{"id":185659,"date":"2008-11-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-08-21T12:01:28","modified_gmt":"2018-08-21T06:31:28","slug":"shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Shri Rajendra Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation … on 27 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Shri Rajendra Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation … on 27 November, 2008<\/div>\n
              CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                Appeal No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2007\/00916 dated 23-8-2007\n                  Right to Information Act 2005 - Section 19\n\nAppellant:          Shri Rajendra Singh\nRespondent:         Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)\n\n\nFACTS<\/pre>\n
      By an application of 12-1-07 Shri Rajendra Singh, Public Prosecutor,
\nCBI, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi applied to the CPIO & SP, Hqrs. CBI seeking
\ncopies of documents as follows:\n<\/p>\n
      “4.    Number of cases which resulted in the discharge or
\n             acquittal of the accused and in these cases, the Ld.
\n             Judges\/ magistrates passed strictures against the
\n             investigating officers\/ prosecutors and the CBI neither
\n             has filed appeals\/ revisions against the Judgements\/
\n             Orders nor filed appeals\/ revisions to expunge the
\n             strictures nor responsibility was fixed against the erring
\n             officers.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      5.     Details\/ File Notings\/ steps\/ Initiatives, taken from
\n             17.10.2006 till date by the Director, CBI, New Delhi for
\n             extending special incentive allowance to the ministerial\/
\n             prosecutor and technical staff, posted in CBI.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      6.     Copy of recommendation letter of Shri K. L. Bishnoi, DIG\/
\n             SCB, Mumbai about my having completed the probation
\n             period of two years satisfactorily.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      7.     Copy of report about my having completed the probation
\n             period of two years satisfactorily forwarded to UPSC,
\n             New Delhi in July 2001.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      8.     Copy of letter for having declared fit for having completed
\n             my probation period of two years satisfactorily.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      9.     Copy of Petition dated 8.9.2003 submitted to the court in
\n             RC 5(A)\/ 2001 (D) by the accused Praveen Kumar Mishra
\n             challenging the authority of the conducting public
\n             prosecutor to conduct the trial.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      10.    Copy of time petition dated 20.11.2003 submitted to the
\n             court by me in RC 5(A)\/2001(D).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      11.    Copy of Benevolent Fund file including File notings,
\n             maintained in the office of the SP\/CBI\/ACB, Dhanbad.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                                      1<\/span><\/p>\n
       12.    Copy of complaint dated 26.9.2006 with injury report
\n             lodged against Shri Sudhanshu Shekhar Inspector, CBI\/
\n             ACB, DHN by Shri Dharma Nand Thakur, LDC\/CBI\/ACB,
\n             DHN and copy of extracts of relevant portion of file
\n             notings wherein said complaint dealt with.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      13.    Copy of station diary dated 25.9.2006 maintained in the
\n             O\/o the SP\/CBI\/ACB Dhanbad.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      14.    Copy of FIR in RC 6(A)\/2003 (D).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      15. Copy of Court Diary No. 47, RC 8(A)\/95(D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.06, RC 11 (A)\/94 (Pat).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No. 25, RC 5(A)\/96(D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.18, RC10 (A)\/2000 (D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.39, RC 21 (A)\/94 (D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.73, RC 3(A)\/ 92 (D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.10, RC 8(A). 2002\/(D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.22, RC 14 (A)\/99(D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.19, RC 8 (A)\/97 (D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.56, RC 10 (A)\/98 (D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.28, RC 21 (A)\/95 (D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary dated 5.8.2003, RC 18(A)\/86(D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.57, RC 10 (A)\/98\/(D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.13, RC 15(A)\/2001(D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.73, RC 1(A)\/94(D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.8, RC 4(A)\/02(D).
