{"id":184867,"date":"2010-08-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010"},"modified":"2018-07-30T15:40:52","modified_gmt":"2018-07-30T10:10:52","slug":"m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"M Narayanasway vs The Land Tribunal on 24 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M Narayanasway vs The Land Tribunal on 24 August, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: V.G.Sabhahit And K.Govindarajulu<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANG\/-U.ORE___\n\nDATED THIS THE 24\"' DAY OF AUGUST 2010   VT\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HONBLE MRJUSTICE V.\u00a73M_SABHA'HI'T~.:'f; .  '\n\nAND\n\nTHE HON'E5i_E MR.)UST1c:E'K~..._'GOY1-NBARAJULVU._, \n\nWRIT APPEAL NO.1418\"OE2O08  E\nBETWEEN:   -   \n\nM NARAYANASWAY\n\nS\/O LATE S MUNISHAMAPPA V .\n\nAGED ABOUT 52 YEARS   \n\nRESEDING AT HOUSE NO.\u00ab-as  j _.    ~\nBHAORAPPA LAYOUT   .   _  \" \nNAGESHAHALLE I \" \"      \nBANGALORE. ' _ .;:   \u00bb L   'g..;APPELLAa\\:T\n\n(BY SRLfS N' ASV\\.i\u00a7f\u00bb.ATHK\u00a7\\TA.RA\\'T'\u00ab1A'N, ADVOCATE}\n\n\n\nE. THE LAND TRIB'U!\\aAL . _ \ncH1C:<BALLAPUR " _\n v ._cH1c}'<BALI,APUR TAl_U\u00a7<~- ..... .. v\nCs~\u00a7;CTr\u00ab1A\n\n. LATE V C THIMMARAYAPPA E\n' W\/.0 YENKATESH\n AGEO ABOUT 54 YEARS\n\n\n\n2(c) T I\/EN:-<ARAMANA \\\nLATE v C THIMMARAYAPPA\nAGED ABOUT 50 YEARS\n\nRESPONDENT 2(8) TO Z(C) ARE\nRESIDING AT \u00a7\\10.204\nDHARMACHATRA ROAD\nCHICKSALLAPUR TAEUK\nCHICK$ALLAPUR DISTRICT.\n\n2(a) SMT T VENKATALAXMI\n\nWIO SRIRAME GOWDA ,    _ .\nLATE v C THIMMARAYAPPA = _  Amended vidfe Covwsw \nAGED AEBGUT 50 YEARS   Orderdatevde _l_:3.71,2O3IO.\n\nR\/O NO565, AGRAHARA LAYOUT g\nNEAR RAGHAVENDRA SWAMAE\/.TEMPLE**"\nRAMANAGARA TALUK ' '  '\nRAMANAGARA DISTRICT. \n\n2(e) SMT T MuNIRATHNA,_ \nW\/'O A M NANIUNATHA-._ ;_  _   \nLATE V C THIfVlM\u00a3\u00a5.RA'I'If\\FPA    " _  \nAGEO ASOLJT '_'?7"'Y'5AR5...'-'. ' ' "  \nR\/O IA LA\u00a5.OUT '\nAMRUT|-\u00a7AHALLI'*, '   '- ~ _ \nSHANRARA'TNAGAP; ROS}?  \nBANGALORE ~ _S6C'09_2.~,   _ _+ ...RESPONDENTS\n\n(BY SRIYLJTHS: A Ii<VSUI?.5I:":sAI'A;I:I,"'A. S PONNANNA,\nADVOCATES FOR RESRONDENTS 2(a--C),\nSRI: D VIJAYA KVUIVEAR-, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT\nADVOCATE T~OR'R'ESRONDENT NO.1)\n\n. .\u00b0-T'HI":3- 'WRIST APPEAL FAILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA\nHIGH COURT A_CT.PR.Av=ING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT\nPETITION NO..378_Q2,I2'0.IIITDATEO 1.7.2008.\n\nTHIISV' W'RIT"CA_PPIEAL COMING ON ?'OR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS\n\nDAV, V.G. SEAS!-g_Ak\u00a7I'f', 3., DELIVERED TNE FOLLOWING:\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
 _ ThI\u00bbS..EIppea% is fiied by first respondent in W.P.37’802\/200}.<\/p>\n
IIbe’ing.._a\u00a7ggrieved by the order of the ieamed smgle Judge dated<\/p>\n
OOO”–\u00abV.AVi{‘.’7″.2{)O8 wherein the ieamed single Judge in the writ petition<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
filed by the respondent No.2 herein has set aside the order of<\/p>\n
the Land Tribunai, wherein occupancy rights was conf’errfe.d”i–ivVn<\/p>\n
favour of the appeilant and remanded the nwatterrt-to <\/p>\n
