{"id":184957,"date":"2011-03-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011"},"modified":"2016-08-26T23:22:33","modified_gmt":"2016-08-26T17:52:33","slug":"state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"State vs Bachubhai on 14 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
State vs Bachubhai on 14 March, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: Jayant Patel,&Nbsp;Ms.Justice B.M.Trivedi,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nFA\/3667\/2009\t 7\/ 7\tJUDGMENT \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nFIRST\nAPPEAL No. 3667 of 2009\n \n\nTo\n\n\n \n\nFIRST\nAPPEAL No. 3681 of 2009\n \n\n \n \nFor\nApproval and Signature:  \n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL  \nHONOURABLE\nMS.JUSTICE B.M.TRIVEDI\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n1\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n2\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nTo be\n\t\t\treferred to the Reporter or not ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n3\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\ttheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n4\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tthis case involves a substantial question of law as to the\n\t\t\tinterpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order\n\t\t\tmade thereunder ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n5\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tit is to be circulated to the civil judge ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT & 1 - Appellant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nBACHUBHAI\nGAMJIBHAI LAWAR & 2 - Defendant(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMS\nMOXA THAKKAR Ld. AGP for Appellant(s) : 1 - 2. \nMR VIJAY N RAVAL\nfor Defendant(s) :\n1, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL\n\t\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\t \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nand\n\t\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\t \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMS.JUSTICE B.M.TRIVEDI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 14\/03\/2011 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nJUDGMENT<\/pre>\n
(Per
\n: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL)<\/p>\n
1.\tWhen
\nthe Civil Application for fixing early date of hearing of these First
\nAppeals, is taken up for hearing, with the consent of the learned
\ncounsel appearing for both the sides, the appeals are taken up for
\nfinal hearing.\n<\/p>\n
2.\tAs
\nall the appeals arise from the common judgment and award passed by
\nthe Reference Court, they are being considered by this common
\njudgment.\n<\/p>\n
3.\tThe
\nshort facts of the case are that for the project of Adalwada
\nIrrigation Scheme, the land at village Bhorva, Taluka Dhanpur was
\nacquired under the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as
\n“the Act”). The notification under sec. 4 of the Act was
\npublished on 4.3.2004, whereas, the notification under sec. 6 of the
\nAct was published on 27.5.2004.  The award was passed on 15.1.2005 by
\nthe Special Land Acquisition Officer and the compensation was
\nawarded. However, the said compensation was not satisfactorily to the
\noriginal land owners,  raised dispute under sec. 18 of the Act, which
\ncame to be referred to the Reference Court for adjudication. The
\nReference Court, after hearing both the sides, awarded the
\ncompensation at Rs. 35\/- per sq. mtrs. plus statutory benefits of
\nsolatium and increase of price as per Section 23(1-A) of the Act and
\nthe interest as per the statutory requirement. It is under these
\ncircumstances, the present appeals before this Court.\n<\/p>\n
4.\tWe
\nhave heard learned AGP Ms Moxa Thakkar for the appellants and Mr.
\nV.N. Raval learned advocate for the original claimants.\n<\/p>\n
5.\tIt
\nis undisputed position that village Bhorva at which lands were
\nsituated, is adjacent to village Adalwada. The lands were also
\nacquired for the very project at village Adalwada and for the said
\nlands also, the dispute was raised for compensation and the matters
\ncarried up to this Court in the proceedings of First Appeal No.
\n2168\/2010 and allied matters, which came to be decided by this Court
\n(Coram: Jayant Patel & Ms. Abhilasha Kumari, JJ) on 2.8.2010 and
\nas per the said decision, the compensation at Rs. 35\/- per sq. meter
\nis confirmed by this Court.\n<\/p>\n
6.\tWe
\nmay state that this Court in the above referred decision of First
\nAppeal No. 2168\/2010 and allied matters, inter alia, observed that:\n<\/p>\n
“4.\tThe
\nonly contention raised on behalf of the Special Land Acquisition
\nOfficer by the learned Assistant Government Pleader is that the
\nReference Court ought not to have relied upon the decision of other
\nReference Court for acquisition of the land of Jalod taluka. He
\nsubmitted that unless evidence was there on record to show that the
\npresent lands were just adjacent to the land of Reference Case No.
\n254 of 2004, in respect to the lands of Jalod Taluka, the reliance
\nplaced is erroneous,therefore, it would be a case for remand of the
\nmatter to the Reference Court for re-consideration.\n<\/p>\n
5.\tThe
\nexamination of the said contention shows that it is not the only
\nmatter where the Reference Court has not at all considered the other
\naspects. In order to assess the valuation of the land,broadly, three
\nmodes or the yardsticks are settled. One is of the sale instances,
\nthe another is, if any award or compensation is fixed by the
\ncompetent Court in respect to the similar land or adjacent land and
\nthe third is yield method. On the aspect of the sale instances, the
\nReference Court has considered, but the said aspect is not given
\nweightage on the ground that there was no evidence which led to the
\neffect that there was voluntary sale and voluntary purchase and\/or
\nfertility of the land for which, the sale instances were shown. The
\nsale deeds were also not produced. On the aspect of yield method, the
\nclaim was of Rs.1,00,000\/- per acre and the evidence, as was led on
\nbehalf of the claimants, was to the effect that the annual
\nagricultural income from the land was Rs.1,00,00\/- per acre per year.
\nLearned Judge, while appreciating the evidence,has not fully relied
\nupon the said aspects and has assessed yearly income of approximately
\nRs.30,000\/- per acre. Out of the said amount, 50% is deducted towards
\nexpenses of the agriculture and net income assessed is Rs.15,000\/-
\nper acre.\n<\/p>\n
6.\tThe
\nformula applied for capitalist value is 10
\ntimes of the annual income,therefore, the learned Judge has found
\nthat the market value would be considered as Rs.1,50,000\/- per acre.
