{"id":184073,"date":"2011-02-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011"},"modified":"2015-07-16T15:13:46","modified_gmt":"2015-07-16T09:43:46","slug":"g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"G vs The Present Appeal on 9 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
G vs The Present Appeal on 9 February, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: Z.K.Saiyed,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCR.A\/2134\/2010\t 2\/ 5\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nAPPEAL No. 2134 of 2010\n \n\n=========================================================\n\n \n\nG\nB VORA - Appellant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nPANDIT\nDIPAKKUMAR KANAIYALAL & 1 - Opponent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nM\/S\nRJ RAWAL ASSOC. for\nAppellant(s) : 1,MS SHIVYA A DESAI for Appellant(s) : 1, \nNone for\nOpponent(s) : 1, \nMR HL JANI Ld. APP for Opponent(s) :\n2, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n: 09\/02\/2011 \n\n \n\nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n
1.0
\nThe present appeal, under section 378 of the Code of Criminal
\nProcedure, 1973, is directed against the judgment and order of
\nacquittal dated 26.5.2010 passed by the learned Metropolitan
\nMagistrate, Court no. 8, Ahmedabad in Criminal  Case No. 11280\/2007,
\nwhereby the accused has been acquitted of the charges under sec. 7(1)
\n& 16(1)(A)(I) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act,
\nleveled against him.\n<\/p>\n
2.0
\nThe brief facts of the prosecution case are as under:\n<\/p>\n
2.1
\nIt is the case of the prosecution that on 17.5.2007 the Food
\nInspector has visited the shop of respondents-accused, and has taken
\nthe sample of Milk. Thereafter, he purchased the same and paid the
\nprice, cash memo was taken and after following the necessary
\nprocedure,  the sample was sent to the Public Analyst, for analysis
\nand as per the report of the Public Analyst, the sample was found to
\nbe adulterated. On these facts, the complaint was filed before the
\nCourt, which was numbered as Criminal Case No. 11280\/2007 against the
\nrespondent. At the time of trial, evidence was led before the trial
\nCourt. The documents were produced  and oral evidence of the
\nwitnesses were also recorded by the trial Court and after considering
\nthe oral as well as documentary evidence, the learned Magistrate has
\npassed the order of acquittal which is impugned in this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
3.0
\nIt was contended by learned Advocate Mr. Soni for the appellant that
\nthe judgment and order of the learned Magistrate is not proper, legal
\nand it is erroneous. He has also argued that the learned Magistrate
\nhas not considered the evidence of the witnesses. He has argued that
\nFood Inspector has followed the rules prescribed by law and he has
\nalso followed the procedure of taking the sample and the contents of
\nForm No. 6 etc are just and proper. The sample was seized and sealed
\nproperly. Yet, the learned Magistrate has not considered the evidence
\nof prosecution. Therefore, the order impugned in this appeal passed
\nby the learned Magistrate requires to be quashed and set aside.\n<\/p>\n
4.
\n\tIt is a settled legal position that in acquittal appeal, the
\nAppellate Court is not required to re-write the judgment or to give
\nfresh reasonings when the Appellate Court is in agreement with the
\nreasons assigned by the trial court acquitting the accused.  In the
\ninstant case, this Court is in full agreement with the reasons given
\nand findings recorded by the trial Court while acquitting the
\nrespondents- accused and adopting the said reasons and for the
\nreasons aforesaid, in my view, the impugned judgment is just, legal
\nand proper and requires no interference by this Court at this stage.
\nHence, this appeal requires to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
5.
\nEven in a recent decision of the Apex Court in the case of State
\nof Goa V. Sanjay Thakran & Anr. Reported<\/a> in (2007)3 SCC 75,
\nthe Court has reiterated the powers of the High Court in such cases.
\nIn para 16 of the said decision the Court has observed as under:\n<\/p>\n
 16.
\nFrom the aforesaid decisions, it is apparent that while exercising
\nthe powers in appeal against the order of acquittal the Court of
\nappeal would not ordinarily interfere
\nwith the order of acquittal unless the approach of
\nthe lower Court is vitiated by some manifest illegality and the
\nconclusion arrived at would not be arrived at by any
\nreasonable person and, therefore, the decision is to be
\ncharacterized as perverse. Merely because two views are possible, the
\nCourt of appeal would not take the view which would upset the
\njudgment delivered by the Court below. However, the appellate court
\nhas a power to review the evidence if it is of the view that the
\nconclusion arrived
\nat by the Court below is perverse and the Court has committed a
\nmanifest error of law and ignored the material evidence on
\nrecord. A duty is cast upon the appellate court, in such
\ncircumstances, to re-appreciate the evidence to arrive to a just
\ndecision on the basis of material placed on record to find out
\nwhether any of the accused is connected with the commission of the
\ncrime he is charged with.\n<\/p>\n
6.
