{"id":185939,"date":"2008-09-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008"},"modified":"2014-06-14T20:39:42","modified_gmt":"2014-06-14T15:09:42","slug":"chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Chidamparanatha Pillai vs )The Executive Officer on 9 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Chidamparanatha Pillai vs )The Executive Officer on 9 September, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT\n\nDATED:09\/09\/2008\n\nCORAM\nTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU\n\nW.P.(MD)No.7710 of 2006\nW.P.(MD)Nos.9004 &amp; 9023 of 2006\nand\nM.P.(MD)Nos.1,1,1,2,2 &amp; 3 of 2006\n\nChidamparanatha Pillai\n\t\t\t\t...\tPetitioner in W.P.No.7710\/2006\nSelvaraj\n\t\t\t\t...\tPetitioner in W.P.No.9004\/2006\nMuthupandi\n\t\t\t\t...\tPetitioner in W.P.No.9023\/2006\n\nVs.\n\n1)The Executive Officer,\n  Sathankulam Selection Grade Town Panchayat,\n  Sathankulam,\n  Tuticorin District.\n\n2)The President,\n  Sathankulam Selection Grade Town Panchayat,\n  Sathankulam,\n  Tuticorin District.\n\n3)T.Madasamy\n\n4)L.K.V.Venkatachalam Pillai\n  (R3 &amp; R4 impleaded as per order dated 01.09.2008 in\n   M.P.No.1 of 2007 in W.P.No.7710 of 2006)\n\n\t\t\t\t...\tRespondents in W.P.No.7710\/2006<\/pre>\n<p>1)The Executive Officer,<br \/>\n  Sathankulam Selection Grade Town Panchayat,<br \/>\n  Sathankulam,<br \/>\n  Thoothukudi District.\n<\/p>\n<p>2)The President,<br \/>\n  Sathankulam Selection Grade Town Panchayat,<br \/>\n  Sathankulam,<br \/>\n  Thoothukudi District.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t&#8230;\tRespondents in W.P.No.9004\/2006<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t&#8230;\tRespondents in W.P.No.9023\/2006<\/p>\n<p>PRAYER IN W.P.No.7710 of 2006<\/p>\n<p>Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the<br \/>\nConstitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing<br \/>\nthe respondents to allot a shop covering an extent of 34&#215;13 feet as per the<br \/>\noriginal allotment of the site in favour of the petitioner at K.T.Kosalram Bus<br \/>\nStand, Sathankulam, Tuticorin District, considering the petitioner&#8217;s<br \/>\nrepresentation dated 20.07.2006.\n<\/p>\n<p>PRAYER IN W.P.No.9004 of 2006<\/p>\n<p>Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the<br \/>\nConstitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing<br \/>\nthe respondents to allot a shop No.13 covering an extent of 10&#215;15 feet as per<br \/>\nthe original allotment of the site in favour of the petitioner at K.T.Kosalram<br \/>\nBus Stand, Sathankulam, Tuticorin District, considering the petitioner&#8217;s<br \/>\nrepresentation dated 06.09.2006.\n<\/p>\n<p>PRAYER IN W.P.No.9023 of 2006<\/p>\n<p>Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the<br \/>\nConstitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing<br \/>\nthe respondents to allot a shop Nos.16 &amp; 17 covering an extent of 10&#215;15 and<br \/>\n10&#215;15 feet as per the original allotment of the site in favour of the petitioner<br \/>\nat K.T.Kosalram Bus Stand, Sathankulam, Tuticorin District, considering the<br \/>\npetitioner&#8217;s representation dated 07.09.2006.\n<\/p>\n<p>!For Petitioners  &#8230; Mr.K.Srinivasan<br \/>\n^For Respondents  &#8230; Mr.V.Chellammal, Spl.G.P.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t  for R1 &amp; R2<br \/>\n\t\t\t  Mr.S.Sundar and<br \/>\n\t\t\t  Mr.S.Balaji for R3 &amp; R4<\/p>\n<p>:COMMON ORDER<\/p>\n<p>\tSince the subject matter of the three writ petitions relate to the same<br \/>\nissue they were heard together and a common order is passed.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t2.In W.P.(MD)No.7710 of 2006, the petitioner was allotted a vacant site at<br \/>\nSathankulam Selection Grade Town Panchayat in Thiyagi K.T.Kosalram Bus Stand at<br \/>\nSathankulam.  As per the resolution of the Town Panchayat dated 31.03.1998, the<br \/>\nallotments were made and subsequently, the rent for the shops were revised from<br \/>\ntime to time.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t3.The petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.9023 of 2006 was also one such allotee.  In<br \/>\nW.P.(MD)No.9004 of 2006 the petitioner claims to have been allotted a vacant<br \/>\nsite in the year 1990 and the Panchayat had fixed the rent for the vacant site<br \/>\nat Rs.710\/- per month for running a Beeda Stall.  But for such allotment made in<br \/>\nhis favour, the petitioner had not produced any such order in the typed set of<br \/>\npapers.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t4.In all the three writ petitions the prayer of the petitioners was for a<br \/>\ndirection to allot new shops in favour of the petitioners at the Bus Stand<br \/>\nconsidering their representations dated 20.07.2006, 06.09.2006 and 07.09.2006.