\nIf the said finding of the learned Judge is considered per sq.meter,
\nthe value of the land would be Rs.40 per sq.meter. It is in addition
\nto the aforesaid finding, the learned Judge has relied upon the order
\nof the Reference Court in Reference Case No. 254 of 2004 in respect
\nto the other agricultural land of Jalod Taluka, wherein the
\nadditional compensation awarded was Rs.35\/-. The pertinent aspect is
\nthat, as stated by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the said
\ndecision of the Reference Court in Reference Case No.254 of 2004 has
\nbeen confirmed by this Court
\nin First Appeal No. 4073 of 2007 and allied
\nmatters vide order dated 17.8.2007. Another
\naspect which is required to be taken note of is that the Notification
\nunder Section 4 of the Act in that case  was published on 22.1.2001
\nand the additional compensation awarded was Rs.35 per sq.meter. If
\nthe appreciation, at the rate of 10% per annum, is considered from
\nthe date of the Notification under Section 4 of the Act, in that case
\n and the date of the Notification under Section 4 of the Act in the
\npresent case, it would be approximately 30% more since there is a gap
\nof about 3 years in between. In spite of the same, the learned Judge
\nhas not considered the appreciated value and has taken the base as
\nwas granted
\non the basis of the valuation assessed in
\nthe year 2001 at Rs.35\/- per sq.meter. Under these circumstances, we
\nfind that the contention that unless the land of Taluka Jalod, which
\nwas subject matter of Reference Case No.254 of 2004 was adjacent to
\nthe land in question,the Reference Court could not have relied upon
\nthe decision of the earlier award passed in respect to the land of
\nTaluka Jalod, which would not only lose its importance but
\nconsidering the case in either way, may be on the basis of the yield
\nmethod or may be on the basis of the compensation fixed for similar
\nland,it is not possible to accept the contention that the additional
\ncompensation awarded can be said to be unfair or improper.”\n<\/p>\n
7.\tFor
\nthe reasons recorded by the reference Court is considered in light of
\nthe aforesaid observations made by this Court for acquisition of the
\nlands at village Adalwada, it is not possible for us to take a
\ndifferent view.\n<\/p>\n
8.\tThe
\nattempt was made by the learned AGP for the appellant to contend that
\nthere was distance of about 60 kilometers from the land which was
\ncovered in Land Reference Case No. 254 of 2004, pertaining to Jhalod
\nTaluka, which is considered as a basis by the Reference Court in the
\npresent matter.\n<\/p>\n
9.\tWe
\nmay record that the similar contention came to be raised by the
\nlearned AGP in respect of the acquisition of lands for the same
\nproject at village Nalu  in the proceedings of First Appeal No.
\n5244\/2010 and allied matters, decided on 25.2.2011. It may be
\nrecorded that village Nalu is on the otherside of village Adalwada
\nand in the said group of First Appeal No. 5244\/2010, while dealing
\nwith the said contention, this Court observed, thus:\n<\/p>\n
“9.We
\nare araid such can be considered in view of the aforesaid decision of
\nthis Court. Same fact situation prevailed in the earlier matter of
\nFirst Appeal No. 2168 of 2010 and even though there was distance of
\nabout 60 kilometers from the land covered by Reference case No. 254
\nof 2004, this Court accepted the compensation for the land of village
\nAdalwada having found that no error has been committed by the
\nReference Court. On the contrary, if the appreciation is to be
\nconsidered as it is, as observed in the above referred judgment and
\nreproduced hereinabove, it could be 30% more in comparison to the
\nland located at Taluka Jhalod, whereas,
\nsuch appreciation was not given by the Reference Court in the said
\nmatter for the land at village Adalwada and such has also not been
\ngiven in the present matter. Therefore, even if that aspect is
\nconsidered, it would not lead us to take a different view than the
\nview taken in First Appeal No. 2168 of 2010 and allied matters.”\n<\/p>\n
10.\tThe
\nsame view deserves to be taken in the present matters. It appears
\nthat the reference Court has
\nawarded compensation of Rs. 35\/- per sq. meter at par
\nwith the view taken by this Court and, therefore, all the appeals are
\nmeritless and, therefore, dismissed. Considering the facts and
\ncircumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n
11.\tIn
\nview of the order passed in the main First Appeal, Civil Application
\nNo. 3120 of 2011 would not survive and shall stands disposed of
\naccordingly.\n<\/p>\n
(JAYANT
\nPATEL, J.)<\/p>\n
(Ms.\n<\/p>\n
B.M. TRIVEDI, J.)<\/p>\n
mandora\/\t<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court State vs Bachubhai on 14 March, 2011 Author: Jayant Patel,&Nbsp;Ms.Justice B.M.Trivedi,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print FA\/3667\/2009 7\/ 7 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No. 3667 of 2009 To FIRST APPEAL No. 3681 of 2009 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL HONOURABLE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-184957","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState vs Bachubhai on 14 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State vs Bachubhai on 14 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-26T17:52:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State vs Bachubhai on 14 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-26T17:52:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1517,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011\",\"name\":\"State vs Bachubhai on 14 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-26T17:52:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State vs Bachubhai on 14 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State vs Bachubhai on 14 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State vs Bachubhai on 14 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-26T17:52:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State vs Bachubhai on 14 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-26T17:52:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011"},"wordCount":1517,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011","name":"State vs Bachubhai on 14 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-26T17:52:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-bachubhai-on-14-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State vs Bachubhai on 14 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184957","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184957"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184957\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184957"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}