{"id":184733,"date":"2009-02-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009"},"modified":"2019-01-30T21:56:37","modified_gmt":"2019-01-30T16:26:37","slug":"bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Bangalore Metropolitan … vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Bangalore Metropolitan … vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n
%\n1\n\n\" . 5*'\n\nN THE Hm: count or KARRATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED ms THE 2\"\" DAY or FEBRUARY, zoos\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BtE MR.JUSTlCE SUBHASH 3.\u00bb):     ' \n\n \n\nBANGALORE METRQPOUTAN V A %\nCENTRAL OFFECE. K.H ROAD.   2:!  f \nBY rrs CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGERREP av :75 ._ 'T   \u00a2\nCHEF LAWOFFICER.      \n\n  '   ..PETETiONER\n\n(By Smt : H R RENi3\u00a7<A';'Aii\u00a7\\f;)"   1    \n\nms  C(:MM.tS$.:{}\u00a7:ER %\nAN9 THE Af'PE1LLATE"--AUT!+i{}RtT\u00a7'   %\nUNDER THE 'F*A\\'fvi\u00a7.NT OF GRATUITY? ACT.\nsmGAz.oRs-,k :e5s:e;w_  A\nKARMEEKAsHAwA\u00a7:V%     .\nammeasmrra mm      \nBANGALORE-.566'07\u20ac:'.? j  %\n\nTHE ;sssA:sTAmr Ezdmmssnowaa ms\nCQN"!.'RQLL!NG Amlmlw\n\n%  "\u00a3}1vi$-.ION'~ 4.% KARMEEKA BHAWAN\n\n'  ROAD.\n\n   ._  076.\n\nL;AF\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7GHUi\u00a51f\u00a7\u00a7ts\u00a3I}\u00a7AhlA\nAGED ABOUT 61 YEARS\n\n --_s: LA'!'E'1~LA\u00a7(SHMlKANTHA SYENGAR . %\n\n  r\u00bbs<a.e3z2;'MuDAm=PA moss. DODBAMAVALU\n  i3A_NGALGRE- seocm.\n\n RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
  (By sm. JAGADEESH MUNDARGI. GA. FOR R1 3. 2.\n<\/p>\n
SRI. LSHEKAR. ADV. FOR R3)<\/p>\n
Ii\ufb01ii<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND –\n<\/p>\n
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PRAYING TO: QUASH THE
\nORDER OF THE SECOND RESPONDNET DT. 18.10200? VIBE
\nANNEXURE-‘B’ AM”) QUASH THE ORDER OF THE FIRST
\nRESPONDENT DT. 20.10.2008 VIBE ANNEXURE-‘D’ AND ET(}…._ <\/p>\n
mas PETITION comm on son PRLY. 4; *af[   _<\/p>\n
GROUP. THIS BAY. THE COURT MADE THE FOI.LG\\NII’–3G’2 V  ‘*-\n<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is directed against    <\/p>\n
respondent by order dated 20.10.2303  A.:’1’t:o.:_uc:1v\u00a7:re~_I?3.\n<\/p>\n
2. Respondent sought fof  of gratuity amount
\non the ground that. ne\u00a7.ad%  and he is
\non\ufb01\ufb01od for Rs.1   }’\u00a7-j\u00e9oaid and claimed an
\narmunt of  was opposed on the
\nground I   of 10 months 25 days.\n<\/p>\n
however. one A<3:w__n'troi|it\u00a5\u00a7_. tho evidence. directed
\nthe Corpofgs\ufb02oo   of amount of Rs.63.7i49i~.
\n=wa3\u00a2aiIodVV'"i\u00e9\u00a7"ouest\u00a7on before the  Authority.\n<\/p>\n
  — :j.Authority. the Corporation contended that.\n<\/p>\n
: wais  as a badili conductor and he worked as badii<\/p>\n
.   _6._8.”I’98g0 _to 2.8.1981 and _during this period. he had<\/p>\n
_  ‘   days and aiso ciaimed that more is excess payment<\/p>\n
  It is aiso contondw that. though Rs.1.15.G65i- 3 said.
\nIt I  —   “Controlling Authority has mentioned Rs.1.05.211I-\u00bb only. The<\/p>\n
15.
\n.1.\u00bb ~<\/p>\n
. passed by 2′” respondent produced  xoiro   1* <\/p>\n
QLV<\/p>\n
 \ufb01mannertznjust enrichment. Learned counset also relied
\n f\ufb01iounnjudgment reponm in 2005(2) LLJ P1040 in the<\/p>\n
% A’ ‘eotseon\u00e9rnmr. on. AND NATURAL ens COMMISSION LTD.
