Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tLearned<br \/>\nadvocate for the petitioner, Mr. Tirmizi, submitted that the grounds<br \/>\nof detention do not indicate any satisfaction recorded by the<br \/>\ndetaining authority that the activities of the detenu are detrimental<br \/>\nto public order, and, therefore, the detention order is bad and<br \/>\nillegal. He further submitted that the detaining authority has placed<br \/>\nreliance on a solitary case under the Prohibition Act but the same do<br \/>\nnot indicate anything to support disturbance to public order. He<br \/>\nfurther submitted that on behalf of the petitioner,  representations<br \/>\nwere made on 29.10.2009 and 02.11.2009 but the same has not been<br \/>\ndecided by the concerned authorities within a reasonable period, and<br \/>\ntherefore, on the ground of delay in deciding the representation<br \/>\nalso, the detention order requires to be quashed and set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tMs.\n<\/p>\n<p>Trusha Patel, learned AGP submitted that the detention order is just<br \/>\nand proper and detaining authority has passed the order after<br \/>\nconsidering all relevant aspects of the matter, and the same needs no<br \/>\ninterference. She has also relied on the affidavit filed by the<br \/>\ndetaining authority in support of her contentions.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tHeard<br \/>\nlearned advocate Mr. Tirmizi for the petitioner and Ms. Patel,<br \/>\nlearned AGP for the respondents. I have also perused the records.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIt<br \/>\nappears that on the basis of a solitary case, viz. Prohibition FIR<br \/>\nNo. 5018\/09 dated 06.09.2009 registered at DCB Police Station for 288<br \/>\nbottles of foreign liquor against the petitioner, the detaining<br \/>\nauthority held that the said activities of selling  liquor of the<br \/>\npresent detenu were harmful to the health of the public, and to<br \/>\nrestrain from carrying further illegal activities, the detenu has<br \/>\nbeen detained. He further submitted that the offence registered is as<br \/>\nback as 06.09.2009 while the detention order is passed on 01.10.2009<br \/>\nand hence there is a delay in passing the order of detention. The<br \/>\ndelay caused in passing the order of detention is not satisfactorily<br \/>\nexplained.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tOn<br \/>\nbehalf of the petitioner, it is submitted that on behalf of the<br \/>\npetitioner a representation was made by him 29.10.2009. It is the<br \/>\ndetenu&#8217;s case that till filing of the petition, he has not been<br \/>\nreplied and hence there is delay in deciding his representation and<br \/>\non that ground alone, his detention order requires to be quashed and<br \/>\nset aside.  In paragraph 9 of the affidavit in reply filed by<br \/>\nrespondent No.2, it is stated that:\n<\/p>\n<p>\t the<br \/>\nrepresentation dt. 29.10.2009 was received by me on 07.11.2009. As<br \/>\nthe order of detention was already approved by the State Government<br \/>\non 7-10-2009, the detenu was informed accordingly on 9-11-2009 and<br \/>\ncopies of the said representation were forward to the State<br \/>\nGovernment and to the Advisory Board on the same day .\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIt<br \/>\nthus appears from the above affidavit that the representation made on<br \/>\nbehalf of the petitioner has not been considered at all by the<br \/>\nconcerned authorities or by the State and a mere communication is<br \/>\ngiven to the detenu that prior to receipt of his representation, the<br \/>\nState Government has approved the order of detention. Thus, on the<br \/>\nground of not considering the detenu&#8217;s representation also, this<br \/>\npetition requires to be allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tMoreover,<br \/>\nexcept the statements of some anonymous witnesses, there is no<br \/>\nmaterial on record which shows that the detenu is carrying on<br \/>\nactivities of selling liquor which is harmful to the health of the<br \/>\npublic. In the case of Ashokbhai Jivraj @ <a href=\"\/doc\/687998\/\">Jivabhai Solanki v. Police<br \/>\nCommissioner, Surat<\/a> [(2001) (1) GLH 393), having considered the<br \/>\ndecision of the Hon&#8217;ble Apex Court in the case of Ram Manohar Lohia<br \/>\nv. State of Bihar (AIR 1966 SC 740), this Court held as under in<br \/>\nparagraphs 22:\n<\/p>\n<p>\t So<br \/>\nfar as the cases against the detenu are concerned, they have already<br \/>\nbeen registered.  They were against persons mentioned therein which<br \/>\nis stated in the grounds of detention by the detaining authority.<br \/>\nRegarding two statements having taken into account, the law laid down<br \/>\nby the Supreme Court in Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar, AIR 1966<br \/>\nSC 740 and reiterated from time to time including decisions referred<br \/>\nto by us hereinabove, the case falls under the maintenance of  law<br \/>\nand order  and not  public order .  