\n          Copy of Court Diary No.37, RC 5(D)\/95 (D).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      16.    Copy of inquiry report, conducted by Shri A. K. Singh,
\n             DIG\/CBI\/ACB\/RO, Ranchi in the matter of fabrication of
\n             official record in RC 6(A)\/2003 (D).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      17.    Copy of the then Naib Court Shri Judaki Rajak’s Court
\n             cases diary dated 12.5.2003, 13.5.2003 and 8.8.2003
\n             maintained by him to keep track records of court cases
\n             pending in the court of the then special Judge-cum-1st
\n             ADJ, Dhanbad.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      18.    Copy of the extracts of relevant portion of file notings,
\n             wherein my complaint dated 27.6.2003 and 2.7.2003
\n             regarding fabricating of the official records in case RC
\n             6(A)\/2003 (D) were dealt with.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      19.    Period for which information asked for: last 20 years.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      To this he received a response from Shri R.L. Azad, SP, CBI, SPG,
\nDhanbad dated 7-2-07 on question Nos. 9 to 18 of the application of 20-11-06,<\/p>\n
                                      2<\/span>
\n in which disclosure of information was refused on all points either on grounds
\nthat the information “cannot be supplied” or that “the record is not in the office”,
\nor from exemption claimed u\/s 8 (1) (h).\n<\/p>\n
       Appellant Shri Rajendra Singh then moved his first appeal before the
\nDIG, CBI\/ RO, Ranchi received by the latter on 18.3.2007, upon which by an
\norder dated 8.4.2007 DIG Shri AK Singh directed disclosure of information on
\nseven of the points upholding the CPIO’s decision to refuse only with regard
\nto three points. However, appellant Shri Rajendra Singh wrote to DIG, Shri A.
\nK. Singh on 3.5.07 that despite these orders the DIG’s orders dated 8.4.2007
\nhave not been complied with. Thereafter he has moved a second appeal
\nbefore us with the following prayer: –\n<\/p>\n
       “10.1 That Shri R. N. Azad, CPIO\/SP\/CBI\/ACB, Dhanbad be
\n             directed to furnish the information and copies thereof.
\n       10.2 Any other order(s) deemed fit and proper, may be
\n             passed.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
       In this ground of appeal, however, Shri Rajendra Singh has nowhere
\nmade reference to the order of 8.4.2007 of the first Appellate Authority or the
\nsituation with regard to compliance or non-compliance of the latter’s orders.\n<\/p>\n
       The appeal was heard through Videoconference on 27-11-08.
\nFollowing are present.\n<\/p>\n
       Appellant (at CIC Studio, New Delhi)
\n       Shri Rajendra Singh
\n       Respondents
\n       Shri A. K. Singh, DIG, CBI (at NIC Studio, Ranchi)
\n       Shri V. P. Arya, SP, CBI, ACB, (at NIC Studio, Dhanbad)<\/p>\n
                              DECISION NOTICE<\/p>\n
       In response to a question by the Commissioner, appellant Shri
\nRajendra Singh submitted that there has been part compliance with the orders
\nof First Appellate Authority. He submitted the following statement.\n<\/p>\n
      Queries CPIO       order FAA order dated Reply of CPIO
\n              dated 7.2.07     8.4.2007        dated 25.6.2007
\n                                               to the decision
\n                                               of FAA dated
\n                                               8.4.2007<\/p>\n
                                         3<\/span>
\n      Q. No. 9   Refused              CPIO          was     The CPIO has
\n                                     directed         to   not   complied
\n                                     provide        the    with.\n<\/p>\n
                                     information.\n<\/p>\n
     Q.    No. Refused               CPIO          was     The CPIO has\n     10                              directed         to   not   complied\n                                     provide        the    with.\n                                     information.\n     Q.    No. Refused               The CPIO was          The          CPIO\n     11                              directed         to   allowed         to\n                                     supply\/          or   inspect.\n                                     permitted        to\n                                     inspection.\n     Q. No.12   Refused              The      CPIO    is   Claimed\n                                     justified to claim    exemption.\n                                     exemption u\/s 8\n                                     (1) (h).\n     Q. No.13   Refused              The      CPIO    is   Claimed\n                                     justified to claim    exemption.\n                                     exemptions u\/s 8\n                                     (1) (h).\n     Q. No.14   Refused              CPIO          was     The CPIO has\n                                     directed to supply    complied with the\n                                     the information.      direction.\n     Q. No.15   Refused\/             CPIO is justified     Claimed\n                Claimed              to           claim    exemption.\n                exemption            exemption.\n     Q. No.16   Refused on the       The CPIO should       It was transferred\n                grounds that it is   have transferred      to the office of\n                not the record of    it       to    the    FAA.\n                his office.          concerned CPIO.\n     Q. No.17   Refused on the       Agreed with the       Not available at\n                ground that Shri     CPIO.                 this stage.\n                Judaki      Rajak\n                does not have\n                any dairy for the\n                year 2003.\n     Q. No.18   Refused            The CPIO Was            CPIO          has\n                                   directed to supply      furnished    false\n                                   the information.        information.\n\n<\/pre>\n
