{"id":185045,"date":"2011-02-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011"},"modified":"2017-10-21T00:03:15","modified_gmt":"2017-10-20T18:33:15","slug":"fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"Fathimath Raheena V vs The Director Of Public &#8230; on 4 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Fathimath Raheena V vs The Director Of Public &#8230; on 4 February, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 37923 of 2010(M)\n\n\n1. FATHIMATH RAHEENA V.\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER\n\n3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER\n\n4. THE MANAGER, AMLPS,KUNDILPARAMBA &amp;\n\n5. SHARANYA M NAIR,\n\n6. SHAMEER, LPSA, AMLPS, PULLITHARA\n\n7. DEEPAK P, LPSA LEAVE SUBSTITUTE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.K.MURALEEDHARAN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR\n\n Dated :04\/02\/2011\n\n O R D E R\n                 T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.\n                     -------------------------------\n                    W.P.(C).No.37923 of 2010\n                     -------------------------------\n             Dated this the 4th day of February, 2011.\n\n                          J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The petitioner herein was appointed as LPSA, by the fourth<\/p>\n<p>respondent, in a newly created vacancy in the AMLPS,<\/p>\n<p>Kundilparamba and AMLPS, Pullithara under his management.<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1 is the copy of the appointment order. The appointment of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner was in the additional division vacancy during 2007-<\/p>\n<p>08. In the light of the order issued by the Government as per<\/p>\n<p>G.O.(P) No.317\/2005\/G.Edn dated 17.8.2005, the said division<\/p>\n<p>was not sanctioned and therefore the appointment was rejected<\/p>\n<p>by the third respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. It is stated that two resignation vacancies of LPSA&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>arose in AMLPS, Kundilparamba and Pullithara with effect from<\/p>\n<p>13.7.2009 due to the resignation of one Babu M.V. and Pramod.A<\/p>\n<p>for joining Government service.         Both the above schools are<\/p>\n<p>under the management of fourth respondent. According to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, she is entitled to be appointed in one of the regular<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 2<\/span><br \/>\nW.P.(C).No.37923 of 2010<\/p>\n<p>vacancies thus pointed out. The fourth respondent appointed<\/p>\n<p>the fifth respondent in the vacancy of Pramod.A from 1.6.2010<\/p>\n<p>onwards and the sixth respondent in the vacancy of Babu M.V.<\/p>\n<p>from the same date. The seventh respondent was appointed in<\/p>\n<p>the leave vacancy of one Abdulrahiman, in which the fifth<\/p>\n<p>respondent was working.       The details of such appointments<\/p>\n<p>have been explained in para 5 of the writ petition. The petitioner<\/p>\n<p>has filed a representation as Ext.P2, raising his claim.         By<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P3 the Government has passed an order to grant approval<\/p>\n<p>of the teachers appointed in the additional division vacancies,<\/p>\n<p>which obliges the manager to file a declaration to appoint<\/p>\n<p>protected teachers in equal number of posts. Petitioner&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>grievance is now against Ext.P5 order whereby his claim was<\/p>\n<p>rejected. It is the case of the petitioner that she has filed an<\/p>\n<p>appeal before the Director of Public Instruction as Ext.P6(a)<\/p>\n<p>along with a stay petition marked as Ext.P6(b).<\/p>\n<p>        3. In these circumstances, the writ petition has been filed,<\/p>\n<p>seeking various reliefs. The grievance voiced by the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>mainly is that the petitioner was entitled to be appointed and the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    3<\/span><br \/>\nW.P.(C).No.37923 of 2010<\/p>\n<p>Manager even though is bound by the Government order Ext.P3,<\/p>\n<p>no action has been taken on the basis of the Government order<\/p>\n<p>so far.\n<\/p>\n<p>        4.     Inspite of receipt of notice, none of the party<\/p>\n<p>respondents have appeared. Therefore it is only proper to direct<\/p>\n<p>the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P6(a) revision with<\/p>\n<p>a notice to all the parties concerned. Learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner prays for a further direction to the Director of Public<\/p>\n<p>Instruction, Thiruvananthapuram, to consider the petition filed by<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner as Ext.P6(b) before the appeal is disposed of. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner seeks for an interim order, in the light of the fact that, a<\/p>\n<p>proposal for the approval of appointment of the respondents 5 to<\/p>\n<p>7, is pending before the Education Officer concerned.<\/p>\n<p>        5.    There will be a direction to the Director of Public<\/p>\n<p>Instruction to take a decision on the revision petition Ext.P6(a)<\/p>\n<p>after hearing the petitioner and respondents 4 to 7 within a<\/p>\n<p>period of 3 months from the date of receipt of copy of this<\/p>\n<p>judgment.           The stay petition Ext.P6(b) if pending will be<\/p>\n<p>considered and appropriate orders will be passed within a period<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    4<\/span><br \/>\nW.P.(C).No.37923 of 2010<\/p>\n<p>of three weeks from the date of production of a copy of this<\/p>\n<p>judgment.        The petitioner will produce a copy of writ petition<\/p>\n<p>along with a copy of this judgment for compliance. No costs.<\/p>\n<p>                                       T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,<br \/>\n                                                Judge<br \/>\nami\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Fathimath Raheena V vs The Director Of Public &#8230; on 4 February, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 37923 of 2010(M) 1. FATHIMATH RAHEENA V. &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER 3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER 4. THE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185045","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Fathimath Raheena V vs The Director Of Public ... on 4 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fathimath Raheena V vs The Director Of Public ... on 4 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-20T18:33:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Fathimath Raheena V vs The Director Of Public &#8230; on 4 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-20T18:33:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":611,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011\",\"name\":\"Fathimath Raheena V vs The Director Of Public ... on 4 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-20T18:33:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fathimath Raheena V vs The Director Of Public &#8230; on 4 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fathimath Raheena V vs The Director Of Public ... on 4 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fathimath Raheena V vs The Director Of Public ... on 4 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-20T18:33:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Fathimath Raheena V vs The Director Of Public &#8230; on 4 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-20T18:33:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011"},"wordCount":611,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011","name":"Fathimath Raheena V vs The Director Of Public ... on 4 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-20T18:33:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fathimath-raheena-v-vs-the-director-of-public-on-4-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fathimath Raheena V vs The Director Of Public &#8230; on 4 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185045","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185045"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185045\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185045"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}