{"id":184504,"date":"2008-08-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008"},"modified":"2017-09-21T00:35:08","modified_gmt":"2017-09-20T19:05:08","slug":"pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"Pancham Singh vs Am Janata on 4 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Patna High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Pancham Singh vs Am Janata on 4 August, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Smt. Sheema Khan<\/div>\n<pre>                           APPEAL FROM ORIGINAL DECREE No.26 OF 1998\n                                 -----------\n\n           AGAINST THE ORDER AND JUDGMENT DATED 22.9.1997                          PASSED\nBY\n          SRI BIPIN DUTTA PATHAK, 2nd ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE,\n          AURANGABAD IN PROBATE CASE NO. 3 OF 1986\/ 2 OF 1993.\n                              -----------\n\n         PANCHAM SINGH--------------------------------------------------------Appellant.\n                                                Versus\n         AM JANATA---------------------------------------------------------------Respondent.\n\n                                    -----------\n                    For the Appellant: Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate.\n                    For the Respondent: None.\n                                        -----------\n                                             PRESENT\n\n                        THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT. SHEEMA ALI KHAN\n\n     Sheema Ali              This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 22.9.1997\n      Khan,J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>                  passed by 2nd Additional District Judge, Aurangabad in Probate Case<\/p>\n<p>                  No. 3 of 1986 \/ 2 of 1993        by which the court has rejected the<\/p>\n<p>                  application of the applicant to grant probate of a Will dated 1.8.1983<\/p>\n<p>                  executed in favour of the applicant by one Hari Bansh Kuer wife of<\/p>\n<p>                  Ramjatan Singh of village- Baruna.\n<\/p>\n<p>                             The case of the appellant is that Hari Bansh Kuer executed a<\/p>\n<p>                  deed of will in his favour on 1.8.1983, out of love and affection as the<\/p>\n<p>                  appellant had taken care of her. She has transferred all her lands in<\/p>\n<p>                  favour of the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>                             It has further been stated by the appellant that the executant<\/p>\n<p>                  was an agnate and the relationship was that she was the grand- mother<\/p>\n<p>                  of the appellant. Since the applicant had not impleaded any one as an<\/p>\n<p>                  objector in this case, the court had ordered that a general notice be<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                         2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>issued to the public at large regarding the case.<\/p>\n<p>          The order dated 1.6.1995 reveals that a notice was given to<\/p>\n<p>the general public by a beat of drum and thereafter the case was fixed<\/p>\n<p>for ex-parte hearing.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The only issue to be decided in this case whether the<\/p>\n<p>appellant is entitled to get the benefits of the Will dated 1.8.1983 ?<\/p>\n<p>          On behalf of the appellant, three witnesses have been<\/p>\n<p>examined to prove his case. P.W.1 is the appellant himself who<\/p>\n<p>supports his case and states that the executant was an agnate and was<\/p>\n<p>his grand -mother. It has been stated by the appellant that she died in<\/p>\n<p>the year 1985 and after that property has come in his possession. The<\/p>\n<p>appellant has also deposed that apart from the appellant there is no<\/p>\n<p>other person who is entitled to receive a share in her property.<\/p>\n<p>          To prove the document, the appellant has examined P.W. 2<\/p>\n<p>who is the deed writer of the Will in question. P.W.2 supports the fact<\/p>\n<p>that he has written the document and also proved the Will. P.W.3<\/p>\n<p>Lakhan Singh is the witness to the Will. P.W.3 supports the case of<\/p>\n<p>the appellant and proves his own signature on the Will.<\/p>\n<p>          After perusing the findings, I find there is no reason for<\/p>\n<p>disbelieving the evidence led on behalf of the appellant and in fact the<\/p>\n<p>court below has not disbelieved the evidence of the appellant at all but<\/p>\n<p>has rejected the application for grant probate on three grounds which<\/p>\n<p>according to me are very unreasonable.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The first ground for rejecting the     claim of the appellant is<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                       3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>that according to the court below, the Will did not disclose whether<\/p>\n<p>the executant had any heirs. It is quite clear from the evidence led on<\/p>\n<p>behalf of the parties that the executant did not have heir and in fact no<\/p>\n<p>body came forward to make a claim with respect to the property<\/p>\n<p>belonging to the appellant. As such, this reason given by the court<\/p>\n<p>below is untenable.