      As can be seen in the above statement the CPIO is stated to have
\ncomplied with directions with regard to question nos. 11,14 and 16.       On the
\nremaining two issues Nos. 9 and 10 the orders are claimed not to have been
\ncomplied with and in response to question no. 18 the allegation of appellant is
\nthat the information supplied is false. But upon receiving this information he
\nhas made no appeal on this account to the first appellate authority.\n<\/p>\n
                                       4<\/span><\/p>\n
                     st
\n      Because the 1 appellate authority has not addressed the questions of
\nappellant, which are of direct concern to his public authority and because
\nappellant has pleaded no ground for making a direct complaint to us u\/s 18, or
\napprehension of malafide on the part of the Department, the Commission has
\n                                                                             st
\ndecided to remand this appeal to Shri A.K. Singh, DIG, CBI\/RO, 1
\nappellate authority, at 2 Booty Road, Ranchi-834 008 who is directed to
\ndispose of the appeal, together with action on non-compliance with his
\norders, if any found by him, within 15 working days from the date of
\nreceipt of this decision, under intimation to Shri PK Shreyaskar, Jt Registrar,
\nCentral Information Commission. If not satisfied with the information so
\n                                                                            nd
\nprovided, appellant Shri Rajendra Singh will be free to move a fresh 2
\nappeal before us as per Sec 19 (3). This Appeal now stands disposed of
\naccordingly.\n<\/p>\n
       Announced in the hearing. Notice of this decision be given free of cost
\nto the parties.\n<\/p>\n
(Wajahat Habibullah)
\nChief Information Commissioner
\n27-11-2008<\/p>\n
Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against
\napplication and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO
\nof this Commission.\n<\/p>\n
(Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar)
\nJoint Registrar
\n27-11-2008<\/p>\n
                                      5<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Shri Rajendra Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation … on 27 November, 2008 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2007\/00916 dated 23-8-2007 Right to Information Act 2005 – Section 19 Appellant: Shri Rajendra Singh Respondent: Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) FACTS By an application of 12-1-07 Shri Rajendra Singh, Public Prosecutor, CBI, Vasant […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185659","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Rajendra Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation ... on 27 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Rajendra Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation ... on 27 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-21T06:31:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Rajendra Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation … on 27 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-21T06:31:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1172,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Shri Rajendra Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation ... on 27 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-21T06:31:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Rajendra Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation … on 27 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Rajendra Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation ... on 27 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Rajendra Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation ... on 27 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-21T06:31:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Rajendra Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation … on 27 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-21T06:31:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008"},"wordCount":1172,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008","name":"Shri Rajendra Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation ... on 27 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-21T06:31:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajendra-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-on-27-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Rajendra Singh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation … on 27 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185659","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185659"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185659\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185659"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185659"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185659"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}