\n Ann tino’f\u00a3HR –vs- V.U_.WARR!ER and submioaemat, in case of<\/p>\n
   _  nneuttiorized occupation of the quarters beyond the period towards the<\/p>\n
 feeovery of penalty amount was deducted from me gratuity.\n<\/p>\n
Apwilate Authonty though referred to the contentions. but without”
\nadvertinn to the said contentions. rejected the appeal.\n<\/p>\n
3. The contention of the Ieamedoouneel for the neti\ufb02oneif   ._
\nduring the badii period. untess the workman compietes 2443:   ‘
\nnot entitled for gratuity. it is aiso contended_.that._ 4the_t’eV  ” ” V
\nRs.1.15.035I-. whereas, the Controtling  ‘togn
\nRs.1 135.21 11- The break in service”tVius’-else”
\nsubmitted that. in case of exoese   entttted to
\nwi\ufb01thoid me said amount. In     for the
\npetitioner reiied on the iu_dgment..!a:t)ottetiV  P 763 (Deihi
\nHigh Court) in the sin rsmecoepom non: or= mom
\nLIMITED —vs- eeomt nttsm nttecomusstomen AND
\nANOTHER.     coneidenng the excess payment.
\nhas observed1Vi:*aat..’tt1e   for the payment of gratuity to<\/p>\n
what he is en_title<'1t"to%. if theaetiottanyt excess payment. the management
\njis" 'en\ufb01\ufb01ezfto  "":"he….workman cannot make a claim of any
\natnountin itotw\ufb01nat he is omitted and Court cannot interpret in e<\/p>\n
I   Veareess ea31merlt'b3r'tlie Corporation, in my opinion. the workman wilt not
\n fevr\ufb01en amount more than what he is due. If the excess
\nHere inadvertently or by rnimke has been paid. that will not<\/p>\n
 it  a gift or reward to the workman. At the same time. workman
\nu Aeennat be denied of his legitimate claim and furlher Court cannot be
\n it-uparly to make unjust enrichment of the respondent. in these<\/p>\n
4. Sri Shekhar. learned counsel appwring fer the respondent
\ncontended tnet. no such contention was raised befere the Controlling
\nAuthority. Even the alleged excess payment is not evidenced
\nmaterial nor details are furnished. The respondent had
\neven to know what is the excess payment. Appeal
\nsatisfy the details of the excess payment and
\nwas paid. He also submitted that, the
\nevidenced by an order in terms of’      of it
\nGratuity Act and further submitte<$V.\ufb011at,..itie:..(;c-nti*9lling  as well
\nas the Appellate Authority  has passed
\nthe order in censonenoe    of Gratuity Act,
\nhowever. he   in  amount paid as
\nRm .0521 1\/–instaa e..1  I A [Le  Al? .\n<\/p>\n
5. The’vCorpore\ufb01en\ufb01’:h:a:e  that. there is excess payment<\/p>\n
of Rs.43.093!-.A inltnisv .e:e;;atrai%.  ground is raised before the
\n\ufb01tppeliate  It  cleiaar from the order that. the reepondent
\n  knew what is the excees payment and
\nfurttier.VV_Vdeteils-le’re’V_ irnentioned in the appeal grounds. if there is<\/p>\n
\u00a7\u00a7Aa1I<\/p>\n
13.2.2009 Writ Petition No.1?129i20Q.8{.&.:.;K)_V<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
 NE
\nThis matter was disposed of on 22.2009 and \u00e9rec\ufb01an  a_–i\u00e96′ ” ” C” .  ‘<\/p>\n
issued to the parties to appear before the Appe!!ate:’\u00bbAt.#;orit} 6rs.
\n17.2.2aa9. ‘ ”   %<\/p>\n
Since the certi\ufb01ed copy is not issued. the dateK6fVa’ppearar\u00a7:e
\nthe parties is modi\ufb01ed as. 27.2.2009.  % ‘V X <\/p>\n
*AP!–<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Bangalore Metropolitan … vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2009 Author: Subhash B.Adi % 1 ” . 5*’ N THE Hm: count or KARRATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED ms THE 2″” DAY or FEBRUARY, zoos BEFORE THE HON’BtE MR.JUSTlCE SUBHASH 3.\u00bb): ‘ BANGALORE METRQPOUTAN V A % CENTRAL OFFECE. K.H ROAD. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-184733","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBangalore Metropolitan ... vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-30T16:26:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bangalore Metropolitan … vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-30T16:26:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":759,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-30T16:26:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bangalore Metropolitan … vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-30T16:26:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bangalore Metropolitan … vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-30T16:26:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009"},"wordCount":759,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009","name":"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-30T16:26:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bangalore Metropolitan … vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184733","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184733"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184733\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184733"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184733"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184733"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}