{"id":185779,"date":"2009-08-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-09-25T10:21:05","modified_gmt":"2015-09-25T04:51:05","slug":"sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Pradeep M Juvali vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 20 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Pradeep M Juvali vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 20 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
 \n\nDIST: BELGAUM\n\nSR1 SANDEEP A SOUZA\n\nAGE:26 YEARS, occ: BUSINESS\nR\/O SHUKRAWAR PETH\n\nLONDA, TALUK KHANAPUR,\nDIST. BELGAUM\n\nSR1 JOSEPH SIMON LOBO\n\nAGE: 50 YEARS,\n\nocc: SERVICE  \n\nR\/0 SHUKRAWAR PETH \nLONDA, TALUK 1<HANAPuR,=._ \nDIST: BELGAUMV    - \n\nSR1 MUSTAK A BIC'Z'!-$|!;JF\\il'\\'IR.'5T'\u00ab\u00a7\u00a7'V,\u00a7\\R:   ii  .\n\nAGE:29 YEARS,  \n\nOcc AGRICU'i-_TURE I \n\nR\/O BUDVHAVVARPETH 4_\nLONT:-'A, TALOKYYYKHANA~PuR,'''[ '\nDIST:   ..  \n\nS-RI 'LYO"R[CO_STA\nAGE:-40 "YEAR'S, "QCC; SERVICE\nR\/O-JANATA COLONY'\n\n__LOND)'-\\.., "TAi_'?_JK~-,KFI~ANAPUR,\n DIST: BELGAUM\n\nSR: ABDUL MAJIO DAFEDAR\n\n"V T.AG_E:,6OS_Y*EARS,\n\n , Occ:.,,AGR\u00bbICuLTuRE\n\n" "  REHMANBHAI\n\n' R\/O' 'RA GALLI\n\nLONDA, TALUK KHANAPUR,\n\nOIST. BELGAUM\n\nSR1 SAYYAD HUSSAINSAB\n\nOCC:BUSINESS\nR\/O RAI GALLI\nLONDA, TALUK KHANAPUR,\n\n\n\n \n\n(By Sri ; D RAVTKUMARAGCJKAKAKAR, ADV.,\n\nDIST BELGAUM\n\nSRI KRISHNAJI H KPATIL\nOCC: AGRICULTURE\n\nR\/O PUMP GALLI\n\nLONDA, TALUK KHANAPUR,\nDIST. BELGAUM\n\n11\n\n12 sR1 VINAY B NATHBUNG,\nAGE:31 YEARS,\n\nOCC: BUSINESS \nR\/O RAVIWARWAR PETHW, \nLONDA, TALUK KHANAPUR';-._ \n\nDIST. BELGAUM , \n\nSRI DASHARATH A DEsAI--~'   \nAGE: 55 YEARS, OCC:. ,BusI;NEs's'<  - '- "\nR\/O SOMAWAR PE-E_TH:    Ij , A "\n\nLON BA, '-..TA{ij_'Ul_~<' K1'-!AiT\u00a2APU.P\\,j-V A "\nD1sT:i'  '-  \n\n13\n\n)\n\n TH E'  OA.=:k~ARNATAKA\n\nRr+:R_BY "ITSA.,SE.CR'ETARY\nTOQTHE DEPT_.,7OF BUSINESS\n\nA A _ AND'*--INE_JUSTRY\n\n' .S.BUIvLDING, BANGALORE 1 .\n\n'~1f';tHE"K.ARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION\n\n,  <:O'NTROL BOARD REP.,\n " BY ITS OFFICER\nBB4?" AND ST" FLOOR,\n PARISAR BHAVAN\n\n49, CHURCH STREET\n\nA ,.'."'r~*ETiT1O:\\:ERs.\n\n\n\n \n\nBANGALORE 1\n\nTHE SECRETARY TO\n\nTHE DEPARTMENT OF FOREST\nECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT\nM.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE\n\nTHE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENOGINEE-R f A \nO & M, HESCOM KHANAPUR D_IvISIOLN,'--, I  A\nTQ KHANAPUR, DIST: BELGAUII\/I---_ '\n\nTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER .\nMINOR IRRIGATION DEPARJTMENT '\nGOA VES, SHAHAPUR, BELG--A_;UM',\u00ab._\nTALUK AND DIST. --.._BfEGALU;M.  \n\nTHE REGISTRAR  '\nKARNATAKA_HUM.[\u00a3\\N:    \nRIGHTS COE\u00a7IIVi_IS.S'I.Ol'4_ _  " \nM.S.BiUIL1).IN'G}..__BAN:GALORE"._:  I\n\n'F::4!'E"'{2'El\u00a7LJTY'::F;OM'M.ISSION ER"\nB'ELGAUIv':;',TALUK\u00ab.A'ND DSIT BELGAUM\n\nTHE "TAHSItDA'R', ;{H--ANAPUR\n\nVTALUK"~KHA.NAPU-R,"DIST BELGAUM,\n\n Cpg  ..... \n\nKHAN.A"P.lJ RA TALUK,\n\n "'D'I-ST EEEGAUIVI,\n\n10 I\n\nI \n\n'\u00a7i?LII~\u00a7I:'DIL SPONGE IRON LTD.,\n RE'P.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR\n\nLONDA, TALUK KHANAPUR,\n\n I.  DIST. BELGAUM\n\n'THE UNION OF INDIA\n\nREP.BY THE SECRETARY\nTO THE DEPARTMENT OF FOREST\nENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY\n\nNEW DELHI RESPOVDENTS\n\n\n\n_5I\n\n \n\n(By Sri : NAN3UNDAREDDY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI L\n\nM CHIDANANDAYYA, ADV., FOR R10 \nSRI D. NAGARA3, ADV., FOR R2\n\n' SR1 BASAVARAJ KARREDDY, GA., FOR R1, R3, R4. \n\nAND R8)\n\nW.P. No.18165\/2009 IS FILE:D,,,,PRAYING+vTOD~IRE,CT," ~ \n\nTHE RESPONDENTS CONCERNED:'\u00bb._MC:)'RE:' 4P.A,RTICULAR'L*{F_I'\n\nTHE RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 TO~..yvITH*DRAw ":"HE.,j(,Z.FVEVVl_\\;\u00a7N[\u00a7 \n\nTHE PERMISSION GRANTED  R10,fTO OPERATE\n\nTHE FACTORY, UNDER THE PC--LLl:.jjTiIG\u00bbg\u00a7I..