{"id":182917,"date":"2010-08-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010"},"modified":"2015-10-30T19:36:39","modified_gmt":"2015-10-30T14:06:39","slug":"anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Anandan K. vs Sarada on 31 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Anandan K. vs Sarada on 31 August, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 3791 of 2009()\n\n\n1. ANANDAN K., S\/O.KARUTHAKUNJU,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. SARADA, W\/O.ANANDAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.K.ALEX\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.K.HARILAL\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN\n\n Dated :31\/08\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                          V.K.MOHANAN, J.\n                     -------------------------------\n                    Crl. R.P.No.3791 of 2009\n                     -------------------------------\n            Dated this the 31st day of August, 2010.\n\n                            O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
      This revision petition is preferred by the respondent, who is<\/p>\n
the husband of the aggrieved person in a petition filed u\/s.23 of<\/p>\n
the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. As<\/p>\n
he is aggrieved by the order dated 3.2.2009 of the learned<\/p>\n
Magistrate, awarding the interim order of maintenance to the<\/p>\n
aggrieved person @ Rs.4,000\/- per month, though an appeal was<\/p>\n
filed, the appellate court confirmed the order of the learned<\/p>\n
Magistrate and hence this revision petition.<\/p>\n
      2. From the impugned orders, it appears that the marriage<\/p>\n
between the revision petitioner as well as the respondent,<\/p>\n
hereinafter for convenience referred only as `husband’ and `wife’<\/p>\n
respectively,   was   taken     place      during    the year 1984.<\/p>\n
Subsequently, the relationship became worse and finally the wife<\/p>\n
preferred M.C.No.7\/09 u\/s.23 of the Protection of Women from<\/p>\n
Domestic Violence Act, 2005, on various grounds, before the<\/p>\n
Crl. R.P.No.3791 of 2009
\n                                     2<\/span><\/p>\n
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-Kayamkulam. During the<\/p>\n
pendancy of the above proceedings, the wife preferred<\/p>\n
Crl.M.P.No.2479\/08, claiming interim maintenance u\/s.23 of the<\/p>\n
above Act.           Challenging the claim in the above Crl.M.P., the<\/p>\n
revision petitioner\/husband raised objection also. After having<\/p>\n
regard to the facts and circumstances involved in the case and<\/p>\n
the rival contentions, the learned Magistrate disposed of the<\/p>\n
above Interlocutory Application, directing the revision petitioner to<\/p>\n
pay Rs.4,000\/- per month to the wife as interim maintenance and<\/p>\n
also ordered that the payment shall be made before, the 10th of<\/p>\n
every month, starting from February 2009 onwards, failure of<\/p>\n
which will be met with Sec.125(3) of Cr.P.C. Beside the above,<\/p>\n
the revision petitioner was restrained from evicting the petitioner<\/p>\n
forcefully from his residence, and from committing any act which<\/p>\n
may disturb her peaceful residents there, and from causing hurt<\/p>\n
to her.\n<\/p>\n
         3. Aggrieved by the above order, the revision petitioner<\/p>\n
herein preferred an appeal as Crl.A.No.73\/09 and by judgment<\/p>\n
Crl. R.P.No.3791 of 2009
\n                                   3<\/span><\/p>\n
dated 26.8.2009, the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge-I,<\/p>\n
Mavelikkara, dismissed the appeal confirming the order of the<\/p>\n
trial court. It is the above orders of the trial court as well as the<\/p>\n
lower appellate court challenged in this revision petition.<\/p>\n
         4.    I have heard Adv.Sri.A.K.Alex, the learned counsel<\/p>\n
appearing for the revision petitioner\/husband as well as<\/p>\n
Adv.Sri.K.Harilal, the learned counsel appearing for the 1st<\/p>\n
respondent\/wife.\n<\/p>\n
         5.      The learned counsel for the revision petitioner<\/p>\n
vehemently submitted that, the courts below miserably failed to<\/p>\n
consider the objection raised by the revision petitioner that he<\/p>\n
assigned 20 cents of property to the 1st respondent\/the wife and<\/p>\n
she can derive an income of Rs.3,000\/- from that property and<\/p>\n
therefore the petition seeking interim relief was filed with a view to<\/p>\n
harass the revision petitioner. Thus according to the learned<\/p>\n
counsel,         the courts below, without considering the objection<\/p>\n
raised by the revision petitioner and without proper application of<\/p>\n
mind, passed an order directing the revision petitioner to pay a<\/p>\n
Crl. R.P.No.3791 of 2009
\n                                     4<\/span><\/p>\n
sum of Rs.4,000\/- as monthly maintenance allowance.<\/p>\n
         6. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the<\/p>\n
respondent submitted that the revision petition itself is not<\/p>\n
maintainable, as the orders impugned arising out of an<\/p>\n
interlocutory application and the revision petitioner can raise all<\/p>\n
his contention at the time of final disposal of the main petition,<\/p>\n
pending before the trial court.\n<\/p>\n
         7. I have carefully considered the contentions raised by the<\/p>\n
respective counsels and also perused the orders of the courts<\/p>\n
below and other materials available on record. It is a fact that the<\/p>\n
main petition filed u\/s.23 of the Protection of Women from<\/p>\n
Domestic Violence Act, 2005, is still pending for consideration in<\/p>\n
the trial court.         It is also beyond dispute that the learned<\/p>\n
Magistrate issued the impugned order on the basis of an affidavit<\/p>\n
filed by the wife – the aggrieved person and also after<\/p>\n