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t5.These writ petitions were admitted and interim orders was granted on<br \/>\n01.09.2006, 28.09.2006 and 05.10.2006 respectively.  The Executive Officer of<br \/>\nthe Town Panchayat had filed vacate stay applications in all the three writ<br \/>\npetitions and when they were listed today the main writ petitions were taken up<br \/>\nfor final disposal.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t6.It is seen from the records that the petitioners never had any<br \/>\nconstructed shops.  It is before the construction of the new shops at the Bus<br \/>\nStand, five persons were allotted temporary shops in the Bus Stand.<br \/>\nSubsequently the lease granted in their favour were extended from time to time.<br \/>\nThe Panchayat served notice dated 20.09.2005 stating that in respect of the site<br \/>\nleased out to the petitioners the Panchayat had decided to construct shops under<br \/>\nthe Urban Development Scheme and tenders were called for and hence they were<br \/>\ndirected the petitioners to vacate the sites within seven days.  It was also<br \/>\naverred that the petitioners have vacated the premises.  After the construction<br \/>\nwas completed, the petitioners made representations to the Panchayat to provide<br \/>\nshops to them.  The petitioners&#8217; claim that they made representations to the<br \/>\nPanchayat to allot shops and that the respondent\/Panchayat gave certain oral<br \/>\nassurances were denied.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t7.It was also further stated that the respondent\/Panchayat had invested<br \/>\nhuge amounts for the construction of the new shops at the K.T.Kosalram Bus Stand<br \/>\nand therefore, the question of allotting any shops directly to the petitioners<br \/>\nmay not arise.  It was also stated that in terms of G.O.No.2(D) No.85 Municipal<br \/>\nAdministration and Water Supply Department dated 19.07.2000 no preferential<br \/>\nright of tenancy can be given to any person after a new building was constructed<br \/>\nafter demolishing the existing structures.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t8.Even the earlier order of the Government in G.O.No.916 (Rural and Local<br \/>\nAdministration Department) dated 15.06.1984 got revoked by the new order dated<br \/>\n19.07.2000.  Therefore, the petitioners placing their claims on the basis of the<br \/>\nold G.O. is not available.  In G.O.Ms.No.147 (Municipal Administration and Water<br \/>\nSupply Department) dated 30.12.2000 it was clearly stated that renewal of<br \/>\nlicense can be done only if it is beneficial to a local body and it must<br \/>\nincrease the welfare measures of the Panchayat and that the income of a<br \/>\nPanchayat must be the determining factor.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t9.Pursuant to the said G.O. the Commissioner for Municipal Administration<br \/>\nhad issued sufficient guidelines vide his proceedings dated 11.01.2001 wherein<br \/>\nit is clearly stated that the persons cannot have any preferential right over<br \/>\nallotment in the newly constructed shops.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t10.In fact, in G.O.Ms.No.147 (Municipal Administration and Water Supply<br \/>\nDepartment) dated 30.12.2000, in paragraph 7, it is stated that the new lease<br \/>\namounts fixed for the shops by the local body should not have any financial loss<br \/>\nand if any allottee does not pay the new lease amount, shops should be redeemed<br \/>\nfrom such shopkeepers and must be allotted to other persons who are willing to<br \/>\npay the new lease amount.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t11.The Commissioner for Municipal Administration in his letter dated<br \/>\n11.01.2001 has also clearly stated that when the new shops were built the claim<br \/>\nof the old leaseholders need not be considered.  In the typed set produced by<br \/>\nthe learned Special Government Pleader, it is seen that the amount for<br \/>\nconstructing the new bus stand by the Special Village Panchayat was sanctioned<br \/>\nby the Tamil Nadu Urban Finance and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd<br \/>\nwith heavy interest.  Therefore, necessarily the rentals will have to be fixed<br \/>\non the basis of the cost of new construction and not on the basis of the request<br \/>\nmade by the petitioners.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t12.In the affidavit filed support of the writ petition the only ground<br \/>\nraised was legitimate expectation of the erstwhile shop-keepers.  The further<br \/>\ncontention that they were not in default during the past period.  