{"id":18329,"date":"2010-11-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010"},"modified":"2016-10-17T04:00:03","modified_gmt":"2016-10-16T22:30:03","slug":"ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Ninganna vs The Branch Manager The National … on 30 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Ninganna vs The Branch Manager The National … on 30 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n
I31 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 30TH DAY 09 NOVEMBER, \nBEFORE  \" T\" 3 %\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR.JUs'ricj;A>qAwAD\"m;H1'n?1 = _\n\nMISCELLANEOUS FIRST AP?EAL Neg?4475:\u20acl.'G\u00a7'*'.?.:Q(i3*;  7\n\nBETVVEEN:\n\nI. NINGANNA\nS\/O. ISBIEMANNA .\nAGE 39 YEARS. '  \n\n2 SIVIT. NINGAMMA__V_ '   '\nXV\/O.N1N-GANNA' \" _ _  - \nBSYEARS   = \n\nBOTH:AREPxf35R1C[1\"\u00a7LTU'R.Ai.L COOLI 1+:\n\nR\/O. 'B,OMr\u00bbLAD'E*JARe--x14LALL1 - -\n\nMOLAKALMURU {'.E'ALUvK_)\u00b0'*- .. _ \n\nCHITRADURGA DISTR1.CV,T~.._  APPE1,1',AN'Ts\n\n{sygjx\/1'\/;'3, RAMA2_\u00a7RisHfJA 31 IBHAT A\/S \u00ab ABSENT]\n\nA \"- THE: :l3\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u20aci~;;\\{\u00a7%: 1-fij' iMA1'\\TI.AG ER\n\nTH E NATI'QEfcTj\u00a5I, IN SURANC E1 COMPANY\nIfIT{'L)_'. Cf__}'i'i'Ef'EIA[)URGA CITY & DIS'}'RI.CT. WRESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
  V’ 9233′ smzia ARUN PON NAPPA, AIT)\\f \u00bb\u00bb ABSENT)<\/p>\n
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST 2’~\u00a5jI.3E3EAL ES \u00a7*”‘\u00a7L}’5;I'[)
\nUNI)EiR SECTEON 1788) 0? MV ACT AG-AINST THE
\nJU'[)GME;NT AND JXWARID DATED i0.0′?’.2006 PASSED IN
\nMVC NO. 145\/2003 ON ‘\u00b0Fi”IE FILE OF’ ‘FI*iES CIVIL JUDGE
\nESREDVN] AND f\\DI)L. MACT, CHALLAKERE4 PA.RTLY
\nAL[,O\\?\\!ING ‘I”E-IE CLAEM PE'[‘I.’E”‘ION FOR COMPENSA”I’ION<\/p>\n
AN D SEEKING FUR”!-‘H ER ENHANC EM E?\u00a7’_T -V , ~ <\/p>\n
COMPANESATION: AN 1) ETC.\n<\/p>\n
“mls APPEAL COMING ON FOR 1+-‘1:.\\:_.A i;~–..HEf:gA:”~\u00a71:4G;j<\/p>\n
“m1s:)AY ‘1’:-*1’\u00a3\u00ab: COURT MADE ‘I’I~EE \u00a7:*sLL.Qw1NQE  s ” <\/p>\n
JUDGMENIT  X <\/p>\n
The judgment and   V<\/p>\n
in M.V.C, No.145\/2003 Qr1″”i:\ufb01s  \ufb011_e; of”Aad1f MACT,
\nChallakere, is   <\/p>\n
(2. Csuvrissel   sidesare absent. However, as<\/p>\n
the appeal’ is pgsisai i”0{ ‘fiI’ia1 hearing, p\u20acI”1;l-S\u00e9id records.<\/p>\n
It re*vea}s t’Hs.,vaApp\u00e9:11:3.iI1i:s. sought compensation regarding<\/p>\n
ds\u00e9ith  V”1.h_ei1″ son Gangadhara in 2}, motor Vehicle<\/p>\n
 s_1,c’:~i:_iev:11e’:,;~”:\ufb0141:ij’-\u00abr;V> _I1V.28:;’5.2OO3 involving lorry N.KA 19 A 2309.<\/p>\n
‘I’h”<';\u00a7\/ afik\u00e9gs: that on 28.5.2003 Gangadhara, their son<\/p>\n
