{"id":185410,"date":"2009-04-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009"},"modified":"2015-11-21T11:40:01","modified_gmt":"2015-11-21T06:10:01","slug":"venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Venu vs Managing Director on 3 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Venu vs Managing Director on 3 April, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 925 of 2005()\n\n\n1. VENU, S\/O.RAMAN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. MANAGING DIRECTOR,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. YASIN, S\/O.ABDULLA,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.S.NANDANAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.SUBHASH CYRIAC\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR\n\n Dated :03\/04\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                 R.BASANT & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ.\n                      ------------------------------------\n                      M.A.C.A No.925 of 2005\n                      -------------------------------------\n                Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2009\n\n                               JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
BASANT, J.\n<\/p>\n
       Claimant before the Tribunal is the appellant before us.<\/p>\n
He had suffered personal injuries in an accident which occurred<\/p>\n
on 23.03.2001. He was aged 37 years on the date of the accident<\/p>\n
and he was employed as Principal and Director of a Teachers’<\/p>\n
Training College. He claimed that he was getting an amount of<\/p>\n
Rs.8,000\/- per mensem. He suffered multiple injuries including<\/p>\n
loss of teeth, fracture of maxilla on both sides, fracture mandible<\/p>\n
right and left condyle, fracture mandible symphysis            as also<\/p>\n
fracture of the shaft of radius (left). He was an inpatient for a<\/p>\n
period of 10 days. He had to continue treatment thereafter. He<\/p>\n
allegedly suffered permanent physical disability which was<\/p>\n
certified to be 15% by the doctor in Ext.A8. Before the Tribunal<\/p>\n
the appellant examined himself as PW1. Exts.A1 to A14 were<\/p>\n
marked.\n<\/p>\n
      2.   The Tribunal on an anxious consideration of all the<\/p>\n
relevant inputs came to the conclusion that the appellant is<\/p>\n
entitled to an amount of Rs.1,00,285\/- as compensation as per<\/p>\n
the details shown below:\n<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A No.925 of 2005           2<\/span><\/p>\n
     1.   Loss of earning                        Rs.18,000\/-\n          (6 X 3000)\n\n     2.   Transport to hospital                  Rs. 2,000\/-\n\n     3.   Medical expenses                       Rs.34,785\/-\n          (covered by bills)\n\n     4.   Bystander's expenses                   Rs. 2,000\/-\n\n     5.   Pain and suffering                     Rs.12,500\/-\n\n     6.   Compensation for disability\/\n          loss of amenities (global\n          amount fixed)                          Rs.30,000\/-\n\n\n                            Total                Rs.1,00,285\/-\n\n<\/pre>\n
The said amount was directed to be paid along with interest @<\/p>\n
6% per annum.\n<\/p>\n
     3.   The appellant claims to be aggrieved by the impugned<\/p>\n
award. What is the grievance? Called upon to explain the<\/p>\n
precise nature of the challenge which the appellant wants to<\/p>\n
mount against the impugned award, the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
appellant assails the impugned award on various grounds.<\/p>\n
     4.   First of all it is contended that the interest has been<\/p>\n
awarded only @ 6% per annum. Relying on precedents, it is<\/p>\n
contended that interest must have been awarded at least @ 7.5%<\/p>\n
per annum. We agree with the counsel.\n<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A No.925 of 2005           3<\/span><\/p>\n
     5.    The learned counsel then contends that the monthly<\/p>\n
income of the appellant reckoned for the purpose of<\/p>\n
ascertainment of loss of earnings at Rs.3,000\/- per mensem is<\/p>\n
grossly inadequate.    No evidence whatsoever is produced to<\/p>\n
prove the monthly income of the appellant.              In these<\/p>\n
circumstances, we take the view that the Tribunal cannot be<\/p>\n
faulted for drawing a presumption of prudence that at least<\/p>\n
Rs.3,000\/- must have been earned every month by the appellant<\/p>\n
at the relevant time, in the absence of better evidence. It must<\/p>\n
have been very easy in the circumstances of the case to produce<\/p>\n
such evidence about income.       The appellant can blame only<\/p>\n
himself for not enabling the Tribunal to pass a proper award if<\/p>\n
he feels that the award is not proper.\n<\/p>\n
     6.    The learned counsel then contends that no amount<\/p>\n
has been awarded under the head `reduction in earning<\/p>\n
capacity’ though the Tribunal had entered a positive finding that<\/p>\n
there has been disability to the extent of 12%. The Tribunal<\/p>\n
appears to have taken the view that an amount of Rs.30,000\/-<\/p>\n