Tribunal for fresh consideration of _th.e,__4appii’ca”t’i–o.n.V”o\u00a3’_%.rhve_V<\/p>\n
appellant herein–respondent No.1 in the  pieititioin,:xy=;}’;=gh”*::a:<\/p>\n
direction to the Tribunal to ‘co’iisziderA’v-the. abp;3i.icati.oni lnvd<\/p>\n
accordance with law and in c_ompiian_ce’~of’t_he d.ir’ecti_on_issued in<\/p>\n
the order.\n<\/p>\n
2. The material facts ofithe. jcasey\u00abi’icece”s_sa’i*%,r” For the disposal<\/p>\n
of this appeal are    <\/p>\n
The appeliant’li7ie’re:in dgfii\u00a7:d~…_forrn No.7 seeking confermeni:
\nof occupancy ri’ghtsVin’-  Survey No.3\/1, measuring 1
\nacre 2 guyntasi, Sur\\?ey_V”l\\’io.3\/1A, measuring 2 acres 10 guntas
\ns.ituated~._in (_Z””iiioi:_ij<a\u00abhValii viliage claiming that appiicant was the<\/p>\n
tenantotggithe7"_siaid:;'iand on 1.3.1974, therefore', entitled to<\/p>\n
vV'.;\u00abg\\cori_ferme"n–t o.f:.ocicup_ancy rights. 'i"he Tribunai had originaily<\/p>\n
the application filed by the appeliant herein by an order<\/p>\n
"i_::la'_te_d'._V:t8.'f\u00a31.1986. Being aggrieved by the said order writ<\/p>\n
 ipeititi-on was filed by the appeliant herein and the matter was<\/p>\n
*9;\n<\/p>\n
remanded to the Tribunai and after the remand, the Tribunal has<\/p>\n
proceeded to hold that appiicarit is cultivating the land irr*res.._oe–ct<\/p>\n
of which occupancy rights is claimed and <\/p>\n
conferment, accordingly aliowed the ai_3_p.l.ic__atior\u00e9Mfdr–:’occ’L;ija.ric’~,4_V<\/p>\n
rights. Respondent No.2 herein filed  <\/p>\n
that enquiry has not been held as”,oe–r_Ruie’v-1i7 of tfheA’v\u00abil{‘a-rnartaka v T’<\/p>\n
Land Reforms Rules, 1974. {The o,rd_f:eVVr~,i_s’VV;_1vot   order
\nand proceedings is not  g with law and
\ntherefore, the order co’;-wfterrirfrg” in favour of
\nthe appeliant her.e.iri..i,i’s set ias’idVe’.W;Tl1e learned singie
\nJudge, after  TOT thfi’ i3\u20ac3ftie5 by 89
\norder dated   that the Land Triburiai,
\nChikkabaliapur,  in accordance with Rule 17
\nofthe Larid”R.eform’s.,_V_Ptriles: and the order impugned is not a
\n ,V:I4v’t..,_Qnly refers to the evidence adduced by the<\/p>\n
partie’s._a”nd. ilvi.’t’\u00a72.,ou’t,:’iassigning valid reasons, the Tribunal has<\/p>\n
 “oroceeded’– to v–__oass”””the orders and therefore, the order is liabie to<\/p>\n
 asi_de and accordingly, the iearned single 3udge set aside<\/p>\n
i.or’d_e’r’ of the Land Tribunal and remanded the matter to the<\/p>\n
 VfLa:nd-Tribunal for passing fresh orders in accordance with law<\/p>\n
was<\/p>\n
and the appeiiant and respondent No.2 herein were perrnitted to<\/p>\n
fiie authenticated documents in support of their respect.ijve:’jcl_a’i–m<\/p>\n
within four months from the date of receipt of <\/p>\n
order and accordingiy disposed of th.e…..w_rit Sewing<\/p>\n
aggrieved by the said order passed by ;t.he1’_iea’irned_ “singi\u00e9 <\/p>\n
dated 1.7.2088, the appeiiant has’tiiedg.thisA’appeai.i’.i  .\n<\/p>\n
3. We have heard the iearne”d,cou_nsei’*for”i.hetappeiiant<\/p>\n
and the iearned counsei ap’p:e’a.ring.i’AVfo_r:Vth.e~.i:e~g.ai representatives
\nof respondent No.2 and the vgievarnehdg C:;ove.rnrt_i;e.n’t Advocate for<\/p>\n
respondent No.1.\n<\/p>\n
4. Learned cou’:~*.S*e.i_:i:forg”tt3A\u00e9’r–*3iJ’peiiant submitted that though
\nthe Chairman  ‘signed the impugned order on