 al0__ng'v\u00a7r'ith his f'atI'1er were returning from Sandur and<\/p>\n
Erjs\u00e9itiihsdh "\u00a3'hammenaha11i bus stand at 5.15 pm, Whiis<\/p>\n
'EA<\/p>\n
they were 3;;p'p:"*eaehi\u00a73g the bus Step ihe drixrer of ierry
\nK9; IQ 1% BSQQ iest eontmh due ta his negiigenee the<\/p>\n
ierry" hit against Gangadhar resulting in injureifeee to<\/p>\n
which he succumbed. Hie body was shifted <\/p>\n
where poet marten: was eendueted and.,Q:~w.Veaee._was ._ <\/p>\n
registered ageing: the driver fer :r2\u00a3Sfh'4'–eeai\u00a7d—-.i:e\u00a7.g;?3:\u00a7'ge:1'\u00a3.'<\/p>\n
driving.\n<\/p>\n
:3. They sought~..eempe:1eaf:iei:.._ onfhe j\ufb01lea that
\nGangadhara though agel\ufb02  as an<\/p>\n
agricultural  e2:;2.rr1f;I1:,\u00a7  day. They are<\/p>\n
his pere\ufb01ts .{2i?i1.r;>f- loss of dependency upon
\nhis deat1’1;.__’ ” V V<\/p>\n
  The.\u00bb ‘e1a,i1\u00a7n_.was resisted by the “respondents.<\/p>\n
‘ .H(p,ve-vein ftlie tribunal accepted their evidence regarding<\/p>\n
 L}1e’V\u00ab\u20ac>ceu.i9ifeV3}iee., The tribunai pieced actienable Wrong<\/p>\n
 in \ufb01heeriifixxg ef the Larry and held they were enti\ufb01ed to<\/p>\n
 .;ce%i*;.pe::$aiien. But, while quantifying the eemgensatien<\/p>\n
2;’<\/p>\n
the? iribzlzml ‘:.<31:.2-:11}; m.is:;}uvbtAe’:}I.y”  in V<\/p>\n
<;10r1trave::"2'{.i()r1 of Seszttiorz 168 <\/p>\n
whizth requires the ':ri"r3una1'-v.toV  ..'3'jus'i;. <\/p>\n
Compe13s3.ti0r1". I. am satitsfierl' _g'r0'iL1i1-{ST  tfge appea}<\/p>\n
are acceptable and'  j.j\ufb01iierfere\ufb01\ufb01ieHxwith the
\nimpugned award.  '  ' VA "\n<\/p>\n
 ._ T I of the claimants that
\nGangadhajra V W’aS — ag\u00e95d ‘ 16 years and engaged in<\/p>\n
ag.rj\u00a7g:rz1t:~:1ra]  yrhicth fact is not disputed by the<\/p>\n
 :1f’e~s_por;dAe1’1t:VS;.__ The tribunai substituted its opinion<\/p>\n
 V:\u20ac’7%\u00a5.VfVi’VCi{iI1(E!’:’, to hold that Cxang-adha1″a would not<\/p>\n
ha\\Ic:..be,ef1 earning  no minor is entitied to work. On<\/p>\n
  basis tribzznal holds that Garagadhara {:ar1n0t. be<\/p>\n
iiaken as an \u20acE1l’i1iI1g membzz\u00e9ix Such an ObS\u20ac’I””\u20ac\u20acll\u00a3i()I1 of
\nthe iriburial is uricalled for as a t.ribLii1al is requirrzd to<\/p>\n
CC)F1Sl.Cl63I’ the c;-zviderice 011 recard and not suhsti\u00a3ut’_\u00e97ii,s<\/p>\n
opinion. Therefore that finding is set aside.   <\/p>\n
the evicierice it is to be l1<~:'ic;i Gangadhara was as" <\/p>\n
claimed by the appellants. T .l<\/p>\n
2003. Earriing of an agrict-'ltu.ral d0~0lic w<;=1v,Vil'Ci;!:1{;i.  <\/p>\n
been less than 3.100\/~  was  of his<\/p>\n
residence was wiihin\ufb02j..the{.,';Cl'1-iiracdurga district.