consideration of the objection filed by the revision petitioner-the<\/p>\n
husband.          Admittedly no evidence is taken.  It is also a fact<\/p>\n
beyond dispute that, the 1st respondent herein who is the<\/p>\n
Crl. R.P.No.3791 of 2009
\n                                   5<\/span><\/p>\n
aggrieved party before the trial court is the wife of the revision<\/p>\n
petitioner and their marital relationship still continue as such,<\/p>\n
even though there is a difference of opinion among them. The<\/p>\n
learned Magistrate after having satisfied with the grievance put<\/p>\n
forwarded by the wife, came into a conclusion, as evident from<\/p>\n
the impugned order of the learned Magistrate contained in page<\/p>\n
2, which reads as follows:- “The petitioner has included her son<\/p>\n
also as the 2nd petitioner and is claiming maintenance for him<\/p>\n
also. But as per law, the son, though he is still a student of<\/p>\n
the age 22 years, cannot claim maintenance.             But as the<\/p>\n
affidavit filed by the petitioner, primafacie discloses acts of<\/p>\n
Domestic Violence by the counter-petitioner it is urgent and<\/p>\n
necessary that an interim order be passed in this case.”<\/p>\n
According to the learned Magistrate, it was inevitable and<\/p>\n
expedient to pass an interim order. The learned Magistrate came<\/p>\n
into a conclusion after having referred to the facts and<\/p>\n
circumstances involved in the case, and while exercising the<\/p>\n
revisional jurisdiction, this court is not expected to interfere with<\/p>\n
Crl. R.P.No.3791 of 2009
\n                                   6<\/span><\/p>\n
such a satisfaction arrived on by the trial court.<\/p>\n
         8. The main contention advanced by the learned counsel<\/p>\n
for the revision petitioner is that the court has not considered the<\/p>\n
objection filed by the revision petitioner, wherein it is stated that<\/p>\n
the wife is given 20 cents of property. Even if it is admitted as<\/p>\n
true, that the wife has got 20 cents of property, there is no<\/p>\n
evidence to show that the said property is an income generating<\/p>\n
one so that the wife can depend upon the income from such<\/p>\n
property for her maintenance. In the absence of any materials or<\/p>\n
evidence to that effect, it can not be said that the order of the<\/p>\n
learned Magistrate is illegal, incorrect or improper. Therefore I<\/p>\n
find no reason to interfere with the order of the appellate court as<\/p>\n
well.\n<\/p>\n
         9. However as indicated earlier, the main proceedings are<\/p>\n
pending before the trial court and it is for the contesting parties to<\/p>\n
approach the trial court for an earlier disposal of the matter after<\/p>\n
adducing evidence. It is upto the revision petitioner to adduce<\/p>\n
evidence to show that the 1st respondent-wife has got sufficient<\/p>\n
Crl. R.P.No.3791 of 2009
\n                                      7<\/span><\/p>\n
evidence to maintain herself, without depending the revision<\/p>\n
petitioner and the respondent is also free to adduce contra-<\/p>\n
evidence to substantiate her contention also.<\/p>\n
         In the result, this revision petition is disposed of relegating<\/p>\n
the revision petitioner as well as the 1st respondent to approach<\/p>\n
the trial court for an earlier disposal of the main matter pending<\/p>\n
before it, in accordance with the procedure and law.<\/p>\n
         Criminal revision petition is disposed of accordingly.<\/p>\n
                                                       V.K.MOHANAN,
\n                                                           Judge.\n<\/p>\n
ami\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Anandan K. vs Sarada on 31 August, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3791 of 2009() 1. ANANDAN K., S\/O.KARUTHAKUNJU, … Petitioner Vs 1. SARADA, W\/O.ANANDAN, … Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA, For Petitioner :SRI.A.K.ALEX For Respondent :SRI.K.HARILAL The Hon’ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN Dated :31\/08\/2010 O R D […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182917","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAnandan K. vs Sarada on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Anandan K. vs Sarada on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-30T14:06:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Anandan K. vs Sarada on 31 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-30T14:06:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1153,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Anandan K. vs Sarada on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-30T14:06:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Anandan K. vs Sarada on 31 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Anandan K. vs Sarada on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Anandan K. vs Sarada on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-30T14:06:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Anandan K. vs Sarada on 31 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-30T14:06:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010"},"wordCount":1153,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010","name":"Anandan K. vs Sarada on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-30T14:06:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anandan-k-vs-sarada-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Anandan K. vs Sarada on 31 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182917","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182917"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182917\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182917"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182917"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182917"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}