\n31_v.V8.20O”1;”t’tie sn\u00e9mi_\u00bb.\u00a7’i\u00a7 ot: the Tribunai have singed the order
\n is only a technica! defect as the Tribunal<\/p>\n
has c’onsi”d_eir\u00e9d\u00b0’i_nV__d’e;ta’il the materiai produced by the parties and<\/p>\n
 given”–spec’if-iVc”” finding that appeiiant was the tenant of the<\/p>\n
 respect of which occupancy rights was sought and the<\/p>\n
 is entitled to the occupancy rights and parties couid<\/p>\n
 be made to suffer for the fauit of the members of the<\/p>\n
we<\/p>\n
Tribunal and he also submitted that the Tribunal has assigned<\/p>\n
valid reasons for conferring occupancy rights ln favour.Vof”it_he<\/p>\n
appellant. in support of this, reliance was placed  _<\/p>\n
passed by this Court in case of 3OHl\\l USOUZA   <\/p>\n
av LRs v\/s. VEEAYA BANK & oras. repA_orte.dAzfivnlrfilsligl<\/p>\n
4048, wherein the learned singlessudge ‘ol’._ this  <\/p>\n
that when the matter is remanded four*f_r;esh dilsposialv’:onlfteclmical
\ngrounds for the reasons sta’te\u00a2i’j,\u00ab-  lear’rled\u00bb.l..lASi’ngie Judge was of
\nthe conformant view that  the matter is
\nwholly unnecessary’:alrirlillhrhggirernaindwoirder\u00bb.rrgiguires review and<\/p>\n
acco rd i ng ly, reviewed the orcl  rei~.1a rid [<\/p>\n
5. Learned  “for legal representatives of
\nrespondent No.V2r._s%ubrnit.ted.. that learned single Judge has held
\nthatgthe ensguir’y hasV”not,l_:;e_en conducted in accordance with Rule<\/p>\n
 _LanVd’\u00ab.R’e.l”o*rijjs Rules as judgment is not signed by the<\/p>\n
Chairi”‘n’a:rj—.,and’V’\u00e9.t’he’A’g::’rnernbers on the same day and further<\/p>\n
Vfsubmits tuhazt””vtghe’border is not a speaking order though it is<\/p>\n
.1-.l.e’rigthy,’itgisvlonly cursory of the arguments, the averrnents of<\/p>\n
itor”utheffappiilcalnts made in the affidavit and written submission and<\/p>\n
no reasons are assigned to come to the conclusion that the<\/p>\n
applicant is entitled to conferment of occupancy rights.  <\/p>\n
6. Learned Government Advocate argued in st\u00a5_pp()’rtt:of”dthe’ <\/p>\n
order passed by the learned single Judgef’ ”\n<\/p>\n
7. We have given careful consid_eration_ to the”cojp..t\u00a2_nti_on Void;<\/p>\n
the learned counsel appearing for theiplgartiges Van-ciy_VV:5c’rutiViaised the
\nmaterial on record. The ma.tt\u00a7:i=ial  clearly show
\nthat though the order of the..l;\u00a7–ng\\g\\i\/\/lfa\u00e9ibt’.iAnVal”l’:~i’s—“tieclared to be
\nunanimous, the   on 318.2008
\nand the members   on 2.9.2008 and
\ntherefore when  pronounced on 31.8.2008 the
\nmembers have  and as per Rule 17 of the
\nLand Reforgfns Rules vtsecvition 34 of the Land Revenue Act, the
\n pronounced and signed by the Chairman<\/p>\n
and  .o’_n_’th;ei”‘same day and further, the said ground is<\/p>\n
 the obly V-ground upon which the order passed by the Land<\/p>\n
is setaside. On perusal of the order passed by the<\/p>\n
 iearned single Judge has held that from page 1 to<\/p>\n
  of the order, the contention of the parties has been<\/p>\n
“tat<\/p>\n
cuffed out and without considering the same in the proper<\/p>\n
perspective the order has been passed conferring the ocee\u00bb-pipainpcy<\/p>\n
rights in favour of the appeiiant herein and on <\/p>\n
