{"id":183267,"date":"2010-10-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010"},"modified":"2016-04-04T10:15:44","modified_gmt":"2016-04-04T04:45:44","slug":"p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"P.K.Kunhammu vs The Headmistress on 20 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">P.K.Kunhammu vs The Headmistress on 20 October, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 945 of 2009(K)\n\n\n1. P.K.KUNHAMMU, ARABIC TEACHER\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE HEADMISTRESS\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER\n\n3. THE MANAGER\n\n4. STATE OF KERALA\n\n                For Petitioner  :DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.N.RAGHURAJ\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN\n\n Dated :20\/10\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                 K.T.SANKARAN, J.\n          ------------------------------\n              W.P.(C).No.945 OF 2009\n          ------------------------------\n      Dated this the 20th day of October, 2010\n\n\n\n\n                     JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>    The petitioner while working as Arabic teacher<\/p>\n<p>in Aided Senior Basic School, Mannalur, Palakkad<\/p>\n<p>District, availed leave without allowance.   Rule 60<\/p>\n<p>(c) of Part I KSR was amended by which it was<\/p>\n<p>provided that if the date of superannuation happens<\/p>\n<p>to be during the leave period, the teacher is not<\/p>\n<p>entitled   to   continue   beyond   the    date   of<\/p>\n<p>superannuation  unless   he   joins  duty   on   the<\/p>\n<p>succeeding date of the date of superannuation.    As<\/p>\n<p>a teacher, the petitioner could otherwise continue<\/p>\n<p>to work  up to 31.3.2007.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    2. The petitioner availed commuted leave with<\/p>\n<p>effect from 14.8.2006 to 17.11.2006.   Going by his<\/p>\n<p>date of birth, the date of superannuation was<\/p>\n<p>14.8.2006.    The  petitioner  contended   that  the<\/p>\n<p>amendment of Rule 60(c) of Part I KSR could not<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).No.945 OF 2009        2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>operate   retrospectively    taking   away    the   vested<\/p>\n<p>right of the teachers.      The petitioner filed WP(C)<\/p>\n<p>No.5218 of 2007 in which as per the interim order,<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner was permitted to continue to work.<\/p>\n<p>WP(C)No.5218 of 2007 was disposed of as per Ext.P7<\/p>\n<p>judgment dated 19.2.2007 directing the Assistant<\/p>\n<p>Educational     Officer   to    take    an    appropriate<\/p>\n<p>decision.     The petitioner was also permitted to<\/p>\n<p>attend duty as a teacher in the school.               The<\/p>\n<p>Assistant Educational Officer passed Ext.P8 order<\/p>\n<p>dated 27.3.2007 holding that the petitioner should<\/p>\n<p>be treated as retired with effect from the date of<\/p>\n<p>superannuation.    The matter was taken up before the<\/p>\n<p>Government. The Government passed Ext.P10 order<\/p>\n<p>dated 16.6.2008. The operative portion of Ext.P10<\/p>\n<p>reads as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>              &#8220;The case has been examined in detail<br \/>\n         with reference to the report of the Assistant<br \/>\n         Educational  Officer,  Kuzhalmannam  and  the<br \/>\n         relevant orders in force.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              Rule   60(c) Part  I  KSRs  deals   with<br \/>\n         Compulsory Retirement of teaching staff of<br \/>\n         all educational institutions.   By virtue of<br \/>\n         Rule 4 to Chapter XXVII B KER, the above Rule<br \/>\n         in KSR is made applicable to teachers of<br \/>\n         aided schools also. Rule 60(c) Part I KSR has<br \/>\n         been amended by G.O(P) No.331\/2006\/Fin. dated<br \/>\n         10.8.06 to the effect that if the teaching<br \/>\n         staff who are on leave on the day they attain<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).No.945 OF 2009        3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>         the age of 55 years fail to join duty on the<br \/>\n         first working day immediately after the date<br \/>\n         of superannuation, they shall be retired with<br \/>\n         effect   from  the  date  of   superannuation<br \/>\n         itself.      Subsequently   the    Government<br \/>\n         clarified that as the amendment takes effect<br \/>\n         only   from  10.8.06  and   those  who   were<br \/>\n         sanctioned  or  availed  of  leave  prior  to<br \/>\n         1.8.06 will be permitted to rejoin duty on<br \/>\n         expiry of the leave even if the leave extends<br \/>\n         beyond their date of superannuation.    Later<br \/>\n         the above position was further clarified vide<br \/>\n         Circular No.30\/2007 Fin dated 17.4.07 to the<br \/>\n         effect that the restriction that leave cannot<br \/>\n         be sanctioned for the extended period of<br \/>\n         service will take effect only from 1.4.07 ie,<br \/>\n         after   1.4.07  such   leave  will   not   be<br \/>\n         sanctioned and that leave already sanctioned<br \/>\n         prior to 31.3.2007 need not be cancelled.  