{"id":185962,"date":"2007-07-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-07-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007"},"modified":"2015-01-26T15:10:05","modified_gmt":"2015-01-26T09:40:05","slug":"p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007","title":{"rendered":"P.M. Raphael vs Marykutty on 20 July, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
P.M. Raphael vs Marykutty on 20 July, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRSA No. 644 of 2005()\n\n\n1. P.M. RAPHAEL, AGED 50 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. MARYKUTTY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. ANJU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,\n\n3. ABI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,\n\n4. JOJO, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.T.V.ANANTHAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :20\/07\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                  M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n                    ...........................................\n                    R.S.A.No. 644              OF 2005\n                    ............................................\n         DATED THIS THE 20th                   DAY OF JULY, 2007\n\n                               JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
       Defendant in O.S.660 of 1999 on the file of Additional Sub<\/p>\n
Court, Ernakulam is the appellant. Plaintiffs are respondents.<\/p>\n
The plaint schedule property admittedly originally belonged to<\/p>\n
Anil Bhaskar as purchased from GCDA.                             According to<\/p>\n
respondents, from Anil Bhaskar, second respondent wife of the<\/p>\n
first respondent purchased the property and permitted<\/p>\n
appellant to occupy the building as a licensee on a monthly<\/p>\n
license fee of Rs.675\/-.             Contending that the license was<\/p>\n
terminated, suit was instituted seeking a decree for recovery of<\/p>\n
possession and for arrears of license fee. Appellant resisted the<\/p>\n
suit contending that respondents did not perfect their title as no<\/p>\n
registered sale deed was executed by the assignor of the<\/p>\n
respondents, Anil Bhaskar and even GCDA did not transfer title<\/p>\n
to Anil Bhaskar. It was therefore contended that respondents<\/p>\n
are not entitled to claim recovery of possession on the strength<\/p>\n
of title. It was further contended that making the appellant<\/p>\n
believe that first respondent is the absolute owner of the plaint<\/p>\n
schedule property, an oral agreement for sale was entered into<\/p>\n
RSA 644\/2005                     2<\/span><\/p>\n
with first respondent on 22.2.1987 for sale of the plaint schedule<\/p>\n
property for a total consideration of Rs.52,000\/- and towards the<\/p>\n
sale consideration advance of Rs.5000\/- was paid on 22.2.1987<\/p>\n
and    subsequently     on   3.6.1989,    towards     the    balance<\/p>\n
consideration 20 sovereigns of gold were given and thereby the<\/p>\n
entire consideration was paid, but sale deed was not executed as<\/p>\n
first respondent did not get title by that time. It was admitted<\/p>\n
case that when the suit was filed, G.C.D.A had not transferred<\/p>\n
the title and only allotment was made to Anil Bhaskar which was<\/p>\n
obtained by respondents. During the pendency of the suit under<\/p>\n
Ext.A27 dated 23.6.2000, title to the plaint schedule property<\/p>\n
was transferred by GCDA directly to first respondent. Therefore<\/p>\n
first respondent is the absolute title holder of the plaint schedule<\/p>\n
property.\n<\/p>\n
      2. Learned Sub Judge granted a decree for recovery of<\/p>\n
possession holding that as appellant is only claiming right only<\/p>\n
under an oral agreement for sale, he is not entitled to any<\/p>\n
protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, in<\/p>\n
the absence of a written agreement for sale and as title of first<\/p>\n
respondent was not transferred in favour of the appellant, first<\/p>\n
respondent is entitled to the decree for recovery of possession<\/p>\n
RSA 644\/2005                     3<\/span><\/p>\n
sought for on the strength of title. But decree for arrears of<\/p>\n
license fee was not granted finding that there was monetary<\/p>\n
transaction between the parties which has not been settled.<\/p>\n
Appellant challenged the decree and judgment before District<\/p>\n
Court, Ernakulam in A.S.58 of 2002.          Respondents did not<\/p>\n
challenge the decree, refusing the claim for arrears of license<\/p>\n
fee.   Learned District Judge, on reappreciation of evidence,<\/p>\n
confirmed the findings of learned Sub Judge and dismissed the<\/p>\n
appeal. It is challenged in the second appeal.\n<\/p>\n
      3.   Learned    counsel    appearing    for  appellant  and<\/p>\n
respondents were heard.\n<\/p>\n
      4. The title of first respondent obtained under Ext.A27 is<\/p>\n