\ufb01ONTROL LAWS.\n\nMISC.  ALONG WITH\n\nAFFIDAVIT I-VR'Q)I'x\u00a5.-"BLE COURT MAY BE\nPLEASED    Nos.7,8, 9 TO\nUNLOCK ALL*_TH_E'  THE MAIN GATE\nPREMISES  REAROONS STATED IN THE\n\n   ..... \n<\/pre>\n
“P1_IS'(_’.__.OA “\\.~I}’;”‘.,,,’v_i\u00a7}cn$’,’8299\/2009 IS FILED ALONG WITH
\nVV’.:–,RFFEDAVIT PR.AY’IN’G THAT THIS HON’ BLE COURT MAY BE
\nOT_R’i;EAV$EE3L_.TO”‘PERMIT THE RESPONDENT TO CARRY OUT<\/p>\n
“\u00ab.i_THO,OEA._wORRS IN THE FACTORY FOR THE REASONS STATED<\/p>\n
  I  , _ 1N.,THvE APPLICATION.\n<\/p>\n
-7-<\/span><\/p>\n
destroying and destructing the environment balance,<\/p>\n
severly affecting the ecology in an area of _:Larou4n.d_:”-@100<\/p>\n
acres of densely forest land and rnultiple\u00bb\u00a7V.dariia’g:i_ng.._._T’.<\/p>\n
activities spoiling the road heaith;gof__ton_d’a”vi.l’i’ag”e va.nd.r,:’ <\/p>\n
surrounding area. It is averred Vthat;”the pe_ti’tio’nei*s”ii—are;i<\/p>\n
the residents of tonda villag’e.__and’-have 7noAv;2peVrso3naVl
\ninterest in the reliefs sought   The
\ntenth respondent —   Iron Limited
\n(hereinafter referred toiasvthie  is a large Red
\ncategory  tlojndlaiWfhanapur Dlstrict,
\nBelgaum_._r:established in the year
\n2005 for  MTPA capacity Sponge<\/p>\n
Iron l.’4TPA as a by\/’i3roduct. The<\/p>\n
V seco”n;d”respont:e_nt”- V’l<arnataka State Pollution Control<\/p>\n
 board if _'hAerein.after referred to as the ' Pollution Control<\/p>\n
Eoalrdx' Consent For Establishment (for short,<\/p>\n
'CFVE-') …eni.:e8.01.2005. The State has granted ECC on<\/p>\n
 The consents for operating the unit were<\/p>\n
lg-__'v'ali'ci**"up to a period of 30.06.2008. Thereafter, the<\/p>\n
if  'i'l'i'0i.iStry is being operated by the tenth respondent without<\/p>\n
0' the consent of the second respondent since 01.07.2008.<\/p>\n
\\?\n<\/p>\n
.3.\n<\/p>\n
Industry is established in a denseiy forest area in__ the<\/p>\n
Londa viiiage and the same is set up over an areaw.Vo”f._:l7.5<\/p>\n
Acres. The tenth respondent is in possession.-pf’aro:u.nd.._._T’.<\/p>\n
167 Acres of forest iand as a single unit _.con1–piI_e><f."~: The.:' "<\/p>\n
industry manufactures sponge iron'ri.,4fro=rniron\u00bb.ore:"'with"tti-the'<\/p>\n
help of coal brought from Chahd–rapur'anjd sendsfvthewgsalme<\/p>\n
to its Goa unit.\n<\/p>\n
2.1 It is further~.__averred’i.thaVt-the vil’lag’ers had<\/p>\n
resisted for the establishnrient :’Spon–gf_e.V”Iron Project by<\/p>\n
the tenth respo..nden’t and d\u20aces.piteAthe~.representation made,<\/p>\n
no steps ha*v*eAVVi5e.en_:’tai\u00a7<evn:"'fo__r slzopping the industry run by<\/p>\n
the tenth '=.responde'nt iiiiim obtaining CFE from the<\/p>\n
V second' "respondentV'and unless CFE is obtained from the<\/p>\n
 syecogxnd resgpondvent, the tenth respondent is not entitied to<\/p>\n
run"-lthe The toxic effluents emitted by the said<\/p>\n
V _ indu"stry.–..have' caused air and water pollution and is posing<\/p>\n
:th.reat toilife of peopie of tonda Village and perishing<\/p>\n
'rapidiy the flora andufauna in the area. Though the school<\/p>\n
if  -authorities and the authorities of Grama Panchayat of ali<\/p>\n
" the affected areas have given representation, no steps<\/p>\n
vi<\/p>\n
-13-<\/span><\/p>\n
Africa and the same has been unioaded in Marmugao Port,