\nSimilar principle has been laid down by the Apex Court in the cases
\nof State
\nof Uttar Pradesh Vs. Ram Veer Singh & Ors, reported in 2007 AIR
\nSCW 5553 and
\nin Girja
\nPrasad (Dead) by LRs Vs. state of MP, reported in 2007 AIR SCW 5589.
\nThus, the powers which this Court may exercise against an order of
\nacquittal are well settled.\n<\/p>\n
7.
\nIt is also a settled legal position that in acquittal appeal, the
\nappellate court is not required to re-write the judgment or to give
\nfresh reasonings, when the reasons assigned by the Court below are
\nfound to be just and proper. Such principle is laid down by the Apex
\nCourt in the case of State
\nof Karnataka Vs. Hemareddy, reported in AIR 1981 SC 1417,
\nwherein,
\nit is held as under:\n<\/p>\n
 &
\nThis court
\nhas observed in Girija
\nNandini Devi V. Bigendra Nandini Chaudhary (1967)1 SCR 93: (AIR 1967
\nSC 1124) that
\nit is not the duty of the appellate court
\nwhen it agrees with the view of the trial court on the evidence to
\nrepeat the narration of the evidence or to
\nreiterate the reasons given by the trial court expression
\nof general agreement with the reasons given by the Court the decision
\nof which is under appeal, will ordinarily suffice.\n<\/p>\n
8.\tThus,
\nin case the appellate court agrees with the reasons and the opinion
\ngiven by the lower court, then the discussion of evidence is not
\nnecessary.\n<\/p>\n
9.\tI
\nhave gone through the judgment and order passed by the trial court. I
\nhave also perused the oral as well as documentary evidence led by the
\ntrial court and also considered the submissions made by learned
\nAdvocate for the appellant. The trial court while considering the
\noral as well as documentary evidence has clearly observed that the
\nprosecution has not followed the mandatory provisions during the
\nsealing and seizing the sample. The prosecution has failed to prove
\nits case beyond reasonable doubt.  Even in the present appeal,
\nnothing is produced or pointed out to rebut the conclusion of the
\ntrial Court.  Thus, from the evidence itself it is established that
\nthe prosecution has not proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.\n<\/p>\n
10.\tMr
\n Soni learned Advocate  for the appellant is not in a position to
\nshow any evidence to take a contrary view of the matter or that the
\napproach of the trial court is vitiated by some manifest illegality
\nor that the decision is perverse or that the trial court has ignored
\nthe material evidence on record.\n<\/p>\n
11.
\nIn the above view of the matter, I am of the considered opinion that
\nthe trial court was completely justified in acquitting the respondent
\nof the charges leveled against him.\n<\/p>\n
12.
\nI find that the findings recorded by the trial court are absolutely
\njust and proper and in recording the said findings, no illegality or
\ninfirmity has been committed by it.\n<\/p>\n
13.\tI
\nam, therefore, in complete agreement with the findings, ultimate
\nconclusion and the resultant order of acquittal recorded by the court
\nbelow and hence find no reasons to interfere with the same. Hence the
\nappeal is hereby dismissed. R & P to be sent back to the trial
\nCourt, forthwith. Bail bond, if any, stands cancelled.\n<\/p>\n
(Z.K.\n<\/p>\n
SAIYED, J.)<\/p>\n
mandora\/<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court G vs The Present Appeal on 9 February, 2011 Author: Z.K.Saiyed,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CR.A\/2134\/2010 2\/ 5 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2134 of 2010 ========================================================= G B VORA – Appellant(s) Versus PANDIT DIPAKKUMAR KANAIYALAL & 1 – Opponent(s) ========================================================= Appearance […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-184073","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nG vs The Present Appeal on 9 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"G vs The Present Appeal on 9 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-16T09:43:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"G vs The Present Appeal on 9 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-16T09:43:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1225,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011\",\"name\":\"G vs The Present Appeal on 9 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-16T09:43:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"G vs The Present Appeal on 9 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"G vs The Present Appeal on 9 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"G vs The Present Appeal on 9 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-16T09:43:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"G vs The Present Appeal on 9 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-16T09:43:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011"},"wordCount":1225,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011","name":"G vs The Present Appeal on 9 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-16T09:43:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-vs-the-present-appeal-on-9-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"G vs The Present Appeal on 9 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184073","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184073"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184073\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184073"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184073"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184073"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}