order we do not find any ground to differ  \u00ab.\\\/iei:\/ii<\/p>\n
taken by the Eearned singie Eudge.  decisifkan-,rei.ie’d4’i;i=;f>je._;7 <\/p>\n
the teamed counsel for the appeiEa4_nt isioot appii\ufb01apbiepptoil the_:”;<\/p>\n
present Case. Accordingiy, we hoivd\ufb01hat ap’p–e.ai”is devoid of
\nmerits and pass the foi%owin’g_’_.o:%i?dei–fV;  .  ”<\/p>\n
8. Appeal is  is ‘divvrected to dispose
\nof the appiicationafresh,’:’–_Vsti’\u00abi\u00a7–ti_\u00a7\/-v..isf}’-~’ac:\u00a3:ordanCe with Eaw within
\nsix months fr”or\ufb01 ‘th.eii,dat\u00e9f0Fiawtfopy of this judgment or
\nproduction ofvzcertified.Copy’.Vof\u00bb\u00abth’i’s.to;.:der, whichever is ear\u00e9iei”.<\/p>\n
Sd\/-‘
\nJudge<\/p>\n
1a’aq”\u00e9<\/p>\n
‘ :\u00bbV<;'\u00bb–i  V<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M Narayanasway vs The Land Tribunal on 24 August, 2010 Author: V.G.Sabhahit And K.Govindarajulu IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANG\/-U.ORE___ DATED THIS THE 24″‘ DAY OF AUGUST 2010 VT PRESENT THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE V.\u00a73M_SABHA’HI’T~.:’f; . ‘ AND THE HON’E5i_E MR.)UST1c:E’K~…_’GOY1-NBARAJULVU._, WRIT APPEAL NO.1418″OE2O08 E BETWEEN: – M NARAYANASWAY S\/O LATE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-184867","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM Narayanasway vs The Land Tribunal on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M Narayanasway vs The Land Tribunal on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-30T10:10:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M Narayanasway vs The Land Tribunal on 24 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-30T10:10:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1243,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010\",\"name\":\"M Narayanasway vs The Land Tribunal on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-30T10:10:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M Narayanasway vs The Land Tribunal on 24 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M Narayanasway vs The Land Tribunal on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M Narayanasway vs The Land Tribunal on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-30T10:10:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M Narayanasway vs The Land Tribunal on 24 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-30T10:10:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010"},"wordCount":1243,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010","name":"M Narayanasway vs The Land Tribunal on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-30T10:10:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-narayanasway-vs-the-land-tribunal-on-24-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M Narayanasway vs The Land Tribunal on 24 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184867","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184867"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184867\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184867"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184867"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184867"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}