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The second ground for rejecting the case of the appellant is<\/p>\n<p>that the court has observed that Ramdeo Singh, the process server was<\/p>\n<p>the person responsible for informing the general public by the beat of<\/p>\n<p>drum, has not been examined to prove service of notice.<\/p>\n<p>          I do not understand why the court should disbelieve his own<\/p>\n<p>records. By the order dated 1.6.1995, the court has recorded that the<\/p>\n<p>notice was served by a beat of drum and the record shows that such<\/p>\n<p>steps were taken for service of notice, and as such, the reasoning of<\/p>\n<p>the court below is defective. Moreover, if the court had any doubt<\/p>\n<p>while hearing the matter the court could have summoned Ramdeo<\/p>\n<p>Singh and examined him as a court witness.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The third reason for rejecting the claim of the appellant by<\/p>\n<p>the court below is that the appellant had not made his brothers party in<\/p>\n<p>the lower court. The appellant has specifically pleaded and testified<\/p>\n<p>that Hari Bansh Kuer had no heirs, and has stated that the executant<\/p>\n<p>was his grand mother and she has executed the Will because he used to<\/p>\n<p>look after her. The brothers of the appellant live in the same village<\/p>\n<p>and they would have made a claim or appeared during the hearing of<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                           4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                   the case if they had some stake in the property.\n<\/p>\n<p>                             There is another aspect to this case. Admittedly, the<\/p>\n<p>                   appellant has been in possession of the property belonging to Hari<\/p>\n<p>                   Bansh Kuer since the year 1985 to the knowledge of all concerned and<\/p>\n<p>                   if anyone had an objection certainly they would come forward and<\/p>\n<p>                   objected to his possession, however, in this case no body has come<\/p>\n<p>                   forward to object to the possession of the appellant, and as such, that<\/p>\n<p>                   the court below has erred in coming to the conclusion that the<\/p>\n<p>                   petitioner is not entitled to grant probate of the Will on the ground that<\/p>\n<p>                   he has not come with clean hands.\n<\/p>\n<p>                             For the reasons mentioned aforesaid, the order and judgment<\/p>\n<p>                   dated 22.9.1997 passed in Probate Case No. 3 of 1986 \/ 2 of 1993 is<\/p>\n<p>                   set aside and this appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>PATNA HIGH COURT                                                        (Sheema Ali Khan,J)\nDATED, 4TH\nAUGUST,2008.\n N.A.F.R.\/U.K.\/SECRETAR\n            Y\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court Pancham Singh vs Am Janata on 4 August, 2008 Author: Smt. Sheema Khan APPEAL FROM ORIGINAL DECREE No.26 OF 1998 &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; AGAINST THE ORDER AND JUDGMENT DATED 22.9.1997 PASSED BY SRI BIPIN DUTTA PATHAK, 2nd ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, AURANGABAD IN PROBATE CASE NO. 3 OF 1986\/ 2 OF 1993. &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; PANCHAM SINGH&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;Appellant. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-184504","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Pancham Singh vs Am Janata on 4 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pancham Singh vs Am Janata on 4 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-20T19:05:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Pancham Singh vs Am Janata on 4 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-20T19:05:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":848,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008\",\"name\":\"Pancham Singh vs Am Janata on 4 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-20T19:05:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pancham Singh vs Am Janata on 4 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pancham Singh vs Am Janata on 4 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pancham Singh vs Am Janata on 4 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-20T19:05:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Pancham Singh vs Am Janata on 4 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-20T19:05:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008"},"wordCount":848,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008","name":"Pancham Singh vs Am Janata on 4 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-20T19:05:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pancham-singh-vs-am-janata-on-4-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pancham Singh vs Am Janata on 4 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184504","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184504"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184504\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184504"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184504"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}