{"id":184983,"date":"2011-08-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011"},"modified":"2015-07-27T17:06:49","modified_gmt":"2015-07-27T11:36:49","slug":"ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Ramdeo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Patna High Court – Orders<\/div>\n
Ramdeo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 August, 2011<\/div>\n
                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA\n                                            CR. REV. No.770 of 2009\n                        Ramdeo Yadav son of Parsadi Yadav, resident of\n                         village Babhnauli, P. S. Nardiganj, District-\n                         Nawadah.\n                                                             .... Petitioner.\n                        1. The State of Bihar\n                        2. Azad Yadav son of Ravran Yadav, resident of\n                            village Babhnauli, P. S. Nardiganj, District-\n                            Nawadah.\n                                                            ... Opp. Parties.\n                                      --------\n                        For the petitioner :Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Adv.\n                        For the State        : Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey, APP.\n                                     ---------\n\n                                    PRESENT\n                        Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amaresh Kumar Lal\n\n                                     O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
                                   ( 11.08.2011)\n<\/p>\n
                                     ——–\n<\/p>\n
Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.                The             informant-petitioner                has<\/p>\n
                         preferred       this    revision        application        against<\/p>\n
                         the order dated 26th June 2008 passed by the<\/p>\n
                         learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada by<\/p>\n
                         which     the    cognizance            has    been      taken    in<\/p>\n
                         Nardiganj       P.     S.    Case      No.    28   of    2007   for<\/p>\n
                         offence punishable under Section 302 I.P. C.<\/p>\n
                         and 27 of the Arms Act against an accused<\/p>\n
                         Bhushan    Chauhan          and   no    cognizance       has    been<\/p>\n
                         taken against co-accused Azad Yadav.<\/p>\n
                                     2.          According        to     the     informant-\n\n                         petitioner,      he     gave      his    fard      beyan   to   the\n\n<\/pre>\n
                         office-in-charge, Nardiganj Police Station on<\/p>\n
                         13.5.2007 at 8.15 P. M. alleging that on the
\n                    2<\/span><\/p>\n
same day at 7.15 a.m. while he was ploughing<\/p>\n
his field, cattle graziers               raised alarm that<\/p>\n
Kailu Yadav was shot by the accused- Bhushan<\/p>\n
Chauhan. Thereafter, the informant went to the<\/p>\n
place of occurrence and saw that his brother,<\/p>\n
Kailu   Yadav     was     lying    dead      and       blood    was<\/p>\n
oozing from his person. Son of the informant,<\/p>\n
Bali    Yadav    and     his   nephew        Pandit      Jee    and<\/p>\n
several    persons        told     the       informant         that<\/p>\n
Bhushan Chauhan shot the deceased dead. The<\/p>\n
reason for the occurrence is the contract of<\/p>\n
constructing road. Bhushan Chauhan had taken<\/p>\n
soil from the wheat field of the informant for<\/p>\n
which on 12.5.2007 Kailu Yadav had altercation<\/p>\n
with Bhushan Yadav, who had threatened him to<\/p>\n
kill.\n<\/p>\n
            3.          The    contention          of     learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the petitioner is that fard beyan<\/p>\n
of the informant was not correctly mentioned<\/p>\n
by the police officer and he filed a protest<\/p>\n
petition    dated       17.5.2007       in      the     Court    of<\/p>\n
learned    Chief        Judicial    Magistrate           stating<\/p>\n
therein    that    on    the     date    and     time     of    the<\/p>\n
occurrence the deceased was returning after<\/p>\n
getting    grinded       the     gram     and     in     the    way<\/p>\n
accused    Bhushan      Chauhan     and      Azad      Yadav    had
\n                         3<\/span><\/p>\n
made    altercation               with    the    deceased.         During<\/p>\n
that altercation, Azad Yadav instigated co-<\/p>\n
accused Bhushan Chauhan to kill the deceased<\/p>\n
and, thereafter, Bhushan Chauhan shot fire at<\/p>\n
Kailu Yadav causing his death. Informant as<\/p>\n
well as other cattle graziers Bali Yadav son<\/p>\n
of Ramdeo Yadav and Pandit Jee, son of Lakhan<\/p>\n