\nTherefore his income ;i\u00a7=-\u00a7"t2il\u00e9'<;e-ii'  per day. The
\nsecongi"  erifb"n\u00e9ous approach of the
\ni;ribur1a_l. r10tis::t:_d"wtinz'~i.is=._a~wa.rd is having heid that<\/p>\n
Claimants  parents will be entitled to<\/p>\n
\u00b0"corrip'ei\u00bbi'saf'iQn bas\u00e9tl on their age. the tribunal has<\/p>\n
  the mult.ip1ier. The Obsen-'ai.i0n of the<\/p>\n
tribunav}: isvilffbithe following 2:-f:['ect.<\/p>\n
"In the petition it is stated that late:\n<\/p>\n
=   Gazigadhara was an agri<:ultui*al 900116. This<\/p>\n
.6.\n<\/p>\n
ie given. a gewby by PW. in hiss eviderzee.
\n‘Fherefe’r*e, I took :10t.i<:sI1al Income of"''—<\/p>\n
GaI1ga<iha_ra at 3,50,\/'~ per day. PW.l <\/p>\n
aged about 60 years at the tm\ufb01\ufb01sg of *7' <\/p>\n
examination. He has admitted  .\n<\/p>\n
that his age was 55
\nexamination A boy Qf  \\x.rlcl)i:_.1A.d’~ .n\u00ab;~>t”  ll
\nearn anything till att’a’ir1 a .\n<\/p>\n
Therefore the multiplief’-applieatieallo {be
\ncase is ’16’. T isfanf.taeeeleratienVefufive
\nyears in getting  ‘;\u00a7’Vhe.3}.e’f?5;;’.el fzive years<\/p>\n
of age ._i;o  “‘it’::> get the
\ncorrect .  1   Vltiiiliiltiplier that<\/p>\n
comes ta   f11’e01’ig1e’ of Gangadhara<\/p>\n
after ‘ _ his personal expenses
\nColmesletol  If the multiplier ‘9’ is
\n_ . applied V_:tV0Vt1{:e rietleontributlon to the parents<\/p>\n
V  Of} V. ‘v\u00bb’Eate”  \u00ab …Ga\ufb02gadhara it comes to<\/p>\n
    l\u00a7\u00bb{::SA;.1;.’?\u00a7}L6OO\/w,”\n<\/p>\n
  lltkneecis to be reminded that while evolving<\/p>\n
 eeheme’ to determine compensation on the baeis of<\/p>\n
muitipiier 931 Vtssitucie ef Eife has been tzikerx into<\/p>\n
consideration to fix mttitipiier en five years p:urtr:1  35 years. The
\ntribunal has1″;eeer;de’d.:_e\u00a71de1}ee:f_mueh Eater. As on the
\ndate 0112” the.\u00bbevider1c.e”‘:t:he age of the second
\ne1aim\u00e9gnt*–\\Vas  or 55 years. Even if We take
\nage as eh ttdatet xii’ \u00bbre\u00abe(51rding of evidence which the<\/p>\n
respsnden\u00e9ts  net e\ufb01vspttted, the multiplier has to be<\/p>\n
:,_–sn-t.the  the younger of the parents ‘i..e.,<\/p>\n
‘ \u00a7’\u20aci11.gamma\u00ab.eV\u00e9it..__32 years. However, since the deceased<\/p>\n
 Wi~;tis.1fE3 age eouid not have been 32 years at<\/p>\n
‘\ufb02’1i3._i1iI_tiEE.\u00a3\u20ac1’7 aeeidetnt. Therefore reasohabiy it ean be<\/p>\n
ixakertz as 40 years and on that basis the mL1Etipiier has<\/p>\n
is be chosen. F01′ the ciaimamt. who is aged wi.1:hi.zji 1920<\/p>\n
years the rnultiplier applicable is 15. Tfxe  _<\/p>\n
chosen rnultipiier of “Q” which is Wholly i1′.*~.’:’e ii:~_1b~le”t(:{<\/p>\n
aside. The income of the deeeszsed is \/- 2 L’<\/p>\n
per month, ?.36,000,{_j per  50%
\nout of 1:. as he was  shall be the
\nmultiplicandiv   is ’15’ and
\ntherefore   be 32,70,000\/~,<\/p>\n
to which’   be,””-added””Compensation towards<\/p>\n
Convefxtienal  Eoss of affection, care to
\nthe parents thweyjsafe-.e___”axvarded \u20ac25,000\/–. Towards
\ntrar1sp0rta’t’io’r1 V of  \u00bbde\u00e9\u00a3d body, funeral expenses<\/p>\n
3 Ti_5\u20ac.{)’VO(),\/ ~ isv.’aWa{<H:1_eei, Similarly, towards loss to estate<\/p>\n
 e1a:i'rr12{1if\u00a3.s:V"s.ha11 be entitied to %.20,000\/–. In an the
\n I _'wAie1i—-be entitled to 33,30,000\/~. The award is