In<br \/>\n         view of the above, the petitioner is entitled<br \/>\n         to continue in service till 31.3.07 by virtue<br \/>\n         of the clarification issued by the Government<br \/>\n         in circular No.30\/2007\/Fin. dated 17.4.07.<br \/>\n         Government are therefore pleased to allow the<br \/>\n         Ext.P9    revision   petition    and    order<br \/>\n         accordingly.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              The   Assistant   Educational   Officer,<br \/>\n         Kuzhalmannam will take urgent further steps<br \/>\n         in the matter.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>    3.    Thereafter,    the    Assistant     Educational<\/p>\n<p>Officer passed Ext.P13 order dated 27th November,<\/p>\n<p>2008. In Ext.P13, the contention put forward by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was not accepted.       The petitioner filed<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P16 revision before the Government.             It is<\/p>\n<p>stated that Ext.P16 revision is pending disposal.<\/p>\n<p>Though the main relief prayed for in the Writ<\/p>\n<p>Petition is to issue a Writ of Certiorari to quash<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C).No.945 OF 2009       4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Ext.P13 order, since the petitioner has thereafter<\/p>\n<p>filed Ext.P16 revision before the Government, the<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that<\/p>\n<p>it would be sufficient, if a direction is issued to<\/p>\n<p>the  Government     to dispose  of  Ext.P16 revision<\/p>\n<p>expeditiously.\n<\/p>\n<p>    In the facts and circumstances of the case, the<\/p>\n<p>Writ   Petition     is  disposed  of  directing  the<\/p>\n<p>Government (4th respondent) to consider and dispose<\/p>\n<p>of Ext.P16 revision filed by the petitioner as<\/p>\n<p>expeditiously as possible, and at any rate within a<\/p>\n<p>period of three months from the date of receipt of<\/p>\n<p>a  copy    of   the   judgment, after  affording  an<\/p>\n<p>opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and<\/p>\n<p>the Manager. The petitioner shall produce a copy of<\/p>\n<p>the Writ Petition, a copy of I.A.No.14201 of 2010<\/p>\n<p>and certified copy of the judgment before the 4th<\/p>\n<p>respondent.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                       K.T.SANKARAN,<br \/>\n                                           JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>cms<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court P.K.Kunhammu vs The Headmistress on 20 October, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 945 of 2009(K) 1. P.K.KUNHAMMU, ARABIC TEACHER &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE HEADMISTRESS &#8230; Respondent 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER 3. THE MANAGER 4. STATE OF KERALA For Petitioner :DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM For Respondent :SRI.N.RAGHURAJ The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-183267","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>P.K.Kunhammu vs The Headmistress on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.K.Kunhammu vs The Headmistress on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-04T04:45:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.K.Kunhammu vs The Headmistress on 20 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-04T04:45:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":753,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010\",\"name\":\"P.K.Kunhammu vs The Headmistress on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-04T04:45:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.K.Kunhammu vs The Headmistress on 20 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.K.Kunhammu vs The Headmistress on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.K.Kunhammu vs The Headmistress on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-04T04:45:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.K.Kunhammu vs The Headmistress on 20 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-04T04:45:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010"},"wordCount":753,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010","name":"P.K.Kunhammu vs The Headmistress on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-04T04:45:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-k-kunhammu-vs-the-headmistress-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.K.Kunhammu vs The Headmistress on 20 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183267","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=183267"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183267\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=183267"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=183267"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=183267"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}