Yadav saw giving shot to the deceased and both<\/p>\n
of     them       running         away        from    the     place     of<\/p>\n
occurrence.\n<\/p>\n
                  4.        It is further contended that<\/p>\n
again       the    petitioner            filed       another      protest<\/p>\n
petition          dated      14th    September          2007      in    the<\/p>\n
Court       of    learned         Chief       Judicial       Magistrate<\/p>\n
that    Kailu          Yadav       was     murdered         by    accused<\/p>\n
Bhushan Chauhan and Azad Yadav, opposite party<\/p>\n
no.    2.     Again         the    petitioner         has     filed     the<\/p>\n
protest petition dated 26.10.2007.<\/p>\n
                  5.    After investigation, the police<\/p>\n
submitted         charge-sheet            against       the      accused,<\/p>\n
Bhushan       Chauhan         for    the       offence       punishable<\/p>\n
under Section 302 I.P. C. and 27 of Arms Act<\/p>\n
and    the       complicity         of     the       co-accused        Azad<\/p>\n
Yadav        was        not        found.        Thereafter,           the<\/p>\n
cognizance          has      been        taken       against      accused<\/p>\n
Bhushan          Chauhan      only       by    the     learned      Chief
\n                     4<\/span><\/p>\n
Judicial Magistrate vide impugned order dated<\/p>\n
26.6.2008<\/p>\n
              6.     The main contention of learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the petitioner is that the protest<\/p>\n
petition and the other materials were before<\/p>\n
the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and he<\/p>\n
ought to have taken cognizance against accused<\/p>\n
Azad    Yadav,      opposite   party     no.    2.    He   has<\/p>\n
further contended that after receipt of the<\/p>\n
charge-sheet,        learned     Magistrate     has       three<\/p>\n
options. He may agree with the final report<\/p>\n
and accept it and close the proceeding or he<\/p>\n
may    give    direction    to    the   police       to    make<\/p>\n
further       investigation       or     he     may        take<\/p>\n
cognizance of the offence if in its opinion<\/p>\n
the facts set out in the final form constitute<\/p>\n
an offence notwithstanding contrary conclusion<\/p>\n
of    the   Investigating      Officer.    It     cannot     be<\/p>\n
said that the Magistrate cannot disagree with<\/p>\n
the report while exercising its power under<\/p>\n
Section       190   Cr.P.C..      In    support      of     his<\/p>\n
contention, he has relied upon decisions of<\/p>\n
this Court in the case of Ashok Yadav & Anr.<\/p>\n
Vs. State of Bihar, reported in 2006(1) PLJR<\/p>\n
204 and in the case of Nathun Yadav & Anr. Vs.<\/p>\n
State of Bihar, reported in 2001(4) PLJR 754.
\n                       5<\/span><\/p>\n
               7.           On     the     other       hand,        the\n\ncontention       of       learned    counsel         for     opposite\n\n<\/pre>\n
party is that opposite party no. 2 was not<\/p>\n
named in the FIR and the petitions filed by<\/p>\n
the    informant-petitioner               do     not    amount       to<\/p>\n
protest     petition         as     it     appears         from     the<\/p>\n
petitions       filed       by     the    informant.         He     has<\/p>\n
further submitted that there is no material on<\/p>\n
record to show the complicity of the opposite<\/p>\n
party no. 2 in the alleged offence, as such<\/p>\n
the      learned          Magistrate           has     not        taken<\/p>\n
cognizance against him.\n<\/p>\n
               8.         After hearing learned counsel<\/p>\n
for both the parties and on perusal of the<\/p>\n
material on record it appears that FIR was<\/p>\n
lodged    against          the    accused       Bhushan      Chauhan<\/p>\n
only     for        the     occurrence          took       place     on<\/p>\n
13.5.2007. When the informant-petitioner                           came<\/p>\n
to know that the name of co-accused has not<\/p>\n
been mentioned in the fard beyan, he filed a<\/p>\n
protest petition in the Court of learned Chief<\/p>\n
Judicial       Magistrate           at     the       earliest       on<\/p>\n
17.5.2007.       Again       he    filed       petition       in    the<\/p>\n
Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate on<\/p>\n
14.9.2007        and       again     on     26.10.2007.            From<\/p>\n
reading     of       all     these       three       petitions      it
\n                     6<\/span><\/p>\n
appears     that    protest       was    made     against       the<\/p>\n
police      and    allegations          were    made     against<\/p>\n
opposite party no. 2. After investigation the<\/p>\n
police has submitted charge-sheet against co-<\/p>\n
accused Bhushan Chauhan and the complicity of<\/p>\n
accused Azad Yadav has not been found. It was<\/p>\n
open to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate<\/p>\n