not disputed. The only contention was that when the suit was<\/p>\n
filed  respondents had no title, as the title then vested with<\/p>\n
GCDA.     But appellant is also contending that he was put in<\/p>\n
possession of the property by first respondent, making him<\/p>\n
believe that he is the title holder. It is clear from the evidence<\/p>\n
that first respondent could not get the title at the time of<\/p>\n
institution of the suit, as the building was alloted to Anil<\/p>\n
Bhaskar. But under Ext.A27 title has now been transferred to<\/p>\n
first respondent. Hence on the strength of title respondents are<\/p>\n
RSA 644\/2005                      4<\/span><\/p>\n
entitled to get a decree for recovery of possession unless<\/p>\n
appellant has a better title or he has perfected his title by<\/p>\n
adverse possession and limitation.\n<\/p>\n
      5. As rightly found by courts below, appellant is not entitled<\/p>\n
to the protection provided under Section 53A of the Transfer of<\/p>\n
Property Act, as even according to appellant there is no written<\/p>\n
agreement for sale. Hence appellant cannot dispute the title of<\/p>\n
respondents.    As appellant is admitting the title and is only<\/p>\n
setting up an agreement for sale, he is not entitled to contend<\/p>\n
that title of respondents is barred by adverse possession and<\/p>\n
limitation. In such circumstances courts below rightly granted<\/p>\n
the decree for recovery of possession, though decree for<\/p>\n
realisation of arrears of license fee was not granted, which<\/p>\n
portion of the decree has already become final.            In such<\/p>\n
circumstances I find no substantial question of law involved in<\/p>\n
the appeal and it is only to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
      6.    Learned counsel       appearing for appellant then<\/p>\n
submitted that appellant may be granted reaasonable time to<\/p>\n
vacate the building. It was submitted that the execution petition<\/p>\n
is posted for 21.7.2007. If the appellant files an affidavit before<\/p>\n
the executing court within five days from today, undertaking to<\/p>\n
RSA 644\/2005                    5<\/span><\/p>\n
surrender the plaint schedule property unconditionally on the<\/p>\n
expiry of three months from today, executing court shall<\/p>\n
postpone the delivery for three months from today.<\/p>\n
     Appeal is dismissed, with the above observation.<\/p>\n
                           M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE<\/p>\n
lgk\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court P.M. Raphael vs Marykutty on 20 July, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RSA No. 644 of 2005() 1. P.M. RAPHAEL, AGED 50 YEARS, … Petitioner Vs 1. MARYKUTTY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, … Respondent 2. ANJU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 3. ABI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 4. JOJO, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185962","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nP.M. Raphael vs Marykutty on 20 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.M. Raphael vs Marykutty on 20 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-26T09:40:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.M. Raphael vs Marykutty on 20 July, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-26T09:40:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007\"},\"wordCount\":844,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007\",\"name\":\"P.M. Raphael vs Marykutty on 20 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-26T09:40:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.M. Raphael vs Marykutty on 20 July, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.M. Raphael vs Marykutty on 20 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.M. Raphael vs Marykutty on 20 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-26T09:40:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.M. Raphael vs Marykutty on 20 July, 2007","datePublished":"2007-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-26T09:40:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007"},"wordCount":844,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007","name":"P.M. Raphael vs Marykutty on 20 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-07-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-26T09:40:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-m-raphael-vs-marykutty-on-20-july-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.M. Raphael vs Marykutty on 20 July, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185962","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185962"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185962\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185962"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185962"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185962"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}