can be paid under the head compensation for disability\/loss of<\/p>\n
amenities. But no amount has at all been awarded under the<\/p>\n
head reduction in earning capacity.        We have been taken<\/p>\n
through Ext.A8 disability certificate in detail. The nature of the<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A No.925 of 2005          4<\/span><\/p>\n
alleged disability suffered reveals that such disability was<\/p>\n
unlikely to have a direct substantial bearing on the earning<\/p>\n
capacity of the appellant.   The appellant is stated to be the<\/p>\n
Principal of a Teachers’ Training Institution.     The disability<\/p>\n
includes tenderness and instability to inferior radio ulnar joint<\/p>\n
left. Nerve palsies were suffered, it is further noted. In these<\/p>\n
circumstances, we are further satisfied that though the<\/p>\n
percentage of physical disability certified in Ext.A8 to be 15%<\/p>\n
and accepted by the Tribunal to be 12%, may not result in<\/p>\n
reduction of earning capacity to an identical extent must<\/p>\n
certainly be held to reduce the earning capacity of the appellant.<\/p>\n
The Tribunal, we agree with the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
appellant, erred in not awarding any amount under the head of<\/p>\n
loss of earning capacity. Taking the totality of circumstances<\/p>\n
into account, we take the view that the physical disability of 12%<\/p>\n
accepted by the Tribunal can safely be assumed to result in<\/p>\n
reduction in earning capacity to the extent of 5%. The appellant<\/p>\n
is entitled to be compensated for such reduction\/impairment in<\/p>\n
the earning capacity. The appellant is shown to be aged 37<\/p>\n
years on the date of the accident and 16, as stipulated in the<\/p>\n
second schedule, can be accepted as the multiplier. We are not<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A No.925 of 2005          5<\/span><\/p>\n
persuaded to agree that the amount awarded under any other<\/p>\n
head warrants appellate interference.\n<\/p>\n
     7.   The above discussions lead us to the conclusion that<\/p>\n
the appellants are entitled for a further amount of Rs.28,800\/-<\/p>\n
under the head reduction in earning capacity (Rs.3000 X 12 X 16<\/p>\n
X 5\/100) in addition to the amounts already awarded by the<\/p>\n
Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n
     8.   We     further  direct that   the   entire  amount  of<\/p>\n
compensation shall carry interest @ 7.5% per annum from the<\/p>\n
date of petition till payment.\n<\/p>\n
     9.   This appeal is allowed in part to the above extent.<\/p>\n
                                     (R.BASANT, JUDGE)<\/p>\n
                                    (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE)<\/p>\n
rtr\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Venu vs Managing Director on 3 April, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 925 of 2005() 1. VENU, S\/O.RAMAN, … Petitioner Vs 1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, … Respondent 2. YASIN, S\/O.ABDULLA, For Petitioner :SRI.P.S.NANDANAN For Respondent :SRI.SUBHASH CYRIAC The Hon’ble MR. Justice R.BASANT The Hon’ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR Dated […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185410","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVenu vs Managing Director on 3 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Venu vs Managing Director on 3 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-21T06:10:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Venu vs Managing Director on 3 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-21T06:10:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":831,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Venu vs Managing Director on 3 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-21T06:10:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Venu vs Managing Director on 3 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Venu vs Managing Director on 3 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Venu vs Managing Director on 3 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-21T06:10:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Venu vs Managing Director on 3 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-21T06:10:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009"},"wordCount":831,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009","name":"Venu vs Managing Director on 3 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-21T06:10:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venu-vs-managing-director-on-3-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Venu vs Managing Director on 3 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185410","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185410"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185410\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185410"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185410"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185410"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}