The subjective satisfaction<br \/>\narrived at by the detaining authority, therefore, cannot be said to<br \/>\nbe legal, valid and in accordance with law. Since in the facts and<br \/>\ncircumstances, an order of detention could have been passed by the<br \/>\ndetaining authority for maintenance of  public order , the order<br \/>\ndeserves to be quashed and is hereby set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIn<br \/>\nthe case of <a href=\"\/doc\/271008\/\">Collector and Dist. Magistrate v. S. Sultan<\/a>  reported in<br \/>\nAIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 2096 the Apex Court held as under:-\n<\/p>\n<p> The<br \/>\ncrucial issue, therefore, is whether the activities of the detenu<br \/>\nwere prejudicial to public order. While the expression &#8216;law and<br \/>\norder&#8217; is wider in scope inasmuch as contravention of law always<br \/>\naffects order. &#8216;Public order&#8217; has a narrower ambit, and public order<br \/>\ncould be affected by only such contravention which affects the<br \/>\ncommunity or the public at large. Public order is the even tempo of<br \/>\nlife of the community taking the country as a whole or even a<br \/>\nspecified locality. The distinction between the areas of &#8216;law and<br \/>\norder&#8217; and &#8216;public order&#8217; is one of the degree and extent of the<br \/>\nreach of the act in question on society. It is the potentiality of<br \/>\nthe act to disturb the even tempo of life of the community which<br \/>\nmakes it prejudicial to the maintenance of the public order. If a<br \/>\ncontravention in its effect is confined only to a few individuals<br \/>\ndirectly involved as distinct from a wide spectrum of public, it<br \/>\ncould raise problem of law and order only. It is the length,<br \/>\nmagnitude and intensity of the terror wave unleashed by a particular<br \/>\neruption of disorder that helps to distinguish it as an act affecting<br \/>\n&#8216;public order&#8217; from that concerning &#8216;law and order&#8217;. The question to<br \/>\nask is : &#8220;Does it lead to disturbance of the current life of the<br \/>\ncommunity so as to amount to a disturbance of the public order or<br \/>\ndoes it affect merely an individual leaving the tranquillity of the<br \/>\nsociety undisturbed&#8221; ? This question has to be faced in every<br \/>\ncase on its facts.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.<br \/>\n&#8220;Public order&#8221; is what the French call &#8216;ordre publique&#8217; and<br \/>\nis something more than ordinary maintenance of law and order. The<br \/>\ntest to be adopted in determining whether an act affects law and<br \/>\norder or public order, is : Does it lead to disturbance of the<br \/>\ncurrent life of the community so as to amount to disturbance of the<br \/>\npublic order or does it affect merely an individual leaving the<br \/>\ntranquillity of the society undisturbed ? <a href=\"\/doc\/1378263\/\">(See Kanu Biswas v. State<br \/>\nof West Bengal (AIR<\/a> 1972 SC 1656).\n<\/p>\n<p>\tApplying<br \/>\nthe ratio of the above decisions, it is clear that before passing an<br \/>\norder of detention of a detenu, the detaining authority must come to<br \/>\na definite finding that there is threat to the  public order  and<br \/>\nit is very clear that the present case would not fall within the<br \/>\ncategory of threat to  public order . In that view of the matter,<br \/>\nwhen the order of detention has been passed by the detaining<br \/>\nauthority without having adequate grounds for passing the said order,<br \/>\nit cannot be sustained and, therefore, it deserves to be quashed and<br \/>\nset aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe<br \/>\npetition is allowed. The impugned order of detention dated 01.10.2009<br \/>\npassed by the passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City<br \/>\nrespondent No.2  against  the detenu is hereby quashed and set<br \/>\naside.   The detenu is ordered to be set at liberty forthwith,  if<br \/>\nnot  required  in  any other case.    Rule is made absolute<br \/>\naccordingly.  Direct service is permitted.\n<\/p>\n<pre>mathew\t\t\t\t\t[\nH.B. ANTANI, J.]\n\n    \n\n \n\t   \n      \n      \n\t    \n\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\t   \n      \n\t  \t    \n\t\t   Top\n\t   \n      \n\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court ========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 22 March, 2010 Author: H.B.Antani,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/12026\/2009 6\/ 6 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 12026 of 2009 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182846","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 22 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 22 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-23T17:55:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 22 March, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-23T17:55:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1363,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010\",\"name\":\"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 22 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-23T17:55:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 22 March, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 22 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 22 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-23T17:55:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 22 March, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-23T17:55:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010"},"wordCount":1363,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010","name":"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 22 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-23T17:55:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-22-march-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 22 March, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182846","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182846"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182846\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}