But as found<br \/>\nalready the reliance placed upon the petitioners on G.O.Ms.No.916 Rural and<br \/>\nLocal Administration Department does not give any preferential right to the<br \/>\npetitioners in the allotment of the new shops.  The said G.O. has no application<br \/>\nto the case on hand.  On the contrary as rightly contended by Mrs.V.Chellammal,<br \/>\nlearned Special Government Pleader that the said G.O. stood cancelled by<br \/>\nG.O.2(D) No.85 dated 19.07.2000.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t13.The contention that the petitioners have earlier invested substantial<br \/>\namounts cannot be accepted, because what was allotted to them was only a site to<br \/>\nput up temporary structures and their lease itself was renewed by the<br \/>\nresolutions of the Panchayat from time to time.  Therefore, the argument that<br \/>\nthey had invested huge amounts does not find any support from this Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t14.In any event, the Special Town Panchayat had invested money after<br \/>\nborrowing funds from Tamil Nadu Urban Finance and Infrastructure Development<br \/>\nCorporation Limited and the obligation of paying back the said amount also<br \/>\narises for the local body.  They will have to determine the lease amount for new<br \/>\nshops in the light of the investment made therein.  That could be done only by<br \/>\nway of publicly auctioning the shops and to fetch maximum revenue for the<br \/>\nPanchayat.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t15.Under these circumstances, all the three writ petitions are<br \/>\nmisconceived, devoid of merits and accordingly stand dismissed.  No costs.<br \/>\nConsequently, connected M.Ps. are closed.\n<\/p>\n<p>nbj<\/p>\n<p>To<\/p>\n<p>1)The Executive Officer,<br \/>\n  Sathankulam Selection Grade Town Panchayat,<br \/>\n  Sathankulam,<br \/>\n  Tuticorin District.\n<\/p>\n<p>2)The President,<br \/>\n  Sathankulam Selection Grade Town Panchayat,<br \/>\n  Sathankulam,<br \/>\n  Tuticorin District.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court Chidamparanatha Pillai vs )The Executive Officer on 9 September, 2008 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09\/09\/2008 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.(MD)No.7710 of 2006 W.P.(MD)Nos.9004 &amp; 9023 of 2006 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1,1,1,2,2 &amp; 3 of 2006 Chidamparanatha Pillai &#8230; Petitioner in W.P.No.7710\/2006 Selvaraj &#8230; Petitioner in W.P.No.9004\/2006 Muthupandi &#8230; Petitioner [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185939","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Chidamparanatha Pillai vs )The Executive Officer on 9 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chidamparanatha Pillai vs )The Executive Officer on 9 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-14T15:09:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chidamparanatha Pillai vs )The Executive Officer on 9 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-14T15:09:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1354,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Chidamparanatha Pillai vs )The Executive Officer on 9 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-14T15:09:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chidamparanatha Pillai vs )The Executive Officer on 9 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chidamparanatha Pillai vs )The Executive Officer on 9 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chidamparanatha Pillai vs )The Executive Officer on 9 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-14T15:09:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chidamparanatha Pillai vs )The Executive Officer on 9 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-14T15:09:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008"},"wordCount":1354,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008","name":"Chidamparanatha Pillai vs )The Executive Officer on 9 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-14T15:09:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chidamparanatha-pillai-vs-the-executive-officer-on-9-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chidamparanatha Pillai vs )The Executive Officer on 9 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185939","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185939"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185939\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185939"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185939"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185939"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}