\nGoa. Out of the said 30,000 Metric Tonnes of coai, 23,000<\/p>\n
Metric Tonnes have aiready been transported and stor’ed’\u00bbi.n<\/p>\n
the factory premises and on account of iocking  <\/p>\n
gate by respondent Nos.7, 8 and 9, the tenth,’,_re.sVpotndt.er:t <\/p>\n
is not in a position to transport the coat ;to:_a’n_’e\u00a7<ten?:"o,f,_y':'<\/p>\n
7,000 Metric Tonnes, from theport to't_he- facto.ry.pv'reimi\u00a7\u00a7esi<\/p>\n
and wherefore, respondent  has Viiiepdi ~.v'ap.piiication
\nNo.8162\/2009 for a directionto:_re'spVo–vn'dent  8 and
\n9 to unlock aii the seats   and inside
\nthe factory prerniseys1"an.dA._appiicatio:n':.Nio.,.8V209\/2009 is fiied
\nseeking interz.'  7,000 Metric
\nTonnes   the factory premises
\nso as to Vvavuoada  Rs.8-4,000\/-, imposed by<\/p>\n
the port authorities;  i\ufb01earned senior counsel further<\/p>\n
I-'ftV'su*?h1t:i..t'ted"~. tri\ufb02t: the""t'eVnth respondent admits that the<\/p>\n
  the second respondent – Poiiutiori<\/p>\n
Controi Boardf-has come to an end; appiication for renewai<\/p>\n
 conse_nf- fiied by the tenth respondent is pending<\/p>\n
  'coAAris_ideration before the second respondent; the tenth<\/p>\n
'"0—-\ufb02respondent wiii not run the industry unless consent is<\/p>\n
V"\n<\/p>\n
-14-<\/span><\/p>\n
granted by the second respondent; the tenth respondent<\/p>\n
is ready to give an undertaking to that effect\ufb02:’anti\u00ab,v’<\/p>\n
wherefore, there is no merit in the writ petition. <\/p>\n
same is iiabie to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
9. We have given carefui conspideraft.iVon[_:to…the<\/p>\n
contentions of the iearned counlsei”V-.%3DDe’a”rin.g, for the
\nparties and scrutinized the rriateria.i’ <\/p>\n
10. .,con\u00abtefntion’sWVof the iearned
\ncounsei ap_pVea~r.ingljafowr ttae:”‘Ap’et.ifi9_n:-\ufb01e-rs and the iearned
\nsenior counse: aVp”p.ea,r’i’ng'”for–~respondent No.10, it is ciear<\/p>\n
that responderiiirvi\\ic..i’0,’ \u00ab\ufb01ind\u00e9ustry had obtained consent<\/p>\n
__from tijiie”second'”respondent – Poiiution Control Board and<\/p>\n
akthe’same’.f:t:a:s’\u00ab\u00ab..expired on 30.06.2008 and respondent<\/p>\n
 entitied to start the industry uniess<\/p>\n
V 0′ _consen–t is..’granted by the second respondent. Respondent<\/p>\n
4if’V,4″‘i\\io..10_,4ha’s”cieariy averred in the application – Misc. W.<\/p>\n
4’_’_,iiio”.._i31’6’2\/2009 supported by the affidavit of the Managing<\/p>\n
0 :’.,:E)’i’i’ector of the industry that it has no intention of starting<\/p>\n
 the industry, however, it is necessary to carry on minimum<\/p>\n
Q7<\/p>\n
-15-<\/span><\/p>\n
necessary to issue direction to the Deputy Commissioner,<\/p>\n
Beigaum District, who has sealed the premises .io’f.,:’th:e-,,’<\/p>\n
industry run by the tenth respondent to open  i-<\/p>\n
to permit the tenth respondent…..to the <\/p>\n
maintenance of machinery in the ifactory’~. “p.remiis’es,\u00b07–:<\/p>\n
However, it is necessary to,.,:,i’E.f_1sure- iti1.ai;”*v–itenth
\nrespondent wouid not start Vt_h_0e:*v:ind.u_stry “‘\u00a5\\ii.tAhQ,t\u00a73t the
\nconsent of the second   respondent
\nstarts the industry ,_without–  from the
\nsecond respo:nden’t,’i_:Qi:t~:’_isrespondent Nos.7, 8
\nand 9 to tenth respondent.\n<\/p>\n
Having revgarci  made in the applications –<\/p>\n
Misc. w. i\\i’or.,_:816v2″\/*2_0’0,9\u00bb–‘and’08299\/2009 that the tenth<\/p>\n
._,VrespongdeVnt. has Vimpiorted 30,000 Metric Tonnes of Steam<\/p>\n
inA’~.Coai\u00abfromE$.otith..Africa, out of which, 23,000 Metric Tonnes<\/p>\n
are._ai.ready”‘tvrarisported and stored in the premises and on<\/p>\n
V .account oiviiociiing of the main gate by respondent Nos.7, 8<\/p>\n