\n'H\u20acF1'h_\u00a7EIit,;e}:}., ffifej\ufb01i 33,29,000\/2 to 38,30,000\/\u00ab. The<\/p>\n
-9-<\/span><\/p>\n
\u00e93nha1m:ed zm1m;::1\u20ac, Shexil Carry intereat. at 5′?\/{L E10 be
\ndi$(:ha’:’g<3d by the I.r1s2,.1raI1ce Company wit.hir:r"'—-four<\/p>\n
weeks. The ;21w"a:1*d is apportioned beiween the c\u00a3;ii:3f\u00a3.ah;'\u20acs<\/p>\n
in equal pr0p:’ti\u00ab;)n. 75% of which is  .<\/p>\n
deposiied in {he respective acc01,mt.s permitiihg  :6 <\/p>\n
draw iilterest: periodicaily. infVthie\u00bb_\u00a731~1.haff1\u00e9;V{:d7<\/p>\n
compensation with a(:c1″ued int\u00e9resf; Ads c51’ri\u00e9:r\u20acd <\/p>\n
3:e1eased., Rest of the Cii1f\u20ac<;:ionA'\u00bb-i1{1   are–. <\/p>\n
affirmed.\n<\/p>\n
YKLV  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Ninganna vs The Branch Manager The National … on 30 November, 2010 Author: Jawad Rahim I31 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY 09 NOVEMBER, BEFORE ” T” 3 % THE I-ION’BLE MR.JUs’ricj;A>qAwAD”m;H1’n?1 = _ MISCELLANEOUS FIRST AP?EAL Neg?4475:\u20acl.’G\u00a7’*’.?.:Q(i3*; 7 BETVVEEN: I. NINGANNA S\/O. ISBIEMANNA . AGE 39 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18329","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNinganna vs The Branch Manager The National ... on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ninganna vs The Branch Manager The National ... on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-16T22:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ninganna vs The Branch Manager The National … on 30 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-16T22:30:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1242,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Ninganna vs The Branch Manager The National ... on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-16T22:30:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ninganna vs The Branch Manager The National … on 30 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ninganna vs The Branch Manager The National ... on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ninganna vs The Branch Manager The National ... on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-16T22:30:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ninganna vs The Branch Manager The National … on 30 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-16T22:30:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010"},"wordCount":1242,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010","name":"Ninganna vs The Branch Manager The National ... on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-16T22:30:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ninganna-vs-the-branch-manager-the-national-on-30-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ninganna vs The Branch Manager The National … on 30 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18329","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18329"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18329\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18329"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18329"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18329"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}