to   take    recourse      to    three      options.     He     may<\/p>\n
agree with the final report and accept it and<\/p>\n
close the proceeding or he may give direction<\/p>\n
to the police to make further investigation or<\/p>\n
he may take cognizance of the offence if in<\/p>\n
its opinion the facts set out in the final<\/p>\n
form     constitute       an     offence       notwithstanding<\/p>\n
contrary      conclusion         of     the     Investigation<\/p>\n
Officer. It cannot be said that the Magistrate<\/p>\n
cannot      disagree       with       the       report        while<\/p>\n
exercising        its    power    under     Section      190     of<\/p>\n
Cr.P.C. as it has been held in the decision<\/p>\n
reported     in    2006(1)       PLJR    204     (supra).       The<\/p>\n
petitioner has no grievance against the order<\/p>\n
taking cognizance against co-accused Bhushan<\/p>\n
Chauhan. He has only grievance that learned<\/p>\n
Magistrate        should       have     differed       with     the<\/p>\n
finding      of    the     Investigating         Officer       and<\/p>\n
should have taken cognizance against opposite
\n                                   7<\/span><\/p>\n
                 party no. 2 against whom there is material to<\/p>\n
                 show his complicity in the alleged offence.<\/p>\n
                            9.        Considering   the   facts   and<\/p>\n
                 circumstances stated above, learned Magistrate<\/p>\n
                 is directed to consider the material available<\/p>\n
                 on record for considering the facts whether<\/p>\n
                 there is material against accused, opposite<\/p>\n
                 party no. 2. The Hon’ble Supreme court in the<\/p>\n
                 case of Raghubans Dubey vs. State of Bihar,<\/a><\/p>\n
                 reported in AIR 1967 page 1167 has held that<\/p>\n
                 once the Magistrate takes cognizance, it is<\/p>\n
                 his duty to find out who the offenders really<\/p>\n
                 are and once he comes to the conclusion that<\/p>\n
                 apart from the persons sent up by the police<\/p>\n
                 there are material against the other accused<\/p>\n
                 persons for issuance of summons, he can summon<\/p>\n
                 the accused. The summoning of the additional<\/p>\n
                 accused is part of the proceeding initiated by<\/p>\n
                 his taking cognizance of offence.<\/p>\n
                            10.   With the aforesaid observation<\/p>\n
                 and   direction,       this   application    stands<\/p>\n
                 disposed of.\n<\/p>\n
Patna High Court                      (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)
\nDated 11th of August 2011
\nN.A.F.R\/Kanchan\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Patna High Court – Orders Ramdeo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 August, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.770 of 2009 Ramdeo Yadav son of Parsadi Yadav, resident of village Babhnauli, P. S. Nardiganj, District- Nawadah. …. Petitioner. 1. The State of Bihar 2. Azad […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-184983","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court-orders"],"yoast_head":"\nRamdeo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramdeo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-27T11:36:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramdeo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-27T11:36:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1146,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court - Orders\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Ramdeo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-27T11:36:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramdeo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramdeo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramdeo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-27T11:36:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramdeo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-27T11:36:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011"},"wordCount":1146,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court - Orders"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011","name":"Ramdeo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-27T11:36:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeo-yadav-vs-the-state-of-bihar-anr-on-11-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramdeo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184983","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184983"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184983\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184983"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184983"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184983"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}