 respondent No.10 is unable to transport the coal to<\/p>\n
‘_’_,an”‘..:e5<tent of 7,000 Metric Tonnes and is iiabie to pay<\/p>\n
0 md\u00e9rnurrages of Rs.84,000\/- per day to the port authorities,<\/p>\n
 "Goa, it is aiso expedient to permit the tenth respondent to<\/p>\n
\\i3=<\/p>\n
-13-<\/span><\/p>\n
ii). Respondent No.10 is also permitted to<\/p>\n
transport 7,000 Metric Tonnes of Coal imported from South<\/p>\n
Africa and store the same in the premises of the <\/p>\n
and the said Coal should not be used for <\/p>\n
running the industry unless the tenth. .respo’nd’e’ntfVoVljta_i_nqs it <\/p>\n
consent from the second respondent;  A <\/p>\n
iii). Strict vigilance shaAiyl.._l:lwV)V:A’e:.riiaintained,._AAtQV,\u20acensure
\nthat the tenth respondent-.shalVi:–.’:no’tiifst.ar’.t_Vthe industry
\nwithout obtaining_:consent”fronji t_he.V:’Vis_ec.on;dHtespondent and
\nonly after  from the
\nsecond vpr.esp_o’i1cl’en1t;:_ permitted to run the
\nindustry’…an–d’  if there is any violation of<\/p>\n
conditions   respondent, which could<\/p>\n
lead pollutiortyof air and change of environmental<\/p>\n
A”~._Vc\u00bbon’d.itionVs;_i~ty:’i’e open to the petitioners herein to make<\/p>\n
a”pp:ro.priaVte.”_va_p’p’l’ication reporting such violation of consent<\/p>\n
.v issued itihefsecond respondent.\n<\/p>\n
\\,–$<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Pradeep M Juvali vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 20 August, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit DIST: BELGAUM SR1 SANDEEP A SOUZA AGE:26 YEARS, occ: BUSINESS R\/O SHUKRAWAR PETH LONDA, TALUK KHANAPUR, DIST. BELGAUM SR1 JOSEPH SIMON LOBO AGE: 50 YEARS, occ: SERVICE R\/0 SHUKRAWAR PETH LONDA, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185779","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Pradeep M Juvali vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Pradeep M Juvali vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-25T04:51:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Pradeep M Juvali vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 20 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-25T04:51:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1260,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Pradeep M Juvali vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-25T04:51:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Pradeep M Juvali vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 20 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Pradeep M Juvali vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Pradeep M Juvali vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-25T04:51:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Pradeep M Juvali vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 20 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-25T04:51:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009"},"wordCount":1260,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009","name":"Sri Pradeep M Juvali vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-25T04:51:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pradeep-m-juvali-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-20-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Pradeep M Juvali vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 20 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185779","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185779"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185779\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}